De: John Gregg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: martes 5 de marzo de 2002 1:27
in the layout of one's users and roles tables. The current
implementation
(1.20) assumes the roles table will have a column with the
same name and
meaning as the username column in the users table. In
A RPM is allready available for mx4j 1.0b3,
at www.jpackage.org, should I upload it also
to jakarta ?
And should we add it to TC 4.0.4 and 4.1, in LE mode,
since it's a full OSS solution ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP
Hi to all,
As you may know, my Tomcat 4 rpms change the listen port
from 8080 to 8180, 8081 to 8181, 8082 to 8182, 8443 to 8543
and 8009 to 8109 to help people have at both time
Tomcat 3.x and 4.x
I've got many reports from users complaining that the
online documentation indicate standard
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6709.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
larryi 02/03/05 05:04:52
Modified:xdocsnews.xml
Log:
Update for Tomcat 3.3.1 Release Candidate 1
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +14 -0 jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs/news.xml
Index: news.xml
===
larryi 02/03/05 05:04:59
Modified:docs news.html
Log:
Update for Tomcat 3.3.1 Release Candidate 1
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +11 -1 jakarta-tomcat-site/docs/news.html
Index: news.html
The first release candidate of Tomcat 3.3.1 is available for download.
This release contains a number of bug fixes over the Tomcat 3.3.1 Beta 1
release. It contains many bug fixes and a number of small feature additions
since the Tomcat 3.3 release. It continues to be a Servlet 2.2/JSP 1.1
keith 02/03/05 06:18:15
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/res
LocalStrings.properties
Log:
Add 423 Locked to message bundle.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -0
keith 02/03/05 06:24:09
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/res
LocalStrings.properties
Log:
Add 423 Locked status message
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -0
And should we add it to TC 4.0.4 and 4.1, in LE mode,
since it's a full OSS solution ?
4.0.4 doesn't need JMX, so no ;-)
4.1, I vote yes (MX4J is quite small).
Remy
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
larryi 02/03/05 08:42:27
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core ContextManager.java
src/webpages index.html
Log:
Revert to dev status
Revision ChangesPath
1.203 +1 -1
jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core/ContextManager.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6883.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6883.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Ignacio,
I don't see how views will solve this problem. I'm not so much concerned
with reading user and role data as I am with updating it. Somehow the two
tables need to be linked by some common identifier. The current JDBRealm
assumes that identifier is the username. My concern with
And should we add it to TC 4.0.4 and 4.1, in LE mode,
since it's a full OSS solution ?
4.0.4 doesn't need JMX, so no ;-)
4.1, I vote yes (MX4J is quite small).
So when I release 4.1 RPM, should I also provide a mx4j RPM ?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6884.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
uri.servletName:/my.host.com:8080/examples/HelloW=HelloWorldServlet
Could we get these translation from web.xml forwarded by Ajp14
autoconf feature ?
We should get these from web.xml - either extracted directly or
by extracting the info from tomcat.
tomcat allready decode the information
Confirmed :-)
-ajp12 is optional ( or it was last time I checked this ),
for backward compat.
Ok, the 3.3.1-rc1 RPM use ajp12
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6884.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6883.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
De: John Gregg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: martes 5 de marzo de 2002 20:11
I don't see how views will solve this problem. I'm not so
much concerned
with reading user and role data as I am with updating it.
Somehow the two
tables need to be linked by some common identifier.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6887.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
We should get these from web.xml - either extracted directly or
by extracting the info from tomcat.
tomcat allready decode the information and could send them in
a simpler form to jk.
Yes, but that creates some strange dependencies between
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6890.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6890.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6891.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6891.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
So when I release 4.1 RPM, should I also provide a mx4j RPM ?
I'd say yes. (but obviously, you get to decide :))
Remy
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On 1 Mar 2002, Christopher K.St.John wrote:
I'm stuck, and not sure how to proceed. MinimalTomcat
really needs AuthenticatorBase to be core-clean.
It should be pretty easy to change this particular use
of StandardContext to use reflection instead.
Got the
The first beta release of Tomcat 4.0.4 has been released. This release
includes bugfixes and small feature additions over Tomcat 4.0.2/4.0.3
(please refer to the release notes for the complete list).
Release notes:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.4-b1/RELEAS
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6896.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
billbarker02/03/05 19:50:50
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/generators
ErrorHandler.java
Log:
Cleanup the logic to find an error handler.
The old code wasn't setting the server on the request, so that everything was
trying the DEFAULT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6887.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
billbarker02/03/05 20:23:05
Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES-3.3.1.txt
Log:
Document fix to 6887
Revision ChangesPath
1.44 +3 -1 jakarta-tomcat/RELEASE-NOTES-3.3.1.txt
Index: RELEASE-NOTES-3.3.1.txt
craigmcc02/03/05 22:50:25
Added: webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/service
AddServiceAction.java
Log:
Re-add obsolete file that was replaced with a new version.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +52 -159
craigmcc02/03/05 22:55:57
Removed: webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/service
SetUpAddServiceAction.java SetUpServiceAction.java
Log:
Remove obsolete files.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
So when I release 4.1 RPM, should I also provide a mx4j RPM ?
I'd say yes. (but obviously, you get to decide :))
Now I'm sure you say yes :)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doing some digging into the Tomcat 4.0.x source code, I noticed that
valueUnbound is called even on a session's setAttribute method. I would
think that the valueUnbound method would only be called when removing
something from the session. Turns out that when i modify the object that is
stored in
38 matches
Mail list logo
