HELP! need binaries of nsapi_redirect.so (Solaris)!

Why won't it compile on my system? Here is the error message: ~/dl/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat-3.2.1-src/src/native/netscape# make -f Makefile.solaris make: *** No rule to make target `jk_ajp12_worker.o', needed by `nsapi_redirector.so'. Stop. I originally installed the Tomcat binary distribution,

Khurram Mahmood/PeopleSoft is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 01/16/2001 and will not return until 01/30/2001. I will respond to your message when I return. Take it easy. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EM

RE: TOMCAT ENCRYPTION OF CREDIT CARD NUMS???????

Why not? It seems like a good answer, and saves someone else the trouble of offering the same advice. I'll tuck it away and refer to it in a few weeks, when I will have the same problem. *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 1/16/2001 at 7:18 PM Rob S. wrote: DOH sorry i didn't mean to

load balanced and highly available services in tomcat

Does tomcat have that functions? Did that implement? thx Jeans _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. - To unsubscribe

RE: TOMCAT ENCRYPTION OF CREDIT CARD NUMS???????

DOH sorry i didn't mean to send this to the list =( - r > -Original Message- > From: Rob S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 7:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: TOMCAT ENCRYPTION OF CREDIT CARD NUMS??? > > > Hi Mary, > > The servlet container

RE: TOMCAT ENCRYPTION OF CREDIT CARD NUMS???????

Hi Mary, The servlet container (Tomcat in this case) you choose is irrespective to the type of application you wish to write. That's the whole point of the servlet spec - .WAR files, etc. As far as encryption goes, check out http://java.sun.com/. I think Java Cryptography Engine (JCE) might be

TOMCAT ENCRYPTION OF CREDIT CARD NUMS???????

Hi all, Help badly needed by anyone with ANY information on the foollowing: I am designing an online booking system using JSP, Java Beans and Tomcat for a project at uni. Does anyone have any information on how to encrypt a credit card number with Tomcat in mind. Surely there is some code I code

Re: Forwarding side-effects HttpSession in Tomcat 3.2.1

By the way, this is for RequestDispatcherImpl... I think this produces another bug with session invalidation, though... -Bill William Flanders wrote: > > I don't have cvs access at the moment, so if anyone is interested in > this fix: > >public void forward(ServletRequest request, Servlet

Forwarding side-effects HttpSession in Tomcat 3.2.1

I don't have cvs access at the moment, so if anyone is interested in this fix: public void forward(ServletRequest request, ServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException { . HttpSession oldSession = realRequest.getSession(false); context.getCo

TC 4 / mod_jk

Craig, I assume I'm the person interested in porting mod_jk to TC 4 (if there's anyone else, please get in touch with me ;-). Thank you for clarifying the issue about the difference between the 2.2 and 2.3 specs -- I hadn't realized that. I do have a question: how would you feel about includi

Re: An alternative to JSP (REVISED)

Thanks to everyone for the comments on my paper. I've tried to address them in the revised version by emphasizing the validation and site architecture and moving MLS into the supporting article. The new version is at http://virtualschool.edu/wap. I'd be interested whether the validation/site s

mod_jk ACL - next

Hi, I'm busy these days and didn't have many time on ACL for mod_jk. Before investing too many times, just want to describe the plan : 1) Create stuff to handle InetMask a là hosts.allow / hosts.deny. Data initialized via config in server.xml From 3.2 server.xml

BugRat Report #786 has been filed.

Bug report #786 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #786 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: medium Severity: serious

should I worry - mod_jk problem?

[jk_ajp12_worker.c (585)]: ajpv12_handle_response, error reading from [jk_ajp12_worker.c (585)]: ajpv12_handle_response, error reading from [jk_ajp12_worker.c (585)]: ajpv12_handle_response, error reading from [jk_ajp12_worker.c (585)]: ajpv12_handle_response, error reading from [jk_ajp12_worker.c

Re: Proposed name encoding patch

It's worth to mention that both JSP encoding and work dir encoding are resolved/improved in 3.3 - and the code can be easily ported back / reused. I'll take a look at both patches and try to integrate them into 3.3 also ( what is not covered already ) -- Costin -

Re: [Fwd: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info]

> Yeah, I've used variations on this pattern to help save architectures > that were spiralling out of control. You may also check: http://jakarta.apache.org/cvsweb/index.cgi/~checkout~/jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/internal.html ( it's not up-to-date, a everything is now much cleaner, and most of the

