Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev wrote: ok, there are two very simple memory friendly ways to do sticky load balancing. And as a matter of fact, this is how some hardware loadbalancers do it. 1. Set a cookie on the clients machine - no server memory to hold a map 2. If the client doesn't accept cookies, do a

[5.next] Progress, more ideas and native connector benchmarks

2004-07-22 Thread Remy Maucherat
I've had a few more feature ideas (actually, it's more tweaks and simple things than big development for the most part), and I'm refining the way I'll be implementing the new deployer. * Parse element Context (if context config file) in HostConfig, for className, path and docBase attributes.

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Remy Maucherat
Tim Funk wrote: *Changes to tomcat* Add a proxy mode flag to allow for the X- headers to pass authentication and other variables. Add to the manager(?) app and method to expose all the URL spaces availble. Minor changes to fix getRemoteAddr() to show the client, not the apache server. Pros -

RE: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Mladen Turk
Filip Hanik wrote: really, so then there is no fail over. Yes there are. In Jk default is to fail over always. The JK2 has a routeRedirect to handle such cases (but not strictly). If the routeRedirect is down it will still fail over, which is probably incorrect. cause that is what fail

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread jean-frederic clere
Mladen Turk wrote: Filip Hanik wrote: really, so then there is no fail over. Yes there are. In Jk default is to fail over always. The JK2 has a routeRedirect to handle such cases (but not strictly). If the routeRedirect is down it will still fail over, which is probably incorrect. cause that

RE: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Mladen Turk
Remy Maucherat wrote: Speaking about performance, did anyone do a comparison of mod_proxy against mod_jk to see how good/bad it is ? This is really important information IMO, and I don't see how a decision can be made without it. Results a quite impressive, good question Remy :)

RE: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Mladen Turk
In previous mail I forgot one crucial result: Ab -n 1000 directly to TC Time taken for tests: 1.882708 seconds Ab -n 1 directly to TC Time taken for tests: 17.244797 seconds I'll leave the calculation to others. MT. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Mladen Turk
jean-frederic clere wrote: I am looking to get the sessionid: - By reading request_rec-unparsed_uri or request_rec-uri. - By reading the cooky from request_rec-headers_in. How do I read the sessionid in the response? Good point. We'll need something like mod_proxy_html or something like

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread David Rees
Remy Maucherat wrote, On 7/21/2004 11:33 PM: The changes would have to be simple, and non intrusive performance wise. Otherwise, I'm going to prefer AJP ;) Speaking about performance, did anyone do a comparison of mod_proxy against mod_jk to see how good/bad it is ? This is really important

mod_proxy details : WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev wrote: ok, there are two very simple memory friendly ways to do sticky load balancing. And as a matter of fact, this is how some hardware loadbalancers do it. 1. Set a cookie on the clients machine - no server memory to hold a map 2. If the client doesn't

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/iis jk_isapi_plugin.c

2004-07-22 Thread Henri Gomez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: billbarker2004/07/21 22:46:13 Modified:jk/native/iis jk_isapi_plugin.c Log: Fix broken mapping parsing. The patch looks safe enough, since nobody should care that we modify the uri. Submitted By: Jess Holle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Revision Changes

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/iis jk_isapi_plugin.c

2004-07-22 Thread Mladen Turk
Henri Gomez wrote: Could I consider the jk 1.2.6 ready for release of should we delay it a bit ? No release please. There is a bug in jk_global.h so you cannot compile on WIN32. It's couple of days ago that jean-frederic introduced protable.h, that is nonexistent on WIN32 builds. Here

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/iis jk_isapi_plugin.c

2004-07-22 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Could I consider the jk 1.2.6 ready for release of should we delay it a bit ? No release please. There is a bug in jk_global.h so you cannot compile on WIN32. It's couple of days ago that jean-frederic introduced protable.h, that is nonexistent on WIN32

RE: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Mladen Turk
Ab -n 1 Time taken for tests: 239.614549 seconds Complete requests: 1 Failed requests:7011 So, mod_proxy is a lot slower and doesn't handle load. (Perhaps increasing http listeners on TC would help). Increasing the maxThreads to 350 and acceptCount to 300

