It's an excellent news :)
What about doing the same against jakarta-tomcat 3.3 mod_jk
(I will upload it to site for others win users).
Also it will be good to have you done the same for
jakarta-tomcat-connectors which cover the up to date mod_jk.
BTW: What about switching to Apache
But I'm +1 on whatever you choose. Let me know if/how
I can help - I don't have time but I could sleep less :-)
I concur with Costin here. Your pick is +1.
me2
Same for me, I'm ok for a release (security fixes are mandatory)
and will produce the RPM and binaries.
BTW, it will be fine to
Hi Remy,
What's the final goal for Coyote ?
;)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
In few days we'll have the jk2 working, so you can play with
unix domain
sockets - that should improve a bit the performance. There are few
other optimizations there ( more agressive recycling, etc ) - and
we really need help testing it and feedback.
( I have it working on my machine, but I'm
Seems to be good ;)
Tks JF
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere
Hi Remy,
A little late reply but :
Hi Remy,
What's the final goal for Coyote ?
;)
- It should be faster than the current HTTP/1.1 processor
- It should address the HTTP/1.1 items marked as later in bugzilla
- It should be maintainable
- It should be easily testable
- It uses j-t-c/util
I am playing with jk2 and I have noted that the loadNative()
in AprImpl fails:
+++
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
/home/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.1/webapps/jk/WEB-INF/jk2/jni/l
ibapr.so:
/home/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.1/webapps/jk/WEB-INF/jk2/jni/l
ibapr.so:
undefined symbol: crypt
Couldn't we have an automatic jvmRoute generated from
misc entropy if the entry is not present in server.xml ?
for example just the server hostname or ip address ?
Adding the hostname/adress should be fine for the majority of case
where only one JVM will be make run TC 4.x by system.
Or may be
I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of
the week (with
the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:
ballot
[ ] +1 Make the release
[ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
[ ] -0 Bad idea
[ ] -1 No, because:
/ballot
+1 since you'll add the load-balancing
The Tomcat 3.3 rpms has been updated to release 2
to fix a problem with launchers configuration paths.
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3/rpms/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bravo.
Consider also the JSSE alternative,
http://www.rtfm.com/puretls/ from Eric Rescorla,
which should be commiter by now (Craig ?)
puretls is BSD Style and use Cryptix which is also BSD
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP
Here is a quick build.xml for 1.0b1 since the one
from CVS didn't works with 1.0b1 tarball (normal)
Regards.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39
Hi to all,
I've got a little problem with our AS/400 since
they didn't respect the general layout for JDK 1.2/1.3
where java.home is xxx/jre or xxx/sdk and where tools.jar
live in xxx/lib
Sus Tomcat 3.3 couldn't find the needed tools.jar for
JSP compilation
Choices :
- Add code in tomcat to
Tomcat 3.3.1 Release Plan Ballot:
[X] +1 I am in favor of this plan and will help
[ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
[ ] -0I am not in favor of this plan
[ ] -1 I am against this plan being executed, and my
reason is:
--
To
Faraj are you commiter ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Faraj Meir [mailto:[EMAIL
Not but I'm liking to try tomcat .
It's a very beautiful servlet implementation .
Only commiters could vote on release plan ;)
BTW : we need strong testers and fine bug reports
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I saw last e-mails concerning IPv6 and Tomcat in this place in
March. So
is it all clear?
I have installed Tomcat 4.0.1 on RedHat (kernel 2.4.14) and tried to
connect to Tomcat using IPv6. Unfortunately, I got the 400 HTTP error
Bad Request returned by Tomcat.
The form of URL wan analogous to
Our iSeries are using now latest JDK 1.3.1
and the strange layout is still here :(
/QIBM/ProdData/Java400/jdk13
The patch is really needed ;)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP
For the C side, I'm working on JNI worker as a channel - that
will resolve
some of the current problems in jni ( performance, i18n, etc) and will
make the jni channel available in 4.0 too. But we still have
to update the
other server connectors, decide what we want to do about
config, etc - so
What do you think ? Henri, JFC, Kevin - I hope for an quick
answer :-)
it sounds like you're heading towards a good deal of symmetry
between the
java and c code, which is definitely good :)
Yes, and you got my +1 also :)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Bravo :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I've got a little problems with all the jars that are
mandatory to build TC 4.0, javamail, jta, jdbc-ext, jmxri.
tyrex is allready packaged and JSSE is only optional.
Could someone, may be from Sun staff, could release all of
them in a single tarball and put it on the download area ?
For now
That's why jtc tag 4.0.2 b2 didn't build when you only have
jakarta-tomcat-4.0.2-b2.
Question :
- Should we retag jtc 4.0.2-b2 including these patches or
should I patch my tarball for jtc tagged 4.0.2-b2 to compile
jtc with just TC 4.0.2-B2 on path ?
Regards
BTW: Did the jtc tagged
total_read = readN(in, b, H_SIZE, len);
-
-if (total_read = 0) {
+
+// it's ok to have read 0 bytes when len=0 -- this means
+// the end of the stream has been reached.
