Bojan Smojver wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I don't think I can do this alone ( if it sounded like I volunteer to fix
> > it - well, I need help ).
>
> > - Test.
>
> I'm one of those overly brave and too stupid that put CVS versions of
> software in production environment. Promise
TED]]
>Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:52 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Volunteers for: - RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()
>
>
>I thought you were talking about the mod_jk in the TC3.3
>branch. If you're talking j-t-c only, then I don't mind an
>Option, as long
1 11:24 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: Volunteers for: - RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()
|
|
| >Why can't we implement the 3.3 collaborative solution in 4.0 ?
| >That would maintain compatibility.
|
| And also in TC 3.2.4 ?
|
| >I just hate to provide an option which could re
worst, it will
>generate erroneous bug reports. I'd hesitate to
>add it.
The Option could be hidden and use the TC 3.3 behaviour
by default...
>
>| -Original Message-
>| From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>| Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:35 AM
>| To: [EM
orts. I'd hesitate to
add it.
Keith
| -Original Message-
| From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:35 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: Volunteers for: - RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()
|
|
| >What whould happen in 3.3 if ForwardEsc
>What whould happen in 3.3 if ForwardEscapedURI was chosen?
>Wouldn't the facade escape it again?
>
My goal in mod_jk is to keep compatibility with ALL tomcat
release, TC 3.2, 3.3 and 4.0.
The option will let us configure it, even if by default
mod_jk found in TC 3.3 and J-T-C will use the TC
ge-
| >| From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| >| Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:18 AM
| >| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| >| Subject: RE: Volunteers for: - RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >| >- Revert jk/apache to use uri, remove the encode call (
|
t;| Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:18 AM
>| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>| Subject: RE: Volunteers for: - RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()
>|
>|
>|
>| >- Revert jk/apache to use uri, remove the encode call (
>again, j-t and
>| >j-t-c - one more week to do that, after that we
n Option?
Keith
| -Original Message-
| From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:18 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: Volunteers for: - RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()
|
|
|
| >- Revert jk/apache to use uri, remove the encode call ( again, j-t
>- Revert jk/apache to use uri, remove the encode call ( again, j-t and
>j-t-c - one more week to do that, after that we'll be j-t-c
>only ). Henri
>- could you do this and the next one ?
I'll reintroduce the JkOptions which will help us play with
different encoding :
ForwardStandardURI :
wil
rom: "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Bill Barker"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 12:40 AM
> Subject: Re: Volunteers for: - RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()
>
>
> >
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: Volunteers for: - RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()
> Actually, my original was a straight java.net.URLEncode after stripping
out
> the session id. However, I'm easy. Attached is using UEncoder (which I
> initiall
Barker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: Volunteers for: - RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Bill Barker wrote:
>
> > It seems that I must have been bad in a past life, since my Karma isn't
high
>
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Bill Barker wrote:
> It seems that I must have been bad in a past life, since my Karma isn't high
> enough.:)
>
> I've added the code to re-encode the URL to DecodeInterceptor on my machine.
> If you want it right away, I can post a diff.
Hi,
Could you send the diff, I'll h
It seems that I must have been bad in a past life, since my Karma isn't high
enough.:)
I've added the code to re-encode the URL to DecodeInterceptor on my machine.
If you want it right away, I can post a diff.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fr
15 matches
Mail list logo