Costin Manolache wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Tomcat 4.1.22 Alpha is now available for testing.
Changes over 4.1.21 include:
- Fix for mangling with JSPC
- Fix precompilation with tag libraries packaged in JARs
- Fix JDBC store thread safety bug which
Alexander Leyke wrote:
Hello,
I am a developer at AOL and have been recently working on a JK2 family
module for AOLserver. The module is ready now and I'd like to take steps
necessary to contribute the sources to Tomcat project. I read the
guidelines for contribution, but still am a bit
Did some of you ever think that Tomcat could became a
direct Apache subproject, like ant ?
It seems Maven follow the same way.
As such having Tomcat as a direct Apache projects will
allow a Tomcat PMC ?
Costin, Remy, other commiters, what do you think ?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17867.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17860.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17860.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17873.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I am unable to authenticate using digest authentication. I browsed
through the code and found that getPassword() method in JDBCRealm returns
null (harcoded). I am using the following configuration. Am I missing
something somewhere?
server.xml:
--
Realm
Hi,
I have implemeted the methods getPassword() and getPrincipal() in
JDBCRealm. Digest authentication works for me with these changes. One thing
that still doest work is if I have stored the password in encrypted form in
the database. I have doubts if this will always work in the scenario
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
amyroh 2003/03/11 06:15:45
Modified:webapps/admin banner.jsp
webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin
Lists.java TomcatTreeBuilder.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17878.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17878.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17878.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17878.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17878.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Alexander Leyke wrote:
I am a developer at AOL and have been recently working on a JK2 family
module for AOLserver. The module is ready now and I'd like to take steps
necessary to contribute the sources to Tomcat project. I read the
Just send the patches and the new files. You can open an
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17878.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17878.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
amyroh 2003/03/10 19:25:52
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans
MBeanFactory.java ServerLifecycleListener.java
Log:
Set to use JSR77 names as default.
Please make sure tomcat 5 is also updated.
I would do
Henri Gomez wrote:
Did some of you ever think that Tomcat could became a
direct Apache subproject, like ant ?
It seems Maven follow the same way.
As such having Tomcat as a direct Apache projects will
allow a Tomcat PMC ?
Costin, Remy, other commiters, what do you think ?
I'm
Costin Manolache wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Did some of you ever think that Tomcat could became a
direct Apache subproject, like ant ?
It seems Maven follow the same way.
As such having Tomcat as a direct Apache projects will
allow a Tomcat PMC ?
Costin, Remy, other commiters, what do you think
remm2003/03/11 09:21:16
Modified:..cvsignore
Log:
- Add embed to the ignore list.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +1 -0 jakarta-tomcat-5/.cvsignore
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17878.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
amyroh 2003/03/11 06:15:45
Modified:webapps/admin banner.jsp
webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin
Lists.java TomcatTreeBuilder.java
Absolutely. I might use the admin app just for that feature (course I'm just a user
not a committer).
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 2:58 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: More Clustering Features - feedback
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17892.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Filip Hanik wrote:
hey yaall,
so I have the basic replication implemented, I'm gonna write some test contexts and also submit a tcp loadbalancer (java) so that people can really play around with it.
Sounds good :)
For the next set of features I was actually thinking of distributed deployment,
Amy Roh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amy, could you talk to someone before making that sort of changes ?
The idea is that the stable branch is stable, and that big changes will
bring no interesting feature except instability.
Why didn't you start doing them in the 5.0 branch and then
Amy Roh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
amyroh 2003/03/10 19:25:52
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans
MBeanFactory.java ServerLifecycleListener.java
Log:
Set to use JSR77 names as default.
Please make sure tomcat 5 is also
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17900.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I don't see anything you get in return for changing the names. Sure,
it's more consistent, but it doesn't help stability (hopefully, 4.1.x
has now entered the mature phase of its lifecycle), so I don't see any
incentive.
The changes can be easily reverted based on the TOMCAT_4_1_22
Filip Hanik wrote:
hey yaall,
so I have the basic replication implemented, I'm gonna write some test contexts and
also submit a tcp loadbalancer
(java) so that people can really play around with it.
For the next set of features I was actually thinking of distributed deployment,
currently TC5
costin 2003/03/11 16:41:32
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_ajp13.c
Log:
Check for null - because in C you don't get NullPointerExceptions :-)
Revision ChangesPath
1.47 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_ajp13.c
Index:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Did some of you ever think that Tomcat could became a
direct Apache subproject, like ant ?
It seems Maven follow the same way.
As such having Tomcat as a direct Apache projects will
allow a Tomcat PMC ?
Costin, Remy, other commiters, what do you think ?
