-Chad Johnson
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 11:15 AM
> > To: Tomcat Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Http Connector / Gzip
> >
> >
> > Remy Maucherat a écrit
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
Henri Gomez wrote:
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
+0 if disabled by default; -1 otherwise.
All this stuff is inefficient, as it uses Strings. Ie, we take the
byte array we have for the header value, convert it to a String, and
then regexp will likely convert it to something
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
Henri Gomez wrote:
Could I commit my changes and start working on an optimizing version ?
Yes, of course. There's no big rush to start optimizing this ;-) (it's
really disabled by default, right ?)
Yes, since the restrictedUserAgents and restrictedUserAgents are set t
Henri Gomez wrote:
Could I commit my changes and start working on an optimizing version ?
Yes, of course. There's no big rush to start optimizing this ;-) (it's
really disabled by default, right ?)
Remy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
Well I take my inspiration from what is done in some TC 4.1 Valves...
I know ;-)
Some problematic stuff went away, though (the various mappers), but some
remain.
This feature would really need to be seriously optimized, as ideally
this would be enabled by default.
We could do better as usua
Henri Gomez wrote:
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
+0 if disabled by default; -1 otherwise.
All this stuff is inefficient, as it uses Strings. Ie, we take the
byte array we have for the header value, convert it to a String, and
then regexp will likely convert it to something else to work with it
(lik
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
Henri Gomez wrote:
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
What about using regexp in HTTP 1.1 connector to include/exclude
browser which could/couldn't use gzip compression ?
May be it could be use also to drop to HTTP 1.0 browser which
claims to be 1.1
Henri Gomez wrote:
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
What about using regexp in HTTP 1.1 connector to include/exclude
browser which could/couldn't use gzip compression ?
May be it could be use also to drop to HTTP 1.0 browser which
claims to be 1.1 compatible, but are not.
>>>
Here is the patch against latest remy changes ...
Index: build.properties.sample
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/build.properties.sample,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 build.properties.sample
---
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
What about using regexp in HTTP 1.1 connector to include/exclude
browser which could/couldn't use gzip compression ?
May be it could be use also to drop to HTTP 1.0 browser which
claims to be 1.1 compatible, but are not.
CF: Apache HTTPD serv
---
From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 11:29 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: Http Connector / Gzip
interesting results. By any chance did you compare it
to Perl regexp to see the difference? :)
peter
--- Chad Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Peter Lin wrote:
interesting results. By any chance did you compare it
to Perl regexp to see the difference? :)
That would be interesting indeed :)
Do you know what the HTTPd uses, BTW ?
Remy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
Original Message-
> From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 11:15 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: Http Connector / Gzip
>
>
> Remy Maucherat a écrit :
>
> > Henri Gomez wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
Some regex benchmark's I ran across:
http://tusker.org/regex/regex_benchmark.html
-Chad Johnson
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 11:15 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Http Connector / Gzip
Remy Maucherat a
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
What about using regexp in HTTP 1.1 connector to include/exclude
browser which could/couldn't use gzip compression ?
May be it could be use also to drop to HTTP 1.0 browser which
claims to be 1.1 compatible, but are not.
CF: Apache HTTPD ser
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
What about using regexp in HTTP 1.1 connector to include/exclude
browser which could/couldn't use gzip compression ?
May be it could be use also to drop to HTTP 1.0 browser which
claims to be 1.1 compatible, but are not.
CF: Apache HTTPD server
Well, I thought regexp
Hi to all,
What about using regexp in HTTP 1.1 connector to include/exclude
browser which could/couldn't use gzip compression ?
May be it could be use also to drop to HTTP 1.0 browser which
claims to be 1.1 compatible, but are not.
CF: Apache HTTPD server
-
17 matches
Mail list logo