Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 28/10/02 22:40, Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 00:31, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Those are _not_ processes, they are threads... Use a decent operating system
that supports them nicely (not Linux) and you'll see the difference (how
many times
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14038.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2002/10/29 00:21:29
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
ContextConfig.java
Log:
- Port patch.
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +5 -5
remm2002/10/29 00:26:30
Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Log:
- Update changelog.
Revision ChangesPath
1.26 +11 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Index: RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14040.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14040.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello Tomcat crew,
I'm working on a slick OpenEJB/Tomcat integration (finally), and am
running into a bit of a stickiness on ClassLoading and JSP Compilation.
The integration I'm doing allows users to just put one OpenEJB library
in the Tomcat common/lib directory. The first time OpenEJB is
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:news;main.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Costin Manolache
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 6:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JkRequestLogFormat for JK 1.2.x on Apache 2.0 ?
Henri Gomez wrote:
I added 'JkRequestLogFormat' for
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14021.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14030.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:hgomez;apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: JkRequestLogFormat for JK 1.2.x on Apache 2.0 ?
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: news
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 20:15, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The Linux threads implementation is _bad_ but that does not mean that
the whole thing bad.
I was just teasing. Anyway, have a look at this:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=103269598000900w=2
and this:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14045.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14045.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14045.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello everybody!
I have the following GREAT problem with basic authentication in Tomcat
I have two servers configured as follows:
Server 1:
Operating system: Windows 2000 Advanced Server
Web Server: IIS 5.0
Servlet Container: Tomcat 4.x
Server 2: Windows XP Professional
Web Server: IIS
remm2002/10/29 03:22:50
Modified:.tomcat.nsi
resources config.ini
Added: resources jvm.ini
Log:
- Add a JVM selection page (the default path is autodetected as before, so
most users can just click next).
- If the VM path is bad, the installer
Hello,
i have made the following observation:
I am using Tomcat 4.1.12 on Windows NT.
If i display the jsp page with charset windows-1253 by invoking the page
the direct way,
the characters are displayed correct.
e.g. http://localhost/jsp/enc_test/ch1253.jsp
After that i wrote a small
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14040.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Linux threads implementation is _bad_ but that does not mean that the
whole thing bad.
That's why I said works for you? Good... For our setup we _need_
threads...
For the Fun. The kernel threads appair also in ps but I have not (yet) tried
to
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Linux threads implementation is _bad_ but that does not mean that the
whole thing bad.
That's why I said works for you? Good... For our setup we _need_
threads...
So the problem is a little different: you need a JVM
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13924.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi, i was waiting a new release of Tomcat 4.1.x for a problem with
symlink and looking at this test version i see that the problem is here yet.
The problem is this: if symlink are allowed (allowLinking true) AND the
link is beetween two file INSIDE context path,
remm2002/10/29 09:42:58
Modified:jsr152/examples index.html
jsr152/examples/WEB-INF web.xml
jsr152/examples/jsptoserv jsptoservlet.jsp
jsr154/examples cookies.html helloworld.html index.html
reqheaders.html
remm2002/10/29 09:58:09
Modified:.build.properties.default build.xml
Log:
- Fix incorrect nsis path.
- Update to MX4J 1.1.1.
Revision ChangesPath
1.48 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.properties.default
Index: build.properties.default
remm2002/10/29 10:07:38
Modified:.build.properties.default build.xml
Log:
- Reorganize property.
- Add a Watchdog specific download target.
Revision ChangesPath
1.49 +55 -49jakarta-tomcat-5/build.properties.default
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14055.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14055.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14059.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14059.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2002/10/29 11:12:52
Modified:docs bugreport.html index.html irc.html news.html
resources.html
xdocs/stylesheets project.xml
Added: docs building.html
xdocsbuilding.xml
Log:
- Add page on building
patrickl2002/10/29 11:33:16
Modified:jsr154/src/share/javax/servlet ServletRequestEvent.java
Log:
Change getRequest() method to getServletRequest() to match upcoming change in the
next Servlet 2.4 spec document.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -1
I'm running into Bug 4690 in our applications and it is currently marked
to be addressed later. The comments state that the issue may be
addressed in the 4.1 release, but I have not seen any activity on this
particular bug. Would it be possible to re-open this bug or get some
pointers on where
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9931.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Resending this. Does anyone happen to know the answer
to this? Is this supported?
