Bug report #802 has just been filed.

You can view the report at the following URL:

   <http://znutar.cortexity.com/BugRatViewer/ShowReport/802>

REPORT #802 Details.

Project: Tomcat
Category: Bug Report
SubCategory: New Bug Report
Class: swbug
State: received
Priority: low
Severity: serious
Confidence: public
Environment: 
   Release: 3.2.1
   JVM Release: any
   Operating System: any
   OS Release: any
   Platform: any

Synopsis: 
SimpleTcpConnector doesn't work

Description:
There seems to be a bug with the SimpleTcpConnector.  SimpleTcpEndpoint extends 
PoolTcpEndpoint, but maintains it's own ServerSocketFactory "factory" property.  It 
provides a setter for this property, but does not provide a getter method.  This means 
that the call to getServerSocketFactory() in the processConnection() method of 
HttpConnectionHandler is calling the method from the PoolTcpConnecter superclass, 
which will always return null because the subclass overrides the setter method.

At least, that is what it seems like to me!
Title: BugRat Report # 802

BugRat Report # 802

Project: Tomcat Release: 3.2.1
Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report
Class: swbug State: received
Priority: low Severity: serious
Confidence: public

Submitter: _Anonymous ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
Date Submitted: Jan 18 2001, 01:11:46 CST
Responsible: Z_Tomcat Alias ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )

Synopsis:
SimpleTcpConnector doesn't work
Environment: (jvm, os, osrel, platform)
any, any, any, any

Additional Environment Description:

Report Description:
There seems to be a bug with the SimpleTcpConnector. SimpleTcpEndpoint extends PoolTcpEndpoint, but maintains it's own ServerSocketFactory "factory" property. It provides a setter for this property, but does not provide a getter method. This means that the call to getServerSocketFactory() in the processConnection() method of HttpConnectionHandler is calling the method from the PoolTcpConnecter superclass, which will always return null because the subclass overrides the setter method. At least, that is what it seems like to me!

Workaround:
null

View this report online...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to