Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
NormW wrote:
Good morning Costin.
Apologies for the silence. I had hoped there might have been a
little more
input from others on this topic.
Same here :-)
We're working, Jean-Frederic, Kurt and I
I converted the project to a .net 2003 project, and tried to build. No dice.
Got a really flaky error that made no sense to me.
I then looked at the .vcproj file that MS created, and tracked down
the issue (in my environment).
It seems that when the dsp file is converted to a vcproj file, InputDir
Any comment(s)/suggestion(s) from Microsoft Tech Support?
Keep me apprised,
Marty Gainty
617-852-7822
- Original Message -
From: Aryeh Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 10:32 AM
Subject: HOWTO: building mod_jk2 with Visual studio .net 2003
I
Hi,
maybe we should export the .mak files and check into CVS, just as with Apache?
Please try if this works:
http://www.gknw.com/test/mod_jk2.mak
Guenter.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
maybe we should export the .mak files and check into CVS, just as with Apache?
Please try if this works:
http://www.gknw.com/test/mod_jk2.mak
I already did that, and it worked fine. That's why I prefaced my comment
by stating this was an issue with vs2003 .net.
Do you
Aryeh Katz wrote:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
maybe we should export the .mak files and check into CVS, just as with
Apache? Please try if this works:
http://www.gknw.com/test/mod_jk2.mak
I already did that, and it worked fine. That's why I prefaced my comment
by stating this was an issue
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 10:32 AM
Subject: HOWTO: building mod_jk2 with Visual studio .net 2003
I converted the project to a .net 2003 project, and tried to build. No
dice.
Got a really flaky error that made no sense to me.
I then looked
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: HOWTO: building mod_jk2 with Visual studio .net 2003
Martin Gainty wrote:
Any comment(s)/suggestion(s) from Microsoft Tech Support?
Keep me apprised,
Marty Gainty
617-852
Hi,
maybe we should export the .mak files and check into CVS, just as with
Apache?
Please try if this works:
http://www.gknw.com/test/mod_jk2.mak
I already did that, and it worked fine. That's why I prefaced my comment
by stating this was an issue with vs2003 .net.
Do you want my makefile
Costin Manolache wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
NormW wrote:
Good morning Costin.
Apologies for the silence. I had hoped there might have been a
little more
input from others on this topic.
Same here :-)
We're
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
maybe we should export the .mak files and check into CVS, just as with
Apache?
Please try if this works:
http://www.gknw.com/test/mod_jk2.mak
I already did that, and it worked fine. That's why I prefaced my comment
by stating this was an issue with vs2003 .net.
Do you
Hi Aryeh,
I'm using 2.0.2, and your makefile fails at link time with a missing
symbol jk2_channel_socket_factory.
I assume that's a 2.0.4 issue.
Other than that, the compile was file.
ok, that sounds good. If you perhaps could do a test with recent CVS that would be
fine; then I would create
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Aryeh,
I'm using 2.0.2, and your makefile fails at link time with a missing
symbol jk2_channel_socket_factory.
I assume that's a 2.0.4 issue.
Other than that, the compile was file.
ok, that sounds good. If you perhaps could do a test with recent CVS that would be fine;
.
A diff follows. Most of the differences are .dll instead of .so. The one
difference that seems to matter is the RSC line (and the InputDir for
the debug build).
!MESSAGE No configuration specified. Defaulting to mod_jk2 - Win32
Release.
---
!MESSAGE Keine Konfiguration angegeben. mod_jk2
Henri Gomez wrote:
Well, if we didn't get the POST somewhere on the WebServer, and if the
tomcat failed to respond, we couldn't resent the whole POST to the
second one.
If we get the first bytes ( but not the entire POST ), we can still save
them, and if the first tomcat fails - resend it.
Henri and the other people actively involved in this
release you need to convince :-)
* I don't have 'barrow' to push much beyond wanting to make mod_jk2 function
in what I perceive is a logical way and have it's modular design become
visible enough to remove a lot of the questions I see on user
- Original Message -
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: Mod_Jk2 - Default Worker
Henri Gomez wrote:
Well, if we didn't get the POST somewhere on the WebServer, and if the
tomcat failed to respond
' configuration file that would achieve the same end. The
present
situation hides the basic building blocks of Mod_Jk2 and leads to the
majority of questions in regard to how to reconfigure the module. Remove
the
ability of 'workers' to directly accept requests and force all URI's
through
an lb type
NormW wrote:
Good morning Costin.
