Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
I would rather pick one and use it, and deal with the build
problems.
Probably we should just use what apache uses, it seems like
a reusable
piece of code.
Other opinions ?
We should use a regexp
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
I would rather pick one and use it, and deal with the build
problems.
Probably we should just use what apache uses, it seems like
a reusable
piece of code.
Other opinions ?
We should use a regexp implementation which use a
Costin Manolache wrote:
Something like that was discussed on commons ( I think ).
The problem seems to be that different regex packages use
different rules ( Perl-like, etc ), there is not standard
syntax for regexp.
That means the behavior would be dependent on which regexp
engine is used.
Hi,
I've posted a uriMap code that matches uri's using regular expressions
couple of weeks ago.
There was a consensus that we need to wait until 2.1 and eventually that
we use the regex from APR (if it ever will be there).
Ok, so I'm proposing that we make our own regex code (?).
Why?
1.
Something like that was discussed on commons ( I think ).
The problem seems to be that different regex packages use
different rules ( Perl-like, etc ), there is not standard
syntax for regexp.
That means the behavior would be dependent on which regexp
engine is used.
I would rather pick one