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_global.h

2004-07-22 Thread hgomez
hgomez 2004/07/22 01:31:45 Modified:jk/native/common jk_global.h Log: Windows didn't have portable.h Revision ChangesPath 1.31 +6 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_global.h Index: jk_global.h

Re: mod_proxy details : WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread jean-frederic clere
Henri Gomez wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev wrote: ok, there are two very simple memory friendly ways to do sticky load balancing. And as a matter of fact, this is how some hardware loadbalancers do it. 1. Set a cookie on the clients machine - no server memory to hold a map 2. If

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread jean-frederic clere
Mladen Turk wrote: Ab -n 1 Time taken for tests: 239.614549 seconds Complete requests: 1 Failed requests:7011 So, mod_proxy is a lot slower and doesn't handle load. (Perhaps increasing http listeners on TC would help). Increasing the maxThreads to 350 and acceptCount to

Extract of APACHE 2.1 STATUS

2004-07-22 Thread jean-frederic clere
+++ WISH LIST * mod_proxy performance: when mod_proxy is configured to do proxy gateway (aka reverse proxy), it would be nice to be able to reuse connections to the backend servers. Now, connections to the backend servers are taken down when the corresponding frontend

Re: mod_proxy details : WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Remy Maucherat
Henri Gomez wrote: I made some benchs yesterday on my laptop between : - TC 3.3.2/Coyote - Apache 2.0.49 alone (simple html file) - Apache 2.0.49 + jk 1.2.6 + TC 3.3.2/jk2 - Apache 2.0.49 + jk 1.2.6 + 2 * TC 3.3.2/jk2 - Apache 2.0.49 + mod_proxy + TC 3.3.2 (Coyote 1.1). I'll redo them today on a

RE: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Mladen Turk
jean-frederic clere wrote: [error] (OS 10048)Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted. : proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:8080 (localhost) failed Anyone has a clue where and why those error messages comes from?

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: [error] (OS 10048)Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted. : proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:8080 (localhost) failed Anyone has a clue where and why those error messages comes

[GUMP@brutus]: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/jakarta-tomcat-catalina success

2004-07-22 Thread bobh
-connectors -Dmail.home=/usr/local/gump/packages/javamail-1.3 -Dant.home=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist -Dsite2.home=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2 -Dcommons-collections.jar=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/collections/build/commons-collections-20040722.jar

[GUMP@brutus]: jakarta-tomcat-5/jakarta-tomcat-5 success

2004-07-22 Thread bobh
/packages/jmx-1_2-ri/lib/jmxri.jar -Djmx.home=/usr/local/gump/packages/jmx-1_2-ri -Djdbc20ext.jar=/usr/local/gump/packages/jdbc2_0/jdbc2_0-stdext.jar -Dregexp.jar=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-regexp/build/jakarta-regexp-20040722.jar -Dmail.home=/usr/local/gump/packages/javamail-1.3

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread jean-frederic clere
Mladen Turk wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: [error] (OS 10048)Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted. : proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:8080 (localhost) failed Anyone has a clue where and why those error messages comes

Some benchs results : WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Henri Gomez
I made some benchs on my Linux Fedora Core 2 on a P4 2.8ghz / 1Gb RAM : Apache 2.0.50 in - Apache 2.0.50 alone (simple html file) - TC 3.3.2/Coyote 1.1 - Apache 2.0.50 + jk 1.2.6 + TC 3.3.2/jk2 JkMount /examples/* local worker.local.port=8009 worker.local.host=localhost worker.local.type=ajp13

Re: AJP protocol description??

2004-07-22 Thread Henri Gomez
Bill Barker wrote: - Original Message - From: Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 8:42 PM Subject: AJP protocol description?? Hi.. I'm lurker from over in httpd-dev do you guys have a description of the AJP protocol?

