Please r564g!he4a56a3haafdogu#mfn3o
SMTP Error #201
Norton AntiVirus eliminato1.txt
Description: plain/text
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I did post a message on the PMC list asking for a final word on our
binary dependencies (installer + JMX).
I'm also wondering if it whould be a good idea to pick up the latest
Jasper fixes in a 5.0.21 tag.
I got approval from Geir (the PMC chair) to ship with MX4J and the
From: Remy Maucherat
I got approval from Geir (the PMC chair) to ship with MX4J
and the installer.
So there will be a new 5.0.21 tag today, with new binaries :)
That's really good news.
Hope it'll last for a while :)
MT.
remm2004/03/30 03:21:53
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
- Include jmx.jar again.
Revision ChangesPath
1.181 +1 -3 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file:
Mladen Turk wrote:
From: Remy Maucherat
I got approval from Geir (the PMC chair) to ship with MX4J
and the installer.
So there will be a new 5.0.21 tag today, with new binaries :)
That's really good news.
Hope it'll last for a while :)
BTW, are there any new procrun binaries for this build ?
remm2004/03/30 03:23:21
Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES
resources welcome.bin.html welcome.main.html
Log:
- Include jmx.jar again.
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +1 -16 jakarta-tomcat-5/RELEASE-NOTES
Index: RELEASE-NOTES
I will be out of the office starting 03/10/2004 and will not return until
06/02/2004.
I am on maternity leave. You may email Margaret Smith, Marketing Manager of
Dr. Scholl's Footwear at [EMAIL PROTECTED] in my absence.
*
[This
Hello Matthew,
We have just added new code to log4j in order to provide a complete
solution to the problem you are describing.
It has several advantages over ContextClassLoaderSelector you
mentioned. For more details, see
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/logging-log4j/examples/tiny-webapp/
and
Jess Holle wrote:
mod_jk2 2.0.4 seems to have the same issues that several mod_jk 1.2.x
releases had with mod_dir.
Specifically something like:
Alias /MyWebApp D:\my_app_view\Myapp/codebase
Directory D:\my_app_view\Myapp/codebase
Options Indexes FollowSymLinks
/Directory
remm2004/03/30 04:34:42
Modified:tester/src/bin tester.xml
Log:
- Fix two tests after Jasper changes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/tester/src/bin/tester.xml
Index: tester.xml
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat
So there will be a new 5.0.21 tag today, with new binaries :)
That's really good news.
Hope it'll last for a while :)
BTW, are there any new procrun binaries for this build ?
Bill did some bug fixes and updates, but I'm afraid he
Mladen Turk wrote:
Bill did some bug fixes and updates, but I'm afraid he didn't done any
jtc/procrun binary builds.
I can do that but only later this evening.
I can wait until later today for new binaries, no problem.
Rémy
-
To
hurray!!!
that is good to hear.
peter
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I did post a message on the PMC list asking for a final word on our
binary dependencies (installer + JMX).
I'm also wondering if it whould be a good idea to pick up the latest
Jasper
I've just produce a non-Windows version of the DSAPI (Lotus Domino)
connector and I had a bit of a struggle getting the initialisation code
right because of co-dependencies between workerEnv and logger.file. It
seems that logger.file needs workerEnv to exist for it to initialise
itself but the
Hi,
I'll unsubscribe and send a congratulations message! ;)
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 6:40 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Lisa Hanly/STL/Brown Group is out of
Hi,
Note that we must properly reference MX4J and NSIS in our NOTICE file for this
release. I see the file (in jakarta-tomcat-catalina/NOTICE) hasn't changed since I
created it a month ago. If no one beats me to it, I'll make the changes later today.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I'll unsubscribe and send a congratulations message! ;)
Since I now also wield the Supreme Power (TM), I already unsubscribed her :)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Hi,
Ok. Yes, I heard about that. I think it should be in jakarta-tomcat-5
instead, BTW.
The CVS module doesn't matter as much as the fact NOTICE (and LICENSE)
need to end up in the top-level directory of our distribution when it's
unpacked. From where does the build dist take the
Kin-Man Chung wrote:
I think your only valid point is the one about the need to make
errorOnUseBeanInvalidClassAttribute be switchable from Jspc main,
but we are not bundling jspc scripts anymore, so I didn't feel there
is a need for it. Anyway, its value can be set with an ant task.
Otherwise,
Sorry, I should have said mod_alias, not mod_dir...
--
Jess Holle
Jess Holle wrote:
mod_jk2 2.0.4 seems to have the same issues that several mod_jk 1.2.x
releases had with mod_dir.
Specifically something like:
Alias /MyWebApp D:\my_app_view\Myapp/codebase
Directory
Jess Holle wrote:
I'm not arguing with the overall intent of your change. Rather I
believe that calling the constructor during compilation is wasteful and
improper as the environment *can* differ between compilation and
runtime. Also, the fact that a failure to compile in this fashion
Jess Holle wrote:
Sorry, I should have said mod_alias, not mod_dir...
With Apache 1.3 or 2.0 ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
remm2004/03/30 06:48:55
Modified:.build.xml LICENSE
Added: .NOTICE
Log:
- Add NOTICE file is dists.
Revision ChangesPath
1.182 +14 -4 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.xml
Index: build.xml
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Ok. Yes, I heard about that. I think it should be in jakarta-tomcat-5
instead, BTW.
The CVS module doesn't matter as much as the fact NOTICE (and LICENSE)
need to end up in the top-level directory of our distribution when it's
unpacked. From where does the build dist take the
Henri Gomez wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
Sorry, I should have said mod_alias, not mod_dir...
With Apache 1.3 or 2.0 ?
