Hello, I am trying to differentiate Apache and Apache Tomcat in terms of the serving mechanism, and subsequent log files. Of course, Apache is a web server, and Tomcat a servlet container, but Tomcat also is a/has a web server? If Tomcat contains a web server as a seperate entity, where can (if at
Valid Lists
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Valid Lists
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Valid Lists
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
next try
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Torsten Fohrer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. September 2003 13:55
An: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Betreff: AW: AW: AW: [5.0] JSP performance ...
patched a snapshot to merge template text nodes.
I implement following using a
Has anyone used NonLoginAuthenticator? Or know if it is still ok?
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/NonLoginAuthenticator.java?rev=1.3content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
From a quick code walkthrough it looks like an
Hello All,
With Tomcat 4 server on my dynamic includes pageEncoding directive does not seem to be
working.
a.jsp has jsp:include page=/include/b.jsp flush=true /
b.jsp contains:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pageEncoding=UTF-8%
Other CONTENTS
pageEncoding does work on any static includes though. Any
remm2003/09/10 08:40:27
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader
WebappLoader.java
Log:
- Remove the artificial limit of 3 for classpath creation. It seems like a bad idea
to do this (if the parent CLs are not correctly setup, Tomcat
Florent BENOIT wrote:
For the saving feature :
That feature is thought out for standalone mode. It's hard to predict
what are the components which should be saved, and which should not.
Now if you want to refactor the save-to-xml code to a separate class
(and allow configuring that class,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23071.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Torsten Fohrer wrote:
next try
Yes, the code is better (IMO) and performs a little better also.
However, looking more at my profiler, I think the problem with that
benchmark is all the not optimized int - String conversions. Since
that's not too useful in the real world (but in that benchmark,
jfarcand2003/09/10 09:56:45
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/security
SecurityUtil.java
Log:
Always associate a Subject. If not created, then create a default one.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +5 -0
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23074.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Previously in a mention of a vote for Tomcat 5.0.11 as being Beta or Alpha
status, I vote beta.
I have not done major extensive testing, but in everything I hav run so far
nothing has had a major hickup. The major issue I saw immediately, was the
config of the appBase and docBase attributes in
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:34:40 +0200
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [5.0] JSP performance ...
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Torsten Fohrer wrote:
next try
Yes, the code is better (IMO) and performs a little better also.
However,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23074.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21763.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Richard Norman wrote:
Previously in a mention of a vote for Tomcat 5.0.11 as being Beta or
Alpha status, I vote beta.
I have not done major extensive testing, but in everything I hav run so
far nothing has had a major hickup. The major issue I saw immediately,
was the config of the appBase and
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21763.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Seems my apache/sun email are blocked when I reply. :-(
Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
[X] Alpha
[ ] Beta
/ballot
When turning the security manager on:
java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.io.FilePermission
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23077.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23077.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23077.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jean-Francois Arcand wrote:
ballot
[X] Alpha
[ ] Beta
/ballot
When turning the security manager on:
java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.io.FilePermission
/home/ja120114/src/jakarta-tomcat-5/build/server/webapps/manager/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/log4j/Logger.class
read)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23077.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21763.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21763.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21763.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21763.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21763.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Good morning... looks like another beautiful day here!
Unfortunately it isn't off to a good start somehow your most recent
e-mail got picked up in the lot to be deleted... sigh... could you send a
copy of your last one, with a subject of 'rainy Wednesday...' please? I quit
the tomcat-user list
Chunked encoding with the coyote http1.1 connector seems to be very
inefficient. I have 3 major comments about it which I will summarize, then
explain in more detail for those interested.
1) There are some performance problems with the current implementation of
chunked encoding.
2) I would
jfarcand2003/09/10 14:28:37
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/security
SecurityUtil.java
Log:
Do not create session when no one is available.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +9 -5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23088.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Steve Appling wrote:
Chunked encoding with the coyote http1.1 connector seems to be very
inefficient. I have 3 major comments about it which I will summarize, then
explain in more detail for those interested.
1) There are some performance problems with the current implementation of
chunked
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21763.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22645.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19245.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19617.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
kinman 2003/09/10 16:11:56
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
Log:
- Use out.print(expr) instead of out.write(String.valueOf(expr)) for outputting
expressions in template texts.
Revision ChangesPath
1.206 +4 -5
you have to love this reply!!! ;)
filip
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: Coyote Performance Problems with HTTP1.1
Steve Appling wrote:
Chunked encoding with
Dear Jakarta-Tomcat Committers,
Hello,
I've verified and reviewed this patch (Japanese Resources).
This seems very good. Could you please apply this patch
because it helps us a lot ?
Thanks!
-- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
P.S. I am willing to announce new beta release of the
TC 5.0.X @
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22867.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I don't know about others, but my feeling is chunking is useful for large files and
not necessarily where the size of the content is unknown at the beginning of the
response. I seriously doubt a 2-5K static file would see a real benefit. We all know
the internet has a ton of packet collision.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Look, there's no reason to start whining. Adding a lower level buffering
(using a ByteChunk maybe) is nearly trivial, and since you seem to know
what you're doing, you could have done in less than the amount it took
you to write your email.
I'm not convinced it's the
luehe 2003/09/10 18:59:51
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/util RequestUtil.java
Log:
Fix for 4918152 (using % in the value of jsp:param corrupts the query string)
Patch provided by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +11 -6
jfarcand2003/09/10 20:56:48
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteRequest.java
Log:
Oups forgot that one (See previous commit)
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +10 -7
billbarker2003/09/10 21:05:02
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads ThreadPool.java
Log:
Fix potential problem with dying threads when the pool is empty.
Functionally, this isn't that much different from what Remy posted on Bug #21763.
However (at least on
billbarker2003/09/10 21:15:42
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads Tag: coyote_10
ThreadPool.java
Log:
port patch
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.9.2.2 +34 -24
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21763.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
50 matches
Mail list logo