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk aphowto.xml

2004-07-22 Thread hgomez
hgomez 2004/07/22 03:02:24 Modified:jk/xdocs/jk aphowto.xml Log: make no-jk appears in bold Revision ChangesPath 1.28 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk/aphowto.xml Index: aphowto.xml

RE: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Mladen Turk
Henri Gomez wrote: Very strange and totally unusable at least on WIN32. Well ab running on Win32 didn't very stable ;( Yeah, sure :) WTF then mod_jk doesn't produce such errors ? BTW, the errors reported comes from mod_proxy. MT. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30255] New: - Tomcat 5.0.26 JSP Encoding problem

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30255. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Graham Leggett
Filip Hanik - Dev wrote: I suppose in this case the load balancer would run HOOK_MIDDLE, and sticky would run HOOK_LAST. cool, and then have the server just try them in that order? ie, if the sticky server went down, it just takes the next one from the list (and that list should be ordered well

GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter)

2004-07-22 Thread postmaster
A message sent by you was blocked by GWAVA - Content protection for Novell GroupWise. The message was blocked for the following reason(s): Content filter The message contained the following information: Subject:Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Graham Leggett
Tim Funk wrote: I'm not sure of the status so far, but I'd like to summarize a strawman. I have no idea how to code this at this time or if it can be done. No problem, we drill down into the details as we go along :) *Config* [Feel free to change the names] ProxyClient http://server1/config.xml

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Graham Leggett
Remy Maucherat wrote: It's cool to have one less thing to configure, but it seems to me jvmRoute is the most reliable and efficient way of doing stickiness Can you describe the jvmRoute method to me? (the cookie way is intrusive, and the IP way is highly inaccurate). I agree on the IP way being

GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter)

2004-07-22 Thread postmaster
A message sent by you was blocked by GWAVA - Content protection for Novell GroupWise. The message was blocked for the following reason(s): Content filter The message contained the following information: Subject:Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

Re: mod_proxy details : WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Graham Leggett
Henri Gomez wrote: - I'm using ab (ApacheBench) and wonder if the -k (keep alive) if HTTP keep-alive is really used ? - Did mod_proxy keep a connection cache ? Proxy's HTTP module will reuse the same connection from previous connections if keepalives are being used, it doesn't keep a connection

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Graham Leggett
Mladen Turk wrote: BTW, the errors reported comes from mod_proxy. What are the errors though, and do they come from mod_proxy or mod_proxy_http? It would be a huge help to the people using proxy (ie for non tomcat related stuff) if we could find and fix these error conditions under load.

custom login and user management to tomcat realm

2004-07-22 Thread Don Hill
I am looking for some direction as to what APi I should be using for doing a custom login to tomcat 4.x 5.x, I don't want to use the j2ee container authentication, any suggestion on where I could find some info or sample code, I need to also do things like, get user list, get Roles,

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Remy Maucherat
Graham Leggett wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: It's cool to have one less thing to configure, but it seems to me jvmRoute is the most reliable and efficient way of doing stickiness Can you describe the jvmRoute method to me? It's really dumb: we append the node name to the session id when it's

GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter)

2004-07-22 Thread postmaster
A message sent by you was blocked by GWAVA - Content protection for Novell GroupWise. The message was blocked for the following reason(s): Content filter The message contained the following information: Subject:Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

error with Windows Service

2004-07-22 Thread Nasser Dawoud /MEM/PRO
I get the following error when trying to start the Tomcat 5 service in Windows XP...any idea why this is happening now? It used to work fine a week ago and all of a sudden, I started getting this error:

error with Tomcat Windows Service

2004-07-22 Thread Nasser Dawoud /MEM/PRO
I get the following error when trying to start the Tomcat 5 service in Windows XP...any idea why this is happening now? It used to work fine a week ago and all of a sudden, I started getting this error: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: error with Tomcat Windows Service

2004-07-22 Thread Nasser Dawoud /MEM/PRO
my mistake...here's the error from windows service: [2004-07-22 08:29:49] [364 javajni.c] [error] Unsuported JNI version 65537 [2004-07-22 08:29:49] [770 prunsrv.c] [error] Failed initializing java ..\bin\bootstrap.jar [2004-07-22 08:29:49] [982 prunsrv.c] [error] ServiceStart returned 2