Thanks in advance,
Eddie
--- Eddie Ruvinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In Tomcat 4.1.x, is the Jasper 2 runtime supposed to
be backwards compatible the Jasper 1 runtime (i.e.,
from Tomcat 4.0.x), so that
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14064.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14066.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi all,
( sorry to post here... in users list nobody answered )
One of my users is asking for the following permission in his context
java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.lang.RuntimePermission
accessClassInPackage.org.apache.catalina.realm)
He is using the
Renato wrote:
Hi all,
( sorry to post here... in users list nobody answered )
One of my users is asking for the following permission in his context
java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.lang.RuntimePermission accessClassInPackage.org.apache.catalina.realm)
He is using
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14069.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12196.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
are available under
http://javaweb.sfbay.sun.com/~ja120114/security-audit/SecurityAudit.html
Let me know if something is missing.
Thanks,
-- jeanfrancois
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Oups..wrong list...sorry.
-- Jeanfrancois
Jean-Francois Arcand wrote:
are available under
http://javaweb.sfbay.sun.com/~ja120114/security-audit/SecurityAudit.html
Let me know if something is missing.
Thanks,
-- jeanfrancois
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14073.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14069.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
costin 2002/10/29 14:29:05
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime Tag:
tomcat_4_branch PageContextImpl.java
Log:
Port from the main branch the Content-Length fix.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11657.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14069.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
One might still feel he's on the pteam! :-)
pier
On 29/10/02 22:00, Jean-Francois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oups..wrong list...sorry.
-- Jeanfrancois
Jean-Francois Arcand wrote:
are available under
http://javaweb.sfbay.sun.com/~ja120114/security-audit/SecurityAudit.html
send_files failed to open
/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/netware/mod_jk_1.3.n
lm.asc: Permission denied
send_files failed to open
/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/netware/mod_jk_2.0.4
2.nlm.asc: Permission denied
send_files failed to open
Lol. :-D
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
One might still feel he's on the pteam! :-)
pier
On 29/10/02 22:00, Jean-Francois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oups..wrong list...sorry.
-- Jeanfrancois
Jean-Francois Arcand wrote:
are available under
DOH!
Sorry. Thats what you get when you get a Non-Unix weanie to play around on a Unix
box. I knew that I've had to do this in the past but completely spaced it for this.
This should be fixed now.
Mike Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/29/02 03:51PM
send_files failed to open
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9417.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
A new test milestone of Tomcat 4.1 has just been released. Please help
test this upcoming Tomcat release for compliance issues and other
problems.
Downloads:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/test/v4.1.14/
Significant changes over 4.1.13 include a
Remy Maucherat wrote:
A new test milestone of Tomcat 4.1 has just been released. Please help
test this upcoming Tomcat release for compliance issues and other
problems.
Downloads:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/test/v4.1.14/
Significant changes over 4.1.13 include a
On 29/10/02 23:02, Mike Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DOH!
Sorry. Thats what you get when you get a Non-Unix weanie to play around on a
Unix box. I knew that I've had to do this in the past but completely spaced
it for this. This should be fixed now.
Rsync should run in another 5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14077.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 29/10/02 22:46, Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
A new test milestone of Tomcat 4.1 has just been released. Please help
test this upcoming Tomcat release for compliance issues and other
problems.
Downloads:
A new test milestone of Tomcat 4.1 has just been released. Please help
test this upcoming Tomcat release for compliance issues and other problems.
Downloads:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/test/v4.1.14/
Significant changes over 4.1.13 include a security manager bugfix. Over
hi there,
we got a web application running on production system. it uses SSL to serve
few pages. we have been getting the following exception lately on a regular
basis but the SSL page is served to the user. looks like, the performance is
affecting a bit because of this exception. do any of u
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14080.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
billbarker2002/10/29 19:47:27
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java
Log:
Fix what looks like a typo.
Without this, the same buffer is used for both input and output. The result is that
fields like requestURI and remoteHost are trashed after the servlet
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3888.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3888.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14064.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14069.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12196.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
67 matches
Mail list logo
