RE: IIS and TC4

2001-11-15 Thread Kevin Jones
Thank you, Kevin Jones Developmentor www.develop.com -Original Message- From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 November 2001 22:30 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: IIS and TC4 sorry to ask on this list as this is really a user question, but I'm not on

tomcat 4.01 SSL stop work

2001-11-15 Thread 123times . com webmaster
I run tomcat 4.01 in Solaris under JDK1.4. after i start tomcat ,http and https is work well, but after a minutes,https is unable to connect use by ie,but http is still visitable. Then i telnet to 443,It's have echo. Who can help me to resolve it. Thanks all.

Re: Portable SSL Support

2001-11-15 Thread jean-frederic clere
Bill Barker wrote: This is for TC 3.3. As a result, we are only required to expose the certificates. However, there is nothing that prevents exposing other request attributes as a non-portable feature (and Ajp13 JNI already do this). For TC 3.3: I would advice to follow 2.3 when

Re: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management revisited

2001-11-15 Thread Mika Goeckel
Costin, that point of view is really interesting. What about separating the distribution part from the integration part of a integrated solution. That would user's give the option to use the transparent session replication or to use explicit object replication services. The former would ease

Re: Portable SSL Support

2001-11-15 Thread jean-frederic clere
Eric Rescorla wrote: Eric Rescorla wrote: jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Eric Rescorla wrote: With JDK 1.1.x and AJP a null is returned. With JDK 1.1.x should the CC be returned as a String? (I thought it was). It's certainly not in the JSSE code I was

Re: Distributed Session Management

2001-11-15 Thread Mika Goeckel
Tom, from my (personal?!) philosophy, tests should be with the tested targets. My experience tells me that tests get out of focus if they are in a separate tree. Now when you are going to start hacking, is your approach creating use cases, sequence diagrams etc. before, or something like class

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3509] - Apache 1.3.20 mod_webapp Tomcat 4b7 HANGS under Win

2001-11-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3509. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

AW: Distributed Session Management

2001-11-15 Thread Lauer, Oliver
Hi, if I can help please tell. Oliver AXA eSolutions GmbH AXA Konzern AG Germany Oliver Lauer Web Architect Wörthstraße 34 D-50668 Köln Germany Tel.: +49 221 148 31277 Fax: +49 221 148 43963 Mobil: +49 179 59 064 59 e-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4887] New: - catalina / LocalStrings_es.properties needs update

2001-11-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4887. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4887] - catalina / LocalStrings_es.properties needs update

2001-11-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4887. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4891] New: - Tyrex's EnabledDataSource cannot find JDBC driver's class placed in $CATALINA_HOME/lib

2001-11-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4891. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Default policy file for TC4 - excessive permissions

2001-11-15 Thread Antony Bowesman
The catalina.policy file gives AllPermissions to the webapp shared lib/classes directories by default. Isn't this too liberal. Shouldn't the policy file explicitly name the 3 jars with the default 4.0.1 distribution in lib. Rgds Antony -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: Portable SSL Support

2001-11-15 Thread costinm
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote: Yes, but the question is what does it costs to setAttribute each time we process a request even if the servlet does not do a getAttribute. Yes, this is a good point. This suggests that we ought to just expose SSLSupport as a single

Re: Portable SSL Support

2001-11-15 Thread costinm
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Paul Speed wrote: Eric Rescorla wrote: [snip] To be consistant with 2.3 containers, I'd go with individually named attributes. Fine with me. Anyone object to this? -Ekr I'm confused. Is this for Tomcat 3.x or Tomcat 4.x? I thought it was the former,

Re: Portable SSL Support

2001-11-15 Thread costinm
On 14 Nov 2001, Eric Rescorla wrote: Well, I suppose that since JDK 1.1.x didn't stop you from putting classes in java. I could do my own version of java.security.cert.X509Certificate. A little gross but perhaps the best plan. The alternative is to blatantly violate the spec in 1.1 and just

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4893] New: - Tomcat dies with following error..

