RE: Connector compatibility between TC 4.0 and 4.1

On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > As appealing an idea as this sounds (packaging plug-in modules as > webapps), it doesn't solve the underlying issue -- different containers > have radically different internal architectures, and packaging the plug-in > as webapp doesn't avoid havi

RE: Connector compatibility between TC 4.0 and 4.1

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Connector compatibility between TC 4.0 and 4.1 > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Kevin Seguin wrote: > > > > My thinking ( for 4.1/3.3 ) was to have j-t-c built as a > > > 'standalone module', a trusted/priviledged webapp that can b

RE: Connector compatibility between TC 4.0 and 4.1

On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Kevin Seguin wrote: > > My thinking ( for 4.1/3.3 ) was to have j-t-c built as a > > 'standalone module', a trusted/priviledged webapp that can be > > deployed and > > is self-contained. > > > > can you provide some more detail? i'm quite interested in learning more. It's q

RE: Connector compatibility between TC 4.0 and 4.1

> My thinking ( for 4.1/3.3 ) was to have j-t-c built as a > 'standalone module', a trusted/priviledged webapp that can be > deployed and > is self-contained. > can you provide some more detail? i'm quite interested in learning more. thanks, -kevin. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: Connector compatibility between TC 4.0 and 4.1

>The standalone connector (at least the future version of it) >for TC 4.x is >also in j-t-c, Do you speak of coyote or jk2 ? >and I'd like it to work with both versions of >TC with only >one codebase. Why ? It saves time, and that also avoid mistakes (like >forgetting to apply a patch on one

Re: Connector compatibility between TC 4.0 and 4.1

On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Paul Speed wrote: > > My thinking ( for 4.1/3.3 ) was to have j-t-c built as a > > 'standalone module', a trusted/priviledged webapp that can be deployed and > > is self-contained. > > > > Keeping all container adapters in j-t-c has the extra benefit that we can > > share mor

Re: Connector compatibility between TC 4.0 and 4.1

> On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > After a lot of efforts, it turns out the connectors (in j-t-c) still can't > > be compiled against both the 4.0 branch and the HEAD branch of the Tomcat > > CVS. > > > > There are a few solutions to this: > > > > 1) Force the connector

Re: Connector compatibility between TC 4.0 and 4.1

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Keeping all container adapters in j-t-c has the extra benefit that we can > > share more code among them. > > It still feels wierd to me. Imagine if JNDI did things this way... > we'd have to have every provider installed just to build it. :) > > I think if the

Re: Connector compatibility between TC 4.0 and 4.1

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Kevin Seguin wrote: > > > perhaps now is the time to do some rethinking of where the connectors for > > each serlvet container live. > > > > today, in j-t-c, there is the framework (for lack of a better word) for > > connectors plus the individ

Re: Connector compatibility between TC 4.0 and 4.1

On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > After a lot of efforts, it turns out the connectors (in j-t-c) still can't > be compiled against both the 4.0 branch and the HEAD branch of the Tomcat > CVS. > > There are a few solutions to this: > > 1) Force the connectors to be built against

RE: Connector compatibility between TC 4.0 and 4.1

On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Kevin Seguin wrote: > perhaps now is the time to do some rethinking of where the connectors for > each serlvet container live. > > today, in j-t-c, there is the framework (for lack of a better word) for > connectors plus the individual connectors or adapters for tomcat 3 and

RE: Connector compatibility between TC 4.0 and 4.1

> > Hi, > > After a lot of efforts, it turns out the connectors (in > j-t-c) still can't > be compiled against both the 4.0 branch and the HEAD branch > of the Tomcat > CVS. > > There are a few solutions to this: > > 1) Force the connectors to be built against the HEAD branch. > They should

Connector compatibility between TC 4.0 and 4.1

Hi, After a lot of efforts, it turns out the connectors (in j-t-c) still can't be compiled against both the 4.0 branch and the HEAD branch of the Tomcat CVS. There are a few solutions to this: 1) Force the connectors to be built against the HEAD branch. They should run fine on Tomcat 4.0 (altho