Place for optional components

2003-06-17 Thread Bill Barker
I would like to port the log4j context-separation logic from TC 3.3. It seems that the log4j team has made a stab at it, but it is nowhere near what TC 3.3 does. So the question is where to put it. If nobody answers, then I'll just stick it in j-t-catalina/modules.

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat mod_jk 1.2.4 Web Server Connector released

2003-06-17 Thread jean-frederic clere
Henri Gomez wrote: BTW, the JF-Clere fix in configure.in to use the libtool in Apache 2.0 case, don't works with Redhat 8.0/9.0 where there is an Apache 2.0.40 with post 2.0.40 security fixes. And what is the error? It works with a vanilla Apache-2.0.40. I don't know what they do with their

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets DefaultServlet.java

2003-06-17 Thread funkman
funkman 2003/06/16 18:31:12 Modified:catalina/src/conf web.xml catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets DefaultServlet.java Log: - Allow a site (webapp) wide xslt transformation for look (real file name) - Allow per directory xslt

problems with web.xml and security

2003-06-17 Thread Rosaria Silipo
Hi, I am trying to set up Tomcat as a secure web engine. From the tutorial I understood that you should insert the following lines in web.xml and the password protection should work. This works perfectly for files in the root directory, it does not work for files in subdirectories, like

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat mod_jk 1.2.4 Web Server Connector released

2003-06-17 Thread Henri Gomez
jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: BTW, the JF-Clere fix in configure.in to use the libtool in Apache 2.0 case, don't works with Redhat 8.0/9.0 where there is an Apache 2.0.40 with post 2.0.40 security fixes. And what is the error? It works with a vanilla Apache-2.0.40. I don't

Re: problems with web.xml and security

2003-06-17 Thread Bill Barker
Your web.xml file is invalid. If you re-post the question to tomcat-user, I'll be more than happy to explain why. - Original Message - From: Rosaria Silipo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:20 PM Subject: problems with web.xml and security Hi, I

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat mod_jk 1.2.4 Web Server Connector released

2003-06-17 Thread jean-frederic clere
Henri Gomez wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: BTW, the JF-Clere fix in configure.in to use the libtool in Apache 2.0 case, don't works with Redhat 8.0/9.0 where there is an Apache 2.0.40 with post 2.0.40 security fixes. And what is the error? It works with a vanilla

Fwd: [ANN] Apache Tomcat mod_jk 1.2.4 Web Server Connector released

2003-06-17 Thread stephan.beal
-Ursprungliche Nachricht- Glenn Nielsen wrote: The Tomcat team has released version 1.2.4 of the Tomcat mod_jk web server connector. This version fixes a number of minor bugs and ports all features from the Apache 1.3 version to the Apache 2 version of mod_jk 1.2. ... Good morning,

[GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-tomcat-5

2003-06-17 Thread bobh
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2003-06-17/jakarta-tomcat-5.html Buildfile: build.xml prepare-release: [mkdir] Created dir:

java processes created by tomcat

2003-06-17 Thread siddharth
hello, I am running following servers on my linux machine 1. tomcat4 using many JSPs and Servlets 2. apache 3. qmail 4. postgresql etc. Tomcat is the only process which is usijg java. when i do 'top' and 'sort by memory usage' i get following output.

Re: java processes created by tomcat

2003-06-17 Thread jean-frederic clere
siddharth wrote: hello, I am running following servers on my linux machine The JVM you use use clone() to create threads. Each thread looks like one process for ps, top etc. That is normal. 1. tomcat4 using many JSPs and Servlets 2. apache 3. qmail 4. postgresql etc. Tomcat is the only

AW: java processes created by tomcat

2003-06-17 Thread Hans Schmid
See http://tomcatfaq.sourceforge.net/linx.html cheers, Hans -Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht- Von: siddharth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Juni 2003 12:13 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: java processes created by tomcat hello, I am running following servers on my

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20834] New: - The Service for Windows is buggy

2003-06-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20834. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20834] - The Service for Windows is buggy

2003-06-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20834. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: [ANN] Apache Tomcat mod_jk 1.2.4 Web Server Connector released

2003-06-17 Thread Jason Corley
I've found with the releases of mod_jk 1.2.4 and mod_jk2 2.0.2 that ant native builds just don't work. The only way I could get a binary to build (on linux and mac os x) was to cd jk/native (or jk/native2) and run: sh buildconf.sh ./configure make And then copy the binaries into