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Graham Leggett
jean-frederic clere wrote: I also I have some (40) errors with concurrency 300 but Tomcat and Apache are in 2 different machines: +++ [Thu Jul 22 11:39:39 2004] [error] [client 172.25.182.35] proxy: DNS lookup failure for: pgtr0327.mch.fsc.net returned by ^^

Re: Some benchs results : WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Remy Maucherat
Henri Gomez wrote: I made some benchs on my Linux Fedora Core 2 on a P4 2.8ghz / 1Gb RAM : Apache 2.0.50 in - Apache 2.0.50 alone (simple html file) - TC 3.3.2/Coyote 1.1 - Apache 2.0.50 + jk 1.2.6 + TC 3.3.2/jk2 JkMount /examples/* local worker.local.port=8009 worker.local.host=localhost

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Remy Maucherat
Graham Leggett wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: I also I have some (40) errors with concurrency 300 but Tomcat and Apache are in 2 different machines: +++ [Thu Jul 22 11:39:39 2004] [error] [client 172.25.182.35] proxy: DNS lookup failure for: pgtr0327.mch.fsc.net returned by

Re: GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter)

2004-07-22 Thread Andreas Ernst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: http://www.gwava.com A message sent by you was blocked by GWAVA - Content protection for Novell GroupWise. The message was blocked for the following reason(s): * Content filter The message contained the following information: *Subject:* Re: Simple Sticky LB

RE: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Mladen Turk
Graham Leggett wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: BTW, the errors reported comes from mod_proxy. What are the errors though, and do they come from mod_proxy or mod_proxy_http? All are exactly the same: [error] (OS 10048)Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port)

RE: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Mladen Turk
Remy Maucherat wrote: +1 on using a real OS ;) Well, you could also use a real programming language for start ;-). MT. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Some benchs results : WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: I made some benchs on my Linux Fedora Core 2 on a P4 2.8ghz / 1Gb RAM : Apache 2.0.50 in - Apache 2.0.50 alone (simple html file) - TC 3.3.2/Coyote 1.1 - Apache 2.0.50 + jk 1.2.6 + TC 3.3.2/jk2 JkMount /examples/* local worker.local.port=8009

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Graham Leggett
Remy Maucherat wrote: DNS lookup failure for: pgtr0327.mch.fsc.net returned by ^^ It's not normal there's a DNS lookup on each request. Why does it happen ? In the config it was set to connect to a DNS name, which has to be resolved - but httpd doesn't do any caching of this

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Graham Leggett
Mladen Turk wrote: All are exactly the same: [error] (OS 10048)Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted. : proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:8080 (localhost) failed Ok. We had a same problen in jk for over two years now. The problem is

Re: Some benchs results : WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Peter Lin
the nightly build of jmeter has an alpha sampler that uses Commons HTTPClient. you may want to try that one instead, if you use jmeter peter On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 15:09:19 +0200, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: I made some benchs on my Linux

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread jean-frederic clere
Remy Maucherat wrote: Graham Leggett wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: I also I have some (40) errors with concurrency 300 but Tomcat and Apache are in 2 different machines: +++ [Thu Jul 22 11:39:39 2004] [error] [client 172.25.182.35] proxy: DNS lookup failure for: pgtr0327.mch.fsc.net

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Graham Leggett
Mladen Turk wrote: /* make the connection out of the socket */ do { rv = apr_socket_connect(*newsock, backend_addr); } while (APR_STATUS_IS_EINTR(rv)); One further question (I am not 100% clued up on the workings of apr's socket handling) - would a situation

RE: [5.next] Progress, more ideas and native connector benchmarks

2004-07-22 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, * Redo naming resources configuration using setAllProperties rule to make the XML less verbose. Example: Resource name=bean/MyBeanFactory auth=Container type=com.mycompany.MyBean factory=org.apache.naming.factory.BeanFactory bar=23/ I personally really like this

GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter)

2004-07-22 Thread postmaster
A message sent by you was blocked by GWAVA - Content protection for Novell GroupWise. The message was blocked for the following reason(s): Content filter The message contained the following information: Subject:RE: [5.next] Progress, more ideas and native connector benchmarks

