Re: JK 1.2.12 is broken and can not be released as stable

2005-05-12 Thread Günter Knauf
Hi, > What is the thought, is 1.2.10 stable? 1.2.8? Or 1.2.6? I'm partial > to 1.2.8 myself. from what I see in our NetWare forums I can only agree to Klaus and say that everything after 1.2.6 has some kind of issues - that was also the reason why I dint move the NetWare bins to its place unt

Re: JK 1.2.12 is broken and can not be released as stable

2005-05-12 Thread Mark Thomas
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Truly hope it helps. Sorry for having to route through rowe-clan, it seems tomcat-dev hates my apache.org persona. (tomcat cvs did not complain, but it's forwarded onto tomcat-dev.) This should now be fixed. Let me know if it isn't. Mark -

Re: JK 1.2.12 is broken and can not be released as stable

2005-05-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Ok, all of the file ^M fixes within jakarta-tomcat-connectors are finished. I added the /Oy- flag as there was unanimous concensus for -that- change. I left out the /Gs0 since legit concerns were raised. Think we are ready for a tarball :) -kb files which should not have been are now -ko. It's

Re: JK 1.2.12 is broken and can not be released as stable

2005-05-10 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 04:33 AM 5/10/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: >Interesting is that it was spotted only when the release >was made, so this gives one reason more for making some >sort of releases and binaries to attract more users to >actually do the testing. Agreed that development releases (early and often) are a v

Re: JK 1.2.12 is broken and can not be released as stable

2005-05-10 Thread Henri Gomez
Well the JK 1.2 branch should be fixed and when we'll have something stable, we could start a new branch. BTW, there was many bugs related to LB in jk for ages :-) 2005/5/10, Klaus Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:33:56AM +0200, Mladen Turk wrote: > > There was a nasty bug

Re: JK 1.2.12 is broken and can not be released as stable

2005-05-10 Thread Klaus Wagner
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:33:56AM +0200, Mladen Turk wrote: > There was a nasty bug in load balancer, that basically > broke the failover. > > Interesting is that it was spotted only when the release > was made, so this gives one reason more for making some > sort of releases and binaries to attr

JK 1.2.12 is broken and can not be released as stable

2005-05-10 Thread Mladen Turk
There was a nasty bug in load balancer, that basically broke the failover. Interesting is that it was spotted only when the release was made, so this gives one reason more for making some sort of releases and binaries to attract more users to actually do the testing. My question is what to do? I wo