[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native (in module jakarta-tomcat-connectors) failed
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 projects, and has been outstanding for 10 runs. The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'. For reference only, the following projects are affected by this: - jakarta-tomcat-jk-native : Connectors to various web servers Full details are available at: http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jakarta-tomcat-jk-native/index.html That said, some information snippets are provided here. The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided: -INFO- Failed with reason build failed The following work was performed: http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jakarta-tomcat-jk-native/gump_work/build_jakarta-tomcat-connectors_jakarta-tomcat-jk-native.html Work Name: build_jakarta-tomcat-connectors_jakarta-tomcat-jk-native (Type: Build) Work ended in a state of : Failed Elapsed: Command Line: make [Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native] - Making all in common make[1]: Entering directory `/home/gump/workspaces2/public/workspace/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common' /bin/sh /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/apache-httpd/dest-22122004/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc -I/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/apache-httpd/dest-22122004/include -g -O2 -g -O2 -pthread -DHAVE_APR -I/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/apr/dest-22122004/include/apr-1 -g -O2 -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -I /opt/jdk1.4/include -I /opt/jdk1.4/include/ -c jk_ajp12_worker.c /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/apache-httpd/dest-22122004/build/libtool: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/apache-httpd/dest-22122004/build/libtool: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [jk_ajp12_worker.lo] Error 127 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/gump/workspaces2/public/workspace/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 - To subscribe to this information via syndicated feeds: - RSS: http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jakarta-tomcat-jk-native/rss.xml - Atom: http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jakarta-tomcat-jk-native/atom.xml == Gump Tracking Only === Produced by Gump version 2.2. Gump Run 3722122004, brutus:brutus-public:3722122004 Gump E-mail Identifier (unique within run) #12. -- Apache Gump http://gump.apache.org/ [Instance: brutus] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32795] New: - If RequestDumperValve is enabled, the request parameter value parsed by default character encoding is always returned.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32795. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32795 Summary: If RequestDumperValve is enabled, the request parameter value parsed by default character encoding is always returned. Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.30 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: Catalina AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In Tomcat container that enabled the RequestDumperValve valve, request.setCharacterEncoding method doesn't affect the behavior of request.getParameter method, so servlet or jsp cannot correctly get any multi-byte characters contained in the request parameter. On the other hand, if the RequestDumperValve valve is disabled, the request parameter that contains multi-byte characters is done correctly. This issue occurs in both GET and POST requests, and also Tomcat 4.1.31 release. Root cause: It seems that the logging processes of the request infomations are worked in RequestDumperValve, before calling servlet, jsp, and filter. In that case, naturally, the request character encoding contained in them is null value and RequestDumperValve prints out it, and it also prints out an information about request parameters. Then, any request parameters are initially parsed by default encoding (=8859_1), because character encoding of request is null. In CoyoteRequest, when the method to get request parameter is called, parsing of request parameters is processed for only one time. After this initial parsing of request parameters, the setter method of request character encoding doesn't affect the behavior of getter methods of request parameter at all. For that reason, even if the setter method of request character encoding is often invoked in servlet or jsp, or filter, the request parameter value that was initially parsed by default encoding is always returned. Workaround: Customize and substitute the filter class equivalent to the RequestDumperValve valve. RequestDumperFilter class contained in examples application is a good guide. Regards, Kan Ogawa -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32793] - Can't run Tomcat 5.5.4 with JRE version 5.0
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32793. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32793 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 10:12 --- omg, did you even read the error message? look again ... The JAVA_HOME environment variable is not defined corre This environment variable is needed to run this program NB: *JAVA_HOME should point to a JDK not a JRE* Now look at your JAVA_HOME Using JAVA_HOME: C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0 Looks like JRE no breaking the *JAVA_HOME should point to a JDK not a JRE* Right-click My Computer, Properties, Advanced Tab, Environment Variables buttonm, New System variable Name= JAVA_HOME Value=c:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.5.0 Run startup.bat. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32771] - Cannot undeploy/deploy misconfigured app after tomcat startup
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32771. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32771 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 11:51 --- Well, Remy, just out of curiosity, when you consider a bug a bug? ;) Avoid screwing up context.xml (and same with server.xml). In a perfect world i'd agree with you, but in a large company where, who's operating (and sometimes configuring) the application servers are not the same people who wrote the apps, to paraphrase a famous movie, I've seen things, you humans can't even imagine...:) Anyhow, i tried to look into the source and i saw that the problem is that the app gets registered in the deployed Map when indeed the Context has not been built and there's no child with that name added to the host container. This makes the app no longer neither deployable nor undeployable and makes Tomcat behaving erratically at stop time. If i didn't overlook something, in org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig should be enough to check if the digester correctly built the Context and if has been added as a child to the host container before registering it into the deployed Map. In this case, the war deployer will have a chance later to try to deploy the app war, but since the context.xml is screwed up, the app will be registered but will remain stopped. This will allow to undeploy and redeploy it without problems. Obviously this will cause the context.xml to be parsed twice, and the log will show twice the SAXException messages, but i don't think this should be a problem, because now it is a recoverable and controlled situation. I'll attach a patch for this. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32771] - Cannot undeploy/deploy misconfigured app after tomcat startup
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32771. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32771 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 11:53 --- Created an attachment (id=13820) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13820action=view) HostConfig patch Here's the patch that should solve what described above. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is the status of work on StandardContext.isLazy()
I recently noticed boolean lazy field in StandardContext. It is marked as experimental and seems to do nothing. Is anyone willing to implement Context lazy loading? If not, why has it been abandoned? cheers, /dd - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32800] New: - Add Redirector and failOnError support for Catalina Ant tasks
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32800. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32800 Summary: Add Redirector and failOnError support for Catalina Ant tasks Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.6 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Catalina AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm submitting a patch to Catalina Ant task to add Redirector and failOnError support, so that Manager and JMX commands output can be captured in files or Ant properties to ease Ant task automation. The change is transparent to the casual user, because if the Redirector support is not configured nothing changes in the usual task behaviour. If the patch is accepted i'll update the tasks documentation accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32800] - Add Redirector and failOnError support for Catalina Ant tasks
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32800. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32800 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 16:16 --- Created an attachment (id=13821) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13821action=view) Patch to existing tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32800] - Add Redirector and failOnError support for Catalina Ant tasks
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32800. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32800 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 16:17 --- Created an attachment (id=13822) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13822action=view) Redirector helper task -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP issues
Hi, There are apparently a few licensing issues with some files in the Tomcat CVS: jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src /share/org/apache/catalina/util/CharsetMapper.java 18: * This class is based on a class originally written by Jason Hunter 19: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] as part of the book Java Servlet Programming 20: * (O'Reilly). See http://www.servlets.com/book for more information. 21: * Used by Sun Microsystems with permission. 22: */ 23: 24: package org.apache.catalina.util; jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admi n/images/Context.gif 4: ?ycga???wHIL!?OCopyright 2000 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5: JLF GR Ver 1.0 jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admi n/images/Host.gif 2: !?OCopyright 2000 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/ org/apache/tomcat/util/http/LocaleToCharsetMap.java 19: * This class was originally written by Jason Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20: * as part of the book Java Servlet Programming (O'Reilly). 21: * See http://www.servlets.com/book for more information. 22: * Used by Sun Microsystems with permission. Fixing the GIFs should be easy. How about the two Java files ? I would need an answer from Jason and Craig to see if I can safely remove the comments (otherwise we would have to reimplement these, right ?). Thanks, Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32800] - Add Redirector and failOnError support for Catalina Ant tasks
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32800. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32800 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 17:41 --- I'll look into your patches (which look good) tomorrow. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP issues
