Document

2004-07-26 Thread pier
Important notice! KWF Email scanner found a virus in following attachment: Notice.zip Content type: application/octet-stream Additional information from antivirus: W95/Spaces.gen Attachement has been removed by firewall.

Response from Rolia.net

2004-07-26 Thread webmaster
This email account no longer exists. To contact the management team of Rolia.net, please visit: http://www.rolia.net/mem/mem_mailRolia.php Thank you! ´Ëµç×ÓÓÊÏäÒѾ­Í£Ö¹Ê¹ÓÃ. Èç¹ûÄúÒªÁªÏµÏàÔ¼¼ÓÄôóÍøÉÏÉçÇø(Rolia.net), Çë·ÃÎÊ´ËÍøÒ³: http://www.rolia.net/mem/mem_mailRolia.php

RE: [GUMP@brutus]: jakarta-tomcat-5/jakarta-tomcat-5 success

2004-07-26 Thread Microsoft UK Graduate Recruitment
Please take me off this mail list. Many Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 July 2004 10:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jakarta-tomcat-5/jakarta-tomcat-5 success To whom it may satisfy... This is an

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Context.java

2004-07-26 Thread remm
remm2004/07/26 01:09:21 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup HostConfig.java ContextRuleSet.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardContext.java

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Remy Maucherat
Graham Leggett wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Until I'm shown a mod_proxy (with HTTP) with performance close to mod_jk, my opinion is that we can't use it. As I've pointed out already, mod_proxy is a framework. The performance numbers quoted tested mod_proxy_http, not mod_proxy, which doesn't do

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30291] - Wrong smap in expressions and scriptlets

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30291. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat wrote: Graham Leggett wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Until I'm shown a mod_proxy (with HTTP) with performance close to mod_jk, my opinion is that we can't use it. As I've pointed out already, mod_proxy is a framework. The performance numbers quoted tested mod_proxy_http, not

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Henri Gomez
Bill Barker wrote: I'm with Graham on this. Personally, I have very little interest in a mod_ajp module, but I am interested in proxy_ajp, proxy_lb, etc. Of course, since j-t-c has long doubled as j-t-sandbox, this means that I'm +0 for committing your stuff there. Well Mladen has been quick to

[PATCH] proxy lb support - step 1

2004-07-26 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi all, There has been some serious discussion for building load balancing support for mod_proxy. Here is the first in series of patches that will enable this. The patch adds lb support in scoreboard, so that statuses for each lb worker can be calculated for each child process. It uses optional

RE: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Mladen Turk
Henri Gomez wrote: Bill Barker wrote: I'm with Graham on this. Personally, I have very little interest in a mod_ajp module, but I am interested in proxy_ajp, proxy_lb, etc. Of course, since j-t-c has long doubled as j-t-sandbox, this means that I'm +0 for committing your

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Graham Leggett
Remy Maucherat wrote: The framework itself could be designed in a way which would end up hurting performance. It did happen in Tomcat in the past, and I don't know about mod_proxy since I haven't looked at it, but it could happen. All the framework does is determine that a proxy handler is

TC 5: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools

2004-07-26 Thread Rainer Jung
Am I right, that by design TC 5 only fully supports one Coyote JK pool at the moment? I enabled JMX HTTP adaptor via mx.enabled=true. Obviously org.apache.jk.common.JkMX tries to initialize the JMX HTTP adaptor not only once, but for every Coyote JK pool configured in server.xml. For the

Re: TC 5: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools

2004-07-26 Thread Remy Maucherat
Rainer Jung wrote: Am I right, that by design TC 5 only fully supports one Coyote JK pool at the moment? I enabled JMX HTTP adaptor via mx.enabled=true. Obviously org.apache.jk.common.JkMX tries to initialize the JMX HTTP adaptor not only once, but for every Coyote JK pool configured in

