[Bug 3591] - HttpServletResponse.sendError() and sendRedirect() should commit the response

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3591 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: Tomcat4-RC1: parse exception on taglibs

2001-09-14 Thread Remy Maucherat
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Yesterday, I added an update to Embedded.start() to set catalina.base to the value of catalina.home if it's not already set. That way, others won't get bit by this one. Yes, I saw the commit message in CVS, which hinted that I should do it manually with RC1.

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread jean-frederic clere
Pier Fumagalli wrote: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi to all, I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java, and didn't find reference to SSL informations forwarded from WebServer. Should it be fixed before release since it may break the spec ? I could grab code from

[Bug 3581] - Ctx() : Error creating validation mark - java.io.FileNotFoundException

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

Re: Tomcat 4 Documentation

2001-09-14 Thread TAKAHASHI Hideo(BSD-M1G)
OK, I checked the nightly build. I have to say sorry because I found out another table tag that needs to be fixed the same way. The one inside subsection also needs to be changed to avoid clipping. I think I lost track of what I modified in my first report. I should have used diff or

RE: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
So, IMO, it's a win-win situation... JK can support all web-servers and all old protocols, it's tested, it works, we just need to make it able to talk the new AJPv14/WARP protocol and can be used as the strong foundation. WebApp will talk only AJPv14/WARP, based on APR, and only ported to

[Bug 3600] New: - /etc/rc.d scripts of the rpm

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3600 Summary: /etc/rc.d scripts of the rpm Product: Tomcat 3 Version: 3.3 Beta 2 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: Other

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0 Release Candidate 2 Available

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Where could we find even mod_webapp code ? - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6

[Bug 3602] New: - Tomcat is enabled by default after an rpm install

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3602 Summary: Tomcat is enabled by default after an rpm install Product: Tomcat 3 Version: 3.3 Beta 2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement

[Bug 3602] - Tomcat is enabled by default after an rpm install

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3602 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-09-14 01:15 --- For security reasons services are not enabled by default on modern distributions. It is not the case with the tomcat rpms. Could this be changed ?

RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
7. Evaluate whether anything should be done to deal with the use of non-thread-safe DateFormat and related classes. The Date used in Http10 connector response, is allready handled by stuff I commited some time ago which use a speed hack and return allready processed date String if it was

RE: [Bug 3600] New: - /etc/rc.d scripts of the rpm

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi man, I'm learning to you. What do you want exactly ? Move tomcat configuration to /etc ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 10:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Bug 3600] New: - /etc/rc.d scripts of the rpm

Tomcat is enabled by default after an rpm

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Another one related to rpm :) What the problem having tomcat enable after a rpm install ? That's exactly the same thing when you install Apache on sendmail !!! - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD

FW: configuration of mod_jk and tomcat-4.0

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Forwarded to tomcat-dev !!! -Original Message- From: Jesse Farley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: configuration of mod_jk and tomcat-4.0 Greetings, First, I'd normally opt to figure out this problem by myself, but

[Bug 3604] New: - /etc/rc.d scripts and stop command

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3604 Summary: /etc/rc.d scripts and stop command Product: Tomcat 3 Version: 3.3 Beta 2 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other

RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0. To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE. Yes, will do... Check out # 3510... You'll have also to grab other information like cipher suite used and bit size of the algorithm SPEC 2.3 : SRV.4.7

[Bug 3606] New: - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3606 Summary: Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant Product: Tomcat 3 Version: 3.3 Beta 2 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other

RE: [Bug 3606] New: - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Could you stop mark as bug things which are only just requests of features. Thanks - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6

[Bug 3606] - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3606 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Normal |Enhancement

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread jean-frederic clere
GOMEZ Henri wrote: It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0. To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE. Yes, will do... Check out # 3510... You'll have also to grab other information like cipher suite used and bit size of the

[Bug 3600] - /etc/rc.d scripts of the rpm

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3600 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-09-14 03:29 --- Created an attachment (id=536) Proposed /etc/rc.d/init.d/tomcat

[Bug 3600] - /etc/rc.d scripts of the rpm

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3600 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-09-14 03:30 --- Created an attachment (id=537) Proposed /etc/tomcat.conf

[Bug 3608] New: - invalid parameter parsing

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3608 Summary: invalid parameter parsing Product: Tomcat 3 Version: 3.3 Beta 2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other

