GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm +1 for jakarta-service and -1 for jakarta-tomcat-service
Still of this idea? I can't open jakarta-service as I have to
get down to
the PMC to do it, and I'd like to commit some code...
Thanks...
Argh, if you need the PMC agreement, it will
GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm +1 for jakarta-service and -1 for jakarta-tomcat-service
Still of this idea? I can't open jakarta-service as I have to
get down to
the PMC to do it, and I'd like to commit some code...
Thanks...
I'm +1 for jakarta-service and -1 for jakarta-tomcat-service
Still of this idea? I can't open jakarta-service as I have to
get down to
the PMC to do it, and I'd like to commit some code...
Thanks...
Argh, if you need the PMC agreement, it will delay that piece
of code too much.
ME BIG DOPE :) :) :) There are TWO Win32 Service implementations... I
thought Joe and Elijah were working on the same code :) :) :) But THEY'RE
NOT! (Sometimes I'm just so fuckin' stupid! :)
On a very rough analysis, Elijah's JavaService is better as it uses JNI,
but
on the other hand,
[X] +1 - Do it, and I can help
[ ] +0 - Do it, but I can't help
[ ] -0 - Do it, even if
[ ] -1 - Don't do it, because
My comments:
There are:
jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/nt_service/jk_nt_service.c
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/nt_service/jk_nt_service.c
Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say, let's stick it with Tomcat until we don't have a proof-of-concept
that it works, and then we can decide... I like jakarta-tomcat-service.
Request-for-vote: Can I go ahead and open the new CVS repo?
ME BIG DOPE :) :) :) There are TWO Win32 Service
implementations... I
thought Joe and Elijah were working on the same code :) :)
:) But THEY'RE
NOT! (Sometimes I'm just so fuckin' stupid! :)
On a very rough analysis, Elijah's JavaService is better as
it uses JNI,
but
on the
jean-frederic clere at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X] +1 - Do it, and I can help
[ ] +0 - Do it, but I can't help
[ ] -0 - Do it, even if
[ ] -1 - Don't do it, because
My comments:
There are:
jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/nt_service/jk_nt_service.c
Kevin Seguin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ME BIG DOPE :) :) :) There are TWO Win32 Service
implementations... I
thought Joe and Elijah were working on the same code :) :)
:) But THEY'RE
NOT! (Sometimes I'm just so fuckin' stupid! :)
On a very rough analysis, Elijah's JavaService is better
Ok, but JavaService looks perfect to me :
- Uses JNI indeed
- Service installation / removal works great
- Pipes the out and the err of the JVM process into logs files in
CATALINA_HOME/logs (good)
- Logs stop / start / trouble to the NT event log
- Very generic
fwiw, i agree
I'm speaking here with very limited experience with projects like this
and the only JNI code I have written has been to verify NDS names and
passwords and enumerate users in an NDS Group object. And, I haven't
looked at the JavaService code yet. So, take all this with a grain of
salt.
I'm sure
[ ] +1 - Do it, and I can help
[X] +0 - Do it, but I can't help
[ ] -0 - Do it, even if
[ ] -1 - Don't do it, because
My comments:
If we do so ( create the service workspace ), can we also check in the
existing service ( the one that was used in the last year or so for tomcat
3.3
On Wednesday July 25, 2001 Remy Maucherat wrote:
However,
1. I tried my damndest and couldn't get the JavaService to work with
Tomcat on an NT server that I have.
I tried javaserv, srvyany, etc. Nothing worked for me. *Very very
frustrating*, and I can usually figure out just about
Elijah Roberts at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday July 25, 2001 Remy Maucherat wrote:
I want GOOD system integration; that means I want Tomcat to look like a
native process, and to behave like a native process.
This is one of the reasons I wrote with JNI in the first place. I wanted
On Wednesday July 25, 2001 Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Yes. I am definitely _EAGER_ to include JavaService with my Service code,
and distribute it all together with Tomcat 4.0 (from the next beta).
A couple of changes are needed for your code to be integrated with my
current Service, as you
GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm +1 for jakarta-service and -1 for jakarta-tomcat-service
Still of this idea? I can't open jakarta-service as I have to get down to
the PMC to do it, and I'd like to commit some code...
Thanks...
Pier
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Since it can be used by different projects (not only Tomcat), I wanted to
separate the Service code into a new CVS repository (jakarta-service).
How about it?
Under the management of which subproject?
How about putting it in commons, if
Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Since it can be used by different projects (not only Tomcat), I wanted to
separate the Service code into a new CVS repository (jakarta-service).
How about it?
+1
Pier
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Since it can be used by different projects (not only Tomcat), I wanted to
separate the Service code into a
Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far, commons is 100% Java, but I don't believe they (really we, cause
I'm a committer there :-) would be opposed to a commonly useful project
that has native code components.
Dunno...
jakarta-tomcat-connectors is a place where C and Java
Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say, let's stick it with Tomcat until we don't have a proof-of-concept
that it works, and then we can decide... I like jakarta-tomcat-service.
Request-for-vote: Can I go ahead and open the new CVS repo?
Pier
Print and detach the
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say, let's stick it with Tomcat until we don't have a proof-of-concept
that it works, and then we can decide... I like jakarta-tomcat-service.
Request-for-vote: Can I go ahead and open
[ ] +1 - Do it, and I can help
[X] +0 - Do it, but I can't help
[ ] -0 - Do it, even if
[ ] -1 - Don't do it, because
My comments:
Haven't even looked at it but I trust Pier :-)
Mike Anderson
[ ] +1 - Do it, and I can help
[ ] +0 - Do it, but I can't help
[X] -0 - Do it, even if that would make the build process (even) more
complex.
[ ] -1 - Don't do it, because
Remy
Remy Maucherat at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do it, even if that would make the build process (even) more
complex.
I believe this can be achieved by simply copying the few interfaces over to
jakarta-tomcat-4.0. Once those have been defined, they shouldn't change.
While the actual big work is on
Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say, let's stick it with Tomcat until we don't have a proof-of-concept
that it works, and then we can decide... I like jakarta-tomcat-service.
Request-for-vote: Can I go ahead and open the new CVS repo?
Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Since it can be used by different projects (not only
Tomcat), I wanted to
separate the Service code into a new CVS repository
(jakarta-service).
How about it?
Ok for jakarta-service.
And I agree with Pier that since it's not only related to
tomcat, shouldn't
Joe Flowers at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X] +1 - Do it, and I can help
[ ] +0 - Do it, but I can't help
[X] -0 - Do it, even ifI hate MS.
[ ] -1 - Don't do it, because
My comments:
Assuming you're talking about the NT/2000 service codes.
Yes, that's another reason why I'm
Remy Maucherat at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do it, even if that would make the build process (even) more
complex.
I believe this can be achieved by simply copying the few interfaces over
to
jakarta-tomcat-4.0. Once those have been defined, they shouldn't change.
While the actual big work
GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok for jakarta-service.
And I agree with Pier that since it's not only related to
tomcat, shouldn't go under jakarta-tomcat-service.
Should we have all developpment started by a tomcat
commiter under the jakarta-tomcat responsability.
I'm +1
Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe Flowers at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X] +1 - Do it, and I can help
[ ] +0 - Do it, but I can't help
[X] -0 - Do it, even ifI hate MS.
[ ] -1 - Don't do it, because
My comments:
Assuming you're talking about the NT/2000
31 matches
Mail list logo
