This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2003-02-01/jakarta-tomcat-jk-ant.html
Buildfile: build.xml does not exist!
Build failed
Amy:
Thanks for the info. I saw some comments in the server.xml file but am not
sure how to declare the entry in the server.xml file.
!-- Comment these entries out to disable JMX MBeans support --
!-- You may also configure custom components (e.g. Valves/Realms) by
including your own
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16667.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16667.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16667.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16667.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16667.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10378.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
One of the links to the tomcat user archives is bad for bugreport.html
Attached is a diff with the correct version.
Also added are links to marc.theaimsgroup.com and Eyebrowse hosted by
nagoya.apache.org. The new links are for tomcat-user and tomcat-dev.
The diff was made via cvs diff -u from
Resend - my first message didn't seem to have the diff attached.
-Tim
Tim Funk wrote:
One of the links to the tomcat user archives is bad for bugreport.html
Attached is a diff with the correct version.
Also added are links to marc.theaimsgroup.com and Eyebrowse hosted by
nagoya.apache.org.
Arg! Either my moz version is broke or something else is broke. I
renamed my diff to bugreport.txt and sent it to myself and all worked
ok. Hopefully, this gets to you OK. If not - I'll turn off my computer
and cry :(
-Tim
Tim Funk wrote:
Resend - my first message didn't seem to have the diff
Hi,
I have a script which can burst any number of async socket connections to
Tomcat from a remote host. With it, I can get every available connector
processor thread to become busy at once. At that point, Tomcat simply
refuses any new socket connections at all.
Ok, this is to be expected. But
nacho 2003/02/01 14:17:16
Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c jk_service_iis.c
Log:
Fix for Bug#16638 Jk2 connector with Microsoft IIS slow in multiple domain
environment
Added a new registry and properties config send_groups. defaults to false.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16638.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
nacho 2003/02/01 14:28:39
Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi jk_service_iis.c
Log:
Oops, traslating to proper C ;)
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +1 -1
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi/jk_service_iis.c
Index: jk_service_iis.c
Hi Again,
This is not all Tomcat's fault. I have narrowed it down to JSP's that
actually make a JDBC connection.
For static (.html) files and JSP's that don't connect to a db, the
CLOSE_WAIT problem does NOT seem to occur.
I know that EJB's would be the proper way to access persistent data from
glenn 2003/02/01 17:28:34
Modified:xdocsbugreport.xml
Log:
Apply doc patch, thanks to Tim Funk
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +15 -9 jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs/bugreport.xml
Index: bugreport.xml
glenn 2003/02/01 17:33:49
Modified:docs bugreport.html
Log:
Apply doc patch, thanks to Tim Funk
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +17 -11jakarta-tomcat-site/docs/bugreport.html
Index: bugreport.html
glenn 2003/02/01 17:39:10
Modified:xdocsbugreport.xml
docs bugreport.html
Log:
Add a link to report a Tomcat 5 bug
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +3 -0 jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs/bugreport.xml
Index: bugreport.xml
Patch applied to the docs, Thanks Tim!
Tim Funk wrote:
Arg! Either my moz version is broke or something else is broke. I
renamed my diff to bugreport.txt and sent it to myself and all worked
ok. Hopefully, this gets to you OK. If not - I'll turn off my computer
and cry :(
-Tim
Tim Funk
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16659.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16659.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi again,
It looks like it was a bug in my JDBC driver. Sorry to doubt you marvelous
Tomcat developers of the world.
Cheers,
-Dan
-Original Message-
From: Dan Higgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 6:59 PM
To: Tomcat-Dev
Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.0.6
23 matches
Mail list logo