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:40:25 +0100, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fixing the GIFs should be easy. How about the two Java files ? I would need an answer from Jason and Craig to see if I can safely remove the comments (otherwise we would have to reimplement these, right ?). Sounds right. Let me know if you need any assistance. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32805] New: - Intermittent tomcat server crash when running JdbcOdbcResultSetMetaData.getColumnType() method
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32805. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32805 Summary: Intermittent tomcat server crash when running JdbcOdbcResultSetMetaData.getColumnType() method Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.2 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Keywords: ErrorMessage Severity: critical Priority: P1 Component: Catalina AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The tomcat server crashes intermittently when a jsp try access the JdbcOdbcResultSetMetaData.getColumnType() method. Following error was recorded in the jakarta log file. [2004-12-17 08:01:36] [info] Running Service... [2004-12-17 08:01:36] [info] Starting service... [2004-12-17 08:01:46] [info] Service started. [2004-12-22 11:21:00] [info] JNI [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNI An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM. [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNI Unexpected Signal : EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc005) occurred at PC=0x6CE53C10 [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNI Function= [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNI [Unknown. [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNI ] [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNI Library=(N/A) [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNI [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNI NOTE: We are unable to locate the function name symbol for the error [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNI just occurred. Please refer to release documentation for possible [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNI reason and solutions. [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNI [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNI [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNI Current Java thread: [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNIat sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbc.colAttributes (Native Method) [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNIat sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbc.SQLColAttributes(JdbcOdbc.java:2609) [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNIat sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcResultSet.getColAttribute(JdbcOdbcResultSet.java:5448) [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNIat sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcResultSet.getColumnType(JdbcOdbcResultSet.java:6059) [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNIat sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcResultSetMetaData.getColumnType (JdbcOdbcResultSetMetaData.java:527) [2004-12-22 11:21:02] [info] JNIat shared.DB.getStringType(DB.java:70) [2004-12-22 11:21:03] [info] JNIat shared.DB.runQueryMEByRecords (DB.java:230) [2004-12-22 11:21:03] [info] JNIat shared.RunQuery.executeQueryByRec (RunQuery.java:95) [2004-12-22 11:21:03] [info] JNIat olog2.ReadOlog.ReadMain (ReadOlog.java) [2004-12-22 11:21:03] [info] JNIat org.apache.jsp.jsp.olog2.ologMain_jsp._jspService(ologMain_jsp.java:209) [2004-12-22 11:21:03] [info] JNIat org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:133) [2004-12-22 11:21:03] [info] JNIat javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:856) [2004-12-22 11:21:03] [info] JNIat org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:308) [2004-12-22 11:21:03] [info] JNI- locked 0x10cfa0b8 (a org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper) [2004-12-22 11:21:03] [info] JNIat org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:301) [2004-12-22 11:21:03] [info] JNIat org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:248) [2004-12-22 11:21:03] [info] JNIat javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:856) [2004-12-22 11:21:03] [info] JNIat org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter (ApplicationFilterChain.java:237) [2004-12-22 11:21:03] [info] JNIat org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter (ApplicationFilterChain.java:157) [2004-12-22 11:21:04] [info] JNIat org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke (StandardWrapperValve.java:214) [2004-12-22 11:21:04] [info] JNIat org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext (StandardValveContext.java:104) [2004-12-22 11:21:04] [info] JNIat org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:520) [2004-12-22 11:21:04] [info] JNIat org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invokeInternal (StandardContextValve.java:198) [2004-12-22 11:21:04] [info] JNIat org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke (StandardContextValve.java:152) [2004-12-22 11:21:04] [info] JNIat org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext (StandardValveContext.java:104) [2004-12-22 11:21:04] [info] JNIat org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:520) [2004-12-22 11:21:04] [info] JNIat
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32806] New: - Ability to force case-insensitive URL behavior
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806 Summary: Ability to force case-insensitive URL behavior Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.4 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Connector:Coyote AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I know you guys kept Tomcat case-sensitive (for paths, URLs) under win32 because of migration issues but I personally think the entire concept of case-sensitivity is crap (hey, it's my opinion) and so I'd like to disable it on my deployment. I suspect a lot of other win32, macOSX, OS/2 users would love to do the same. Can you please add an option for making paths/URLs case sensitive so I can enable it under win32? Thank you, Gili -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32806] - Ability to force case-insensitive URL behavior
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 18:48 --- No. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32806] - Ability to force case-insensitive URL behavior
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 19:37 --- Uuuh. This is an open-source project right? What the heck is no? I don't think you get to maintain a monopoly on the idea train :) How about you keep this issue open and if it gets eonugh votes you actually go ahead and implement it? Closing it as INVALID states that regardless of how many votes it gets you don't give a damn. Well, as an open-source project I don't think you really get to do that. The community should have a say. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32806] - Ability to force case-insensitive URL behavior
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 19:56 --- Take a look at SRV.9.5 and SRV.11.* The specs are very clear about case-sensitivity and Tomcat development is driven by the Servlet/JSP Specs. To those of us who have written our apps to the specs, the sudden apperance of case-insensitive containers would cause major headaches. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32806] - Ability to force case-insensitive URL behavior
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 20:14 --- Ben, Thank you for your polite reply. Remy, had you given me this kind of reply I would have taken it completely different than I did. Now, on the topic of the specification. You are absolutely right that it calls for case-sensitive string comparisons between request and resource paths. Thank you for pointing this out. I will take this up with authors of the specification. What I am really pushing for is for the use of File.getCanonicalPath() on both the request and resource path before string comparison. Ok, leaving this issue as closed. Thank you, Gili -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32806] - Ability to force case-insensitive URL behavior
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 20:19 --- Case insensitivity is available in 4.1.(for win32) The case insensitive flag is also there in FileDireContext in 5.5. So I think it would still work? http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/windows.html#case -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32795] - If RequestDumperValve is enabled, the request parameter value parsed by default character encoding is always returned.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32795. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32795 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |enhancement --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 20:29 --- This behaviour is clearly documented. quote WARNING: Using this valve has side-effects. The output from this valve includes any parameters included with the request. The parameters will be decoded using the default platform encoding. Any subsequent calls to request.setCharacterEncoding() within the web application will have no effect. /quote Changing the status of this to an enhancement request. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32806] - Ability to force case-insensitive URL behavior
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 20:50 --- Very cool, found it here: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/context.html Ben, back to your original point: what can I expect to happen if I disable case-sensitivity? I don't see how apps that have been written for case-sensitivity would break under case-insensitive containers (unless they explicitly expect a path resolution to fail but it now succeeds -- but this sounds more like a testcase than a real-life application). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32806] - Ability to force case-insensitive URL behavior
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 20:53 --- Oof, sorry. I just read the documentation says disabling case-sensitivity will result in allowing JSP source code disclosure, among other security problems. I know this somewhat requires you guys to go out on a limb, but can we not fix these problems? I don't mind categorizing such fixes as lower-priority, but it would be nice to have it fixed so I can disable case-sensitivity. Meanwhile, I have written a formal request to the Servlet Specification maintainer, asking them to allow implementations to make use of File.getCanonicalPath() if they so choose. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32806] - Ability to force case-insensitive URL behavior
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:00 --- Bugzilla is not really the place for this so I'll make it brief. A case insensitive app server wouldn't be able to differentiate between http://localhost:8080/myPage and http://localhost:8080/mypage Also, if an app is written with the assumption of case insensitivity and then deployed on a server with case sensitivity a file with an extension of .JSP could end up being treated as a text file (the source would be returned). If you want to continue the conversation, just post a question to the tomcat user's list. -Ben -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32806] - Ability to force case-insensitive URL behavior
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:08 --- Continuing on tomcat-dev mailing list under the heading: Case insensitive URLs: Issue #32806 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30168] - warning message needed when workers2.properties not found
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30168. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30168 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:08 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Case insensitive URLs: Issue #32806