Apologies for the silence. I had hoped there might have been a little more
input from others on this topic.
Same here :-)
However the most common case is to have at least one tomcat, and there
is no real benefit in supporting an arbitrary name for the worker (
hgomez 2004/02/09 04:01:22
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c jk_service_apache2.c
Log:
Remove obsolete linefeeds from the logs, see the ap_log_* functions
dont need trailing linefeeds.
Thanks to Gunter Knauf
Revision ChangesPath
1.65 +9 -9
Hi,
following patches remove obsolete linefeeds from the logs; the ap_log_* functions dont
need trailing linefeeds;
see also ./jk/native2/server/apache2/jk_logger_apache2.c line 132:
/* Remove trailing \n. XXX need to change the log() to not include \n */
http://www.gknw.com/test/mod_jk2
. But given that a default architecture is but a 'guess', I see
the programming to be 'cleaner' without such defaults and rather provide a
'default' configuration file that would achieve the same end. The present
situation hides the basic building blocks of Mod_Jk2 and leads to the
majority of questions
-202-82-219.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net with local
(Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon Feb 9 02:06:14 2004
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mod_Jk2 - Default Worker
Date
that a default architecture is but a 'guess', I see
the programming to be 'cleaner' without such defaults and rather provide a
'default' configuration file that would achieve the same end. The present
situation hides the basic building blocks of Mod_Jk2 and leads to the
majority of questions in regard to how
NormW wrote:
Good morning All.
The default 'worker', which is hard-wired into Mod_Jk2, is 'lb:lb', and
is, for most users I believe, a wrong guess at best, since the majority of
users are probably not using mod_jk2 in load-balancing mode. The 'guess'
means that mod_jk2 creates uri objects
Good morning All.
The default 'worker', which is hard-wired into Mod_Jk2, is 'lb:lb', and is,
for most users I believe, a wrong guess at best, since the majority of users
are probably not using mod_jk2 in load-balancing mode. The 'guess' means
that mod_jk2 creates uri objects assigned to either
mmanders2004/02/02 13:58:55
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.dsp
Log:
Removed obsolete files. Patch from Guenter Knauf.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +0 -12 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2/mod_jk2.dsp
Index: mod_jk2.dsp
someone can check and commit this one.
Norm
Hi,
a user just found that the port number is limited to less than 32768 with
mod_jk2;
the patch below solves this:
http://www.gknw.com/test/jk_channel_apr_socket.c.diff
Hi,
a user just found that the port number is limited to less than 32768 with mod_jk2;
the patch below solves this:
http://www.gknw.com/test/jk_channel_apr_socket.c.diff
==
--- ./native2/common
Hi all,
I've the problem that 8009 is already used on NetWare, so it would be nice if I could
default to another port for that platform; I looked at the sources, and it looks if
someone had already such an idea, but didnt finish
found some defines in ./native2/common/jk_worker_ajp13.c which
Hi,
With APR 1.0 apr_sockaddr_port_get() was removed without replacement.
I believe that the patch below is the correct replacement to archive _same_ behaviour
as with apr_sockaddr_port_get() before, and I tested that it also works with APR 0.9.x
(Apache 2.0.48 tested);
and here's also a
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi all,
I've the problem that 8009 is already used on NetWare, so it would be nice if I could
default to another port for that platform; I looked at the sources, and it looks if
someone had already such an idea, but didnt finish
found some defines in
Hi all,
I'm sure that a lot of folks want to see a new release of mod_jk2;
and looking at:
http://www.apache.de/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk2/source/
it seems that the last version 2.0.2 was released 14 (!!) months ago
comments?
Guenter
Hi all,
I'm sure that a lot of folks want to see a new release of mod_jk2;
and looking at:
http://www.apache.de/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk2/source/
it seems that the last version 2.0.2 was released 14 (!!) months ago
comments?
