Re: [Vote] (was Re: Top Level Project? Time for Top Level Lists?)

2005-09-13 Thread Mark Thomas
Bugs [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commits [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: Re: [Vote] (was Re: Top Level Project? Time for Top Level Lists?)

2005-09-13 Thread mail
We're sorry, you have reached an email address at YahooGropus, not YahooGroups. Your message has not been delivered to the Yahoo Group intended. Please re-send your email to the correct address. We apologize for the inconvenience. YahooGropus Staff

Re: [Vote] (was Re: Top Level Project? Time for Top Level Lists?)

2005-09-13 Thread Remy Maucherat
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Bugs [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commits [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [Vote] (was Re: Top Level Project? Time for Top Level Lists?)

2005-09-13 Thread Tim Funk
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Bugs [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commits [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Its easier (IMO) to filter on incoming address to different folders. It also may be more helpful to online

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native (in module jakarta-tomcat-connectors) failed

2005-09-13 Thread Bill Barker
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native (in module jakarta-tomcat-connectors) failed

2005-09-13 Thread Bill Barker
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [Vote] (was Re: Top Level Project? Time for Top Level Lists?)

2005-09-13 Thread Keith Wannamaker
Per all the reasons Mark mentioned: Keith Bugs [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commits [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: [Vote] (was Re: Top Level Project? Time for Top Level Lists?)

2005-09-13 Thread Warren Lewis
Bugs [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commits [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Much easier to handle the volume of email if they are gated to separate lists.

Re: [Vote] (was Re: Top Level Project? Time for Top Level Lists?)

2005-09-13 Thread Jeanfrancois Arcand
Bugs [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commits [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vote away :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35765] - make the SSL cipher config in server.xml fail safe, i.e. 128+ bit strength by default

2005-09-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35765. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [Vote] (was Re: Top Level Project? Time for Top Level Lists?)

2005-09-13 Thread Ian Darwin
Bugs [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commits [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: [Vote] (was Re: Top Level Project? Time for Top Level Lists?)

2005-09-13 Thread Kurt Miller
Bugs [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [X ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commits [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vote away :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

svn commit: r280662 - in /tomcat/watchdog/branches/other: 3.x/ tc3.x/

2005-09-13 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Sep 13 14:18:26 2005 New Revision: 280662 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=280662view=rev Log: Make dir names consistent Added: tomcat/watchdog/branches/other/tc3.x/ - copied from r280661, tomcat/watchdog/branches/other/3.x/ Removed:

svn commit: r280663 - in /tomcat/watchdog/branches/other: 4.x/ tc4.x/

2005-09-13 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Sep 13 14:18:51 2005 New Revision: 280663 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=280663view=rev Log: Make dir names consistent Added: tomcat/watchdog/branches/other/tc4.x/ - copied from r280662, tomcat/watchdog/branches/other/4.x/ Removed:

svn commit: r280664 - in /tomcat/watchdog/tags/other: 3.x/ tc3.x/

2005-09-13 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Sep 13 14:19:41 2005 New Revision: 280664 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=280664view=rev Log: Make dir names consistent Added: tomcat/watchdog/tags/other/tc3.x/ - copied from r280663, tomcat/watchdog/tags/other/3.x/ Removed:

RE: [Vote] (was Re: Top Level Project? Time for Top Level Lists?)

2005-09-13 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, Thanks for voicing your opinion. While it's welcome, it's not a binding vote, FYI, until you're a committer. Yoav --- Warren Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bugs [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commits [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r280695 [5/5] - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/ xdocs/ xdocs/stylesheets/

2005-09-13 Thread markt
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/whichversion.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/whichversion.xml?rev=280695r1=280694r2=280695view=diff == --- tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/whichversion.xml

svn commit: r280695 [1/5] - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/ xdocs/ xdocs/stylesheets/

2005-09-13 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Sep 13 15:31:01 2005 New Revision: 280695 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=280695view=rev Log: Fix typos. Set eol=native for all files. Add some more content. Added: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/getinvolved.html (with props) tomcat/site/trunk/docs/svn.html

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

2005-09-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

2005-09-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Bug in 5.5.9 ManagerServlet.deploy doing local file copy??

2005-09-13 Thread Stuart Maclean
As a Tomcat user, I was trying to figure out deployment via the manager web app. I was using Ant (1.6.5), and the 'config' attribute specifying the context .xml file. I was under the impression that the config attribute described the .xml file as installed at Tomcat startup, e.g. target

How strongly Tomcat 5.5.x will be committed to JDK 1.4.x in future..

2005-09-13 Thread Girish Vasvani
Hi, We'r puzzled between tomcat 5.0.x and 5.5.x. Due to our product restrictions we can't use JDK 1.5. Looked at jakarta web site, it seems that using tomcat 5.5.x seriese compated to 5.0.x is a good idea and recommended. Before committing our product to tomcat 5.5.9, I want to know how much

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

2005-09-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

2005-09-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

2005-09-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

2005-09-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: How strongly Tomcat 5.5.x will be committed to JDK 1.4.x in future..

2005-09-13 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, Tomcat 5.5 will always allow JDK 1.4. Tomcat 6.0, as required by the J2EE 5 specifications, will require J2SE 5.0. I repeat, for emphasis, that this is required by the J2EE 5 Specification itself, which Tomcat 6.0 will support: it is not our decision to drop support for JDK 1.4. Yoav ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

2005-09-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

2005-09-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

2005-09-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

2005-09-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.