Hi, This is a continuation of the discussion here: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806 Ben, I understand the example you posted as comment #8 but I feel this is best handled in release notes. You should dedicate a section to migration notes and discuss this and many other concerns. I'm sure case-sensitivity is only one of many potential concerns with migrating or upgrading Tomcat. Aside from the example you gave (caused by migration) are there any other security concerns? Thank you, Gili - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32518] - JK_IIS fails to translate + character in URL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32518. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32518 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:08 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32404] - Performance regression with load-balancer config
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32404. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32404 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:09 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12946] - parameter serverRoot from jk2.properties not read; workaround
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12946. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12946 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:20 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14323] - Form Based Authentication Not Triggered By Coyote JK Connector
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14323. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14323 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED OS/Version||All Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:20 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22130] - Tomcat VM not shutdown successfull as jk2 JMX handler is active
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22130. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22130 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:22 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30324] - ERROR [JkCoyoteHandler] Error in action code
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30324. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30324 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED OS/Version||All Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:37 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Case insensitive URLs: Issue #32806
This is a continuation of the discussion here:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806
Ben, I understand the example you posted as comment #8 but I
feel this is best handled in release notes. You should dedicate a
section to migration notes and discuss this and many other concerns.
I'm sure case-sensitivity is only one of many potential concerns with
migrating or upgrading Tomcat. Aside from the example you gave (caused
by migration) are there any other security concerns?
Thank you,
Gili
To be honest with you, I don't know. I, personally, prefer case
sensitive environments. With the exception of IIS, I've never had to
work with an app server that wasn't case-sensitive. When I type 'a', I
mean 'a', not ('a' or 'A'). For that reason, I've never researched the
issue.
Since the naming convention in Java depends on case-sensitivity, I
suspect that the majority of Servlet/JSP developers feel the same way.
Pursue it if you like but I suspect it will fall on deaf ears, both here
and with the Spec group.
When in Rome. ;)
-Ben
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20638] - Jun 10, 2003 5:14:47 AM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelUh receive
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20638. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20638 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:40 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22410] - network level bug?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22410. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22410 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:40 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18342] - socketExceptions in 4.1.24
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18342. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18342 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Connector:Coyote JK 2 |Connector:JK/AJP ||(deprecated) OS/Version||All -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25055] - bypass of apache authentication
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Connector:Coyote JK 2 |Connector:JK/AJP ||(deprecated) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18582] - jk_endpoint.c (90)]: workerEnv.init() create slot epStat.0 failed isapi_redirector2.dll v2.0.2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18582. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18582 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED OS/Version||All Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:42 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19044] - Can't find child xxxx in scoreboard
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19044. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19044 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:42 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21129] - Error message : The Parameter is incorrect when doing multipart requests (fileupload)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21129. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21129 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED OS/Version||All Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:43 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21146] - Request variables from Apache are not available in Tomcat
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21146. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21146 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Connector:Coyote JK 2 |Connector:JK/AJP ||(deprecated) OS/Version||All -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22397] - Compiler warnings
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22397. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22397 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:44 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22432] - Tomcat waits, then times out when shut down
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22432. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED OS/Version||All Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:44 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21939] - Coyote JK 2 outputs request parameters
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21939. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21939 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:45 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21983] - Coyote JK2 connector ignores Accept count property
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21983. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21983 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:45 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23810] - thread locked on org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.read
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23810. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23810 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:46 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24151] - JSP page relative to DocumentRoot as Directory Index does not work : Directories are listed
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24151. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24151 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:48 --- This should have been posted to the tomcat-user mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28289] - lb_factor works backwards from the way it is implemented in JK
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28289. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28289 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED OS/Version||All Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:49 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26977] - Request received is corrupt (SOMETIMES)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26977. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26977 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:49 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23105] - JkMount overrides Alias
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23105. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23105 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Connector:Coyote JK 2 |Connector:JK/AJP ||(deprecated) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24380] - Tomcat cannot support file download with non-ISO characters filename
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24380. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24380 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Connector:Coyote JK 2 |Connector:JK/AJP ||(deprecated) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26003] - Missing workers.properties and bug in the example page online
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26003. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Connector:Coyote JK 2 |Connector:JK/AJP ||(deprecated) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26541] - Empty request parameters are stripped as the request passes through the JK connector
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26541. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26541 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:52 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28532] - ajp13.service() ajpGetReply recoverable error 3
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28532. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28532 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED OS/Version||All Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:52 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29301] - URL starting with the name of a context not routed to Tomcat
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29301. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29301 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:52 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29911] - build fails with unable to infer tagged configuration
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29911. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29911 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:53 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26003] - Missing workers.properties and bug in the example page online
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26003. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:54 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24380] - Tomcat cannot support file download with non-ISO characters filename
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24380. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24380 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:55 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 27796 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Case insensitive URLs: Issue #32806
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:39:53 -0500, Ben Souther wrote:
This is a continuation of the discussion here:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806
Ben, I understand the example you posted as comment #8 but I
feel this is best handled in release notes. You should dedicate a
section to migration notes and discuss this and many other concerns.
I'm sure case-sensitivity is only one of many potential concerns with
migrating or upgrading Tomcat. Aside from the example you gave (caused
by migration) are there any other security concerns?