We sure DO WANT a new release.
regz,
Dominik
Dominik Drzewiecki wrote:
Hi all,
I'm sure that a lot of folks want to see a new release of mod_jk2;
and looking at:
http://www.apache.de/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk2/source/
it seems that the last version 2.0.2 was released 14 (!!) months ago
comments?
We sure DO WANT a new release.
I
Good morning All.
Recently there was mention of a patch for Mod_Jk2 (to work with APR 1.0)
which was questioned in regard to a previous 'bug' report. Since then, it is
my understanding the previous correspondent was happy with a solution now in
place regarding the earlier bug. Which, I think
/show_bug.cgi?id=18472
mod_jk2 doesn't handle vhosts correctly when using the JkUriSet commands
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-20 10:14 ---
Looking at the message from Mladen it looks like it made it into CVS
Can you check out the latest version from CVS and see
Hi,
I'm looking for a win32 bin of mod_jk2 for apache
2.0.47 or greater. The only one I found is for apache
2.0.43 which is no longer available. As I'm not able
to build it myself, could someone do it for me (and
other interested people)
thx
bruno canet
Hi Bruno,
you can look at my site where I upload binaries of mod_jk2-dev from time to time:
http://www.gknw.net/development/apache/httpd-2.0/win32/modules/
Guenter.
I'm looking for a win32 bin of mod_jk2 for apache
2.0.47 or greater. The only one I found is for apache
2.0.43 which
/show_bug.cgi?id=18472
mod_jk2 doesn't handle vhosts correctly when using the JkUriSet commands
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
/show_bug.cgi?id=18472
mod_jk2 doesn't handle vhosts correctly when using the JkUriSet commands
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-19 19:32 ---
*** Bug 26172 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug
/show_bug.cgi?id=18472
mod_jk2 doesn't handle vhosts correctly when using the JkUriSet commands
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-19 20:41 ---
I am running the latest build of Tomcat 5 with mod_jk2 version 2.0.2 against
apache 2.0.48 and am having a related problem listed
Good morning Developers.
Recent testing of mod_jk2 status pages revealed the information was being
returned to the client in about 42 byte chunks on a LAN that supports 1500
byte packets. I would like to submit a request for the chunk size to be
increased or adapted automatically (via apr
Good morning still.
Further testing shows jkprintf() is chunking every call made to it such that
some packets are containing as few as 20 bytes of HTML data... will revise
the description of the enhancement.
Norm
Good morning Developers.
Recent testing of mod_jk2 status pages revealed
NormW wrote, On 1/17/2004 12:27 PM:
Good morning Developers.
Recent testing of mod_jk2 status pages revealed the information was being
returned to the client in about 42 byte chunks on a LAN that supports 1500
byte packets. I would like to submit a request for the chunk size to be
increased
Good morning Dave,
Thanks for the advice!
Have a great Sunday.
Norm
NormW wrote, On 1/17/2004 12:27 PM:
Good morning Developers.
Recent testing of mod_jk2 status pages revealed the information was
being
returned to the client in about 42 byte chunks on a LAN that supports
1500
byte
/show_bug.cgi?id=22045
Virtual host mappings in mod_jk2 (related to bug 18472)
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-14 15:13 ---
I am also having this problem. I found this article which provides a workaround
by putting all my URI's in the workers2.properties file
hi,
as I asked for help to this list to configure and use regular expressions
into uri in mod_jk2, I found and resolved some bugs in the code. I think its
nice to send you (I don't know exactly who can evalauate and accept my
suggestions).
The bugs are 2.
1. Cant't use metacharacter ']' in rex
mod_jk2 creates this error long entry each time apache starts up...
[Mon Dec 15 15:20:17 2003] [error] mod_jk child init 1 0
The relevant code printing the error is in function jk2_child_init() in
mod_jk2.c
static void jk2_child_init(apr_pool_t *pconf, server_rec *s
Hello!
