> Bill Barker wrote: > > While editing 'service.bat', I noticed that it seems that we > are shipping all of the '.bat' and '.sh' files without > including an Apache license. > Before I launch into a reallllly boring project of fixing > this, I wanted to hear other opinions on how necessary it is. >
Perhaps only the url would be enough. Most of those files are shorter then a license itself. But feel free to enter 53 rems in each file :-). For example: # This script falls under the Apache License. # See http://www.apache.org/docs/LICENSE Something similar is used for some httpd scripts. MT. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