+if (total_read 0) {
I've got a little problems with all the jars that are
mandatory to build TC 4.0, javamail, jta, jdbc-ext, jmxri.
tyrex is allready packaged and JSSE is only optional.
Could someone, may be from Sun staff, could release all of
them in a single tarball and put it on the download area ?
I'd like to clarify. I could have activation, javamail, jdbc-ext,
jndi, jta, which are Sun products, included in a Tomcat tarball
but couldn't have them included in a separate tarball ?
Yes.
And couldn't they be included in the application source tarball ?
It's unclear in the licences I
Thanks Bojan, I introduced these 2 bugs ;)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I could build webapp for Apache 1.3 on my Redhat 7.2 box
but build for Apache 2.0 failed :
My Linux is using a recent libtool 1.4 ...
BTW: what is the version number for this release of webapp ?
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/webapp-module-1.0.2-tc402'
make[1]: Entering directory
+1
Welcome on board.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Luby [mailto:[EMAIL
Thanks Costin,
iSeries developpers and users are happy to see you fix
that damnt HP-UX bugs :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6056.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Costin
P.S. I can volunteer to write the Makefiles, since soon this may be the
cleanest way to build tomcat...
I hope it's a joke ?)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If your interest in Tomcat is for developing Web Services, you will be
interested in the Java Web Services Developer Pack (version
1.0ea1) that
was just released by Sun:
http://java.sun.com/webservices
The Java WSDP includes early releases of base XML technology: JAXP 1.2
(with schema
* JavaServer PagesTM Standard Tag Library (JSTL) 1.0 EA 3
= ???
http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/doc/standard-doc/intro.html
:o)
Good another piece of stuff in OSS land :)
Thanks for the info,
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Upgrade to Tomcat 4.0.2-B2 for example, the problem is fixed.
And in TC 4.0.2-B2 you'll gain load-balancing support ;)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53
I have a patch that allow mod_jk to send a 'secret', the same
way as ajp12
works. It seems completely safe and backward compatible. The
code to check
the secret on java side is also trivial and unlikely to create any
problems.
I can check this in in 2-3 days ( I'm in NYC now, not sure I'll be
Maybe we should we create a org.apache.jtc.util package ? Or
org.apache.commons.tomcat ?
jtc util should be used by TC 3.3 and 4.0 ?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If your interest in Tomcat is for developing Web Services, you will be
interested in the Java Web Services Developer Pack (version
1.0ea1) that
was just released by Sun:
http://java.sun.com/webservices
The Java WSDP includes early releases of base XML technology: JAXP 1.2
(with schema
May I recommand you to switch to IBM SDK 1.3 which is
quick and stable under Linux on kernel 2.2 and 2.4.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B
Because that's what the Redistribution paragraph of the
license that you
had to click through says you can do and not do. (See why
it's a good
idea to actually *read* these things? :-)
Craig, you've still not answered precisely to my question.
Please explain us
if what we are doing
Hi Ray
After some testing, I have made some observations that might be worth
something, or maybe not...
I installed Redhat 7.2 w/tomcat3.3a-2. I used all RPMS to do this
(including the tomcat-mod-3.3-1 rpm.) I got the stack space
error. So,
I installed a redhat 7.1, same exact tomcat
I notice that I have a growing number of processes that are
left in a w
state according to server-status. I check using netstat and
see that there
are sockets hanging out in a TIME_WAIT state. These will
hang out for who
knows how long but I have some that are days old (when apache was last
They were on the http/https connections.
So the problem as nothing to do with mod_jk
or tomcat but on your OS settings.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If there are any further questions or comments - just hit reply...
I like it - If noone complains I will try to commit it -
I just ask pedro to send me a plain copy, so let me take
at look at ;)
PS: Christopher and Eric should take a look also ;)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+5958 Wrong mod_jk.conf for path pattern
Easy enough to fix. The only question is if we want to change only
${Server}Config, or do we want to change the mod_jk behavior
so that the two
statements:
JkMount /myApp/foobar/* ajp13
and
JkMount /myApp/foobar* ajp13
are the same (i.e.
I send a copy to tomcat-dev since it's an important issue
Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. The distributions you have
provided via jakarta have been very beneficial to us and our
project. We
are grateful so much work has gone into building RPM's.
Thanks ;)
Warning, the RPM goal
Seems good to me and should be applied also to Tomcat 3.3 SSL HOWTO :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original
Hi to all,
You should all know that there is a very good Tomcat 3.3/4.0
plugin for the OSS IDE eclipse (www.eclipse.org), available
at http://www.sysdeo.com/eclipse/.
This plugin allow eclipse developper to launch Tomcat from
the IDE, stop, restart and configure many parameters like
I don't know if the Eclipse configuration allows you to
specify -Dprop=value in Tomcat's startup.
Yes you could set any VM and commandline args.
If it does,
I think a lot of this can be done in Tomcat 3.3.1 using
parameter substitution. I have used in server.xml
Http10Connector
It appears, for example, that the only thing you can override about a
connector is which port it's on. What happens if you want to override,
say, the maximum number of connections that your connector will accept
(the maxProcessors parameter on Tomcat 4's HttpConnector)?
