RE: [PATCH PROPOSAL] for mod_jk

2001-01-04 Thread Michael Kuz
Title: RE: [PATCH PROPOSAL] for mod_jk Hi Dan, Attached are patches for workers.properties and the Tomcat-Workers-HowTo.html (I made some additional changes to the Tomcat-Workers-HowTo, the second table in the _Defining_Workers_ section: the 'Meaning' column was the same for

RE: [PATCH PROPOSAL] for mod_jk

2001-01-04 Thread Michael Kuz
Title: RE: [PATCH PROPOSAL] for mod_jk Thanks Dan, I will post a patch for the docs shortly. Michael R. Kuz Developer Service Intelligence (403) 261-5000 ext. 363 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Dan Milstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday

Re: [PATCH PROPOSAL] for mod_jk

2001-01-04 Thread Dan Milstein
Michael, I took a look at this patch, and it looks good to me. A very useful extension to what the load balancer is doing. I'll try to find some time to test and apply it soon. One caveat, however: I'm hesitant to add something like this without also adding documentation for it. Could you

[PATCH PROPOSAL] for mod_jk (was: RE: gracefull shutdown/removal of worker from load balance...)

2001-01-04 Thread Michael Kuz
Title: RE: gracefull shutdown/removal of worker from load balance... Thanks Dave, here you go!   WARNINGThis is not an official patch and that it has only been tested on Linux. Use at your own risk :) OVERVIEW   The patch allows for a worker.name.active parameter to be added to the workers.