[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: jk2 2.0.4 release plan
Comments welcome
I can throw some tests at the build given some notice if that is any help.
Thanks for picking this up.
Thanks, we're working with JFC to
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: jk2 2.0.4 release plan
>
> Comments welcome
>
I can throw some tests at the build given some notice if that is any help.
Thanks for pick
Henri Gomez wrote:
> Remy Maucherat a écrit :
>
>> Bill Barker wrote:
>>
>>> committers as binding votes). In the unlikely event that we get enough
>>> people to care about 3.3 enough to vote (seeing the trouble that Remy
>>> has getting people to vote :)
>>
>>
>> You're torturing me. I thinn
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
Since many people ask for a jk2 release, 2.0.4, I'll act as
release manager if nobody else want to take the job before
Friday.
I'd like to know what are showstoppers (blocking bugs) which
should be fixed in the current release.
Planning :
Up to Friday 6 Feb, determin
TECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 5:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: jk2 2.0.4 release plan
>
>
>
> "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Mike Anderson a écrit :
> >
> > > I&
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
Bill Barker wrote:
committers as binding votes). In the unlikely event that we get enough
people to care about 3.3 enough to vote (seeing the trouble that Remy has
getting people to vote :)
You're torturing me. I thinnk you should be able to get enough +1s,
though (yo
Bill Barker wrote:
committers as binding votes). In the unlikely event that we get enough
people to care about 3.3 enough to vote (seeing the trouble that Remy has
getting people to vote :)
You're torturing me. I thinnk you should be able to get enough +1s,
though (you, Henri, JF, Larry; that's f
Bill Barker wrote:
"Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
Yeah, well, I suppose that now that I'm an all-great-and-powerful PMC
member, I could RM a JK release. However, I'd like to get out a TC 3.3.2
before that (so, if anyone else wants to RM JK in the meantime, you've got
my +1 :).
Test
At 01:56 AM 2/4/2004, you wrote:
Bill Barker a écrit :
"Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Anderson a écrit :
I'll be happy to deliver zips instead of NLMS. for NetWare.
Henri (and others) since we are tagging and releasing jk2 can/should we
do t
Bill Barker a écrit :
"Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Anderson a écrit :
I'll be happy to deliver zips instead of NLMS. for NetWare.
Henri (and others) since we are tagging and releasing jk2 can/should we
do the same for jk since I know there is ad
"Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mike Anderson a écrit :
>
> > I'll be happy to deliver zips instead of NLMS. for NetWare.
> >
> > Henri (and others) since we are tagging and releasing jk2 can/should we
> > do the same for jk since I know there is added f
Jess Holle a écrit :
Dave Oxley wrote:
Henri,
What is the current state of JK2. Is it alpha, beta or GA. If this is
going to be an alpha release, what is the plan for a GA release. I
would like to migrate from JK when it is stable.
This is a *very* good question.
Last time I dared to ask the
Dave Oxley wrote:
Henri,
What is the current state of JK2. Is it alpha, beta or GA. If this is
going to be an alpha release, what is the plan for a GA release. I
would like to migrate from JK when it is stable.
This is a *very* good question.
Last time I dared to ask the consensus was mod_jk w
Henri,
What is the current state of JK2. Is it alpha, beta or GA. If this is
going to be an alpha release, what is the plan for a GA release. I would
like to migrate from JK when it is stable.
Cheers.
Dave.
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
Since many people ask for a jk2 release, 2.0.4, I'll act
Mike Anderson a écrit :
I'll be happy to deliver zips instead of NLMS. for NetWare.
Henri (and others) since we are tagging and releasing jk2 can/should we
do the same for jk since I know there is added functionality (Ping/Pong
and timeouts) there as well?
Well, one release at a time, users urge
I think Guenter is asking that we change mod_jk2 do be .so. Right now we build a .dll
(at least if we build from the project files) but it would be easy to change this to
.so and I'd be happy to do it.
Mike Anderson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/3/2004 9:57:00 AM >>>
Günter Knauf a écrit :
> Hi,
>
I'll be happy to deliver zips instead of NLMS. for NetWare.
Henri (and others) since we are tagging and releasing jk2 can/should we
do the same for jk since I know there is added functionality (Ping/Pong
and timeouts) there as well?
Thanks,
Mike Anderson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/3/2004 9:27:14 AM
Günter Knauf a écrit :
Hi,
Since many people ask for a jk2 release, 2.0.4, I'll act as
release manager if nobody else want to take the job before
Friday.
great, thanks!
Comments welcome
two things I would like to discuss:
1) I would like to see all binaries packed to tar.gz or zip;
Well it cou
Hi,
> Since many people ask for a jk2 release, 2.0.4, I'll act as
> release manager if nobody else want to take the job before
> Friday.
great, thanks!
> Comments welcome
two things I would like to discuss:
1) I would like to see all binaries packed to tar.gz or zip; this is definitely better
in
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
Since many people ask for a jk2 release, 2.0.4, I'll act as
release manager if nobody else want to take the job before
Friday.
I'd like to know what are showstoppers (blocking bugs) which
should be fixed in the current release.
>
Planning :
Up to Friday 6 Feb, determ
Hi to all,
Since many people ask for a jk2 release, 2.0.4, I'll act as
release manager if nobody else want to take the job before
Friday.
I'd like to know what are showstoppers (blocking bugs) which
should be fixed in the current release.
Planning :
Up to Friday 6 Feb, determine all bugs which sh
21 matches
Mail list logo