[PATCH] TC 3.3: ServletHandler

2001-09-14 Thread Bojan Smojver
If debugging is enabled and sw is null, it blows up (NPE). Patch follows. Bojan --- /home/groups/devel/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat/src/facade22/org/apache/tomcat/facade/ServletHandler.java Mon Jul 23 09:00:00 2001 +++ jakarta-tomcat/src/facade22/org/apache/tomcat/facade/ServletHandler.javaFri

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c

2001-09-14 Thread jfclere
jfclere 01/09/14 04:15:00 Modified:jk/java/org/apache/ajp Ajp13.java jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c Log: Arrange the KEY_SIZE_ATTR. (Note it is for TC4.0). Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +5 -2

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread jean-frederic clere
Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote: GOMEZ Henri wrote: It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0. To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE. Yes, will do... Check out # 3510... You'll have also to grab other information like

[Bug 3608] - invalid parameter parsing

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3608 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/facade22/org/apache/tomcat/facade ServletHandler.java

2001-09-14 Thread larryi
larryi 01/09/14 05:09:27 Modified:src/facade22/org/apache/tomcat/facade ServletHandler.java Log: Avoid NPE. Submitted by: Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Revision ChangesPath 1.16 +1 -1

RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
About SSL_KEY_SIZE I have just noted I have committed a wrong code... I will redo the things in some minutes ;-( I had to add SL_A_SSL_KEYSIZE from the apj14 protocol to apj13 otherwise we cannot fill javax.servlet.request.key_size. Warning, original ajp13 didn't support SSL_A_SSL_KEYSIZE

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Warning, Read my previous mail about adding new features to AJP13 which are unknown to current Tomcat 3.2/3.3 - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53

[Bug 3589] - Cannot process Taglib TLD when deployed through EmbeddedManager MBean

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3589 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread jean-frederic clere
GOMEZ Henri wrote: About SSL_KEY_SIZE I have just noted I have committed a wrong code... I will redo the things in some minutes ;-( I had to add SL_A_SSL_KEYSIZE from the apj14 protocol to apj13 otherwise we cannot fill javax.servlet.request.key_size. Warning, original ajp13 didn't

RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Should we had this attribute to JT also to avoid broke TC 3.2/3.3 when using mod_jk from JTC ? Would it be possible to ignore this attribute in TC 3.2/3.3? The problem is that the current ajp13 java implementation TC 3.2/3.3 ignore this attribute and will fail to decode the stream and will

Tomcat4+JBoss integration

2001-09-14 Thread Rickard Öberg
Hey FYI, I just committed new Catalina integration code to JBoss' CVS. This will make it possible to use Catalina/Tomcat4 from within JBoss for deployment of WAR's or EAR's. See jboss-dev mailing list (archives are available) for slightly more info. There will probably not be a binary with this

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread jean-frederic clere
GOMEZ Henri wrote: Should we had this attribute to JT also to avoid broke TC 3.2/3.3 when using mod_jk from JTC ? Would it be possible to ignore this attribute in TC 3.2/3.3? The problem is that the current ajp13 java implementation TC 3.2/3.3 ignore this attribute and will fail to

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi to all, I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java, and didn't find reference to SSL informations forwarded from WebServer. Should it be fixed before release since it may

RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
+ForwardSSLKeySize You mean adding a configuration parameter like JkForwardSSLKeySize with default value Off? Yes

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, IMO, it's a win-win situation... JK can support all web-servers and all old protocols, it's tested, it works, we just need to make it able to talk the new AJPv14/WARP protocol and can be used as the strong foundation. WebApp will talk only

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0 Release Candidate 2 Available

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where could we find even mod_webapp code ? The JAVA code is compiled in... The C code comes from J-T-C and there's not yet a tag... There are few NASTY-NASTY-NASTY bugs I need to fix before going out... Pier

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0. To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE. Yes, will do... Check out # 3510... You'll have also to grab other information like cipher suite used and bit

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: GOMEZ Henri wrote: It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0. To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE. Yes, will do... Check out # 3510... You'll have also to grab other information

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi to all, I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java, and didn't find reference to SSL informations forwarded from WebServer. Should it be fixed before release since it may

RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I think there a little more missing: - SSL_CLIENT_CERT_CHAIN_n (n is a number). - The user certificate object stored by mod_jk is a String not a X509Certificate - I have prepared a patch for it - Patch for WebApp or JK, BTW? I'm starting to get confused :) JF talk about mod_jk and also

PATCH: Tomcat 4 - Walkaround for Netscape Navigator's charsetmisrecognition

2001-09-14 Thread Kazuhiro Kazama
This is a walkaround patch for the Netscape Navigator's the following problem: If a Web server sends a redirect reply (302) with charset, Netscape Navigator 4.x misrecognizes Web page's charset as the redirect header's charset, not the Web page's charset. For example, Tomcat 4 redirect a

