mturk 2005/01/18 02:22:32
Modified:jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni Library.java
Log:
Change native library default names to tcnative.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +2 -2
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni/Library.java
Index:
mturk 2005/01/18 02:22:50
Modified:jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni OS.java
Log:
Add OS.info for gathering stats
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +26 -8
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni/OS.java
Index: OS.java
mturk 2005/01/18 02:23:15
Modified:jni/native libtcnative.dsp tcnative.dsp
jni/native/os/netware system.c
jni/native/os/unix system.c
jni/native/os/win32 system.c
Log:
Add system info for gathering stats.
Revision ChangesPath
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33143.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi All-
Apologies for cross-posting from the user group - but in retrospect I believe
this might be a better forum for this question:
I am interesting in using the in processes jni_worker with apache 2.0 on linux.
My question concerns the number of instances of a jvm, and hence tomcat that
Fox,Tim wrote:
Hi All-
Apologies for cross-posting from the user group - but in retrospect I believe
this might be a better forum for this question:
I am interesting in using the in processes jni_worker with apache 2.0 on linux.
My question concerns the number of instances of a jvm, and hence
Hi Mladen -
Thanks for your reply.
I suspected as much.
My real motivation here is to basically provide a java implementation of an
apache module or filter. I didn't want to communicate via sockets or whatever
to a shared java process due to performance considerations.
Especially for doing
jfarcand2005/01/18 07:30:42
Modified:jsr152/examples/jsp2/el functions.jsp implicit-objects.jsp
jsr152/examples/jsp2/jspx textRotate.jspx
jsr152/examples/snp snoop.jsp
Log:
FIx for bug: SERVLETAPI: XSS Issues
Patch submitted by Mark Thomas at
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32953.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jfarcand2005/01/18 07:39:24
Modified:jsr152/examples/jsp2/el Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 functions.jsp
implicit-objects.jsp
jsr152/examples/jsp2/jspx Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 textRotate.jspx
jsr152/examples/snp Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 snoop.jsp
Log:
Port
jfarcand2005/01/18 07:45:58
Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml
Log:
Add fix.
Revision ChangesPath
1.223 +3 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Index: changelog.xml
===
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33138.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The only way to do in-process with apache on unix is to use a
multithreaded MPM and a small number of processes ( and lots of
threads). JNI is not much more efficient than IPC - or at least not
in the simplistic use. Even the applets in mozilla/konqueror/etc run out
of process on unix ( but
I have corrected your document.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33157.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33159.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33159.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33157.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2005/01/18 14:11:57
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator
BasicAuthenticator.java
Log:
- 33157: Proper handling of the buffer length.
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +2 -2
remm2005/01/18 14:16:24
Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml
Log:
- Changelog update.
Revision ChangesPath
1.224 +6 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Index: changelog.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33157.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30551.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27158.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17051.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I will be out of the office starting 19.01.2005 and will not return until
31.01.2005.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16822.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Ryan, fancy meeting up here :) You don't mention, so
I'll confirm - you are using mod_jk 1.2.8 (brand new release)?
This sure sounds like the (rather obscure) issues with re-piping
body content, and taking a simple guess, if you drop back and
force http/1.0 (eliminate chunking) the issue goes
Actually, both 1.2.6 and 1.2.8 of mod_jk. What do you mean re-piping body
content? I haven't forced http/1.0 yet, I was about to trace through
Apache to find the problem. My initial investigation looks like the
problem is in Apache somewhere, looks like
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33143.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
At 06:50 PM 1/18/2005, Ryan Bloom wrote:
Actually, both 1.2.6 and 1.2.8 of mod_jk. What do you mean re-piping body
content? I haven't forced http/1.0 yet, I was about to trace through
Apache to find the problem. My initial investigation looks like the
problem is in Apache somewhere, looks
Encrypted message is available.
+++ Attachment: No Virus found
+++ Bitdefender AntiVirus - www.bitdefender.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
31 matches
Mail list logo