DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15693.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I am working on a port of the jk2 connector to Domino based on the iis
connector. Perhaps it can be included in the normal release later, for now
I have some questions which should get me nearer to first beta release of
the Domino connector.
By the way I am working with TC 4.1.18 JDK 1.3.1_06
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15702.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 2:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Questions related to a port of the IIS-connector to
Domino I plan to provide
What version of Domino?
Think that new 6.0 is all JAVA
Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29.12.2002 17:48:40:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 2:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Questions related to a port of the IIS-connector to
Domino I plan to provide
What version of
Any special reason why the so-usefull (I am generating small gif's with a
quick turn around time) tcpNoDelay config directive is not (documented) as
available across all connectors ?
See
http://developer.apple.com/techpubs/webobjects/ReleaseNotes/WO52RelNotes/WOJSPServlet.html
for a similar
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10383.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10383.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
billbarker2002/12/29 18:36:26
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
ManagerBase.java
Log:
Re-enable the unique session-id logic.
Submitted By: Tim Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +10 -10
billbarker2002/12/29 18:40:04
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
ManagerBase.java
Log:
Port from Tomcat 4 branch.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +10 -10
- Original Message -
From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 4:53 AM
Subject: tcpNoDelay for http11/coyote connectors - but not for JK et.al.
Any special reason why the so-usefull (I am generating small gif's with a
quick
glenn 2002/12/29 20:05:39
Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
Log:
Port mod_jk apache 1.3 JkAutoAlias to apache 2.0, 1.3 and 2.0 should be in synch now
Revision ChangesPath
1.63 +110 -1jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c
Index:
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
Any special reason why the so-usefull (I am generating small gif's with a
quick turn around time) tcpNoDelay config directive is not (documented) as
available across all connectors ?
The old and common reason - nobody sent the documentation patch yet :-)
Costin
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15711.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yes that's true if the monotonically increasing value is added to the
random number _before_ the hash... and even worse, there is nothing that
guarantees that two numbers won't hash to the same value so we're back
to the duplicate session id problem.
What I was suggesting is adding the integer to
Michael wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
You're probably right that addThread() doesn't need to be public - but
I don't think it hurts too much either.
It does when you're trying to refactor a class. It forces you to ask
whether the interface really is used, or can you rearrange like you
Schnitzer, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes that's true if the monotonically increasing value is added to the
random number _before_ the hash... and even worse, there is nothing that
guarantees that two numbers won't hash to the same value so we're back
to the duplicate session id problem.
- Original Message -
From: Eric Rescorla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 10:05 PM
Subject: Re: Duplicate session IDs?
Schnitzer, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes that's true if the monotonically increasing value is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 7:20 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: Questions related to a port of the IIS-connector
to Domino I plan to provide
What version of Domino?
Think that new 6.0
Well.
I have Apapche 1.3.27 compiled w/ REENTRANT,
Tomcat 4.1.17(from rpm) and mod_jk2, compiled
w/ Apache1.3 and apr-0.9.1. Also jdk 1.4.1_01.
All that running under RedHat 7.3
Configured to use jni worker.
When i am starting apache have follows errors in jk2.log:
(error ) [jk_workerEnv.c
Eric Rescorla wrote:
Schnitzer, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes that's true if the monotonically increasing value is added to the
random number _before_ the hash... and even worse, there is nothing that
guarantees that two numbers won't hash to the same value so we're back
to the duplicate
21 matches
Mail list logo