[Bug 3611] New: - TEST BUG (Please Ignore) (Do not reply)

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3611. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3611] - TEST BUG (Please Ignore)

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3611. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3611] - TEST BUG (Please Ignore)

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3611. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG

Re: [Bug 3600] New: - /etc/rc.d scripts of the rpm

2001-09-14 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le 2001.09.14 10:20, GOMEZ Henri a écrit : Hi man, I'm learning to you. What do you want exactly ? Move tomcat configuration to /etc ? Well that would be also great (missed this one, damned:) What this bug is about is just moving ***

Re: Tomcat is enabled by default after an rpm

2001-09-14 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le 2001.09.14 10:21, GOMEZ Henri a écrit : Another one related to rpm :) That's my day, sorry. Been thinking about reporting this for some time:) What the problem having tomcat enable after a rpm install ? Bad for security ie you might do a batch install of a lot of rpms and want to

Re: [Bug 3606] New: - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant

2001-09-14 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le 2001.09.14 11:10, GOMEZ Henri a écrit : Could you stop mark as bug things which are only just requests of features. Sorry, forgot about this one (did so for the others, though) -- Nicolas Mailhot

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3612] New: - getServletPath() method returns wrong value

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3612. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

remote tomcat worker help?

2001-09-14 Thread Dan Mellen
I am running Solaris 2.6 and iPlanet Web Server 4.1. I have compiled the nsapi_redirector.so and am now trying to get the servlet piece working. I would like to have Tomcat 3.2.3 running on a DIFFERENT machine process the servlet requests and was wondering if this was possible? Does anyone

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3613] New: - webdav bugs in some operations

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3613. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread jean-frederic clere
GOMEZ Henri wrote: I think there a little more missing: - SSL_CLIENT_CERT_CHAIN_n (n is a number). - The user certificate object stored by mod_jk is a String not a X509Certificate - I have prepared a patch for it - Patch for WebApp or JK, BTW? I'm starting to get confused :)

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3611] - TEST BUG (Please Ignore)

2001-09-14 Thread jean-frederic clere
Pier Fumagalli wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3611. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-14 Thread jean-frederic clere
GOMEZ Henri wrote: WebApp will talk only AJPv14/WARP, based on APR, and only ported to Apache 1.3 and 2.0, when we're happy with it, with the 3.3 implementation of AJPv14/WARP, with the new/revised/corrected APR-based API, we can start porting all other stuff over, and in 12 years

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3614] New: - bug in manager webapp

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3614. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-14 Thread cmanolache
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote: Maybe to you, but buddy Costin doesn't like it... :) No I'm sure Costin like the merge, and I like you all comment the following timing : I like the merge, I don't like the idea of moving all jk features over to webapp ( and not on the

RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote: Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 10:37:47 +0200 From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0 It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0. To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3617] New: - null in JasperException

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3617. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server PoolTcpConnector.java

2001-09-14 Thread hgomez
hgomez 01/09/14 08:54:26 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server PoolTcpConnector.java Log: Typo fix (it's cosmetic Nacho) Revision ChangesPath 1.10 +2 -2

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp13Packet.java

2001-09-14 Thread hgomez
hgomez 01/09/14 08:57:45 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp13Packet.java Log: Fix for bug #2927. When a non ajp13 packet header is sent on an ajp13 connection, we don't try to dump it (it's just only 4 bytes !=) Revision ChangesPath 1.4

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp13Interceptor.java

2001-09-14 Thread hgomez
hgomez 01/09/14 08:58:58 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp13Interceptor.java Log: Pass debug flag from data set in server.xml to Ajp13/Ajp13Request. Very usefull in debug stage Revision ChangesPath 1.15 +16 -6

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp13.java

2001-09-14 Thread hgomez
hgomez 01/09/14 09:01:21 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp13.java Log: Solid reworks to better handle comm part. We don't try to handle partial packet, use of readN to ensure having all data in packets (even in header which is 4 bytes long)

Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-14 Thread Mike Anderson
You can hunt me down, just use tranquilizers when you find me :-) All of the modifications for graceful restart were done in the 3.3 codebase. Most of them were done by Henri Gomez. I just put in a couple of patches for error conditions. 3.2.x still doesn't have these fixes in them, but they

StandardManager : Session expiry thread.

