Hmm,
I think that Remy's patch is working correct. But I think we must
controll the jvmRoute
from those client sessions id's (ManagerBase include this at a comment :-)).
I must check my cluster failover szenarios. I can to that tomorrow.
Peter
Rainer Jung schrieb:
Both Cluster Managers (Delta
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Hmm,
I think that Remy's patch is working correct. But I think we must
controll the jvmRoute
from those client sessions id's (ManagerBase include this at a comment
:-)).
I must check my cluster failover szenarios. I can to that tomorrow.
Yes, I don't know if it is needed or
remm2005/02/08 04:21:18
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/log SystemLogHandler.java
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/util
SystemLogHandler.java
Log:
- 33368: fix leak in swallowOutput.
- Submitted by Rainer Jung.
- I still
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33368.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2005/02/08 05:45:28
Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml
Log:
- Changelog update.
Revision ChangesPath
1.231 +34 -1 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Index: changelog.xml
remm2005/02/08 06:06:36
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper JspC.java
Log:
- 33373: Fix handling of context classloader in jspc. The loader classLoader
must be set on each compilation.
Revision ChangesPath
1.91 +4 -6
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33373.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33445.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2005/02/08 07:45:56
Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml
Log:
- Changelog update.
Revision ChangesPath
1.232 +3 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Index: changelog.xml
Remy Wrote:
BTW, wouldn't it be better to set the route as a separate cookie, which
would be a lot cleaner ? Was this ever considered ?
That would have been the obvious solution, the jvmRoute must have come from a
dark basement somewhere :)
Whatever the change you decide on, I'll be happy to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33448.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm afraid that change will have negative implications: The jvmRoute is
used to enable routing decisions by balancing components. All these
components usually support routing either COOKIE-based or URI-based.
In the URI-based case it is more or less the only clean way to include
the jvmRoute
its not at all that complicated.
This is how a big5 load balancer does it.
A) it sets a cookie, and based on the cookie it load balances.
B) if a cookie is not supported, it does a calculation based on the IP address,
and stays sticky that way.
No need to exchange any info in this scenario and
Filip Hanik - Dev wrote:
its not at all that complicated.
This is how a big5 load balancer does it.
A) it sets a cookie, and based on the cookie it load balances.
B) if a cookie is not supported, it does a calculation based on the IP address,
and stays sticky that way.
No need to exchange any
I don't fully agree: we use F5 too, but:
1) I know many commercial sites (in germany), which do not use Cookies
(privacy reasons).
2) IP based stickyness does not work very well. In many scenarios you
will only be able to correctly route most of your clients. If you rely
on exact routing,
Upgrading mod_jk would be possible (not too complicated), but I'm afraid
we are going to break other products we don't control the way we do with
mod_jk.
mod_jk is a good example to see, why it's not unlikely that changes
would be needed for other balancers.
Rainer
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip
kinman 2005/02/08 10:03:58
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
Log:
- More fine-tuning on smap for jsp:element, making sure that the java
line range is at least one.
Revision ChangesPath
1.239 +4 -3
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 4:21 AM
Subject: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/util
SystemLogHandler.java
remm2005/02/08 04:21:18
Modified:
Bill Barker wrote:
The stack is to accommodate the geniuses who have a Servlet in /appA that
includes one in /appB which in turn includes another in /appA.
In that case the servlet gets called directly by the request dispatcher,
without going through StdWrapperValve.invoke. So there isn't any
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33143.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33143.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33307.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33143.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
luehe 2005/02/08 13:08:39
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper JspC.java
Log:
Removed return tag from initClassLoader() javadocs, because this method was
changed back to 'void'
Revision ChangesPath
1.92 +0 -1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33143.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32424.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33143.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33307.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32424.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33143.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33457.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33457.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
We need to use Apache to load balance a set of Tomcat servers.
However, we need to use a custom load-balancing algorithm, based on the
usage of those servers.
Is this possible with mod_jk? Would it be easy to extend it? Any other
suggestions?
Many thanks,
David
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33143.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
markt 2005/02/08 15:06:30
Modified:catalina build.xml
Log:
Fix bug 10982. include o.a.naming.resources.jndi.Handler in
naming-resources.jar
Revision ChangesPath
1.137 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/build.xml
Index: build.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10982.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
fhanik 2005/02/08 15:15:06
Modified:modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/session
DeltaManager.java
Log:
Set the context class loader while doing a state transfer, otherwise static
struts classes fail loading
Revision ChangesPath
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27371.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27371.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mturk 2005/02/08 23:39:08
Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
Log:
Move jk_set_worker_def_cache_size to post config hook, so that
it is set before the jk configuration is parsed.
Revision ChangesPath
1.122 +12 -12
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33457.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
49 matches
Mail list logo