i found some strange error messages in both tomcat log and mod_jk2 log
and i can't figure out whats going on:
tomcat log:
Dec 10, 2003 11:40:58 AM org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler action
SEVERE: Error in action code
java.net.SocketException: Software caused connection abort: socket
/show_bug.cgi?id=25364
mod_jk2 cannot send additional request attributes
Summary: mod_jk2 cannot send additional request attributes
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.0.16
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: Enhancement
/show_bug.cgi?id=25364
mod_jk2 cannot send additional request attributes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
/show_bug.cgi?id=19965
mod_jk2 connection fails, workerEnv.init() create slot epStat.0 failed
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-24 16:13 ---
I got the same problem, but when i try to correct it with the following lines
in workers2.properties :
[shm]
file=${serverRoot
/show_bug.cgi?id=24882
mod_jk (and mod_jk2) missing post parameters in a fail over scenario
Summary: mod_jk (and mod_jk2) missing post parameters in a fail
over scenario
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: 4.1.27
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
/show_bug.cgi?id=19965
mod_jk2 connection fails, workerEnv.init() create slot epStat.0 failed
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-18 22:00 ---
I had nothing but trouble with JK2, constantly getting the same error message
in the JK2 debug log workerEnv.init() create slot
commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache13
mod_jk2.c Makefile.in
hgomez 2003/11/10 03:05:33
Modified:jk/native2 configure.in Makefile.in
jk/support jk_apr.m4 jk_exec.m4
jk/native2/server/apache13 mod_jk2.c Makefile.in
Log:
Latest jk2/apache
hgomez 2003/11/10 03:05:33
Modified:jk/native2 configure.in Makefile.in
jk/support jk_apr.m4 jk_exec.m4
jk/native2/server/apache13 mod_jk2.c Makefile.in
Log:
Latest jk2/apache 1.3 patch
Obtained from: Kurt Miller
Revision ChangesPath
Hi,
removed obsolete files from mod_jk2.dsp; changed output from .dll to .so
you can get the patch here if the attachment doesnt make it to the list as usual:
http://www.gknw.com/test/mod_jk2.dsp.diff
Guenter.
--- mod_jk2.dsp.origTue Oct 22 18:24:10 2002
+++ mod_jk2.dsp Mon Nov 10 15:15:18
/native2/server/apache13
mod_jk2.c Makefile.in
hgomez 2003/11/10 03:05:33
Modified:jk/native2 configure.in Makefile.in
jk/support jk_apr.m4 jk_exec.m4
jk/native2/server/apache13 mod_jk2.c Makefile.in
Log:
Latest jk2/apache 1.3 patch
/show_bug.cgi?id=16901
[PATCH] mod_jk2 wrong server port when using NAT
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-07 00:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=8969)
I'll add my own patch, against CVS HEAD
Good morning Guenter and Tomcat Developers,
Thanks for the patches to JK2 and can say at this point that it links
without a problem! Just like a textbook demo!
(Sorry about not using Ant though.)
Mod_Jk2 is presently being re-developed from what I've read here, and hope
someone who knows about
Good morning All.
Just looking at trying a compile of mod_jk2 for NetWare, and get as far as
jk_nwmain.c where I find it is pulling in nwthread.h, which is part of the
'Novell-deprecated' CLib library (everything is LibC these days it seems.)
Is anyone at Novell or a NetWare guru looking
Hi Norm,
Just looking at trying a compile of mod_jk2 for NetWare, and get as far as
jk_nwmain.c where I find it is pulling in nwthread.h, which is part of the
'Novell-deprecated' CLib library (everything is LibC these days it seems.)
Is anyone at Novell or a NetWare guru looking
Thanks for reporting this. Forwarding on to the tomcat developers.
Glenn
Matt McParland wrote:
There are links in various places on jakarta.apache.org pointing to the
URL below:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/doc/
But that URL points me to:
Hi,
how can I customize Apache's error page if mod_jk2 does not get a usable
worker (Tomcat is down)?
Using Apache 2.0.47, mod_jk2 2.0.2 and Tomcat 4.1.24 running on Linux I
get an error message when the servlet engine is stopped (Tomcat is
down):
The servlet container is temporary unavailable
Howdy,
For those interested in integrating tomcat5 and apache2, I managed to get the
beasts working together in inprocess mode (tomcat's jvm started within the
apache). It is slightly different compared to tomcat 4.x case. I noticed that one
has to put additional jars on the classpath to prevent
Bernhard Erdmann a écrit :
Hi,
how can I customize Apache's error page if mod_jk2 does not get a usable
worker (Tomcat is down)?
