on 7/17/01 12:19 PM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote on a Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release:
[*] +1 - I support this proposal, and will actively assist
[ ] +0 - I support this proposal, but do not have time to assist
[ ] -0 - I do not support this proposal, but am not going
Please vote on a Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release:
[ ] +1 - I support this proposal, and will actively assist
[X] +0 - I support this proposal, but do not have time to assist
[ ] -0 - I do not support this proposal, but am not going to resist :-)
[ ] -1 - I oppose this proposal (backed by reasons
Please vote on a Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release:
[*] +1 - I support this proposal, and will actively assist
[ ] +0 - I support this proposal, but do not have time to assist
[ ] -0 - I do not support this proposal, but am not going to resist :-)
[ ] -1 - I oppose this proposal (backed by reasons
-- SNIP HERE --
Please vote on a Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release:
[X] +1 - I support this proposal, and will actively assist
[ ] +0 - I support this proposal, but do not have time to assist
[ ] -0 - I do not support this proposal, but am not going to resist :-)
[ ] -1 - I
Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Beta-quality implementation of the mod_webapp connector.
Please vote on a Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release:
[X] +1 - I support this proposal, and will actively assist
[ ] +0 - I support this proposal, but do not have time to assist
[ ] -0 - I do
Please vote on a Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release:
[X] +1 - I support this proposal, and will actively assist
[ ] +0 - I support this proposal, but do not have time to assist
[ ] -0 - I do not support this proposal, but am not going to resist :-)
[ ] -1 - I oppose this proposal (backed by reasons
For what it's worth as a non-committer...
Please vote on a Tomcat 4.0-beta-6 Release:
[X] +1 - I support this proposal, and will actively assist
[ ] +0 - I support this proposal, but do not have time to assist
[ ] -0 - I do not support this proposal, but am not going to resist :-)
[ ] -1 - I