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Remy Maucherat
Graham Leggett wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: The framework itself could be designed in a way which would end up hurting performance. It did happen in Tomcat in the past, and I don't know about mod_proxy since I haven't looked at it, but it could happen. All the framework does is determine that a

jk 1.2.6 release - need more binaries

2004-07-26 Thread Henri Gomez
Hi to all, For jk 1.2.6 the following binaries are allready available : Windows (ISAPI/JK for AP 1.3.31/JK for AP2 2.0.50) Linux (JK for Fedora Core 2 Apache 2.0.50, for Suse 8.0 Apache 2.0.50 PPC, for Suse 9.1 Apache 2.0) Solaris (JK for Apache 1.3.31 EAPI/STANDARD) iSeries (AS/400 V5R2 and UP)

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardContext.java

2004-07-26 Thread remm
remm2004/07/26 03:56:55 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup HostConfig.java ContextConfig.java ExpandWar.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardContext.java Log: - Add logic for

RE: [Launcher] release 1.0

2004-07-26 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, This seems fine. I'm a little surprised Tomcat has been using Launcher all this time without a formal Launcher released ever made, but hey, life is full of surprises right? ;) Let me know if you need help from our side. (Saying that with my Tomcat hat on). Yoav Shapira Millennium Research

default charset for text/*

2004-07-26 Thread Michael Südkamp
Hello, In our web-app that runs with Tomcat 4.1.29 we set the content-type to text/xml in a servlet that serves an XML file. The XML encoding normally is UTF-8. We observed that special characters show up wrong in the browser. Packet sniffing revealed that Tomcat changed the content-type to

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Graham Leggett
Remy Maucherat wrote: I think very few people are actually using mod_proxy instead of mod_jk. You've got to back your assertion with some kind of numbers, otherwise it's FUD. As do you. The assertion was based on comments on this mailing list, but we've already established that there is a need

Re: jk 1.2.6 release - need more binaries

2004-07-26 Thread jean-frederic clere
Henri Gomez wrote: Hi to all, For jk 1.2.6 the following binaries are allready available : Windows (ISAPI/JK for AP 1.3.31/JK for AP2 2.0.50) Linux (JK for Fedora Core 2 Apache 2.0.50, for Suse 8.0 Apache 2.0.50 PPC, for Suse 9.1 Apache 2.0) Solaris (JK for Apache 1.3.31 EAPI/STANDARD) iSeries

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Henri Gomez
Graham Leggett wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: I think very few people are actually using mod_proxy instead of mod_jk. You've got to back your assertion with some kind of numbers, otherwise it's FUD. As do you. The assertion was based on comments on this mailing list, but we've already

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Graham Leggett
Henri Gomez wrote: Peace on ASF :) Indeed :) well mod_ajp will probably goes a bit farther than mod_proxy + proxy_ajp since mod_proxy will allways relay static configuration, ie map some knowns URL to knowns Tomcat. Why would mod_proxy always rely on a static configuration? Don't forget that a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30322] New: - Jsp's source directory in task Jasper2 for ant

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30322. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: TC 5: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools

2004-07-26 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Am I right, that by design TC 5 only fully supports one Coyote JK pool at the moment? I enabled JMX HTTP adaptor via mx.enabled=true. Obviously org.apache.jk.common.JkMX tries to initialize the JMX HTTP adaptor not only once, but for every Coyote JK

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Henri Gomez
Graham Leggett wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Peace on ASF :) Indeed :) well mod_ajp will probably goes a bit farther than mod_proxy + proxy_ajp since mod_proxy will allways relay static configuration, ie map some knowns URL to knowns Tomcat. Why would mod_proxy always rely on a static

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Costin Manolache
Mladen Turk wrote: Of course, no one is forced to participate in development, but everyone is welcome. The only question is do we have enough juice to make it official. AFICT, Remy, Henri and myself are in favor. But frankly I see no reason for someone to object, cause it's open source after

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30322] - Jsp's source directory in task Jasper2 for ant

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30322. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Mladen Turk
Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Of course, no one is forced to participate in development, but everyone is welcome. The only question is do we have enough juice to make it official. AFICT, Remy, Henri and myself are in favor. But frankly I see no reason for someone