2001-09-14 Thread David Lecomber
[tomcat 4.0-rc2] It's possible for the session expiring thread to not catch an exception - thrown within session.expire - which then stops this thread and means all other sessions are not expired (forever!) at

RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
You can hunt me down, just use tranquilizers when you find me :-) All of the modifications for graceful restart were done in the 3.3 codebase. Most of them were done by Henri Gomez. I just put in a couple of patches for error conditions. 3.2.x still doesn't have these fixes in them, but

Specification question.

2001-09-14 Thread Colin Wilson-Salt
I know this probably isn't the correct place to ask this, but I reckon you guys are probably the most qualified to answer it: Am I allowed to include and forward between servlet contexts? i.e. Am I allowed to write a method like this: private void include(ServletRequest request,

Re: StandardManager : Session expiry thread.

2001-09-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, David Lecomber wrote: Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 17:21:06 +0100 From: David Lecomber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: StandardManager : Session expiry thread. [tomcat 4.0-rc2] It's possible for the session

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3612] - getServletPath() method returns wrong value

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3612. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets WebdavServlet.java

2001-09-14 Thread remm
remm01/09/14 09:45:33 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets WebdavServlet.java Log: - Forgot to backport some code from Slide. - Now, the protocol name is not hardcoded when parsing a destination header, so it fixes problems when

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3613] - webdav bugs in some operations

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3613. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_global.h

2001-09-14 Thread hgomez
hgomez 01/09/14 10:45:15 Modified:jk/native/apache-1.3 mod_jk.c jk/native/common jk_global.h Log: Add JkSetOptions Revision ChangesPath 1.15 +111 -40 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-1.3/mod_jk.c Index: mod_jk.c

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/common jk_global.h jk_service.h

2001-09-14 Thread hgomez
hgomez 01/09/14 10:47:58 Modified:src/native/mod_jk/apache1.3 mod_jk.c src/native/mod_jk/common jk_global.h jk_service.h Log: Add JkOptions Directive. You could use now +ForwardUnparsedUri to send URI as unparsed to follow spec or -ForwardUnparsedUri to send URI

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session LocalStrings.properties StandardManager.java

2001-09-14 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc01/09/14 10:48:59 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session LocalStrings.properties StandardManager.java Log: Catch and log exceptions thrown by session.expire() in the manager's expiration thread, to avoid such an exception causing

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_global.h

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Oups in fact it JkOptions ::: with options : +ForwardUnparsed = Forward URI as unparsed, spec compliant but broke mod_rewrite -ForwardUnparsed = Forward URI normally, less spec compliant but mod_rewrite compatible +ForwardSSLKeySize = Forward SSL Key Size, to follow 2.3 specs but may broke

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) Release TC 3.3/4.0 DOH! :) 2) Start to think on how to merge AJP14/WARP Let me know when 3) Add the AJP14-WARP protocol to mod_jk and mod_webapp (adaptation) I'll keep track of the protocol modifications in TC4 and WebApp 4) Add APR to

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/bin catalina.sh

2001-09-14 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc01/09/14 13:01:21 Modified:.RELEASE-PLAN-4.0.txt catalina/src/bin catalina.sh Log: Eliminate use of pushd and popd in the implementation of the debug option, because it is not supported on all shells. Submitted by: Patrick Luby [EMAIL

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs manager-howto.xml

2001-09-14 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc01/09/14 13:08:01 Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs manager-howto.xml Log: Correct the syntax of jar: URLs that reference a local or remote web application archive (WAR) file. Submitted by: Jeff Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +5 -2

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs tomcat-docs.xsl

2001-09-14 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc01/09/14 13:19:10 Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs tomcat-docs.xsl Log: Remove remaining width=100% declarations on inner table elements, in the section and subsection templates. This will have negative visual impacts, but only in the very few cases where there is less

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardWrapperValve.java

2001-09-14 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc01/09/14 13:30:01 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardWrapperValve.java Log: Do not set a character type in the default page created for an HTTP status code. In particular, this avoids problems with Netscape Navigator 4.x

Re: Specification question.

