Hi Mladen,
First, I must say that mod_jk does not require APR neither it will.
So your concerns about dropping 1.3 support are not standing.
ok, good.
The main reason for continuing mod_jk development is the fact
that mod_jk was more stable on more platforms then jk2 was.
Adding new things
Günter Knauf wrote:
As things are now standing, mod_jk will continue support for the
following servers:
apache 1.3.x, apache 2.0.x, IIS, Netscape. (Domino is down I think,
because nobody cares, thought).
ok, fine. BTW. for Netscape on NW applies the same as for Apache 1.3.x.
Sure ;).
Netscape
Mladen Turk wrote:
Apache 2.1/2.2 has mod_proxy_ajp with the active development, and
surprisingly stable :).
Great, but without a release, it's a bit useless :(
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Apache 2.1/2.2 has mod_proxy_ajp with the active development, and
surprisingly stable :).
Great, but without a release, it's a bit useless :(
Yes.
Now that 2.0.53 is released, the people will have more time
to work on 2.1.3 release I hope.
But that's solely dependable on
Mladen Turk wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Apache 2.1/2.2 has mod_proxy_ajp with the active development, and
surprisingly stable :).
Great, but without a release, it's a bit useless :(
Yes.
Now that 2.0.53 is released, the people will have more time
to work on 2.1.3 release I hope.
And 2.2.0
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Great, but without a release, it's a bit useless :(
Yes.
Now that 2.0.53 is released, the people will have more time
to work on 2.1.3 release I hope.
And 2.2.0 before the end of the world ?
He, he.
Taking into account the time needed to release the first 2.0 GA,
I wouldn't be
And to add some goodies like configuration settings while Apache web
server is running :)
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:08:36 +0100, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Great, but without a release, it's a bit useless :(
Yes.
Now that 2.0.53 is released, the people will
Hi Mladen,
appologies that I couldnt closely follow the connector development in the past
year, so I'm somewhat suprised about all the recent directions; and cant
really understand them; so I would greatly appreciate if you could do a
summarize why you are currently again developing to
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi Mladen,
appologies that I couldnt closely follow the connector development in the past
year, so I'm somewhat suprised about all the recent directions; and cant
really understand them; so I would greatly appreciate if you could do a
summarize why you are currently
Hi,
I don't see mod_jk ending up the same as mod_jk2 in that:
1) The configuration is relatively sane as compared to that of mod_jk2
2) There are many reasonably stable mod_jk versions, so even *if*
Mladen screws up a release there are plenty of alternative mod_jk
versions.
unfortunately
Hi,
Well, you put it right. To some point ;)
First, I must say that mod_jk does not require APR neither it will.
So your concerns about dropping 1.3 support are not standing.
The main reason for continuing mod_jk development is the fact
that mod_jk was more stable on more platforms then jk2 was.
11 matches
Mail list logo
