cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_registry.c jk_env.c jk_channel_socket.c

2001-11-19 Thread costin
costin 01/11/19 10:14:38 Modified:jk/native/common jk_registry.c jk_env.c jk_channel_socket.c Log: Patch from Michael Smith. One change I didn't apply is the signature change in jk_env_objectFactory_t. The problem with the worker_factory is that it is specific to workers,

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_registry.c jk_env.c jk_channel_socket.c

2001-11-19 Thread Michael Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: costin 01/11/19 10:14:38 Modified:jk/native/common jk_registry.c jk_env.c jk_channel_socket.c Log: Patch from Michael Smith. One change I didn't apply is the signature change in jk_env_objectFactory_t. The problem with the worker_factory is

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_registry.c jk_env.c jk_channel_socket.c

2001-11-19 Thread costinm
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Michael Smith wrote: Ah. That'd be my misunderstanding of how things work... _without_ that signature change, though, things still won't compile (well, they probably will. With _really_ nasty warnings). I suppose the right thing to do here is to change