Re: Proposed name encoding patch

Hi, Tal I have ever solved the problem already. Try to check http://w4.metronet.com/~wjm/tomcat/2000/Aug/msg00595.html Thanks, Kim On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Tal Dayan wrote: > Hello, > > This is my first posting to this list so please bare with me. > > We are having problems with the jsp name ma

Re: [Fwd: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info]

"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > Paul Speed wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > Can you argue about how Valve's single chain of command ( where > > > authentication, generation, etc are done in a single invoke() ) can > > > be better than what all other server are doing ( and Apa

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.1/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpRequestBase.java

remm01/01/16 10:30:43 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpRequestBase.java Log: - Won't try to read FORM parameters if the servlet has already opened the request stream. If you decide to parse the request yourself, getPar

BugRat Report #785 has been filed.

Bug report #785 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #785 Details. Project: Servlet API Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: criti

RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info

Hans Bergsten wrote: > The way I feel right now is that the best way to answer > this question is by a vote on this list, where all +1 > votes for TC 3.3 also means a commitment to help fix bugs > in TC 3.3. +1 Cheers, Larry -

Error

I have the following error using Jakarta-tomcat with Apache Server on Windows 2000 Can you help me . Thanks in advance . FATAL:java.net.BindException: Address in use: JVM_Bind java.net.BindException: Address in use: JVM_Bind at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketBind(Native Method) at

BugRat Report #784 has been filed.

Bug report #784 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #784 Details. Project: Servlet API Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: criti

BugRat Report #783 has been filed.

Bug report #783 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #783 Details. Project: Servlet API Category: Feature Requests SubCategory: Enhancement Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: se

RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info

Hola a todos: > >Hans Bergsten wrote: > > > >> The way I feel right now is that the best way to answer > >> this question is by a vote on this list, where all +1 > >> votes for TC 3.3 also means a commitment to help fix bugs > >> in TC 3.3. > > > > +1 . > +1 Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega --

Re: Query regrading mod_webapp

Arshad Mahmood wrote: > I have been trying to configure mod_webapp (without much luck) and I notice > that wa_host will not allow applications to be mounted which have common > heads (i.e. '/' and '/examples/'). Tomcat itself doesn't seem to have any > problem with such a setup. > > Is this a gen

Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info - What happens if a 3.3 proposal getsa -1

Sam Ruby wrote: > > Hans Bersten wrote: > > > > Unless another committer can convince whoever votes > > -1 to change his vote, it means that 3.3 will not > > happen. Instead we will continue to maintain the > > 3.x code base based on 3.2.1. That's how decision > > making is defined for this proje

Query regrading mod_webapp

I have been trying to configure mod_webapp (without much luck) and I notice that wa_host will not allow applications to be mounted which have common heads (i.e. '/' and '/examples/'). Tomcat itself doesn't seem to have any problem with such a setup. Is this a genuine design decision? Regards, Ar

Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info

"Rob S." wrote: > > Another alternative could be as, I proposed some time ago, to > > rename Tomcat 3.3 to AnotherName 3.3 ie Bobcat or Finecat 3.3 ;-) > > Robcat! > > - r > > p.s. my brother's name is tom. > Sounds as rational as the thinking at most of the product naming/branding meetings I've

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4 SecurityManager implementation

Sorry not to get this out earlier ... comments intermixed. Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Here is my proposal for implementing the Java SecurityManager in Tocmat 4. > Work on implementing this proposal is in progress. Comments please? > > Tomcat 4 Java SecurityManager Proposal > > Tomca

Re: [Fwd: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info]

Paul Speed wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Can you argue about how Valve's single chain of command ( where > > authentication, generation, etc are done in a single invoke() ) can > > be better than what all other server are doing ( and Apache 2.0 > > moves to a different level with the

Re: BugRat Report #778 has been filed.

BugRat Mail System wrote: > > Bug report #778 has just been filed. > > You can view the report at the following URL: > > > > REPORT #778 Details. > > Project: Tomcat > Category: Bug Report > SubCategory: New Bug Report > Class: swbu

BugRat Report #782 has been filed.

Bug report #782 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #782 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: critical C

RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info

> Another alternative could be as, I proposed some time ago, to > rename Tomcat 3.3 to AnotherName 3.3 ie Bobcat or Finecat 3.3 ;-) Robcat! - r p.s. my brother's name is tom. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For ad

RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info - Is more than just 3.x vs 4.x

BTW, you know the Giant Java Tree project, don't you? Have fun, Paulo Gaspar > -Original Message- > From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 13:42 > > I'm a +1000 to see someone like CJAN (CPAN for java) came to life. > -

Re: [Fwd: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info]

Anil. That was a question, not a stated comment about his mother. It was said in such a way as to show that if I had commented about his mother, it would be as low as telling someone to shut up. -jon on 1/16/01 12:46 AM, "Anil Vijendran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jon Stevens wrote: > >> on

BugRat Report #781 has been filed.