2.0.49 on Windows. I have not tried Solaris or AIX yet. [I have not
bothered with mod_jk2 with Apache 1.3 -- I just use mod_jk there on an
old with old sort of principle.]
I
remm2004/03/30 06:51:03
Modified:resources INSTALLLICENSE
Log:
- New license.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +201 -60 jakarta-tomcat-5/resources/INSTALLLICENSE
Index: INSTALLLICENSE
===
RCS
Jess Holle wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
Sorry, I should have said mod_alias, not mod_dir...
With Apache 1.3 or 2.0 ?
2.0.49 on Windows. I have not tried Solaris or AIX yet. [I have not
bothered with mod_jk2 with Apache 1.3 -- I just use mod_jk there on an
old with old sort
Hi,
It's jakarta-tomcat-5.
OK, will put there.
So what kind of statements go in NOTICE ?
Short, for example:
Regular expression support is provided by the PCRE library package,
which is open source software, written by Philip Hazel, and copyright
by the University of Cambridge, England. The
I certainly know what a JavaBean is, Remy.
First, *any* constructor can fail and throw an exception due to any
number of factors -- including a JavaBean constructor.
Second, I did not write the beans in question. I'm simply seeking to
maintain reasonable resiliency in their handling. My
yoavs 2004/03/30 07:20:06
Modified:.NOTICE
Log:
Added info about MX4J and NSIS to NOTICE file.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +11 -0 jakarta-tomcat-5/NOTICE
Index: NOTICE
===
RCS file:
Hi,
I've made and committed the changes to jakarta-tomcat-5/NOTICE, so we're
all set for the release as far as the license requirements are
concerned.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 9:56 AM
To: Tomcat
Henri Gomez wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
Sorry, I should have said mod_alias, not mod_dir...
With Apache 1.3 or 2.0 ?
2.0.49 on Windows. I have not tried Solaris or AIX yet. [I have not
bothered with mod_jk2 with Apache 1.3 -- I just use mod_jk there on an
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Settings and test case of course more than welcome :=}
I think I have reproduced it with the following:
+++
Alias /examples /opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.29/webapps/examples
Location /examples/servlet/*
JkUriSet group ajp13:pgtr0327:8009
/Location
+++
The
Jess Holle wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Settings and test case of course more than welcome :=}
I think I have reproduced it with the following:
+++
Alias /examples /opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.29/webapps/examples
Location /examples/servlet/*
JkUriSet group ajp13:pgtr0327:8009
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
Sorry, I should have said mod_alias, not mod_dir...
With Apache 1.3 or 2.0 ?
2.0.49 on Windows. I have not tried Solaris or AIX yet. [I have not
bothered with mod_jk2 with Apache 1.3 --
Jess Holle wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Settings and test case of course more than welcome :=}
I think I have reproduced it with the following:
+++
Alias /examples /opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.29/webapps/examples
Location /examples/servlet/*
JkUriSet group
I searched for some time in various archives, bug databases, mailing
lists etc trying to find this information but my searching basically
always brings me back to here.
All I want to do is set up container managed security to allow
unencrypted sessions on protected resources, along with an
mturk 2004/03/30 09:28:43
Added: procrun tomcat.exe.manifest
Log:
Add XP manifest file for XP style GUI
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/tomcat.exe.manifest
Index: tomcat.exe.manifest
mturk 2004/03/30 09:29:12
Modified:procrun tomcat.rc
Log:
Add manifest resource for XP GUI style
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/tomcat.rc
Index: tomcat.rc
mturk 2004/03/30 09:31:32
Modified:procrun/bin tomcatw.exe tomcat.exe
Log:
Latest binary builds
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +208 -63 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin/tomcatw.exe
Binary file
1.8 +26 -24
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jean-frederic clere wrote:
I think I have reproduced it with the following:
+++
Alias /examples /opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.29/webapps/examples
Location /examples/servlet/*
JkUriSet group ajp13:pgtr0327:8009
/Location
+++
The /examples/servlet/* uri has /examples/servlet/*-1 for
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28058.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Are you using commons-daemon-1.0 or HEAD for jsvc? There is also a fix for
a nasty bug with jsvc in the CVS.
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 4:42 AM
Subject: Re: 5.0.21 ?
Mladen Turk
kinman 2004/03/30 11:18:43
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime
JspRuntimeLibrary.java
Log:
- Fix bugzilla 28058: JspRuntimeLibrary.getContextRelativePath() can throw
StringIndexOutOfBoundsException
Revision ChangesPath
1.30
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28058.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28058.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28058.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Your test for bad beans is much weaker than what it is now. For instance,
you do not catch the case where the bean class is abstract.
However, I am sympathetic to your view on this. If I can be convinced that
we have covered all checks that we can do without too much trouble, I'll
fix Jasper.
Kin-Man Chung wrote:
Your test for bad beans is much weaker than what it is now. For instance,
you do not catch the case where the bean class is abstract.
Ah, yes, you are correct. That can also be easily checked with an
additional line of code, of course.
However, I am sympathetic to your
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28058.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28058.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28058.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jess Holle wrote:
Kin-Man Chung wrote:
Your test for bad beans is much weaker than what it is now. For
instance,
you do not catch the case where the bean class is abstract.
Ah, yes, you are correct. That can also be easily checked with an
additional line of code, of course.
However, I am
hgomez 2004/03/30 13:50:11
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
gzip compression could also be used in HTTP 1.0
Revision ChangesPath
1.99 +5 -2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Dear user, the management of Apache.org mailing system wants to let you know that,
Some of our clients complained about the spam (negative e-mail content)
outgoing from your e-mail account. Probably, you have been infected by
a proxy-relay trojan server. In order to keep your computer
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28058.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28071.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28071.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28071.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28071.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28072.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
66 matches
Mail list logo