-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 1:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sun.tools.javac.Main will be removed from JDK1.4
There are some pretty intense discussions going on about this, and the
story hasn't yet been
JULIEN,TIMOTHY (HP-NewJersey,ex2) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over in HP middleware, we're not to happy with this development either
our JSP implementation will suffer for the same reasons Jasper will
We can work with an external compiler, but for speed, we much prefer
JULIEN,TIMOTHY (HP-NewJersey,ex2) wrote:
Over in HP middleware, we're not to happy with this development either
our JSP implementation will suffer for the same reasons Jasper will
We can work with an external compiler, but for speed, we much prefer
sun.tool.javac.Main.
Just a
on 7/20/01 3:45 PM, Christopher Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a question to satisfy my own curiosity (and possibly point out my
compiler ignorance WRT using sun.tool.javac.Main and/or JSP compilation
[since I don't do JSP]). You mention speed being the primary factor in
using the Main
Jon Stevens wrote:
Time to drop Javac and just use Jikes...
LOL! I hadn't even read this one when I (just now) asked my why not
just go with Jikes question. I've started noticing that Jon and I think
alot alike, from HTML-formatted e-mail to documention approaches to JSP
to compiler
Jon Stevens wrote:
Jikes works fine.
The issue is that Jikes is a C++ binary and isn't ported to every platform.
Oh yeah ... =)
It also makes installation/distribution issues a bit more tricky than simply
calling a Java class file...
Yep. I figured the issue was that it would require
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Christopher Cain wrote:
JULIEN,TIMOTHY (HP-NewJersey,ex2) wrote:
Over in HP middleware, we're not to happy with this development either
our JSP implementation will suffer for the same reasons Jasper will
We can work with an external compiler, but for
Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't looked at Jikes, so can't comment on the suitability of any APIs
it exposes. Would someone like to look at this and report back?
Last time I looked at the sources (when I was at IBM, 1+1/2 years ago),
Jikes was not relying on
Christopher Cain at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't looked at Jikes, so can't comment on the suitability of any APIs
it exposes. Would someone like to look at this and report back?
Last time I looked at the
Christopher Cain at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Generic interface, of course :)
Nice ...
What's the point of doing otherwise?
But I didn't say I'm going to do it... :)
D'oh! Maybe I'll have to send my men into your home again, and maybe
this time they steal your primary mod_webapp
10 matches
Mail list logo