Re: Some benchs results : WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Henri Gomez
Peter Lin wrote: the nightly build of jmeter has an alpha sampler that uses Commons HTTPClient. you may want to try that one instead, if you use jmeter peter made some tests with JMeter 2.0.1 but my laptop is way to slow. I need another smaller stress tool ;(

Re: GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter)

2004-07-22 Thread Andreas Ernst
Andreas Ernst schrieb: [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: http://www.gwava.com A message sent by you was blocked by GWAVA - Content protection for Novell GroupWise. The message was blocked for the following reason(s): * Content filter The message contained the following information: *Subject:*

Re: Some benchs results : WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Peter Lin
you can run it in non-Gui mode with -n option. http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/usermanual/get-started.html#non_gui might help, or not. peter On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 15:33:41 +0200, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter Lin wrote: the nightly build of jmeter has an alpha sampler that

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Graham Leggett
jean-frederic clere wrote: Not for each request but each time http makes a new connection to Tomcat. We have to cache the result of apr_sockaddr_info_get(). Added to bugzilla as a request for enhancement (so this doesn't fall through the cracks). Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s Description:

RE: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Mladen Turk
Graham Leggett wrote: So if I committed the above patch to httpd v2.1.0-dev would you be in a position to test it? No, I've tested it. Still has the same error messages. OS error 10048 means: Typically, only one usage of each socket address (protocol/IP address/port) is permitted. This

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs index.xml

2004-07-22 Thread yoavs
yoavs 2004/07/22 06:47:15 Modified:docs index.html xdocsindex.xml Log: Updated latest stable version from 5.0.25 to 5.0.27. Revision ChangesPath 1.62 +5 -3 jakarta-tomcat-site/docs/index.html Index: index.html

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Graham Leggett
Mladen Turk wrote: We had a same problen in jk for over two years now. The problem is that you will need at least: Line 1037 in proxy_util.c: /* make the connection out of the socket */ do { rv = apr_socket_connect(*newsock, backend_addr); } while

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Graham Leggett
Mladen Turk wrote: OS error 10048 means: Typically, only one usage of each socket address (protocol/IP address/port) is permitted. This error occurs if an application attempts to bind a socket to an IP address/port that has already been used for an existing socket, or a socket that was not closed

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread jean-frederic clere
Graham Leggett wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Not for each request but each time http makes a new connection to Tomcat. We have to cache the result of apr_sockaddr_info_get(). Added to bugzilla as a request for enhancement (so this doesn't fall through the cracks). That is PR 30259. Regards,

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Fernando R. Torrijos
Please help me to unsubscribe me from the tomcat and relatives forum. I already send a lot of mails to the mayordomo with the words unsubscribe but im still receiving mail. Please help me. thanks fernando R Torrijos _ Do You Yahoo!?

GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter)

2004-07-22 Thread postmaster
A message sent by you was blocked by GWAVA - Content protection for Novell GroupWise. The message was blocked for the following reason(s): Content filter The message contained the following information: Subject:Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Graham Leggett
Fernando R. Torrijos wrote: Please help me to unsubscribe me from the tomcat and relatives forum. I already send a lot of mails to the mayordomo with the words unsubscribe but im still receiving mail. Please help me. Please follow the instructions at the bottom of the emails you have received,

GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter)

2004-07-22 Thread postmaster
A message sent by you was blocked by GWAVA - Content protection for Novell GroupWise. The message was blocked for the following reason(s): Content filter The message contained the following information: Subject:Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

jk 1.2.6 to be tagged

2004-07-22 Thread Henri Gomez
I'll tag jk 1.2.6 by 17h CET. So if you have any showstopper, send me an email :))) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Mladen Turk
Graham Leggett wrote: used for an existing socket, or a socket that was not closed properly, or one that is still in the process of closing. For server applications that need to bind multiple sockets to the same port number, consider using setsockopt

GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter)

2004-07-22 Thread postmaster
A message sent by you was blocked by GWAVA - Content protection for Novell GroupWise. The message was blocked for the following reason(s): Content filter The message contained the following information: Subject:RE: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

