Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
/ballot
Eric
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
/ballot
Amy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Hans Bergsten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.12 stability rating
Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[x] Beta
/ballot
I've lost the original
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I didn't get futher reports concerning bug 21763 (and related), so I
assume this means things improved. It would be a good idea to release a
new 4.1.28 build once this is confirmed to also provide a fix for Tomcat
4.1.x.
I've had some updates on this:
- Rex Young
Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[X ] Beta
/ballot
-- Jeanfrancois
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
/ballot
I didn't get futher reports concerning bug 21763 (and related), so I
assume this means things improved. It would be a good idea to release a
new 4.1.28 build once this is confirmed to also provide a fix for Tomcat
4.1.x.
Since the amount
Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[x] Beta
/ballot
It runs all examples in my upcoming JSP 2.0 book, so it looks fine
to me. I had some problems with a bundled Xerces version, but for
now I consider that an application problem rather than a container
problem. If further analysis proves
with Tomcat...
Solid Beta all the way baby...
Richard Norman
Web/Application Developer
-Original Message-
From: Hans Bergsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:19 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.12 stability rating
Remy Maucherat wrote
