Re: Proposed Server.xml Change (was RE: Bugzilla #512 is Bunk)

2001-03-02 Thread cmanolache
Right, but that is excruciating to configure and more excruciating to maintain... We need to fix that :-) Why not use two copies of Tomcat, each with their own mod_jk.conf-auto which can be included in the appropriate VirtualHost section? Use 2 copies of tomcat as a workaround for stupid

Re: Bugzilla #512 is Bunk

2001-03-01 Thread Dan Milstein
Steve, Thanks so much! This is very, very helpful -- I am not master of Apache configuration, and the virtual host thing is important. I'll try to work this into the docs some time soonish... -Dan Stephen Jones wrote: The following bug is not a bug:

Re: Bugzilla #512 is Bunk

2001-03-01 Thread William Barker
JkWorkersFiles is the main problem inside of a VirtualHost. I don't know about JkLogFile. JkMount is legal inside of a VirtualHost. - Original Message - From: "Stephen Jones" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001

RE: Bugzilla #512 is Bunk

2001-03-01 Thread GOMEZ Henri
The correct config for mod_jk is : in httpd.conf : JkWorkersFile /etc/httpd/conf/workers.properties JkLogFile /var/log/httpd/mod_jk.log # set it to error since warn just load to many apache JkLogLevel error for virtuals VirtualHost host1.com:80 DocumentRoot

Proposed Server.xml Change (was RE: Bugzilla #512 is Bunk)

2001-03-01 Thread Jones, Stephen
from the ones which apply to only one ContextManager. Just some ideas... Steve -Original Message- From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 2:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Bugzilla #512 is Bunk The co