Thank you,
Gili
To be honest with you, I don't know. I, personally, prefer case
sensitive environments. With the exception of IIS, I've never had to
work with an app server that wasn't case-sensitive. When I type 'a', I
mean 'a', not ('a' or 'A'). For that reason, I've never researched the
issue.
Since the naming convention in Java depends on case-sensitivity, I
suspect that the majority of Servlet/JSP developers feel the same way.
Pursue it if you like but I suspect it will fall on deaf ears, both here
and with the Spec group.
When in Rome. ;)
hehe. Agreed. I admit it is a subjective thing, and exactly for
that reason I think I should have the option/ability to make Tomcat
work the way I personally prefer. I will pursue the issue further with
the specification team :)
Funny you should bring up Java being case-sensitive. My first
programming languages were BASIC and (Turbo) Pascal. While I disliked
the former, I liked the latter. I really like Java a lot, but I still
hold the view that case-sensitivity is a silly concept for
file-systems, programming languages, etc. I agree 100% with you that
when I say 'a' I mean 'a' and not 'A' and I don't want some nitwit
coding using 'a myClassA' when I declare 'class A'. Still, my view is
that this is a coding style sort of thing and just like the compiler
does not flag compiler errors for poor coding style, it should not flag
errors for people ignoring case sensitivity. I would further suggest
that case sensitivity issues are best handled by the IDE
(code-formatter, etc) and not in the compiler level. Just like
code-formatters fix bad style they should handle case sensitivity all
over the place to make sure people use the same casing everywhere. Bad
style is not a compiler error :)
Gili
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19255] - connectors/jk/build.properties does not accept relative paths for apache2.home
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19255. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19255 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Connector:Other |Connector:JK/AJP ||(deprecated) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Last few JK bugs in TC4
I have been going through the tomcat 4 JK2 bugs marking them as WONTFIX - sorry about all those bugzilla e-mails ;) - and there are a few that look like they are really JK bugs. Chances are that these are non-issues/already fixed/configuration problems but I lack the JK experience to tell. If anyone who knows more about JK than I wants to cast their eyes over them that would be great. If not, I'll just leave them to gather dust. The bug numbers are: 18342 25055 21146 23105 27796 19255 Cheers, Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32811] New: - sendRedirect does not commit
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32811. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32811 Summary: sendRedirect does not commit Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.4 Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Servlet JSP API AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The J2EE spec indicates that a response is considered committed after sendRedirect(). But, Tomcat will return a different response code if an exception is thrown after a call to sendRedirect. This means that the following jsp: % response.sendRedirect(/index.jsp); throw new javax.servlet.ServletException(redirected); % should redirect the browser according to the spec. Instead, a 500 error is returned. WebSphere, WebLogic and Jetty all return the redirect. Without critiquing the strategy (its not mine), this is used by some to allow apps to short cut jsp content after a redirect. The theory is that the exception will be logged but the user will never know. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27796] - apache2/mod_jk/tomcat4 - downloading files with special characters in the filename
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27796. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27796 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:55 --- *** Bug 24380 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31632] - Implementing addHeader in org.apache.coyote.Request
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31632. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31632 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:53 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23811] - Erratic The servlet container is temporary unavailable or being upgraded message
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23811. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23811 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 21:49 --- As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 1.2.7, which is slated for release on November 30th, 2004. Another alternative is the ajp addition to mod_proxy which will be part of apache 2. For more information on the Tomat connectors docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[OT] Re: Case insensitive URLs: Issue #32806
Just like code-formatters fix bad style they should handle case sensitivity all over the place to make sure people use the same casing everywhere. Bad style is not a compiler error :) In a language intended to be cross platform case-sensitivity is not a matter of style. For better or worse, Unix looks for files in a case-sensitive manner. If a developer is serious about being able to write once and run anywhere then making sure the search strings are written in the proper case is not a subjective issue. I'm sure we could go back and forth for days and never come to an agreement. I'm also sure that no one else on this list would appreciate us doing so here, so I'm dropping out now. Good-Luck (sort of ;) - Ben - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31567] - 505 request error from .NET client
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31567. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31567 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 22:29 --- Can you please be more specific? What is wrong with the requests from the client? I can't tell if you have issue with data on the original or second request. The client does not know that it will be challenged until it sends the original request and receives the 401. Furthermore, the HTTP spec RFC 2616 Section 10.4.2 states: - The client MAY repeat the request with a suitable Authorization header field. It does not indicate that the request should not contain data. If you could point us to the specification that these requests violate that would help a lot. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3614] - bug in manager webapp
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3614. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3614 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED OS/Version||All Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 22:34 --- I asked for a test case (via private mail) over 12 months ago and have received no reply. Without a test case I can use to reproduce this I am unable to investigate this bug. Fell free to re-open this bug if: - it still exists in the latest release of TC4.1.x; and - you have a test case to attach to this report. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31567] - 505 request error from .NET client
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31567. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31567 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 22:35 --- One additional comment it almost seems that Tomcat is not honoring the Content-Length header. If I read this correctly, you use the first line of the body original request as the first line of the second request. Shouldn't you discard the content specified by Content-Length. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17557] - Symbolic link fails after reload with manager app
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17557. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17557 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 22:49 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21818 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21818] - Tomcat forgets allowLinking=true setting when reloading web applications
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21818. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21818 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 22:49 --- *** Bug 17557 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Last few JK bugs in TC4
- Original Message - From: Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Developers List' tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 1:05 PM Subject: Last few JK bugs in TC4 I have been going through the tomcat 4 JK2 bugs marking them as WONTFIX - sorry about all those bugzilla e-mails ;) - and there are a few that look like they are really JK bugs. Chances are that these are non-issues/already fixed/configuration problems but I lack the JK experience to tell. If anyone who knows more about JK than I wants to cast their eyes over them that would be great. If not, I'll just leave them to gather dust. The bug numbers are: 18342 Possibly fixed with Mladen's changes to the socket timeout in 1.2.8-RC1. 25055 Enhancement request at best (and not one that I like). Security should be done by Tomcat in this case. mod_jk/Apache2 bypasses directory_walk, so '.htaccess' is never looked at. 21146 It's an old mod_jk, so it might have been fixed. Currently mod_jk and mod_jk2 do the same thing here. 23105 Yup, known issue, and one of the reasons for proxy_ajp ;-). 27796 Fixed in j-t-c HEAD long ago. 19255 I don't believe that anybody is supporting the ant build for jk. Even Gump uses configure/make :). Cheers, Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Last few JK bugs in TC4
Bill, Thanks for the quick response. I'll update bugzilla accordingly. Cheers, Mark -Original Message- From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 9:58 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Last few JK bugs in TC4 - Original Message - From: Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Developers List' tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 1:05 PM Subject: Last few JK bugs in TC4 I have been going through the tomcat 4 JK2 bugs marking them as WONTFIX - sorry about all those bugzilla e-mails ;) - and there are a few that look like they are really JK bugs. Chances are that these are non-issues/already fixed/configuration problems but I lack the JK experience to tell. If anyone who knows more about JK than I wants to cast their eyes over them that would be great. If not, I'll just leave them to gather dust. The bug numbers are: 18342 Possibly fixed with Mladen's changes to the socket timeout in 1.2.8-RC1. 25055 Enhancement request at best (and not one that I like). Security should be done by Tomcat in this case. mod_jk/Apache2 bypasses directory_walk, so '.htaccess' is never looked at. 21146 It's an old mod_jk, so it might have been fixed. Currently mod_jk and mod_jk2 do the same thing here. 23105 Yup, known issue, and one of the reasons for proxy_ajp ;-). 27796 Fixed in j-t-c HEAD long ago. 19255 I don't believe that anybody is supporting the ant build for jk. Even Gump uses configure/make :). Cheers, Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18342] - socketExceptions in 4.1.24
