Sorted.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ack - there was a lingering #ifdef JK_NEED_... which should have been an
#if JK_NEED_... - this is fixed in cvs, please retry and thanks for the
detailed report!
Bill
Tim Whittington wrote:
Confused me too.
Error message is listed below.
[exec]
Ack - there was a lingering #ifdef JK_NEED_... which should have been an
#if JK_NEED_... - this is fixed in cvs, please retry and thanks for the
detailed report!
Bill
Tim Whittington wrote:
Confused me too.
Error message is listed below.
[exec] cl.exe /nologo /MD /W3 /Zi /O2 /I "..\co
Confused me too.
Error message is listed below.
[exec] cl.exe /nologo /MD /W3 /Zi /O2 /I "..\common" /I
"C:\j2sdk1.4.2_07\include" /I "C:\j2sdk1.4.2_07\include
\win32" /I "C:/Program Files/Apache Group/Apache2\include" /D "NDEBUG"
/D "WIN32" /D "_WINDOWS" /Fo".\Release\\" /Fd".\R
elea
Tim Whittington wrote:
This breaks the build on Windows using Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit 2003
(at least).
It seems #define FOO 0 on WIN32 is still defined according to #ifdef
Your suggestion is counterintuitive and reflects, perhaps, a compiler
bug.
It would be very helpful if you would pos
This breaks the build on Windows using Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit 2003
(at least).
It seems #define FOO 0 on WIN32 is still defined according to #ifdef
Changing
# define JK_NEED_SET_MUTEX_PERMS 0
to
# undef JK_NEED_SET_MUTEX_PERMS
fixes the problem
tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrowe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+
+#ifndef AS400
#include "ap_mpm.h"
+#endif
That's wrong IMO.
Look at the Apache modules:
mod_mem_cache
mod_cgid
mod_cgid
mod_info
mod_status
mod_ssl
They all have '#include "ap_mpm.h"'
So, I suppose that's something wrong with your
apache build not the way how th
- Original Message -
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List"
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0
mod_jk.c
Wait - you mean to tell me instead
Wait - you mean to tell me instead of converting the hostname
once to lower - we are strcasecmp'ing every time? Outch, that
hurts.
Bill
At 09:14 PM 12/16/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>billbarker2004/12/16 19:14:56
>
> Modified:jk/native/apache-1.3 mod_jk.c
> jk/native/a
Bill Barker wrote:
Remove duplicating uri because map_uri now properly reverts the
changes made when jsessionid is found.
This is a very big -1. map_uri_to_worker is going to modify the uri that
gets passed in, so it absolutely *must* be duped.
Yes, but it will revert the changes made.
It's like
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 10:08 AM
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
> mturk 2004/12/17 10:08:52
>
> Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
> Log:
> Rem
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
+
#ifdef AS400
#include "ap_charset.h"
#include "util_charset.h" /* ap_hdrs_from_ascii */
@@ -50,10 +51,17 @@
#endif
Is it necessary to conditio
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
> +
>#ifdef AS400
>#include "ap_charset.h"
>#include "util_charset.h" /* ap_hdrs_from_ascii */
> @@ -50,10 +51,17 @@
>#endif
Is it necessary to condi
Henri Gomez wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about a 1.2.5 release soon ?
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the path bug fix Bill.
I will be happy to work on a mod_jk 4.1.25 release but I won't have time until
next week.
The only two issues I am aware of are:
1. The libtool build problem.
2. The path mapping bug in Apache.
Are both of these considered fixed now in CVS head?
Has the CHANGES
BTW, we need a fix for this libtool problem.
What about adding libtool in configure.in via a --with-libtool ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about a 1.2.5 release soon ?
billbarker2003/06/26 20:10:44
Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
Log:
Port from apache-1.3
Revision ChangesPath
1.80 +6 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c
Index: mod_jk
Thanks for reporting this. I have changed the code so that
if there is no content only status codes >= 400 are passed
back through apache.
The original patch was made so that when an error occurred at the
Ajp13Processor layer it could propogated back to the browser correctly
instead of a blank pa
Quoting Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And I answer (to myself :-)
>
> On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 14:47, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> > So, the unsolved questions for me are:
> >
> > 1. What is it then that jk_handler() does that makes it actually serve the
> > request when DIR_MAGIC_TYPE is include
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> It's jk_translate who decides if a request is to be handled by
> jk ( by mapping it to a uriEnv ).
>
> You can add a test for r->handler==DIR_MAGIC_TYPE, but don't assume
> any uriEnv is set.
Actually, r->handler is always NULL in jk_translate(). At least in mod_jk
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> It's jk_translate who decides if a request is to be handled by
> jk ( by mapping it to a uriEnv ).
>
> You can add a test for r->handler==DIR_MAGIC_TYPE, but don't assume
> any uriEnv is set.
OK, I did that in jk2_handler(), which now seems like the wrong place to d
This should fix the problem reported by Bojan.
What about tagging jtc for jk_1_2_0 release ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:52 AM
Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0
mod_jk.c
> I will apply the patch to 1.3.
>
&g
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote:
> I have some updates almost ready that use the util source
> out of j-t-c rather than its local copy. I was also going
> to have it build and include http11 and coyote as well.
> I haven't had the time to play much with these. I would,
> at minimum, add
: RE: cvs commit:
> jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
>
>
> I will apply the patch to 1.3.
>
> Are we still maintaining the second copy of jk in 3.3 tree ?
>
> Larry - can we start removing the duplicated util and c code ?
> IMHO the j-t-c code ( the &#
did somebody report these patches to apache 1.3 ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAI
> @@ -306,7 +307,9 @@
>* pointer.
>*/
> /* Works with 4096, fails with 8192 */
> +#ifndef CHUNK_SIZE
> #define CHUNK_SIZE 4096
> +#endif
>
> static int JK_METHOD ws_write(jk_ws_service_t *s,
> const void *b,
> @@ -674,6 +677,7 @@
> retur
26 matches
Mail list logo
