Bug report #320 has just been filed.
You can view the report at the following URL:
http://znutar.cortexity.com:/BugRatViewer/ShowReport/320
REPORT #320 Details.
Project: Tomcat
Category: Bug Report
SubCategory: New Bug Report
Class: swbug
State: received
Priority: medium
Severity:
Class changed from 'suggest' to 'swbug'.
Bug description modified:
Synopsis changed from:
Auto loading jar files from the lib directory
To:
Auto loading jar files from the lib directory for windows
-
To
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, marc fleury wrote:
| What can I say? I agree that this is a reasonable interpretation.
|But I don't think it's the only interpretation, and I'm not sure it's even
|the interpretation intended by the authors. There's another section that
|specifically allows
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, marc fleury wrote:
THIS IS WHERE THE GPL DRAWS THE LINE FOR VIRALITY
4 Aggregation is the weakest, it just means bundling of work. GPL doesn't
apply.
Which to me means that the closest together the two can ever be is if
Tomcat talks to JBoss and vice versa via a
An aside,
There is, AFAIK, one good reason to use GPL over any other Open Source or
Free Software license, and it's a very very good reason: To maximize the
spread of the GPL.
IOW, it's to forward the tenets of freedom in software development and to
more or less declare that other software is
Hi,
Lots of flames and hearsay from both sides, but also
some very valid arguments.
I think we should try to find out exactly where we
agree and where we disagree. This discussion is too
important to use for another flamewar about licensing
ideologies.
We can both agree that neither of us want
on 10/29/2000 8:46 PM, "Aaron Mulder" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should do whatever we can to make jBoss universally
acceptable. Because I want everyone in the universe to be able to choose
to use it, on the basis of its features not on the basis of its license.
Aaron
So, then
on 10/29/2000 11:19 PM, "Ole Husgaard" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should try to find out exactly where we
agree and where we disagree. This discussion is too
important to use for another flamewar about licensing
ideologies.
Right, but at the core of the discussion IS the license so
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Dan OConnor wrote:
In no way is the choice of license intended to prevent aggregation
with Tomcat, nor to the best of my knowledge does the board--or
the jBoss community in general--currently believe that this is the
result. This sort of opinion is not like source
Hello,
Sorry for a long mail. Please help me with this.
Problem:Our company has lot of
small teams developing websites. we use a central jsp engine(tomcat) for
development. In order to refer to pages we use relative paths and it is causing
problems. this is the situation.
This
10 matches
Mail list logo