Using Apache 2.0.47, mod_jk2 2.0.2 and Tomcat 4.1.24 running on Linux I
get an error message when the servlet engine is stopped (Tomcat is
down):
The servlet container
Henri Gomez wrote:
[...]
The first sentence (The servlet container is temporary unavailable or
being upgraded) comes from mod_jk2
(jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.2-src/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_lb.c):
#define NO_WORKER_MSG The servlet container is temporary unavailable or
being upgraded\n
Bernhard Erdmann a écrit :
Henri Gomez wrote:
[...]
The first sentence (The servlet container is temporary unavailable or
being upgraded) comes from mod_jk2
(jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.2-src/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_lb.c):
#define NO_WORKER_MSG The servlet container is temporary
From: Henri Gomez
Bernhard Erdmann a écrit :
Henri Gomez wrote:
I'd like Apache to use its configured ErrorDocument 500
when Tomcat is
down instead of mod_jk2 printing its own error statement.
Ok, we could make it in the new jk2 reworks (Mladen ?)
Perhaps to make
Mladen Turk a écrit :
From: Henri Gomez
Bernhard Erdmann a écrit :
Henri Gomez wrote:
I'd like Apache to use its configured ErrorDocument 500
when Tomcat is
down instead of mod_jk2 printing its own error statement.
Ok, we could make it in the new jk2 reworks (Mladen ?)
Perhaps to make
/show_bug.cgi?id=19965
mod_jk2 connection fails, workerEnv.init() create slot epStat.0 failed
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-16 18:48 ---
I had the same problem. A review of the JK2 code revealed that the epStat slot
objects are created in the shared memory area
/show_bug.cgi?id=23831
problem using mod_jk2 connector with Apache and Tomcat
Summary: problem using mod_jk2 connector with Apache and Tomcat
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: 4.1.27
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity
/show_bug.cgi?id=23831
problem using mod_jk2 connector with Apache and Tomcat
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-15 16:08 ---
Some strange problems with Apache and Tomcat...After some
time and server-stress, Apache doesn't response to requests which are
routed to tomcat
/show_bug.cgi?id=23831
problem using mod_jk2 connector with Apache and Tomcat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Other |High
Hi...
I am using apache 2.0.47, tomcat 4.1.27 integrated with mod_jk2 2.0.2 on
a RedHat 9
It works fine, but sometimes (usually when power crash), the apache can
not find tomcat when restarting the machine. Im error.log of apache2, I
have these errors:
[Mon Oct 06 11:24:21 2003] [notice
Günter Knauf a écrit :
Hi,
with Apache 2.1 and APR 1.0 seems that apu_compat.h is removed (see APR-util Changes);
attached a patch which works for me with both APR 0.9.4 and APR 1.0.0
Thanks to send it as an attached file please
it to the
list...
atatched now an archive diffs.zip which contains both the mod_jk and mod_jk2 diffs...
Hopefully this time
Guenter.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it to the list...
atatched now an archive diffs.zip which contains both the mod_jk and
mod_jk2 diffs...
Hopefully this time
hmm, seems that atatchments do not pass anymore
here the file:
http://www.gknw.com/test/diffs.zip
Guenter
the attachments didnt made
it to the list...
atatched now an archive diffs.zip which contains both the mod_jk and
mod_jk2 diffs...
Hopefully this time
hmm, seems that atatchments do not pass anymore
here the file:
http://www.gknw.com/test/diffs.zip
Thanks got
/show_bug.cgi?id=12750
Virtual hosts using Apache 2.0.40, Tomcat 4.1.10 and mod_jk2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|tomcat- |[EMAIL
Ajay Arora wrote:
Greetings,
I was installing mod_jk2 to interact between apache 2 and tomcat 1.4.
I was not able to build the module. It says jni_md.h is missing. I am
having java1.3.1 and I do not have include directory with it.
Have you try to comment out the #include jni_md.h?
Are you
Greetings,
I was installing mod_jk2 to interact between apache 2 and tomcat 1.4. I
was not able to build the module. It says jni_md.h is missing. I am having
java1.3.1 and I do not have include directory with it.
Can somebody will help mw with it. Can anybody has compiled mod_jk2 for aix
5.1
/show_bug.cgi?id=19965
mod_jk2 connection fails, workerEnv.init() create slot epStat.0 failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version|Solaris
This is a little tricky to reproduce but...