RE: [5.0.3] Tag soon, 5.0 release plan

2003-06-17 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, complete. What's missing is better docs, and lots of tweaks and fixes. I'd like to help with the docs. Can you prioritize what docs you think need work (or need to be written from scratch)? I actually have tomcat commit access already, so there should be no delay like with

RE: Place for optional components

2003-06-17 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, What is included in context-separation logic ? Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics -Original Message- From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:19 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Place for optional components I would like to port the

RE: Renaming /admin and /manager contexts (from user list)

2003-06-17 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, Sounds reasonable to me. Maybe all that's needed is updating the paths in the context descriptors for both webapps. I'll update the docs as needed if we make this change. Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16357] - connection timeout reached in logs when using apache/jk

2003-06-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16357. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Renaming /admin and /manager contexts (from user list)

2003-06-17 Thread Jeff Tulley
Sounds reasonable to me. Maybe all that's needed is updating the paths in the context descriptors for both webapps. Cool. Yeah, it is a very very simple fix. Diff files attached, if they are even of any help at all. I'll let Yoav do the documentation then, since he volunteered. (Thanks

Apache Tomcat server.xml...

2003-06-17 Thread Georgopoulos, Dino
Hello, I exhausted my other resources and thought this would be the best place to pose this question. I'm using Tomcat 4.1.18 and noticed that the server.xml doesn't have an XML declaration (?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?) In the absence of this declaration, what encoding should this file be

Re: [5.0.3] Tag soon, 5.0 release plan

2003-06-17 Thread Tim Funk
+1. Sounds good. I'll try to keep track of common topics from tomcat-user land to indicate what documentation areas need most help. A feature I want to add (post tagging and haven't started yet) is integrating lucene into the tomcat-docs. -Tim Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I am nearly done with

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servletsDefaultServlet.java

2003-06-17 Thread Remy Maucherat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: funkman 2003/06/16 18:31:12 Modified:catalina/src/conf web.xml catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets DefaultServlet.java Log: - Allow a site (webapp) wide xslt transformation for look (real file name) -

Re: Place for optional components

2003-06-17 Thread Bill Barker
The core looks a lot like log4j-sandbox/repository. The addition in 3.3 is what in the Catalina world would be a Listener to manage repositories with regard to context lifecycle (e.g. release the old CL, and use the new one on context reload). It's in j-t/proposals/Log4jHelper if you want to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17762] - runtime link error loading jkjni.so

2003-06-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17762. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servletsDefaultServlet.java

2003-06-17 Thread Tim Funk
ok. I was originally using servletContext().getResourceAsStream(...) and switched to ResourceInfo to attempt to stay consistent with its usage. I'll switch it to Resource (hopefully) today/tommorrow. (unless someone beats me to it) -Tim Remy Maucherat wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: funkman

Re: FAQ location

2003-06-17 Thread Remy Maucherat
Tim Funk wrote: I committed the faq to jakarta-tomcat-site last week. Can someone update daedalus using cvs update -d -P (per the jakarta-tomcat-site readme instructions)? I updated the website with the addition of the FAQ. Remy

Re: [5.0.3] Tag soon, 5.0 release plan

2003-06-17 Thread Remy Maucherat
Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy, complete. What's missing is better docs, and lots of tweaks and fixes. I'd like to help with the docs. Can you prioritize what docs you think need work (or need to be written from scratch)? I actually have tomcat commit access already, so there should be no delay

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8763] - Web app libraries (log4j.jar) remain locked after web apps' stop / remove

2003-06-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8763. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10026] - manager/stop and manager/remove

2003-06-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10026. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20849] New: - RequestDispatcher.include'd Servlets/JSPs cannot addCookie

2003-06-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20849. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20849] - RequestDispatcher.include'd Servlets/JSPs cannot addCookie

2003-06-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20849. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20850] New: - POST is not defined in RFC 2068 and is not supported by the Servlet API

2003-06-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20850. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20851] New: - POST is not defined in RFC 2068 and is not supported by the Servlet API

2003-06-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20851. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20850] - POST is not defined in RFC 2068 and is not supported by the Servlet API

2003-06-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20850. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [5.0.3] Tag soon, 5.0 release plan

2003-06-17 Thread Remy Maucherat
Tim Funk wrote: +1. Sounds good. I'll try to keep track of common topics from tomcat-user land to indicate what documentation areas need most help. A feature I want to add (post tagging and haven't started yet) is integrating lucene into the tomcat-docs. Done in a convincing way, that looks