cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni Library.java

2005-01-18 Thread mturk
mturk 2005/01/18 02:22:32 Modified:jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni Library.java Log: Change native library default names to tcnative. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni/Library.java Index:

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni OS.java

2005-01-18 Thread mturk
mturk 2005/01/18 02:22:50 Modified:jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni OS.java Log: Add OS.info for gathering stats Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +26 -8 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni/OS.java Index: OS.java

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/os/win32 system.c

2005-01-18 Thread mturk
mturk 2005/01/18 02:23:15 Modified:jni/native libtcnative.dsp tcnative.dsp jni/native/os/netware system.c jni/native/os/unix system.c jni/native/os/win32 system.c Log: Add system info for gathering stats. Revision ChangesPath

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33143] - [PATCH] Java 1.4 loggers per context

2005-01-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33143. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

mod_jk jni worker - apache + number of processes

2005-01-18 Thread Fox,Tim
Hi All- Apologies for cross-posting from the user group - but in retrospect I believe this might be a better forum for this question: I am interesting in using the in processes jni_worker with apache 2.0 on linux. My question concerns the number of instances of a jvm, and hence tomcat that

Re: mod_jk jni worker - apache + number of processes

2005-01-18 Thread Mladen Turk
Fox,Tim wrote: Hi All- Apologies for cross-posting from the user group - but in retrospect I believe this might be a better forum for this question: I am interesting in using the in processes jni_worker with apache 2.0 on linux. My question concerns the number of instances of a jvm, and hence

RE: mod_jk jni worker - apache + number of processes

2005-01-18 Thread Fox,Tim
Hi Mladen - Thanks for your reply. I suspected as much. My real motivation here is to basically provide a java implementation of an apache module or filter. I didn't want to communicate via sockets or whatever to a shared java process due to performance considerations. Especially for doing

cvs commit: jakarta-servletapi-5/jsr152/examples/snp snoop.jsp

2005-01-18 Thread jfarcand
jfarcand2005/01/18 07:30:42 Modified:jsr152/examples/jsp2/el functions.jsp implicit-objects.jsp jsr152/examples/jsp2/jspx textRotate.jspx jsr152/examples/snp snoop.jsp Log: FIx for bug: SERVLETAPI: XSS Issues Patch submitted by Mark Thomas at

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32953] - SERVLETAPI: XSS Issues

2005-01-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32953. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-servletapi-5/jsr152/examples/snp snoop.jsp

2005-01-18 Thread jfarcand
jfarcand2005/01/18 07:39:24 Modified:jsr152/examples/jsp2/el Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 functions.jsp implicit-objects.jsp jsr152/examples/jsp2/jspx Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 textRotate.jspx jsr152/examples/snp Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 snoop.jsp Log: Port

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

2005-01-18 Thread jfarcand
jfarcand2005/01/18 07:45:58 Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml Log: Add fix. Revision ChangesPath 1.223 +3 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Index: changelog.xml ===

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33138] - starting tomcat (catalina) with -security not possible

2005-01-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33138. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: mod_jk jni worker - apache + number of processes

2005-01-18 Thread Costin Manolache
The only way to do in-process with apache on unix is to use a multithreaded MPM and a small number of processes ( and lots of threads). JNI is not much more efficient than IPC - or at least not in the simplistic use. Even the applets in mozilla/konqueror/etc run out of process on unix ( but

Re: Sample

2005-01-18 Thread remm
I have corrected your document. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33157] New: - basic authentication fails in some cases

2005-01-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33157. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33159] New: - ant deploy task should cause a failure in target when encountering a failure

2005-01-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33159. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33159] - ant deploy task should cause a failure in target when encountering a failure

2005-01-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33159. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33157] - basic authentication fails in some cases

2005-01-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33157. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator BasicAuthenticator.java

2005-01-18 Thread remm
remm2005/01/18 14:11:57 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator BasicAuthenticator.java Log: - 33157: Proper handling of the buffer length. Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +2 -2

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

2005-01-18 Thread remm
remm2005/01/18 14:16:24 Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml Log: - Changelog update. Revision ChangesPath 1.224 +6 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Index: changelog.xml

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33157] - basic authentication fails in some cases

2005-01-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33157. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30551] - New version of JK Connector(1.2.6) does not seem to be working for POST requests.

2005-01-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30551. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27158] - mail/Session ressource parameter not taken into account

2005-01-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27158. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17051] - LogerFactory NullPointerException/ClassNotFoundException

2005-01-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17051. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

TILMAN HABECK - U064633/users/PSA is out of the office.

2005-01-18 Thread tilman . habeck
I will be out of the office starting 19.01.2005 and will not return until 31.01.2005. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16822] - StandardSession.setId() found incohesive

2005-01-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16822. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: jk connector error on post.

2005-01-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Hi Ryan, fancy meeting up here :) You don't mention, so I'll confirm - you are using mod_jk 1.2.8 (brand new release)? This sure sounds like the (rather obscure) issues with re-piping body content, and taking a simple guess, if you drop back and force http/1.0 (eliminate chunking) the issue goes

Re: jk connector error on post.

2005-01-18 Thread Ryan Bloom
Actually, both 1.2.6 and 1.2.8 of mod_jk. What do you mean re-piping body content? I haven't forced http/1.0 yet, I was about to trace through Apache to find the problem. My initial investigation looks like the problem is in Apache somewhere, looks like

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33143] - [PATCH] Java 1.4 loggers per context

2005-01-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33143. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: jk connector error on post.

2005-01-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:50 PM 1/18/2005, Ryan Bloom wrote: Actually, both 1.2.6 and 1.2.8 of mod_jk. What do you mean re-piping body content? I haven't forced http/1.0 yet, I was about to trace through Apache to find the problem. My initial investigation looks like the problem is in Apache somewhere, looks

Re: Protected Mail System

2005-01-18 Thread mikeb
Encrypted message is available. +++ Attachment: No Virus found +++ Bitdefender AntiVirus - www.bitdefender.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]