remm01/12/11 00:11:09
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
ApplicationDispatcher.java
Log:
- Make code more robust. Fixes a tester failure.
Revision ChangesPath
1.28 +5 -5
remm01/12/11 00:26:17
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
ApplicationDispatcher.java
Log:
- Modify a bit latest patch, since here the flush should be in its own try/catch.
Revision ChangesPath
1.29 +8 -4
remm01/12/11 00:28:38
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardWrapper.java
Log:
- The patch on the STM bug was completely broken (I just found that out by
accident). This should fix the issue for real. Sorry for the trouble.
remm01/12/11 00:29:38
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core Tag:
tomcat_40_branch StandardWrapper.java
Log:
- The patch on the STM bug was completely broken (I just found that out by
accident). This should fix the issue for real. Sorry
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5349.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Gyorgy Gyepesi wrote:
URGENT PLEASE SEND REPLY ASAP!!
The ServletInputStream implementation reports EOF once a byte of value 0xff
appears in the request body (of content-type application/octet-stream
without content-endcoding); the probable cause is the following line in
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4793.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5150.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4542.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5352.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5353.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5354.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5349.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5352.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm01/12/11 10:56:03
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardWrapper.java
Log:
- Since I had lots of trouble getting STM right, I decided to experiment a bit more
as an exercice. This patch implements instance pooling using a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5353.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5364.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5365.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I am reposting that patch again - let me know if there are any
questions or
concerns.
Costin is working on a huge refactory of jk, named native2,
and in that version the jk_init is removed from child_init.
Having it in child_init was only usefull when using ajp14
to grab URIs to be handled
Please commit these changes to the HEAD branch.
thanks,
--Manveen
Comments:
-
1)
Front-end validation added for the server screen.
Checks added:
-Portnumber :
* cannot be null,
* must be a valid integer (cannot be random characters)
* in the range 1-65535.
-ShutdownText:
patrickl01/12/11 14:54:13
Modified:webapps/admin admin.css index.jsp server.jsp
tree-control-test.css
webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin
ApplicationResources_en.properties
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5368.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5368.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm getting close with jk2, there are just few more details I need to
resolve ( and then test, update the other server adapters, test again,
etc).
One change I'm making to get the things cleaner refers to the login and
discovery protocol.
Instead of a RPC-style, where Apache sends a command and
kinman 01/12/11 17:19:35
Modified:jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler JspReader.java
jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime
PageContextImpl.java
Log:
PR: 5345
- This bug is caused by the recent change in response.sendRedirect
kinman 01/12/11 17:28:39
Modified:jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag:
tomcat_40_branch JspReader.java
jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime Tag:
tomcat_40_branch PageContextImpl.java
Log:
PR: 5345
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5345.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
craigmcc01/12/11 18:26:10
Modified:tester/src/bin tester.xml
Log:
Change tester's script to check for the real result (404 not 500) on an
invalid URL that tries to go above the context root.
Revision ChangesPath
1.74 +1 -1
billbarker01/12/11 20:09:35
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/ajp/tomcat4/config ApacheConfig.java
IISConfig.java NSConfig.java
Log:
Add missing j_security_check mapping.
It seems that this isn't a mapped servlet in 4.x.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3
May I recommand you to switch to Tomcat 3.3, for strict
2.2/1.1 RI, which fixes quantities of problems like this ?
The RI for 2.2/1.1 is Tomcat 3.3 today, just take a look
at java.sun.com :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP
Hi all,
I'm trying to upgrade from Tomcat 3.2 to Tomcat 3.3 and I have some jsp
pages that have caracteres with accents. With tomcat 3.3 it
outputs 'garbage' to the browser.
Example:
...
tdI have accents - áéíóú âêîôû/td
...
What am I missing ?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
31 matches
Mail list logo