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30324] New: - ERROR [JkCoyoteHandler] Error in action code

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30324. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30324] - ERROR [JkCoyoteHandler] Error in action code

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30324. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Henri Gomez
Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Of course, no one is forced to participate in development, but everyone is welcome. The only question is do we have enough juice to make it official. AFICT, Remy, Henri and myself are in favor. But frankly I see no reason for someone to object, cause

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29831] - Support for boolean property in bean factory

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29831. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

2004-07-26 Thread Michael Currie
Can someone please unsubscribe me from this list? I have sent about 20 email to unsubscribe and I'm still recieving them. THanks Mike Currie Senior Web Developer New Century Mortgage Direct 949 743 7037 Mobile 949 279 4358 Fax 866 281 0360 This electronic message transmission contains

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29826] - Installation always exits with an error code.

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29826. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: TC 5: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools

2004-07-26 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Am I right, that by design TC 5 only fully supports one Coyote JK pool at the moment? I enabled JMX HTTP adaptor via mx.enabled=true. Obviously org.apache.jk.common.JkMX tries to initialize the JMX HTTP adaptor not only once, but

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

2004-07-26 Thread yoavs
yoavs 2004/07/26 08:39:13 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming/factory BeanFactory.java webapps/docs changelog.xml Log: Addressed Bugzilla 29831. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +3 -0

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader WebappClassLoader.java WebappLoader.java

2004-07-26 Thread remm
remm2004/07/26 08:52:17 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader WebappClassLoader.java WebappLoader.java Log: - Update to use a flag for the anti JAR locking code. It isn't as foolproof as the other one, since you can't just delete a WAR

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30274] - Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30274. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup ContextConfig.java

2004-07-26 Thread remm
remm2004/07/26 08:54:39 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup ContextConfig.java Log: - When using the antiLocking flag, attempt to remove as much of the temp files when stopping. - As it was the case before, remove the work dir when

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30279] - allowLinking attribute value is not preserved or ignored after context is reloaded

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30279. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Dynamic updates and Apache v2.0

2004-07-26 Thread Graham Leggett
Hi all, I am starting a new thread for this, as it seems to be an important killer-app feature for any httpd v2.0 integration. People have said the config should be dynamically configurable - which part of the config should be dynamically configurable? In other words, would any of these

Re: Please take me off the list.

2004-07-26 Thread sjafri
Hi, Why am I included on this list? Please remove me from the list. Thanks. colin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread jean-frederic clere
Henri Gomez wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Of course, no one is forced to participate in development, but everyone is welcome. The only question is do we have enough juice to make it official. AFICT, Remy, Henri and myself are in favor. But frankly I see no reason for someone

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Graham Leggett
Mladen Turk wrote: If I make a design flaw, and the entire project gets unusable, it will make it just something like mod_java, mod_warp, mod_jk and mod_jk2 are... Dead. Nobody will get hanged for that. Some code is always better than no code - at best, the code will be good enough to fit the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30314] - Review new HostConfig and add something

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30314. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30279] - allowLinking attribute value is not preserved or ignored after context is reloaded

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30279. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30314] - Review new HostConfig and add something

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30314. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30314] - Review new HostConfig and add something

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30314. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Mladen Turk
Graham Leggett wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: If I make a design flaw, and the entire project gets unusable, it will make it just something like mod_java, mod_warp, mod_jk and mod_jk2 are... Dead. Nobody will get hanged for that. Some code is always better than no code - at best,

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

2004-07-26 Thread billbarker
billbarker2004/07/26 10:04:04 Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml Log: Fix version #. What ever the next version is that is released from here, it is not going to be called 5.0.x. Revision ChangesPath 1.78 +1 -1

Re: TC 5: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools

2004-07-26 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Am I right, that by design TC 5 only fully supports one Coyote JK pool at the moment? I enabled JMX HTTP adaptor via mx.enabled=true. Obviously org.apache.jk.common.JkMX tries to initialize the JMX HTTP