2001-09-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Sounds like a better place to ask would be TOMCAT-USER. On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Colin Wilson-Salt wrote: Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 17:26:32 +0100 From: Colin Wilson-Salt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Specification question. I know this probably

[PATCH] Make getDateHeader Thread-safe TC3.3B2

2001-09-14 Thread Bill Barker
These should satisfy Larry's item #7. I've simply added synchronized blocks to DateTool.formatOldCookie, since I'm fairly certain that there currently is no path to these functions (so it can't hurt anything). ** This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above

Re: Tomcat Service Manager

2001-09-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Dave Oxley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Here is the code for the TC Service Manager. Would anyone like to check it into jakarta-tomcat-service? ...or even just take a look at it. Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dave, I'm going to check it out after I finish tackling my WebApp bugs

RE: FW: configuration of mod_jk and tomcat-4.0

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
A big thanks to Craig which give the good information on how to use mod_jk with Tomcat 4.0 -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 10:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW:

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c jk_ajp_common.h

2001-09-14 Thread hgomez
hgomez 01/09/14 15:30:05 Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c jk_ajp_common.h Log: Update information on when SSL_KEY_SIZE is sent to Tomcat Server via the use of JkOptions +ForwardKeySize Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +2 -2

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-1.3 mod_jk.c

2001-09-14 Thread hgomez
hgomez 01/09/14 15:31:36 Modified:jk/native/apache-1.3 mod_jk.c Log: Complete the support of chunk encoding and add the required content-length which is now required by recent ajp13 present in JT and which will soon be ported to JTC for at least TC 4.0 use (candidate here

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c

2001-09-14 Thread hgomez
hgomez 01/09/14 15:32:19 Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c Log: Complete the support of chunk encoding and add the required content-length which is now required by recent ajp13 present in JT and which will soon be ported to JTC for at least TC 4.0 use (candidate here

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.h

2001-09-14 Thread hgomez
hgomez 01/09/14 15:34:11 Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.h Log: Fix the double /* which could broke some C compilers Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.h Index: jk_ajp_common.h

RE: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I feel we'll need some schemas on mod_jk workers and webapp broker to see how to better understand them :) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B

[PATCH] BullPointerException in JakataCommentGenerator

2001-09-14 Thread Kin-Man Chung
This patch fixes #3079 misto% runsocks cvs diff -u Parser.java Index: Parser.java === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler/P arser.java,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.12

[J-T-C] Apache 2.0 code review required

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi to all, I've just commited updated code for Apache 1.3/2.0 I will need a serious code review on Apache 2.0 part and particulary the ws_read() which was grabbed from 1.3 and works (at least on Apache 2.0.24) but may be optimized... === static int JK_METHOD ws_read(jk_ws_service_t *s,

Re: Tomcat Service Manager

2001-09-14 Thread Dave Oxley
Pier, Yeah, it's all in C++. Sorry about that :( It's very much for Windows only and it doesn't talk to Tomcat directly, only the Windows Service API. In fact it's hardly Tomcat specific at all. I have been using it this week at work and find it really useful to monitor the state of my

Re: [J-T-C] Apache 2.0 code review required

2001-09-14 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 12:50:27AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote: Hi to all, I've just commited updated code for Apache 1.3/2.0 I will need a serious code review on Apache 2.0 part and particulary the ws_read() which was grabbed from 1.3 and works (at least on Apache 2.0.24) but may be

RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
1798 Tomcat 3.2.2b5 with Apache and ajp13 stops responding after This one is very difficult to reproduce (I never succeed). We need more information on configuration. May be related with CHUNKED. I'd like to see bug reporter to test against latest TC 3.3 Did your attempts include 3.2.2

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-1.3 mod_jk.c

2001-09-14 Thread Schreibman, David
Hi, Shouldn't content-length be Content-Length? Or are the headers already forced to lowercase elsewhere? Or how about a case insensitive comparison to be nice -David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 3:32 PM

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-1.3 mo d_jk.c

2001-09-14 Thread Schreibman, David
OK, Sorry. It's right there in front of me! Been a long week ... -David -Original Message- From: Schreibman, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 4:07 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: cvs commit:

RE: [J-T-C] Apache 2.0 code review required

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi to all, I've just commited updated code for Apache 1.3/2.0 I will need a serious code review on Apache 2.0 part and particulary the ws_read() which was grabbed from 1.3 and works (at least on Apache 2.0.24) but may be optimized... snip, snip ws_write() could need also a serious

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-1.3 mo d_jk.c

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
OK, Sorry. It's right there in front of me! Been a long week ... For some it was even longer... What do you think of the CHUNK code, David ? -David -Original Message- From: Schreibman, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 4:07 PM To: '[EMAIL

Re: [J-T-C] Apache 2.0 code review required

2001-09-14 Thread cmanolache
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Since you have a common infrastructure via callbacks, I don't think you can take advantage of a lot of the new features in Apache 2.0. Oh, well. -- justin Well, we should be able to. We can just add more callbacks - and make sure the code that

  1   2   >