"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> Hear ye! Hear ye! At long last, an updated "beta 7" release of Tomcat
> 3.2 is available for download, at:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/tomcat/release/v3.2-beta-7
> [...]
Thanks a bunch Craig, and everyone else who helped out getting all the
remai
remm00/11/12 22:52:05
Modified:catalina README
Log:
- Update the README files : new instructions on how to install JNDI on
JDK 1.2.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/README
Index: README
=
remm00/11/12 22:51:58
Modified:.README.txt
Log:
- Update the README files : new instructions on how to install JNDI on
JDK 1.2.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/README.txt
Index: README.txt
==
Hi there Craig et al,
I just downloaded the m4 source archives as per the message sent recently
and ant and regexp from cvs and followed the intructions, but I can't get it
to build. Looks to me like theres a problem with the javadoc steps. When I
execute:
D:\apps\jakarta\40-m4\jakarta-tomcat-4.
remm00/11/12 22:48:59
Modified:catalina/docs/dev classloaders.html
Log:
- Updates to the documentation to reflect the change in classloader
architecture.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +13 -3 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/docs/dev/classloaders.html
Index:
remm00/11/12 22:42:31
Modified:catalina build.xml
catalina/src/bin catalina.bat
Added: catalina/src/conf catalina.conf.xml
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
CatalinaBlock.java CatalinaBlock.xinfo
Log:
- A
remm00/11/12 22:19:02
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
Bootstrap.java
Log:
- Adds a new "system" class loader on top of the catalina and shared
classloaders, to avoid any possible problems when Catalina is put on top of
a ma
If it works out-of-box with jikes 1.12, then awesome! (I've had problems
with 1.12 because of the multibyte encoding changes between 1.11 and 1.12)
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Sam Ruby/Raleigh/IBM wrote:
> Nick Bauman wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone gotten Jikes to work with ant?
>
> ant -Dbuild.compiler=ji
ya
see below
The memory management on PowerPC can be used to frighten small children.
-- Linus Torvalds
On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Nick Bauman wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
{snip}
>
> I'll take "doesn't pay the rent to know that" as probably the bottom line
>
Nick Bauman wrote:
>
> Has anyone gotten Jikes to work with ant?
ant -Dbuild.compiler=jikes target
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> One interesting note about your rant is that the only people who care
> about Ant in the first place are those trying to build Tomcat from
> source
> (or want to use it for their own development). If you just need a
> binary build of Tomcat (whic
remm00/11/12 20:53:51
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader
StandardLoader.java
Log:
- Class repositories in the contexts were not loaded correctly if the
catalina.home variable contained a relative path. Now, the path is
normaliz
Nick Bauman wrote:
>
> I have all kinds of problems using new versions of Tomcat (and someone
> said that they are suprised at how few people try the milestone builds /
> betas) and many of them come from problems with Ant. So I think Ant is
> actually _preventing_ people from getting the most ou
Just thought I would throw in the most important factor to meANT is
extensible in a very straightforward, comprehensible and resuable manner.
jim
-Original Message-
From: Nick Bauman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 9:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
I found what I was missing. It was a jar in my classpath.A
On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Nick Bauman wrote:
> What am I missing? I'm trying to build 3.2b7.
>
> [root@fatman jakarta-tomcat-3.2-b7-src]# ant
> Searching for build.xml ...
> Buildfile: /home/nick/build-web/jakarta-tomcat-3.2-b7-src/build.xml
"These kids today and their 'ant's! What's the world coming to?" But I'll
agree, and _is_ more intuitive and elegant than Make. But I put them at
about equal in difficulty in learning curve.
BTW, for those who are interested, I've asked our CTO if I can release the
maketools I used to compile Tom
I'm another young developer, in the sense that I'm inexperienced - my
first projects have been started about 8-9 months ago. I was faced with
the choice of either learning ant or learning make, the two build systems
available to me that I knew of. I expended a few hour of effort on each,
and it's
Allow me to insert my Java / *nix developer novice-compared-to-people-here
2c =)
I've only been paid to write Java code for 6 months as a co-op. There were
10+ developers at the company, and only one of them understood makefiles.
That one person wrote and maintained a number of makefiles, and it
What am I missing? I'm trying to build 3.2b7.
[root@fatman jakarta-tomcat-3.2-b7-src]# ant
Searching for build.xml ...
Buildfile: /home/nick/build-web/jakarta-tomcat-3.2-b7-src/build.xml
prepare:
[chmod] /bin/chmod: too few arguments
[chmod] Try `/bin/chmod --help' for more information.
On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Michael Stanley wrote:
> > And don't say "ant is cross platform, make is not" because that just isn't
> > true. Was someone just bored with the wheel and wanted to reinvent it?
>
> Ant is more than a cross platform make utility. Ant is platform independent,
> which means a
My makefile uses a set of make dependencies that are copyright the company
I work for. I'd have to ask first before I could post it.
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Conor MacNeill wrote:
> Nick,
>
> Can we see the makefile? Did you get the same file to work on many
> platforms? What make did you use (nmak
> Synopsis:
> Struts 1.0 nightly build 20001013 exception testing example "Register with the
>MailrReader"
>
> Description:
> When accessing the /struts-example/editRegistration.do
> (Register with the MailReader link) action I get the
> following error:
>
> Internal Servlet Error:
> va.lang
> And don't say "ant is cross platform, make is not" because that just isn't
> true. Was someone just bored with the wheel and wanted to reinvent it?
Ant is more than a cross platform make utility. Ant is platform independent,
which means alot more than cross platform. Ant is a make utility g
> And don't say "ant is cross platform, make is not" because that just isn't
> true. Was someone just bored with the wheel and wanted to reinvent it?
Ant is more than a cross platform make utility. Ant is platform independent,
which means alot more than cross platform. Ant is a make utility ge
Nick,
Can we see the makefile? Did you get the same file to work on many
platforms? What make did you use (nmake, gmake, ...)?
Conor
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Bauman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 13 November 2000 8:05
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Ant rant
>
>
Question: WHAT THE HECK IS ANT?
Now I know what ant is, I'm just hyperbolizing. But...
It's just that I got the entire Tomcat 3.1 tree to compile with a single
Makefile in around 10 minutes. I can't figure out what Ant is helping this
project with. Maybe I'm just stupid or something but this Ant
nacho 00/11/12 09:30:04
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
Upgraded to ant_12
Revision ChangesPath
1.95 +196 -245 jakarta-tomcat/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-tomc
(Sorry for the repost i did send an old version that did not take into
account includes&excludes inside copydir tasks)
Hola a todos:
I've attached a xsl stylesheet, to upgrade build files from ant_11 to
ant_12, it only takes into account copydir,copyfile and deltree tasks,
but is easy to add so
Hola a todos:
I've attached a xsl stylesheet, to upgrade build files from ant_11 to
ant_12, it only takes into account copydir,copyfile and deltree tasks,
but is easy to add some other transforms if needed,
hope this helps somebody, as it did help me to upgrade tomcat 3.3 build
files, i use it
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Well, your reported behavior is definitely repeatable. But, after analyzing
> it, my conclusion is "user error ... don't do that".
>
[snip "bug" report]
>
> What do you think?
Fine :) I think it might be worth a FAQ entry though
30 matches
Mail list logo