Ich werde ab 14.09.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
16.09.2004.
Ihre Mail wird nicht weitergeleitet.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Alexander Koch
DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH
Unternehmenszentrale
Am DFS-Campus 10
D - 63225 Langen
Tel.: +49-(0)6103-707-0
Home Page: http://www.dfs.de
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Some results for current HEAD build:
It's fixed now. The bug which caused this was minor, but was still worth
fixing (it was causing session creation as long as an authenticator was
configured).
Great!
All the tests are passing now.
Regards,
MT.
mturk 2004/09/14 00:59:41
Modified:.tomcat.nsi
Log:
Fix function findJVMPath. It failed to set the custom jre path if the
path was not JDK path. Now that we can use only JRE, enable that.
The JRE paths does not have 'jre\bin\', but just 'bin\' prefix.
Also add
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21616.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ich werde ab 14.09.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
16.09.2004.
Ihre Mail wird nicht weitergeleitet.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Alexander Koch
DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH
Unternehmenszentrale
Am DFS-Campus 10
D - 63225 Langen
Tel.: +49-(0)6103-707-0
Home Page: http://www.dfs.de
I recognized a behaviour in Tomcat (version 4.1.29) and would like to no if
you
think this behaviour is a requirement to confirm to the servlet-spec-2.3.
The reason for this question is that our production environment uses
another
appserver than tomcat (sorry for that!) which does not behave
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31216.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
If you are submitting your 2002 ES Survey DataDisk, this serves as a confirmation of
receipt. The Survey Project Office will contact you if we have difficulty reading your
submission.
If you are requesting technical assistance on how to complete the 2002 OCR ES Survey
or regarding Survey
Hi,
Great ;)
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 2:45 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: 5.5.2-alpha tomorrow
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Some results for
remm2004/09/14 06:20:03
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Embedded.java
Log:
- Fix classname of the connector.
- Remove socket factory.
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +2 -34
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This
e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed,
Well if you already have a patch, then it would be polite to share :).
Anyhow you can post either to this thread or create a bugzilla #.
Regards,
MT.
Before I post this for real, can we talk? :-) Below is the diff of the
changes I'm testing today. I'm gonna
wait to post this as an
Guys,
We run an internal mass web hosting platform for our clients.
In order to protect them as much as poss we make their areas read only.
We set the normal java.io.tmpdir to be a writeable area.
We've hit an issue at the moment where sometimes under certain conditions the
Hi,
Ant 1.6 adds a tempdir attribute to the Javac task. You can use that to
se the tempdir via Ant or in the DefaultCompilerAdapter. You will need
to run with Ant 1.6 or later obviously, and also have a custom version
of DefaultCompilerAdapter. If you'd like your enhancement to be ported
into
Hi,
Tomcat behaviour is the right one (I've sopken with the spec lead). File
a bug against your Container (or move to Tomcat :-) )
Thanks
-- Jeanfrancois
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recognized a behaviour in Tomcat (version 4.1.29) and would like to no if
you
think this behaviour is a
This is already in bugzilla as
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29570
This was fixed in CVS for TC4 and TC5 2 days ago and should be included in the
next release.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: David Cassidy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31227.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31227.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12428.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The issue is that there's no value in this: it would likely take 5
minutes for an attacker to figure out the webserver is
running Tomcat.
The Server header is maybe the less visible of them (and gives little
information when compared to the
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) --
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Textfile.txt
.exe (in Textfile.zip)
The uncleanable
funkman 2004/09/14 17:16:05
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java Http11Protocol.java
Log:
Allow for customized server header at config time.
So now one can do this:
Connector port=8080 server=TinFoil Hats R US
funkman 2004/09/14 17:21:22
Modified:webapps/docs/config http.xml
Log:
Document the server attribute.
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +30 -25jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config/http.xml
Index: http.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31232.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31232.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12428.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mark Thomas wrote:
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The issue is that there's no value in this: it would likely take 5
minutes for an attacker to figure out the webserver is
running Tomcat.
The Server header is maybe the less visible of them (and gives little
information when
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31233.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31233.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
29 matches
Mail list logo