That is a tempting
glenn 2003/03/11 17:19:03
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
JDBCStore.java
Log:
Fix Bug 17900, first session skipped
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +7 -10
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 4:36 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: More Clustering Features - feedback wanted
Filip Hanik wrote:
hey yaall,
so I have the basic replication implemented, I'm gonna
glenn 2003/03/11 17:21:58
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
JDBCStore.java
Log:
Fix Bug 17900, first session skipped
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +7 -10
glenn 2003/03/11 17:23:35
Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Log:
Update release notes
Revision ChangesPath
1.63 +5 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Index: RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17900.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I'm close to get JAAS realm and the memory LoginModule working - if I
remember correctly we agreed to make JAAS the default for 5.0 ( I don't
remember any objections ).
I never tried it in 4.x - but from the code and code I strongly doubt it
works.
There is one change I would like to make.
Just an FYI:
In JBoss JAAS doesn't really work as expected,
if you log in under a context say
mywar
|
-protected
-unprotected
then getPrincipal() returns null for the unprotected subcontext(directory), but
returns the principal under the secured subcontext.
we don't want that to
Costin,
Sorry to mail you directly, but this doesn't seem like a major group
discussion kind of thing.
At work I'm doing a project that has an interesting set of criteria for user
authentication that I haven't really seen a way to do with JAAS readily.
Basically it boils down to this, a user
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14616.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Greetings,
I brought this up in November. Remy and I have a disagreement
on how important fixing this bug is. I want to see if there is
a quorum of other committers who understand the problem and think
it should be fixed prior to the next stable build release of 4.1.
The immediate problem is
Filip Hanik wrote:
Just an FYI:
In JBoss JAAS doesn't really work as expected,
if you log in under a context say
mywar
|
-protected
-unprotected
then getPrincipal() returns null for the unprotected
subcontext(directory), but returns the principal under the secured
jfarcand2003/03/11 19:53:15
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
StandardSession.java
Log:
Forgot to commit this one. Add a doPrivileged block.
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +18 -6
Hi,
Does JDBCRealm realm work for DIGEST authentication scheme(I have
passwords stored in cleartext form. JDBCRealm works with BASIC
authenctication scheme though)? I find the corresponding coding partially
implemented. IF it works for for someone, could you please guide me on how
you made it
I think it is reasonable to fix it.
This can be serious - if someone relies on application isolation ( like
a hosting environment ), the consequences can be really bad, with
one webapp guessing the credentials of another one.
The fix seems reasonably simple and clean.
Costin
Keith Wannamaker
costin 2003/03/11 22:04:31
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
ContainerBase.java
Log:
Forgive duplicated start() calls. Nobody is hurt
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +25 -6
- Original Message -
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: 4.1 authentication bug / bug 14616
I think it is reasonable to fix it.
This can be serious - if someone relies on application isolation ( like
a
costin 2003/03/11 22:24:15
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardContext.java
Log:
- forgive duplicated start()
- remove unused imports ( thanks Idea )
- Add support for a defaultWebXml configuration option. It adds a bit
costin 2003/03/11 22:28:55
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardHost.java
Log:
- remove unused imports
- switch to commons-logging
- lazy creation of the deployer. I did it because of some class loader problems ( but
the problem
costin 2003/03/11 22:33:37
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader
WebappLoader.java
Log:
Few getters ( Remy: don't panic, I'm not changing the loader ! ).
The array will collect the loaders that are set into the class loader
and allow
I am trying to intall DBPrism for Tomcat.
The installation instruction says
build dpls.ear, executing $PRISM_HOME/applications/build_dpls.sh (or .bat on
windows)
extract dpls.war, unziping dpls.ear file generated into $PRISM_HOME/bin.
Move to the directory $TOMCAT_HOME/webapps and execute jar
costin 2003/03/11 23:12:28
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
ContextConfig.java
Log:
- cleanup imports
- use a normal properties for authenticators - what's with the resource bundle ???
- use the cleaner API in digester to use the
costin 2003/03/11 23:14:18
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm
GenericPrincipal.java
Log:
- more info in toString()
- constructor without realm
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +26 -6
costin 2003/03/11 23:21:52
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans
mbeans-descriptors.xml
Log:
A bigger change - expose more info to JMX. Some features may break in /admin, I'll
do more tests.
- ClassNameMBean is no longer needed, the
Bill Barker wrote:
I think it is reasonable to fix it.
This can be serious - if someone relies on application isolation ( like
a hosting environment ), the consequences can be really bad, with
one webapp guessing the credentials of another one.
The fix seems reasonably simple and clean.
billbarker2003/03/11 23:50:38
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteAdapter.java
Log:
Port cookie-validitity check from 4.1 branch.
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +18 -12
59 matches
Mail list logo