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18342. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18342 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 23:08 --- There have been some changes to the socket timeout in 1.2.8-RC1 that might fix this. Please can you retest? If there is no update to this bug report within the next 3 months, I will assume that this issue has been fixed in 1.2.8-RC1 and later. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25055] - bypass of apache authentication
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 23:09 --- Quoting Bill Barker: quote Enhancement request at best (and not one that I like). Security should be done by Tomcat in this case. mod_jk/Apache2 bypasses directory_walk, so '.htaccess' is never looked at. /quote On this basis I am marking this as WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21146] - Request variables from Apache are not available in Tomcat
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21146. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21146 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 23:10 --- There have been many fixes since 1.2.4. Please can you retest with the latest release (1.2.8-RC1)? If there is no update to this bug report within the next 3 months, I will assume that this issue has been fixed in 1.2.8-RC1 and later. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31567] - 505 request error from .NET client
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31567. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31567 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 23:12 --- (In reply to comment #8) Can you please be more specific? What is wrong with the requests from the client? I can't tell if you have issue with data on the original or second request. The orignal request. See RFC 2616 Section 8.2.3. And, like Remy has said many times, this is invalid, so please stop wasting everybody's time by reopening it. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23105] - JkMount overrides Alias
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23105. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23105 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 23:12 --- This is a known issue and one of the reasons for proxy_ajp. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27796] - apache2/mod_jk/tomcat4 - downloading files with special characters in the filename
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27796. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27796 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 23:27 --- This was fixed some time ago. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19255] - connectors/jk/build.properties does not accept relative paths for apache2.home
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19255. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19255 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 23:28 --- To quote Bill Barker: quote I don't believe that anybody is supporting the ant build for jk. Even Gump uses configure/make :). /quote On this basis, I am going to mark this as WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31567] - 505 request error from .NET client
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31567. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31567 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 23:38 --- Sorry to waste your time. Many thanks, this is the answer I was looking for. It was not clear from the earlier responses. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25055] - bypass of apache authentication
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-22 23:56 --- I don't consider this an enhancement, I consider this a bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core ApplicationContextFacade.java ApplicationFilterChain.java ApplicationFilterConfig.java ApplicationHttpRequest.java ApplicationHttpResponse.java ApplicationRequest.java ApplicationResponse.java ContainerBase.java FastEngineMapper.java MappingRequest.java StandardContextMapper.java StandardContextValve.java StandardEngine.java StandardEngineMapper.java StandardEngineValve.java StandardHost.java StandardHostMapper.java StandardHostValve.java StandardPipeline.java StandardServer.java StandardService.java StandardWrapper.java StandardWrapperFacade.java
markt 2004/12/22 15:12:51 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core ApplicationContextFacade.java ApplicationFilterChain.java ApplicationFilterConfig.java ApplicationHttpRequest.java ApplicationHttpResponse.java ApplicationRequest.java ApplicationResponse.java ContainerBase.java FastEngineMapper.java MappingRequest.java StandardContextMapper.java StandardContextValve.java StandardEngine.java StandardEngineMapper.java StandardEngineValve.java StandardHost.java StandardHostMapper.java StandardHostValve.java StandardPipeline.java StandardServer.java StandardService.java StandardWrapper.java StandardWrapperFacade.java Log: Tidy code / fix Eclipse warnings in o.a.c.core: - unused imports - access of static fields Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +1 -16 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationContextFacade.java Index: ApplicationContextFacade.java === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationContextFacade.java,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- ApplicationContextFacade.java 26 Aug 2004 21:31:21 - 1.4 +++ ApplicationContextFacade.java 22 Dec 2004 23:12:50 - 1.5 @@ -19,29 +19,14 @@ import java.io.InputStream; -import java.io.File; import java.net.MalformedURLException; import java.net.URL; -import java.security.AccessController; -import java.security.PrivilegedAction; -import java.security.PrivilegedExceptionAction; -import java.security.PrivilegedActionException; -import java.util.ArrayList; -import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.Enumeration; -import java.util.HashMap; -import java.util.HashSet; import java.util.Set; -import javax.naming.NamingException; -import javax.naming.Binding; -import javax.naming.directory.DirContext; import javax.servlet.RequestDispatcher; import javax.servlet.Servlet; import javax.servlet.ServletContext; import javax.servlet.ServletException; -import javax.servlet.ServletContextAttributeEvent; -import javax.servlet.ServletContextAttributeListener; -import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest; /** 1.13 +1 -3 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationFilterChain.java Index: ApplicationFilterChain.java === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationFilterChain.java,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13 --- ApplicationFilterChain.java 26 Aug 2004 21:31:21 - 1.12 +++ ApplicationFilterChain.java 22 Dec 2004 23:12:50 - 1.13 @@ -21,11 +21,9 @@ import java.io.IOException; import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Iterator; -import java.security.AccessController; import java.security.PrivilegedActionException; import javax.servlet.Filter; import javax.servlet.FilterChain; -import javax.servlet.FilterConfig; import javax.servlet.Servlet; import javax.servlet.ServletException; import javax.servlet.ServletRequest; 1.10 +1 -2 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationFilterConfig.java Index: ApplicationFilterConfig.java === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationFilterConfig.java,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- ApplicationFilterConfig.java 26 Aug 2004 21:31:21 - 1.9 +++ ApplicationFilterConfig.java 22 Dec 2004 23:12:50 - 1.10 @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Enumeration; -import java.util.Iterator; import java.util.Map; import javax.servlet.Filter; import javax.servlet.FilterConfig; 1.14 +2 -4 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationHttpRequest.java Index: ApplicationHttpRequest.java === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationHttpRequest.java,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14 --- ApplicationHttpRequest.java 26 Aug 2004 21:31:21 - 1.13 +++ ApplicationHttpRequest.java
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32814] New: - Tomcat 5.0.27 refuses connection if secure cookie in session?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32814. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32814 Summary: Tomcat 5.0.27 refuses connection if secure cookie in session? Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.27 Platform: Macintosh OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.0 Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: Unknown AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Seasons Greetings! I start up Safari and can get to the root page of Tomcat through SSL, which I have enabled in the server.xml. I have a local Apache module which allows a secure login and maintains session state by puting a cookie in the browser. It is a secure cookie that is digitally signed. When my browser has that cookie, I can no longer connect to Tomcat through SSL. If I manage the cookies and remove that one cookie, I can once again connect to Tomcat through SSL. Throughout this, I can connect to Tomcat when I don't use SSL. I can't find any debugging or logging information about what is happening. It's like the browser no longer reaches Tomcat. Safari says The error was: bad server response (NSURLErrorDomain:-1011). Also cannot connect with Netscape 7.02. It simply says the document contains no data. I set the debugging level to 4 everywhere in server.xml and enabled the request dumper, but I still cannot see any sign that the request reaches Tomcat. Thanks for your help. ==Leonard -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core ContainerBase.java
markt 2004/12/22 15:28:47
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
ContainerBase.java
Log:
Fix bug 32453. Cross-context calls to getContext can return null during
initialisation.
