Re: Proposed ApacheConfig.java change

2001-03-05 Thread Endre Stølsvik
On Sat, 3 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Costin, | | I would strongly vote for turning the auto-config back on by default for the | following reasons (other than the fact that I explicity turned it back on | when Keith fixed the ApacheConfig class): | | You don't need a "strong" vote -

[PATCH][tc3.3]Re: Proposed ApacheConfig.java change

2001-03-04 Thread Mel Martinez
The attached PATCH modifies org.apache.tomcat.modules.config.ApacheConfig to add some needed flexibility. I need someone who is running apache and tomcat3.3 using mod_jserv to test it in that configuration and give their feedback. I've tested it with mod_jk on winNT and linux 6.2 and it seems

[PATCH][tc3.3]Re: Proposed ApacheConfig.java change

2001-03-04 Thread Mel Martinez
{sorry about the resend - I hit the send button early last time} The attached PATCH modifies org.apache.tomcat.modules.config.ApacheConfig to add some needed flexibility. I need someone who is running apache and tomcat3.3 using mod_jserv to test it in that configuration and give their

RE: [PATCH][tc3.3]Re: Proposed ApacheConfig.java change

2001-03-04 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
: Mel Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: lunes 5 de marzo de 2001 0:04 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: [PATCH][tc3.3]Re: Proposed ApacheConfig.java change {sorry about the resend - I hit the send button early last time} The attached PATCH modifies org.apache.tomcat.modules.c

Re: Proposed ApacheConfig.java change

2001-03-03 Thread Dan Milstein
Costin, I would strongly vote for turning the auto-config back on by default for the following reasons (other than the fact that I explicity turned it back on when Keith fixed the ApacheConfig class): 1) This is how 3.2 worked, and how the docs specify that 3.3 works. 2) Configuration of

Re: Proposed ApacheConfig.java change

2001-03-03 Thread cmanolache
Costin, I would strongly vote for turning the auto-config back on by default for the following reasons (other than the fact that I explicity turned it back on when Keith fixed the ApacheConfig class): You don't need a "strong" vote - I'll do the change :-) 2) Configuration of mod_jk is

Re: Proposed ApacheConfig.java change

2001-03-03 Thread Mel Martinez
FYI: I'm pretty much done with the mods I wanted to make (I ended up adding a few extras) and am in the testing and documenting phase. Should be ready tomorrow. BTW: I figured out soon after my last post that the only thing I needed to do enable auto-generation of apache config files was to

Re: Proposed ApacheConfig.java change

2001-03-02 Thread Mel Martinez
Hi y'all. I'm in the process of making a small tweak so that the mod_jk.conf-auto file uses IfModule conditionals around the LoadModule statments. As discussed earlier, there should be a lot of deployment configuration value in this tweak. However, after upgrading to the latest and greatest

Re: Proposed ApacheConfig.java change

2001-03-02 Thread cmanolache
However, after upgrading to the latest and greatest tomcat 3.3 version out of CVS (as of last night) I've suddenly noticed that tomcat is no longer generating the mod_jk.conf-auto or tomcat-apache.conf files automatically. As near as I can tell, ApacheConfig.execute() is not being