costin 01/01/27 21:54:35
Added: src/share/org/apache/jasper JasperEngineContext.java
JasperOptionsImpl.java
src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler JasperMangler.java
Log:
JspInterceptor: adding support for all options supported by Jasper.
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> Then those jar files and class files need to be in a directory that won't
possibly
> conflict with jasper if a user has a directory named "classes" in the root
of
> their context which contains JSP's. Please use WEB-INF/lib and
WEB-INF/classes
> in the work dir context
Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > I updated Tomcat 4 which has the new code that allows running directly
> > from a WAR file. A few comments about this.
> >
> > I will refer to the 'examples' context in my comments.
> >
> > The directory 'work/localhost/examples/classes is created for
> > the contents
> I updated Tomcat 4 which has the new code that allows running directly
> from a WAR file. A few comments about this.
>
> I will refer to the 'examples' context in my comments.
>
> The directory 'work/localhost/examples/classes is created for
> the contents of 'webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes.
I updated Tomcat 4 which has the new code that allows running directly
from a WAR file. A few comments about this.
I will refer to the 'examples' context in my comments.
The directory 'work/localhost/examples/classes is created for
the contents of 'webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes.
First, what
> > Bruce Eckel on his book "Thinking in Java" states that a simple
> > method call (no parameters) takes 5.9 units of time while a
> > synchronized method call takes 570. OTOH, object creation takes
> > 980 which makes it an even worse alternative.
>
> Normally I would say that numbers such as t
I get internal server error if i modify and apply the status of an
ApJServHost to take it away from the balancing. The jserv and tomcat
configuration works. But i can not shutdown any host.
Can i use mod_jserv for this or must i use mod_jk?
I use TC 3.2.1 and JServ 1.1.2.
Arne
Germany
I am new to tomcat.
I use tomcat3.2.1 binary version to install tomcat and
found the request.getPathInfo() always return null, no
matter it is in JSP or servlet. I simply add a line in
the HelloWorldExample.java and it print null. I read
from the past mail-archives that it is normal in
Hi,
There seems to be a problem with the zip file for Tomcat 3.2.1 available at
the jakarta.apache.org. It doesn't contain the file xml.jar because of
which an exception is thrown and the server doesn't start. I tried putting
the 3.1 xml.jar file in the lib directory but still some exception was
Daer Sir,
This is in reference to the documentation regarding configuring apache 1.3.9
and tomcat3.0. The above matter is highly appreciable and i have tested the
above configuration succesfully.
This is to inform you the other configuration which i have tested
independently i.e. tomcat3.2.1
Title: FW: BugRat Report #418 - Problem with include directive
<>
Hi, there,
I download the Tomcat 3.2.1 on Window2000. I want to use its JSPC compiler to compiler some JSP files.
I have c:\test\boo\foo1.jsp and c:\test\boo\foo2.jsp. foo1.jsp use JSP include directive
<%@include file="fo
larryi 01/01/27 10:42:26
Modified:.STATUS.html
Log:
Add usability enhancements action item offered by Costin.
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +10 -1 jakarta-tomcat/STATUS.html
Index: STATUS.html
=
larryi 01/01/27 10:41:05
Modified:src/tests/webpages/WEB-INF test-tomcat.xml
Log:
Add revision property.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +2 -1 jakarta-tomcat/src/tests/webpages/WEB-INF/test-tomcat.xml
Index: test-tomcat.xml
===
larryi 01/01/27 10:39:33
Modified:src/admin/WEB-INF/classes/tadm GTestTEI.java GTestTag.java
src/admin/test test.jsp
Log:
Update GTestTag to add a gtestTestRevision attribute that retrieves the
"revision" property from the test file, if present. If not present, it
This is a patch against cvs head to autogenerate ajpv13
support for Apache, if the ajpv13 module has been loaded.
Also, update server.xml to show ajpv13 support.
http://www.apache.org/~keith/jk/config.txt
Keith
-
To unsubscrib
Paulo Gaspar wrote:
>
> Bruce Eckel on his book "Thinking in Java" states that a simple
> method call (no parameters) takes 5.9 units of time while a
> synchronized method call takes 570. OTOH, object creation takes
> 980 which makes it an even worse alternative.
Normally I would say that numbers
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> Matthias, I just checked in a change to do exactly this, which will show up in
> tonight's nightly build of Tomcat 4.0. Could you please try it and ensure that
> it fixes your problem?
Tried it. All works fine now. The SessionID gets proberly ad
I got this as a private reply, but I believe that it is of general
interest.
- Sam Ruby
Brian Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/27/2001 07:40:54 AM
To: Sam Ruby/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc:
Subject: Re: Thread-safety
> Hmm. Obviously this subject is much more subtle that I expected. Thanks
> fo
Bruce Eckel on his book "Thinking in Java" states that a simple method call
(no parameters) takes 5.9 units of time while a synchronized method call
takes
570. OTOH, object creation takes 980 which makes it an even worse
alternative.
(The used time unit is the time spent to perform a local assign
Brian Goetz wrote:
>
> This statement is true, but very easy to misinterpret; be careful.
> You can't use this to make an end-run around the problem in the
> general case. If jspx_init() creates any objects, you've gotta
> synchronize, plain and simple. If jspx_init() calculates
> multiple primi
20 matches
Mail list logo