Bug report #781 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #781 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: serious Co

BugRat Report #780 has been filed.

Bug report #780 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #780 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: medium Severity: non-crit

Re: IM LOST, ERROR 500????

Delivery failure: javax.mail.MessagingException: 452 Filesystem error - message not accepted Delivery failure: javax.mail.MessagingException: 452 Filesystem error - message not accepted Delivery failure: javax.mail.MessagingException: 452 Filesystem error - message not accepted Hi Im writi

RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info - Is more than just 3.x vs 4.x

Don't forget about that : PRE-MEETING FESTIVITIES: Before the meeting, Jon Stevens and I welcome you to come to CollabNet and discuss ideas for a CJAN implementation for managing Java JAR libraries. I'm sure that we'd also like to talk about Sam's tinderbox ideas as these ideas a

Tomcat / Configuration / Setting a java system property ...

Hi!   We are using Apache/Tomcat and now we would like to specify a Java System Property to our JVM workers.   We have tried ..     worker..sysprops=propname=propvalue   .. within the "workers.properties" file but with no luck!   Can anyone out there help us?   Thanks in advance, Gunnar Eketr

RE: [Fwd: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info]

> -Original Message- > From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 06:05 > > on 1/15/01 9:03 PM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The reasons why there are advantages for (at least) the next year or so > > on having both 3.3 and 4.x were

RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info

>Hans Bergsten wrote: > >> The way I feel right now is that the best way to answer >> this question is by a vote on this list, where all +1 >> votes for TC 3.3 also means a commitment to help fix bugs >> in TC 3.3. > +1 . I'd like to see a beta release of 3.3. We could see and compare after. D

RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info

I am terribly sorry Sam. It was Larry. Sorry again, Paulo > -Original Message- > From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 08:46 > > > Paulo Gaspar wrote: > > > > Sam and others already stated that 3.3 is easier to maintain. > > They did take a look at t

BugRat Report #778 has been filed.

Bug report #778 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #778 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: critical C

Re: [Fwd: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info]

Jon Stevens wrote: > on 1/15/01 9:51 PM, "Anil Vijendran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Talking about someone's mother is just not kosher. > > I didn't talk about his mother. I'm simply showing the immaturity and > rudeness of telling someone to shut up. What do you mean by "I didn't talk"??

Proposed name encoding patch

Hello, This is my first posting to this list so please bare with me. We are having problems with the jsp name mangling (bug 330 at http://znutar.cortexity.com/BugRatViewer/ShowReport/330). Every '/' or '_' char in the jsp path is converted to 6 chars which easily extend the file path beyond Win

Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info

Hans Bergsten wrote: > > Great. As have been said a few times, you can do > that as a revolution using a different name than > Tomcat within the Jakarta project. +1. - Sam Ruby - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For a

Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info - What happens if a 3.3 proposal getsa -1

Hans Bersten wrote: > > Unless another committer can convince whoever votes > -1 to change his vote, it means that 3.3 will not > happen. Instead we will continue to maintain the > 3.x code base based on 3.2.1. That's how decision > making is defined for this project, see > >

Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info

Hans Bergsten wrote: > The way I feel right now is that the best way to answer > this question is by a vote on this list, where all +1 > votes for TC 3.3 also means a commitment to help fix bugs > in TC 3.3. +1 . That's the right body (the committers of Tomcat) to make this decision, IMHO. -

Re: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info

Jon Stevens wrote: > > Costin, this has been like you since I have known you. You > are an excellent developer in that you can work on your own, > but when it comes to working within a project or group of > people where you need to ask the opinions of others and then > take those seriously, I have

RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info

Paulo Gaspar wrote: > > Sam and others already stated that 3.3 is easier to maintain. > They did take a look at the code. Not me. - Sam Ruby - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PR

Re: Stop! Re: [Fwd: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info]

on 1/15/01 11:17 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll just set a filter - and I advise you do the same. I'm going to ignore > any posting Jon does, and I'll avoid any project where he's involved. Again. More censorship. -jon ---

Re: [Fwd: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info]

on 1/15/01 9:51 PM, "Anil Vijendran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Talking about someone's mother is just not kosher. I didn't talk about his mother. I'm simply showing the immaturity and rudeness of telling someone to shut up. -jon -