Re: [5.next] Progress, more ideas and native connector benchmarks

2004-07-22 Thread Costin Manolache
Quick question - did you had any discussion on class loaders for 5.next? It's one area I'm playing with, I want to make sure I'm not going in oposite direction :-) BTW - another feature idea would be to extend the JMX configuration into the webapps, i.e. allow jmx apps to view and configure

GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter)

2004-07-22 Thread postmaster
A message sent by you was blocked by GWAVA - Content protection for Novell GroupWise. The message was blocked for the following reason(s): Content filter The message contained the following information: Subject:Re: [5.next] Progress, more ideas and native connector benchmarks

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_version.h

2004-07-22 Thread hgomez
hgomez 2004/07/22 08:08:55 Modified:jk/native/common jk_version.h Log: 1.2.6 release (before tagging) Revision ChangesPath 1.19 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_version.h Index: jk_version.h

Re: [5.next] Progress, more ideas and native connector benchmarks

2004-07-22 Thread Remy Maucherat
Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hola, * Redo naming resources configuration using setAllProperties rule to make the XML less verbose. Example: Resource name=bean/MyBeanFactory auth=Container type=com.mycompany.MyBean factory=org.apache.naming.factory.BeanFactory bar=23/ I

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Graham Leggett
Mladen Turk wrote: If you turn the loglevel to debug then there is no error messages (although everything is by the order of magnitude slower), so the closing algorithm is correct. The problem is IMHO that you are using a socket (presuming it is free) still served by the bucket brigade, but I may

Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote: Graham Leggett wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: It's cool to have one less thing to configure, but it seems to me jvmRoute is the most reliable and efficient way of doing stickiness Can you describe the jvmRoute method to me? It's really dumb: we append the node name to the

GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter)

2004-07-22 Thread postmaster
A message sent by you was blocked by GWAVA - Content protection for Novell GroupWise. The message was blocked for the following reason(s): Content filter The message contained the following information: Subject:Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter)

2004-07-22 Thread postmaster
A message sent by you was blocked by GWAVA - Content protection for Novell GroupWise. The message was blocked for the following reason(s): Content filter The message contained the following information: Subject:Re: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

Re: [5.next] Progress, more ideas and native connector benchmarks

2004-07-22 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote: Quick question - did you had any discussion on class loaders for 5.next? It's one area I'm playing with, I want to make sure I'm not going in oposite direction :-) I'll tweak the StandardCL to do a bit the same as the WebappCL (ie, try to make it faster). I'll also

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_version.h

2004-07-22 Thread hgomez
hgomez 2004/07/22 08:16:25 Modified:jk/native/common jk_version.h Log: jk 1.2.7-dev right now Revision ChangesPath 1.20 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_version.h Index: jk_version.h

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged

2004-07-22 Thread Henri Gomez
Henri Gomez wrote: I'll tag jk 1.2.6 by 17h CET. So if you have any showstopper, send me an email :))) JTC tagged as JK_1_2_6 Now back to jk 1.2.7-dev tarball to be released soon. Thanks to various commiters to provide the usual binaries... Regards

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/tcp ReplicationValve.java SimpleTcpCluster.java

2004-07-22 Thread fhanik
fhanik 2004/07/22 08:41:15 Modified:modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster ClusterManager.java modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/session DeltaManager.java SessionMessageImpl.java

Re: [5.next] Progress, more ideas and native connector benchmarks

2004-07-22 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Quick question - did you had any discussion on class loaders for 5.next? It's one area I'm playing with, I want to make sure I'm not going in oposite direction :-) I'll tweak the StandardCL to do a bit the same as the WebappCL (ie, try to make it

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/tcp replicationvalve.java simpletcpcluster.java

2004-07-22 Thread CDZone
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED RESPONSE FROM CDZONE Thank you for contacting us. If your enquiry is covered by the list below please visit our web site at http://www.cdzone.co.uk/accounts where you can: * Check your order status - we are unable to provide any more detailed information about

RE: Simple Sticky LB WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Mladen Turk
Graham Leggett wrote: Can you look at the comments at http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30260 - apparently this may be a Windows specific problem. Could be, or not. If for example after connect I write: if (rv == 730048) { apr_socket_close(*newsock); *newsock =