2001-11-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4893. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management revisited

2001-11-15 Thread Tom Drake
Mika, Costin: While pondering things yesterday, the thought occured to me as well, perhaps this whole notion of distributed management had a wider application (beyond simply HttpSessions). Having said that. I disagree, that Tomcat should expose an 'object replication service' api to

Re: Distributed Session Management

2001-11-15 Thread Tom Drake
Mika: - Original Message - From: Mika Goeckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tom Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:31 AM Subject: Re: Distributed Session Management | Tom, | | from my (personal?!) philosophy, tests should be

Re: Distributed Session Management

2001-11-15 Thread Paul Speed
The only problem with including the tests right in the same package is that they can be hard to remove for a test-free distribution. Also, since they are in the same package, they have access to some non-public methods and properties... this can make them a security risk in some cases

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native build.properties.sample

2001-11-15 Thread mmanders
mmanders01/11/15 11:37:42 Modified:jk/native build.properties.sample Log: Added defaults for netscape and windows. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +10 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/build.properties.sample Index: build.properties.sample

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native build.xml

2001-11-15 Thread mmanders
mmanders01/11/15 11:38:02 Modified:jk/native build.xml Log: Added target for building netscape binaries. Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +134 -19 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/build.xml Index: build.xml

Re: Distributed Session Management

2001-11-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Paul Speed wrote: Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:40:35 -0500 From: Paul Speed [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Distributed Session Management The only problem with including the

Re: Distributed Session Management Unit tests

2001-11-15 Thread Tom Drake
- Original Message - From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:39 AM Subject: Re: Distributed Session Management | | | On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Paul Speed wrote: | | Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:40:35 -0500 |

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4891] - Tyrex's EnabledDataSource cannot find JDBC driver's class placed in $CATALINA_HOME/lib

2001-11-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4891. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Distributed Session Management

2001-11-15 Thread Paul Speed
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Paul Speed wrote: Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:40:35 -0500 From: Paul Speed [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Distributed Session Management

RE: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management revisited

2001-11-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Costin, that point of view is really interesting. What about separating the distribution part from the integration part of a integrated solution. That would user's give the option to use the transparent session replication or to use explicit object replication services. The former would

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly

2001-11-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly

2001-11-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Ajp14 and Ajp13

2001-11-15 Thread cmanolache
Hi, Right now we treat Ajp13 and 14 as 2 separate workers ( even if most of the code is shared). The problem is that this adds complexity that we could avoid. Given that Ajp14 is not 'official' yet, I would propose to change it to Ajp14 == Ajp13 + extra functions. We should use exactly the

Re: Ajp14 and Ajp13

2001-11-15 Thread Bill Barker
I'm in favor of this, since the protocol is only being extended, not really changed. However, I think that one of the extensions that should be implemented early on is a version negotiation so that the newer side can gracefully degrade in the future without having to rely on the user changing

Re: Ajp14 and Ajp13

2001-11-15 Thread costinm
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Bill Barker wrote: I'm in favor of this, since the protocol is only being extended, not really changed. However, I think that one of the extensions that should be implemented early on is a version negotiation so that the newer side can gracefully degrade in the future

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader StandardClassLoader.java

2001-11-15 Thread remm
remm01/11/15 17:21:51 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader Tag: tomcat_40_branch StandardClassLoader.java Log: - Port fix for a race condition in the SCL, where defineClass could be called multiple times on the same class.

Re: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management revisited

2001-11-15 Thread Tom Drake
Understood. I'm looking at a locking mechanism (with a configurable timeout). I'll be sending some diagrams and interface specs out in the next day or two. Tom - Original Message - From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tom Drake

Off for quite a while...

2001-11-15 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Folks, it's time for me to reorganize my life (I'm sure you understand), so I'm going to take it slow and easy and be off for quite some time. I'm planning to do some traveling over the next month, with random internet access (depends a lot on what I get when I'm there - Fellow Titanium is coming

Re: Off for quite a while...

2001-11-15 Thread Tonia A. Flores
Well, I hope enjoy the holidays and the travel. :-) That Mac price -I get the homer award for that one. I didn't realize that site holds the previous selection so that when I went back in I was setup to purchase 2-machines with extra stuff. Probably better to take an extended vaction -one

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4386] - webapp1.0 will not install on Redhat 7.1

2001-11-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4386. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.