Apache 2.0.45
Tomcat 4.1.24 (or .27 for that matter)
mod_jk2 2.0.2
everything built and running on Solaris 2.8
Connect all machines using a 100 Mbit switch or something fast.
Create two instances of tomcat with Coyote AJP 13 connectors where
talk2UtimeHi,
I'm trying to get mod_jk2 to run with apache 2.0.47 and Tomcat 4.1.27
running in Linux. However, I cannot work out how to compile mod_jk2. I can't
seem to get hold of everything I need?
At
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/release/v2.0.
2/src
I can
Stuart Stephen wrote:
talk2UtimeHi,
I'm trying to get mod_jk2 to run with apache 2.0.47 and Tomcat 4.1.27
running in Linux. However, I cannot work out how to compile mod_jk2. I
can't
seem to get hold of everything I need?
At
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/release/v
/show_bug.cgi?id=19965
mod_jk2 connection fails, workerEnv.init() create slot epStat.0 failed
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-14 22:45 ---
Maybe it helps to add the following to the workers2.properties file:
[shm]
file=/programme/net/apache/logs/shm.file
size=1048576
/show_bug.cgi?id=22114
mod_jk2: wrong load balancing group assigned
Summary: mod_jk2: wrong load balancing group assigned
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: 4.1.24
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
/show_bug.cgi?id=22045
Virtual host mappings in mod_jk2 (related to bug 18472)
Summary: Virtual host mappings in mod_jk2 (related to bug 18472)
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: 4.1.24
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity
mod_jk2 allows for AF_UNIX connections to talk to Tomcat4.
(http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/doc/jk2/conf
igwebex.html)
So lets say we specify /tmp/jk2.socket as the AF_UNIX file socket for
communication
between mod_jk2 and Tomcat4. We can tell mod_jk2
/show_bug.cgi?id=21766
mod_jk2 URL mount problem in recent versions
Summary: mod_jk2 URL mount problem in recent versions
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: 4.1.24
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority
Try loading (and maybe configuring?) mod_rewrite before mod_jk. I had a similar
experience with mod_jk2 and mod_rewrite.
Jamey
-Original Message-
From: Nicolas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 3:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mod_rewrite mod_jk2
hi
first
for mod_jk you have to set
JkOptions ForwardURICompat
into httpd.conf and have mod_rewrite load before mod_jk
I have no idea if this option is present in mod_jk2
Note however that this brakes the spec because the servelts/jsps etc get
as requested uri the rewritten part and not the original
/show_bug.cgi?id=21549
mod_jk2 interference with other mods needs to be resolved
Summary: mod_jk2 interference with other mods needs to be
resolved
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: 4.1.18
Platform: Other
URL: http://nagoya.apache.org
hi
first: i did post to tomcat user-first got reply to check out tomcat-dev
is mod_rewrite supported ?
example:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule^/test$ /examples/servlets/index.html
JkSet uri:/examples/*.group ajp13:unixsocket
the request /test tries to access /examples/servlets/index.html in
of these options would be great.
Thanks!
Jamey
James Courtney
InPhonic, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 1:30 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Buggy mod_jk2 AJP 13 communications?
James Courtney a écrit :
Developers
balanced by an Apache 2.0.45/Sun2.8/Sparc machine using mod_jk2. Throughout testing (including some basic load testing) we experienced very good behavior from our cluster and are in general very pleased with the performance over our previous system of Apache 1.3.19/Tomcat 3.2.2/mod_jk. We built our
2.0.45/Sun2.8/Sparc machine using mod_jk2.
Throughout testing (including some basic load testing) we experienced very good
behavior from our cluster and are in general very pleased with the performance over
our previous system of Apache 1.3.19/Tomcat 3.2.2/mod_jk. We built our mod_jk2 Apache
module
/show_bug.cgi?id=16901
[PATCH] mod_jk2 wrong server port when using NAT
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-03 23:14 ---
I just made a similar patch for my mod_jk2 seutp. Seems pretty important that
jk2 use the Apache Way (TM) of figuring out the server name and port
201 - 300 of 682 matches
Mail list logo