- Port of Remy's patch to TC5 for same issue.
Revision ChangesPath
1.24 +9 -2
jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ContainerBase.java
Index: ContainerBase.java
===
RCS file:
/home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ContainerBase.java,v
retrieving revision 1.23
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -r1.23 -r1.24
--- ContainerBase.java22 Dec 2004 23:12:50 - 1.23
+++ ContainerBase.java22 Dec 2004 23:28:47 - 1.24
@@ -768,16 +768,23 @@
child.getName() +
' is not unique);
child.setParent((Container) this); // May throw IAE
+children.put(child.getName(), child);
+
if (started (child instanceof Lifecycle)) {
+boolean success = false;
try {
((Lifecycle) child).start();
+success = true;
} catch (LifecycleException e) {
log(ContainerBase.addChild: start: , e);
throw new IllegalStateException
(ContainerBase.addChild: start: + e);
+} finally {
+if (!success) {
+children.remove(child.getName());
+}
}
}
-children.put(child.getName(), child);
fireContainerEvent(ADD_CHILD_EVENT, child);
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32453] - otherServletContext.getContext returns null with crossContext=true
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32453. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32453 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-23 00:29 --- I have ported Remy's patch from TC5.5.x for this issue and the test case now works correctly. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP issues
I think it would be rude to remove the comments about where the source files originated, as they were developed apart from Apache and have a life on their own apart from Apache. Attribution is fair and proper. However I did grant permission for Sun (and of course Apache) to license the code under the Apache license. -jh- Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, There are apparently a few licensing issues with some files in the Tomcat CVS: jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src /share/org/apache/catalina/util/CharsetMapper.java 18: * This class is based on a class originally written by Jason Hunter 19: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] as part of the book Java Servlet Programming 20: * (O'Reilly). See http://www.servlets.com/book for more information. 21: * Used by Sun Microsystems with permission. 22: */ 23: 24: package org.apache.catalina.util; jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admi n/images/Context.gif 4: ?ycga???wHIL!?OCopyright 2000 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5: JLF GR Ver 1.0 jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admi n/images/Host.gif 2: !?OCopyright 2000 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/ org/apache/tomcat/util/http/LocaleToCharsetMap.java 19: * This class was originally written by Jason Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20: * as part of the book Java Servlet Programming (O'Reilly). 21: * See http://www.servlets.com/book for more information. 22: * Used by Sun Microsystems with permission. Fixing the GIFs should be easy. How about the two Java files ? I would need an answer from Jason and Craig to see if I can safely remove the comments (otherwise we would have to reimplement these, right ?). Thanks, Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Edward Furlong/IE/TLS/PwC is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 22/12/2004 and will not return until 04/01/2005. . _ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP issues
(this is based on assumptions, so let me know if they are wrong Jason) I must admit that I lack the experience to be sure of the correct action here. The image copyrights are easy; things need to be copyright to the ASF, not to Sun. So they need fixing somehow. Jason's code is harder. It doesn't say that it's copyrighted to Jason, just that it's originally from classes by him. As the code in Tomcat is copyright to the ASF, there's no reason why we couldn't remove the comments apart from the politeness aspect that Jason raises. The code isn't licenced to the ASF, it's donated to the ASF and now owned by the ASF (for this instance, Jason owns a duplicate instance). Not knowing the whole story, the whole question is whether we actually own that code or if it was licensed to Sun and then they donated it to Apache, something they did not have the right to do. Does Jason have a CLA, and if not, would we need one? I think we should remove the Sun permission line; it's not important to the existence in Tomcat. Keeping the rest of the comment seems fine to me, provided we're sure we own the code. Hen On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:12:43 -0800, Jason Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it would be rude to remove the comments about where the source files originated, as they were developed apart from Apache and have a life on their own apart from Apache. Attribution is fair and proper. However I did grant permission for Sun (and of course Apache) to license the code under the Apache license. -jh- Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, There are apparently a few licensing issues with some files in the Tomcat CVS: jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src /share/org/apache/catalina/util/CharsetMapper.java 18: * This class is based on a class originally written by Jason Hunter 19: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] as part of the book Java Servlet Programming 20: * (O'Reilly). See http://www.servlets.com/book for more information. 21: * Used by Sun Microsystems with permission. 22: */ 23: 24: package org.apache.catalina.util; jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admi n/images/Context.gif 4: ?ycga???wHIL!?OCopyright 2000 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5: JLF GR Ver 1.0 jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admi n/images/Host.gif 2: !?OCopyright 2000 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/ org/apache/tomcat/util/http/LocaleToCharsetMap.java 19: * This class was originally written by Jason Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20: * as part of the book Java Servlet Programming (O'Reilly). 21: * See http://www.servlets.com/book for more information. 22: * Used by Sun Microsystems with permission. Fixing the GIFs should be easy. How about the two Java files ? I would need an answer from Jason and Craig to see if I can safely remove the comments (otherwise we would have to reimplement these, right ?). Thanks, Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP issues
Jason is correct, the attributions remain. I'll send along the last set of guidelines I saw regarding attribution and licensing. Brian On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Jason Hunter wrote: I think it would be rude to remove the comments about where the source files originated, as they were developed apart from Apache and have a life on their own apart from Apache. Attribution is fair and proper. However I did grant permission for Sun (and of course Apache) to license the code under the Apache license. -jh- Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, There are apparently a few licensing issues with some files in the Tomcat CVS: jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src /share/org/apache/catalina/util/CharsetMapper.java 18: * This class is based on a class originally written by Jason Hunter 19: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] as part of the book Java Servlet Programming 20: * (O'Reilly). See http://www.servlets.com/book for more information. 21: * Used by Sun Microsystems with permission. 22: */ 23: 24: package org.apache.catalina.util; jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admi n/images/Context.gif 4: ?ycga???wHIL!?OCopyright 2000 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5: JLF GR Ver 1.0 jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admi n/images/Host.gif 2: !?OCopyright 2000 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/ org/apache/tomcat/util/http/LocaleToCharsetMap.java 19: * This class was originally written by Jason Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20: * as part of the book Java Servlet Programming (O'Reilly). 21: * See http://www.servlets.com/book for more information. 22: * Used by Sun Microsystems with permission. Fixing the GIFs should be easy. How about the two Java files ? I would need an answer from Jason and Craig to see if I can safely remove the comments (otherwise we would have to reimplement these, right ?). Thanks, Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Edward Furlong/IE/TLS/PwC is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 22/12/2004 and will not return until 04/01/2005. . _ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Case insensitive URLs: Issue #32806