Re: re: [5.next] progress, more ideas and native connector benchmarks

2004-07-22 Thread CDZone
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED RESPONSE FROM CDZONE Thank you for contacting us. If your enquiry is covered by the list below please visit our web site at http://www.cdzone.co.uk/accounts where you can: * Check your order status - we are unable to provide any more detailed information about

Re: [5.next] Progress, more ideas and native connector benchmarks

2004-07-22 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Quick question - did you had any discussion on class loaders for 5.next? It's one area I'm playing with, I want to make sure I'm not going in oposite direction :-) I'll tweak the StandardCL to do a bit the same as the

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged

2004-07-22 Thread Henri Gomez
Henri Gomez wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: I'll tag jk 1.2.6 by 17h CET. So if you have any showstopper, send me an email :))) JTC tagged as JK_1_2_6 Now back to jk 1.2.7-dev tarball to be released soon. Source tarballs available at :

Re: Some benchs results : WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread jean-frederic clere
Henri Gomez wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: I made some benchs on my Linux Fedora Core 2 on a P4 2.8ghz / 1Gb RAM : Apache 2.0.50 in - Apache 2.0.50 alone (simple html file) - TC 3.3.2/Coyote 1.1 - Apache 2.0.50 + jk 1.2.6 + TC 3.3.2/jk2 JkMount /examples/* local

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_global.h

2004-07-22 Thread hgomez
hgomez 2004/07/22 09:31:07 Modified:jk/native/common jk_global.h Log: Well a post 1.2.6 fix since iSeries didn't have portable.h neither (no autoconf here). the jk 1.2.6 iSeries binaries will be generated with this patch Revision ChangesPath 1.32 +2 -2

Re: Some benchs results : WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Henri Gomez
jean-frederic clere wrote: mod_proxy in ap_proxy_http_cleanup() closes the socket if HTTP is 1.1 is that correct? The request was (from ab): +++ GET /examples/ HTTP/1.0^M User-Agent: ApacheBench/2.0.40-dev^M Connection: Keep-Alive^M Host: localhost:7779^M Accept: */*^M ^M +++ I'm still looking

RE: Some benchs results : WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Does wget support HTTP/1.1? Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 12:36 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Some benchs results : WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in

RFE mod_jk: cookie session tracking for load balancing with sub-domains

2004-07-22 Thread Sandy McArthur
I'm happy with the latest change to get_cookie but there is one more problem I've found. We, UF, have a convention of putting production services at http://service.ufl.edu/ and testing beta services at http://test.service.ufl.edu/ . This causes a problem with cookie based session tracking

Re: Some benchs results : WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Tim Funk
Try siege: http://joedog.org/siege/ Despite what the docs say, it runs pretty sweet on cygwin too. (with 2.60b5) -Tim Henri Gomez wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: mod_proxy in ap_proxy_http_cleanup() closes the socket if HTTP is 1.1 is that correct? The request was (from ab): +++ GET

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged

2004-07-22 Thread G√ľnter Knauf
Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ JFC's portable.h breaks NetWare too; should I now extend the #ifndef like Henry did? I guess there are probably more platforms which dont have portable.h, so it's perhaps a better approach to do: #ifdef HAVE_PORTABLE_H

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_global.h

2004-07-22 Thread fuankg
fuankg 2004/07/22 11:23:46 Modified:jk/native/common jk_global.h Log: post 1.2.6 fix since NetWare doesnt have portable.h (no autoconf here). the jk 1.2.6 NetWare binaries will be generated with this patch. Revision ChangesPath 1.33 +5 -1

JMX and tomcat

2004-07-22 Thread Don Hill
Hi, How would I use JMX/tomcat to get a handle on the realm and be able to call methods like authenticate(). I know I can get a realm but I believe its not writeable. I was trying to use the ServerFactory but it seems I get a classnotfound exception, are the container classloader not a child of

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30149] - IllegalArgumentException when using context-param in web.xml

2004-07-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30149. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

  1   2   >