Re: [VOTE] Branch j-t-c for Tomcat 5

A little late :-) [ ] +1 I Support the idea of a branch, and will help maintain it. [X ] +0 I like the idea [ ] -0 I don't like the idea [ ] -1 I'm against the idea of branching -- Jeanfrancois -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Branch j-t-c for Tomcat 5

Glenn Nielsen wrote: Bill Barker wrote: I, personally, think that it's time for a branch in j-t-c. At this point, even Tomcat 3.3 won't build against the HEAD. My proposal is: Revert the JMX dependencies in j-t-c, Create a branch (e.g. coyote_10), and re-apply the JMX patches to the HEAD br

Re: [VOTE] Branch j-t-c for Tomcat 5

Glenn Nielsen wrote: Why is it not possible to add (optional) JMX support to j-t-c components so that we don't have to branch? I did not say anything about 4.1, just that I feel it is preferable to not have to maintain two j-t-c code bases. You can't have everything JMX being optional, it would

Re: [VOTE] Branch j-t-c for Tomcat 5

Glenn Nielsen wrote: >>> Before branching and having to maintain patches in two branches, >>> why not try to fix the builds and/or change the implemenation of the >>> additional JMX support so that it can be built optionally. >> >> >> Sorry, but this is not possible, and I will *not* include the

Re: [VOTE] Branch j-t-c for Tomcat 5

Remy Maucherat wrote: Glenn Nielsen wrote: Bill Barker wrote: [ ] +1 I Support the idea of a branch, and will help maintain it. [ ] +0 I like the idea [ ] -0 I don't like the idea [X] -1 I'm against the idea of branching Before branching and having to maintain patches in two branches, why

Re: [VOTE] Branch j-t-c for Tomcat 5

Glenn Nielsen wrote: Bill Barker wrote: [ ] +1 I Support the idea of a branch, and will help maintain it. [ ] +0 I like the idea [ ] -0 I don't like the idea [X] -1 I'm against the idea of branching Before branching and having to maintain patches in two branches, why not try to fix the buil

Re: [VOTE] Branch j-t-c for Tomcat 5

Bill Barker wrote: I, personally, think that it's time for a branch in j-t-c. At this point, even Tomcat 3.3 won't build against the HEAD. My proposal is: Revert the JMX dependencies in j-t-c, Create a branch (e.g. coyote_10), and re-apply the JMX patches to the HEAD branch. Tomcat 3.3 and Tom

Re: [VOTE] Branch j-t-c for Tomcat 5

Costin Manolache wrote: Bill Barker wrote: I, personally, think that it's time for a branch in j-t-c. At this point, even Tomcat 3.3 won't build against the HEAD. My proposal is: Revert the JMX dependencies in j-t-c, Create a branch (e.g. coyote_10), and re-apply the JMX patches to the HEAD

Re: [VOTE] Branch j-t-c for Tomcat 5

Bill Barker wrote: > I, personally, think that it's time for a branch in j-t-c. At this point, > even Tomcat 3.3 won't build against the HEAD. > > My proposal is: Revert the JMX dependencies in j-t-c, Create a branch > (e.g. > coyote_10), and re-apply the JMX patches to the HEAD branch. Tomcat

[VOTE] Branch j-t-c for Tomcat 5

I, personally, think that it's time for a branch in j-t-c. At this point, even Tomcat 3.3 won't build against the HEAD. My proposal is: Revert the JMX dependencies in j-t-c, Create a branch (e.g. coyote_10), and re-apply the JMX patches to the HEAD branch. Tomcat 3.3 and Tomcat 4.1 will use the