Re: Dynamic updates and Apache v2.0

2004-07-26 Thread Costin Manolache
First, by dynamic updates I mean changes to apache2 config that don't require a restart. For example, .htaccess files provide such a thing ( for a different area ). What updates ? There are several forms: 1. - add a new worker to a pool ( for example - expect big load, you buy more hardware,

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Costin Manolache
Mladen Turk wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Of course, no one is forced to participate in development, but everyone is welcome. The only question is do we have enough juice to make it official. AFICT, Remy, Henri and myself are in favor. But frankly I see no reason for

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Costin Manolache
Henri Gomez wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Of course, no one is forced to participate in development, but everyone is welcome. The only question is do we have enough juice to make it official. AFICT, Remy, Henri and myself are in favor. But frankly I see no reason for someone

Re: [5.next] Progress, more ideas and native connector benchmarks

2004-07-26 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Both difference and similarity :-). Eclipse ( osgi actually ) has a similar flat loader implementation, but with finer control over what is exported/imported and pretty strong versioning. In addition osgi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30325] New: - $CATALINA_HOME set unconditionally in bin/catalina.sh

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30325. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Costin Manolache
Henri Gomez wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Of course, no one is forced to participate in development, but everyone is welcome. The only question is do we have enough juice to make it official. AFICT, Remy, Henri and myself are in favor. But frankly I see no reason for someone

Re: [5.next] Progress, more ideas and native connector benchmarks

2004-07-26 Thread Remy Maucherat
I committed a few things: - The new deployer is getting there. Missing is the support for the manager webapp, but this won't be too hard to write. - I redid partially the naming. Now the NamingResource object is the main object, and Context is not polluted. My list is: - Update manager webapp,

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Remy Maucherat
jean-frederic clere wrote: We have noted that mod_proxy + mod_proxy_http are slow compared with mod_jk. I think that the next step should be to try to find why instead writting a new modules. May be a quick hacked mod_proxy_ajp to replace mod_proxy_http is the first step. Note that I am a bit

RE: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Mladen Turk
Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: If I make a design flaw, and the entire project gets unusable, it will make it just something like mod_java, mod_warp, mod_jk and mod_jk2 are... Dead. Nobody will get hanged for that. I don't think the goal is to accumulate more

Re: [5.next] Progress, more ideas and native connector benchmarks

2004-07-26 Thread Bill Barker
I'll volunteer for the admin webapp stuff. I enjoy deleting stuff from there ;-). - Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 9:27 AM Subject: Re: [5.next] Progress, more ideas and native connector

Re: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools

2004-07-26 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 3:48 AM Subject: TC 5: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools Am I right, that by design TC 5 only fully supports one Coyote JK pool at the moment? Yes. If at some point we

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30325] - $CATALINA_HOME set unconditionally in bin/catalina.sh

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30325. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30325] - [PATCH] $CATALINA_HOME set unconditionally in bin/catalina.sh

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30325. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Costin Manolache
Mladen Turk wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: If I make a design flaw, and the entire project gets unusable, it will make it just something like mod_java, mod_warp, mod_jk and mod_jk2 are... Dead. Nobody will get hanged for that. I don't think the goal is to accumulate more

Re: TC 5: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools

2004-07-26 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Am I right, that by design TC 5 only fully supports one Coyote JK pool at the moment? I enabled JMX HTTP adaptor via mx.enabled=true. Obviously org.apache.jk.common.JkMX tries to

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

2004-07-26 Thread Remy Maucherat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: billbarker2004/07/26 10:04:04 Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml Log: Fix version #. What ever the next version is that is released from here, it is not going to be called 5.0.x. I did refer to that with the 5.5 revision number, because the API isn't

Re: TC 5: Support for multiple Coyote JK-Pools

2004-07-26 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Am I right, that by design TC 5 only fully supports one Coyote JK pool at the moment? I enabled JMX HTTP adaptor via mx.enabled=true. Obviously