Hey guys, Here is some feedback I got from the specification lead maintainer for the Servlet API. He points out that there is nothing preventing an implementation from mapping URLs to paths in a case-insensitive manner. Gili ==BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE== Hi Gili On Dec 22, 2004, at 12:32 PM, Gili wrote: Greg, You talk as if File.getCanonicalPath() did not exist :) So my answer is twofold: 1) Password strings differ from file paths. Yes, the latter can be represented in the form of a String, but we really know it represents a file path. And while we're on the topic, I suspect the implementation stores such entities as File objects internally, not Strings. Yes passwords are a different animal from file paths. An implementation of the servlet API will be whether file paths are canonical or not. Quoting the servlet spec SRV2.4 Glossary page 328 In HTTP-based URLs, the º/ºcharacter is reserved to separate a hierarchical path structure in the URL-path portion of the URL. The server is responsible for determining the meaning of the hierarchical structure. There is no correspondence between a URL-path and a given file system path. The only two APIs that are provided for accessing a resource directly from the servlet spec's perspective are: ClassLoader.getResourceAsStream(String/URL) and ServletContext.getResourceAsStream(String) This is as close to file paths that the servlet API really get. It is generally not a good practice to access the file system directly from a web application. With the J2EE Reference implementation you need to change the security settings of the web container to allow this. 2) You wouldn't need to protect all variations of /WEB-INF. You'd simply need to call File.getCanonicalPath() before doing a String comparison when comparing two file paths. Take this one step further and store the canonical path in all internal data structures so you only need to call File.getCanonicalPath() on incoming requests and compare it against the resource file path which is already canonical. This is simple enough and does not incur any serious performance drop. Under unix, getCanonicalPath() is almost a no-op (I think it handles symbolic links) and under win32 I think it is fairly cheap too. This might be true with the implementation of the API but I'm not sure how this is going to affect the servlet API itself. One thing to remember is that the servlet API needs to service both Unix and Windows platforms in a uniform way. Also keep in mind if you want a web application to run portably on a Unix or Win32 platform you will need consider case. What kind of uses cases are you thinking of for changing the definition of case sensitivity? Are you talking more about url mappings such as *.JSP == *.jsp on win32 platforms? Do you want resources in a web application to ignore case on win32? I there are compelling use case for this I would be more than happy to bring this to the servlet EG. I'm going to ask around and see if this topic has been discussed before. Thank you for your comments, Greg Murray ===END FORWARDED MESSAGE=== - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP issues
I do have a CLA on file. Aren't members required to? :) That code donation happened while Tomcat was still Sun internal and I was helping Sun as a contractor. Those were the good old days before I was burdened with the knowledge about IP rights that I've since acquired (as has Remy obviously). It was even before Jakarta. I'm still fine with the donation. Technically the code wouldn't be covered under the CLA since I didn't take action to donate the code to Apache; it just came over from Sun in the bundle. I'm happy to go on record here as giving it a formal stamp of approval, with the one caveat that I'd like it to retain attribution since the classes have a life of their own separately. I believe Apache has policies for including code with attribution. Our own license requires attribution, so we'd better. :) -jh- Henri Yandell wrote: (this is based on assumptions, so let me know if they are wrong Jason) I must admit that I lack the experience to be sure of the correct action here. The image copyrights are easy; things need to be copyright to the ASF, not to Sun. So they need fixing somehow. Jason's code is harder. It doesn't say that it's copyrighted to Jason, just that it's originally from classes by him. As the code in Tomcat is copyright to the ASF, there's no reason why we couldn't remove the comments apart from the politeness aspect that Jason raises. The code isn't licenced to the ASF, it's donated to the ASF and now owned by the ASF (for this instance, Jason owns a duplicate instance). Not knowing the whole story, the whole question is whether we actually own that code or if it was licensed to Sun and then they donated it to Apache, something they did not have the right to do. Does Jason have a CLA, and if not, would we need one? I think we should remove the Sun permission line; it's not important to the existence in Tomcat. Keeping the rest of the comment seems fine to me, provided we're sure we own the code. Hen On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:12:43 -0800, Jason Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it would be rude to remove the comments about where the source files originated, as they were developed apart from Apache and have a life on their own apart from Apache. Attribution is fair and proper. However I did grant permission for Sun (and of course Apache) to license the code under the Apache license. -jh- Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, There are apparently a few licensing issues with some files in the Tomcat CVS: jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src /share/org/apache/catalina/util/CharsetMapper.java 18: * This class is based on a class originally written by Jason Hunter 19: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] as part of the book Java Servlet Programming 20: * (O'Reilly). See http://www.servlets.com/book for more information. 21: * Used by Sun Microsystems with permission. 22: */ 23: 24: package org.apache.catalina.util; jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admi n/images/Context.gif 4: ?ycga???wHIL!?OCopyright 2000 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5: JLF GR Ver 1.0 jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admi n/images/Host.gif 2: !?OCopyright 2000 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28-src/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/ org/apache/tomcat/util/http/LocaleToCharsetMap.java 19: * This class was originally written by Jason Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20: * as part of the book Java Servlet Programming (O'Reilly). 21: * See http://www.servlets.com/book for more information. 22: * Used by Sun Microsystems with permission. Fixing the GIFs should be easy. How about the two Java files ? I would need an answer from Jason and Craig to see if I can safely remove the comments (otherwise we would have to reimplement these, right ?). Thanks, Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32805] - Intermittent tomcat server crash when running JdbcOdbcResultSetMetaData.getColumnType() method
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32805. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32805 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-23 01:31 --- THe JDBC-ODBC bridge should never be used in production. See google as to why. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How copyright notices on contributed files should be handled.
The below message really should have been sent more widely, it seems. The message applies more in the incubator context, where we're getting new source code into the ASF in bulk form, but would also apply any time you're bringing in new snippets of code under acceptable licenses. Note that if the license on the code you're bringing in doesn't allow for inclusion in an ASL 2.0-licensed work (good rule of thumb: it must make no demands above and beyond the ASL, so MIT/X/BSD-1.1 is fine; when in any doubt, ask) then you must get either a separate acceptable license from the copyright holder, or have the copyright holder sign a CLA with the ASF. Note, as described below, *only* the copyright holder has the right to remove their own license from the contribution. Brian -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:03:34 -0500 From: Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org To: general@incubator.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Reolution of the copyright question Based upon advice for our counsel, the ASF has today adopted a policy governing how copyright notices on contributed files should be handled. Here's what happens: The following notice gets added to the top of each source file: Copyright [] The Apache Software Foundation or its licensors, as applicable. Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the License); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. The contributor may a) remove any copyright notice it may currently have in the file(s); OR b) move it to a package-wide COPYRIGHT file, changing 'Copyright []' to 'Portions Copyright []'; OR c) provide permission in writing to the ASF to do one or the other of the above. If the contributor doesn't have a copyright notice in the files, that's fine; nothing needs be done beyond the adding of the section above. -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ Millennium hand and shrimp! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ursula Witte/NORDLB ist außer Haus.
