:
|
| Subject: Re: Adding working dynamically with mod_jk status?
|
---|
On 5/25/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this still true if we were
On 6/7/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know (David, Mladen?) what will happen to session affinity is
this situation?
ie with Apache in front of several tomcats using mod_jk, when Apache is
restarted gracefully using apache -k restart (Windows) will session
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've been asking some more questions about restarts on the Apache list, and
was redirected back here...
Does anyone know (David, Mladen?) what will happen to session affinity is
this situation?
ie with Apache in front of several tomcats using mod_jk, when Apache
:
|
| Subject: Re: Session Affinity after Graceful Apache restart? [was
Re: Addingworking dynamically |
|with mod_jk status
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all graceful restart will not work on Windows for any busy
server. I suggest that you move to some unix/linux version.
Errr...could you explain why? I was told on the Apache list that it does
work on Windows...what am I missing?
It works of course, but
At 02:08 PM 6/7/2005, Mladen Turk wrote:
It works of course, but IIRC you are planning to use it for
reconfiguring mod_jk. I think you might get into the problems
with shared memory (particularly on unix) because some child
might have a different idea about shared memory addresses.
Oh - so this
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 02:08 PM 6/7/2005, Mladen Turk wrote:
It works of course, but IIRC you are planning to use it for
reconfiguring mod_jk. I think you might get into the problems
with shared memory (particularly on unix) because some child
might have a different idea about shared
On 6/1/05, Bernard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I follow this sequence because mod_jk returns a server error if it
cannot connect to Tomcat.
To avoid this during Tomcat restarts, you need to have 2 Tomcat
instances running and set them up with mod_jk to load balance across
them.
-Dave
At 04:44 PM 5/31/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After some more digging, it *appears* that apache -k restart WILL do a
graceful restart of Apache2 on Windoze.
Of course it will.
Can anyone confirm this please? And are there any gotcha's to watch out
for? Can someone explain exactly how this
Hi,
I use Apache httpd, mod_jk and Tomcat 5 under Linux.
Re-staring Apache httpd alone should never be a problem.
However when I re-start Tomcat, then I follow this sequence:
- Stop Apache httpd
- Restart Tomcat
- Start Apache httpd
I follow this sequence because mod_jk returns a server error
List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: Adding working dynamically with mod_jk status
:
|
| Subject: Re: Adding working dynamically with mod_jk status
Yes, it should be possible on Windows as well. You may have to invoke
apache.exe manually on that platform, I am not familiar with Apache on
Windows. Apache docs or a google search should tell you more.
-Dave
On 5/31/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That sounds perfectbut
On 5/31/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After some more digging, it *appears* that apache -k restart WILL do a
graceful restart of Apache2 on Windoze.
Can anyone confirm this please? And are there any gotcha's to watch out
for? Can someone explain exactly how this works?
Well it should be the final goal.
A way to add a worker dynamically and also if possible an URI to worker.
As such we could have a 24/24 7/7 dynamically manageable tomcat farm
routeur (if we see the HTTP server as such)
2005/5/24, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any
:
|
| Subject: Re: Adding working dynamically with mod_jk status
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this still true if we were to define extra workers that are marked as
disabled at startup? Could we then point them to any new servers as they
are added and enable them without a restart? I know it's not very clean,
but would it work?
It will work if you know
On 5/25/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this still true if we were to define extra workers that are marked as
disabled at startup? Could we then point them to any new servers as they
are added and enable them without a restart? I know it's not very clean,
but would it work?
We'd
:
|
| Subject: Re: Adding working dynamically with mod_jk status?
|
---|
Hi Mladen,
Sure...we have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideas or recommendations on this?
Adding workers would be tricky because if member of load balancer
it has to be known at startup time so that shared memory slot can be
allocated.
The only solution would be to edit the workers.properties file and
then forcing the
Hi,
Is there any way in the current implementatio to **add** a new worker (for
a new Tomcat instance) dynamically? Using mod_jk status? Another way?
cheers,
David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way in the current implementatio to **add** a new worker (for
a new Tomcat instance) dynamically? Using mod_jk status? Another way?
No.
Can you elaborate why would you need such a feature?
Regards,
Mladen.
Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: Adding working dynamically with mod_jk
23 matches
Mail list logo