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/conf server-minimal.xml

2004-07-26 Thread remm
remm2004/07/26 12:35:00 Modified:catalina/src/conf server-minimal.xml Log: - Update server minimal as well. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +3 -12 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/conf/server-minimal.xml Index: server-minimal.xml

PATCH: mod_jk get_cookie jvmroute fix

2004-07-26 Thread Sandy McArthur
Attached is a patch that fixes the get_cookie in jk_lb_worker.c taken from the CVS today. The current implementation will fail if there are two JSESSIONID cookies at different domain levels. My patch below checks a JSESSIONID value for a known jvmroute before it returns a session cookie. The

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: We have noted that mod_proxy + mod_proxy_http are slow compared with mod_jk. I think that the next step should be to try to find why instead writting a new modules. May be a quick hacked mod_proxy_ajp to replace mod_proxy_http is the first step.

Jeg er på ferie

2004-07-26 Thread richard . nilsen
I will be out of the office starting 23.07.2004 and will not return until 16.08.2004. Jeg sjekker mail innimellom. Er det ting rundt drift send mail til [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ha en fortsatt fin dag. Mvh Richard D. Nilsen Orkla Media SSIT

Re: Dynamic updates and Apache v2.0

2004-07-26 Thread Graham Leggett
Costin Manolache wrote: 1. - add a new worker to a pool ( for example - expect big load, you buy more hardware, etc ). - gracefully remove a worker ( for upgrade for example ) - the implication is that sticky sessions will still go, no new sessions. - change parameters of a worker ( like

RE: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Mladen Turk
Costin Manolache wrote: AFICR you said that you will have something to share, and I'd love to see some other, perhaps better ideas. No, I'm trying stuff on java side. OK. And just like with code - I don't think we are missing propositions or ideas. What is missing is an

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java

2004-07-26 Thread kinman
kinman 2004/07/26 13:50:36 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java Log: - Fix 30291: Smap for a tag should not include its body. - Fix 30289: Incorrect Smap for multiple line java expression. Revision ChangesPath 1.236 +8 -5

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30289] - Wrong SMAP mappings with body dependent tags

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30289. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30291] - Wrong smap in expressions and scriptlets

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30291. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/bin setclasspath.sh

2004-07-26 Thread markt
markt 2004/07/26 14:29:42 Modified:catalina/src/bin setclasspath.sh Log: Fix bug 12056. Test for execute rather than read permissions since execute is what we need. Add missing JDK not JRE warning. Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +5 -4

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30331] New: - META-INF/context.xml creates conf/.../foo.xml as a directory

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30331. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30332] New: - Field charsetSet reset problem in class org.apache.coyote.Response

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30332. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/bin setclasspath.sh

2004-07-26 Thread markt
markt 2004/07/26 15:01:19 Modified:catalina/src/bin setclasspath.sh Log: Fix bug 12056. Test for execute rather than read permissions since execute is what we need. Add missing JDK not JRE warning. - Ported from TC4 Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +5 -4

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12056] - Startup scripts test for invalid permissions.

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12056. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30332] - Field charsetSet reset problem in class org.apache.coyote.Response

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30332. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Dynamic updates and Apache v2.0

2004-07-26 Thread Filip Hanik \(lists\)
why are we so focused on dynamic this dynamic that, there is nothing about mod_proxy that is dynamic, and instead of delaying the stability and release of a working mod_proxy with a load balancer, make it work, make it work well, then add fancy features. mod_jk2 became way to cluttered this exact

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30340] New: - substract() disfunctional in CharChunk and ByteChunk classes

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30340. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Mod_ajp initial

2004-07-26 Thread Costin Manolache
Mladen Turk wrote: Well, the way I see (think that Henri has the similar ideas) is to have the ajp protocol lib, usable to communicate to TC from any container, not only http server, and mod_ajp as a layer on top of it _only_ for Apache 2.0 branch _and_only_ if the proxy_ajp doesn't get back