Ich werde ab 22.12.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 05.01.2005. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. Die in dieser E-Mail enthaltenen Informationen sind vertraulich. Diese E-Mail ist ausschliesslich fuer den Adressaten bestimmt und jeglicher Zugriff durch andere Personen ist nicht zulaessig. Falls Sie nicht einer der genannten Empfaenger sind, ist jede Veroeffentlichung, Vervielfaeltigung, Verteilung oder sonstige in diesem Zusammenhang stehende Handlung untersagt und unter Umstaenden ungesetzlich. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht fuer Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, den Absender unverzueglich zu informieren und die E-Mail zu loeschen. The information in this e-mail is confidential. It is intended solely for the addressee and access to the e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not a named recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If the notice is not intended for you, please notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail. -]ncp[- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How copyright notices on contributed files should be handled.
fyi -- Forwarded message -- From: Brian Behlendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:36:39 -0800 (PST) Subject: How copyright notices on contributed files should be handled. To: tomcat-dev tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] The below message really should have been sent more widely, it seems. The message applies more in the incubator context, where we're getting new source code into the ASF in bulk form, but would also apply any time you're bringing in new snippets of code under acceptable licenses. Note that if the license on the code you're bringing in doesn't allow for inclusion in an ASL 2.0-licensed work (good rule of thumb: it must make no demands above and beyond the ASL, so MIT/X/BSD-1.1 is fine; when in any doubt, ask) then you must get either a separate acceptable license from the copyright holder, or have the copyright holder sign a CLA with the ASF. Note, as described below, *only* the copyright holder has the right to remove their own license from the contribution. Brian -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:03:34 -0500 From: Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org To: general@incubator.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Reolution of the copyright question Based upon advice for our counsel, the ASF has today adopted a policy governing how copyright notices on contributed files should be handled. Here's what happens: The following notice gets added to the top of each source file: Copyright [] The Apache Software Foundation or its licensors, as applicable. Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the License); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. The contributor may a) remove any copyright notice it may currently have in the file(s); OR b) move it to a package-wide COPYRIGHT file, changing 'Copyright []' to 'Portions Copyright []'; OR c) provide permission in writing to the ASF to do one or the other of the above. If the contributor doesn't have a copyright notice in the files, that's fine; nothing needs be done beyond the adding of the section above. -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ Millennium hand and shrimp! -- Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP issues
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 18:57:51 -0500, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] The image copyrights are easy; things need to be copyright to the ASF, not to Sun. So they need fixing somehow. It would be best for someone from Sun to actually do this work. Jean-Francois, could you make sure that happens? Craig - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
Wait - you mean to tell me instead of converting the hostname
once to lower - we are strcasecmp'ing every time? Outch, that
hurts.
Bill
At 09:14 PM 12/16/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
billbarker2004/12/16 19:14:56
Modified:jk/native/apache-1.3 mod_jk.c
jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
Log:
Now that the SC lookup is case-insensitive, don't waste cycles converting
the header names to lower case
Revision ChangesPath
1.60 +2 -6 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-1.3/mod_jk.c
Index: mod_jk.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-1.3/mod_jk.c,v
retrieving revision 1.59
retrieving revision 1.60
diff -u -r1.59 -r1.60
--- mod_jk.c 13 Dec 2004 09:11:24 - 1.59
+++ mod_jk.c 17 Dec 2004 03:14:56 - 1.60
@@ -592,12 +592,8 @@
char *hname = ap_pstrdup(r-pool, elts[i].key);
s-headers_values[i] = ap_pstrdup(r-pool, elts[i].val);
s-headers_names[i] = hname;
-while (*hname) {
-*hname = tolower(*hname);
-hname++;
-}
if (need_content_length_header
-!strncmp(s-headers_values[i], content-length, 14)) {
+!strcasecmp(s-headers_values[i], content-length)) {
need_content_length_header = JK_FALSE;
}
}
1.110 +2 -6 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c
Index: mod_jk.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c,v
retrieving revision 1.109
retrieving revision 1.110
diff -u -r1.109 -r1.110
--- mod_jk.c 13 Dec 2004 09:10:31 - 1.109
+++ mod_jk.c 17 Dec 2004 03:14:56 - 1.110
@@ -636,12 +636,8 @@
char *hname = apr_pstrdup(r-pool, elts[i].key);
s-headers_values[i] = apr_pstrdup(r-pool, elts[i].val);
s-headers_names[i] = hname;
-while (*hname) {
-*hname = tolower(*hname);
-hname++;
-}
if (need_content_length_header
-!strncmp(s-headers_values[i], content-length, 14)) {
+!strcasecmp(s-headers_values[i], content-length)) {
need_content_length_header = JK_FALSE;
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardEngine.java StandardHost.java
billbarker2004/12/22 22:11:52
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardEngine.java StandardHost.java
Log:
Fix the locating of orphaned Realms for JMX embedding.
Since Realms don't implement managedResource, this is the only way to get
this unused method to work.
Revision ChangesPath
1.27 +5 -4
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardEngine.java
Index: StandardEngine.java
===
RCS file:
/home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardEngine.java,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -r1.26 -r1.27
--- StandardEngine.java 3 Oct 2004 08:53:56 - 1.26
+++ StandardEngine.java 23 Dec 2004 06:11:51 - 1.27
@@ -412,9 +412,10 @@
try {
realmName=new ObjectName( domain + :type=Realm);
if( mserver.isRegistered(realmName ) ) {
-Realm nrealm = (Realm)mserver.getAttribute(realmName,
- managedResource);
-setRealm(nrealm);
+mserver.invoke(realmName, init,
+new Object[] {},
+new String[] {}
+);
}
} catch( Throwable t ) {
log.debug(No realm for this engine + realmName);
1.36 +5 -4
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardHost.java
Index: StandardHost.java
===
RCS file:
/home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardHost.java,v
retrieving revision 1.35
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -r1.35 -r1.36
--- StandardHost.java 5 Oct 2004 17:12:51 - 1.35
+++ StandardHost.java 23 Dec 2004 06:11:51 - 1.36
@@ -676,9 +676,10 @@
try {
realmName=new ObjectName( domain + :type=Realm,host= +
getName());
if( mserver.isRegistered(realmName ) ) {
-Realm nrealm = (Realm)mserver.getAttribute(realmName,
- managedResource);
-setRealm(nrealm);
+mserver.invoke(realmName, init,
+new Object[] {},
+new String[] {}
+);
}
} catch( Throwable t ) {
log.debug(No realm for this host + realmName);
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