Right +1 for you here
I don't know if the Eclipse configuration allows you to
specify -Dprop=value in Tomcat's startup. If it does,
I think a lot of this can be done in Tomcat 3.3.1 using
parameter substitution. I have used in server.xml
Http10Connector port=${http.port} ... /
and included
I'm wondering whether we really need to build it in to Tomcat itself,
though. Can't you accomplish the same thing by using a little
Ant script
and run a filter or replace task? All this would require
is packaging
ant.jar along with Tomcat, or requiring users that need the facility to
download
There's a lot of power in what the replace task can do.
Here's a very
simple one that replaces the string @port@ with the port number
specified by the port property:
project name=Create server.xml default=generate
target name=generate description=Generate customized
server.xml
As discussed yesterday, the binaries will include a minimal
distribution
designed to be run on JDK 1.4.
I miss the discussion of yesterday, sorry.
Did it means that the build won't require jndi/jdbcext/javamail/jaf
that caused me so many headaches in RPM packaging ?
ballot
[ ] +1 - I support
For the ZIP/TGZ packaging:
A) Full JDK 1.4: This includes everything, except the
libraries which are
already included in the JDK (including the JAXP XML parser).
I'd like to use Xerces 2.0, will it be in JDK 1.4 ?
B) Light JDK 1.4: This incluides a bare bones Tomcat
distribution which
The build doesn't require that, unless you use the full.dist
option (which
forces building everything, to prevent the release manager
from releasing
incomplete builds ;-)).
JNDI is the only API you mentioned that is required (but it's
included in
JDK 1.3+, and you dont need the JAR).
I am using xerces 2.0.0 in one of my webapps so I need to move xerces.jar
out of /common/lib and into /server/lib. This works just fine with
4.0.2-b2.
With 4.0.2 If I keep xerces.jar in /common/lib and use xerces.jar 1.4.3 in
my web app everything starts up just fine. But if I move xerces.jar
Hi to all,
TC 4.0.2 rpms are available at :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.2/rpms/
But read the following before rushing :
Tomcat 4.0.2 in light mode need :
servletapi 2.3, regexp 1.2 and xerces 1.x, that
are for some compiled (servletapi), present in
source
One of the last changes on the connector ( the secret )
introduced a bug,
when worker_cache is enabled. The secret will not be initialized, and
that may creates all kind of serious problems.
Could you detail the problem ?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
TC 4.0.2 rpms are available at :
The new RPM packaging looks much cleaner, and this time it should be
compliant with the official standard, right ?
Yes, and I hope to see other jakarta/xml projects use these kind of
packaging.
BTW, openjmx RPM is ready, and also puretls, cryptix, cryptix-asn1
Might be worth forwarding it to tomcat-dev (the guy sent to
announcements)
Yep ;)
Are not the RELEASE-NOTES updated? See following secition of
known problems:
The WARP connector for Tomcat 4.0 does not support load
balancing at this
time.
and
The AJP connector for Tomcat 4.0 does
RPMs are also available :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1-b1/rpms/
Take a look at the information on how to use PureTLS, the OSS alternative
to JSSE, which use Cryptix as security provider.
May be updated in Tomcat Doc also,
BTW: What about PureTLS on jakarta ?
I've done a RPM for tomcat-connectors which include :
mod_jk for Apache 1.3
mod_jk for Apache 2.0
mod_jk2 for Apache 2.0
I still can't build mod_webapp since the APR_DIR/APR_VARS
are mandatory and I want/need to use instead APR_INCLUDE
and APR_LIBS.
Today you have 2 choices to have APR :
What about adding this part in tomcat.sh (TC 3.3) and
catalina.sh/jasper.sh to help them discover JAVA_HOME on
at least Linux systems ?
+if [ -z $JAVA_HOME ]; then
+# Search for java in PATH
+JAVA=`which java`
+if [ -z $JAVA ] ; then
+JAVA_BINDIR=`dirname ${JAVA}`
+
What about renaming native2 (jk2) in JTC to mod_jk2
and jk2_module ?
It will allow us to install both modules at the same
times and test original mod_jk and new mod_jk.
It will be need to rename all non static references,
variables functions, but I could do that, by suffixing
with jk2_ :
And
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:23 AM
JXTA holds puretls and cryptix jars on jxta.org - so it shouldn't be a
problem on jakarta.
Incidently, tls is not ssl, although there are many similarities.
Just one question - are tls socket factories available for tomcat?
You means TLSSocket instead of SSLSocket ?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
If we consider native2 as a remplacement for the native of
mod_jk, no. That is
just a new version.
If you thing of easy testing may be... I have libjk.so from
native and mod_jk.so
from native2 and I stop/start Apache for testing both.
The idea is that native2 will replace more or less quickly
-Original Message-
From: Jarecsni Jnos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:02 PM
To: Tomcat-Dev
Subject: jakarta-tomcat-connectors
Hi,
I'd like to build TC40x. Where can I download
jakarata-tomcat-connectors?
The building.txt says one should download it.
You
What about adding this part in tomcat.sh (TC 3.3) and
catalina.sh/jasper.sh to help them discover JAVA_HOME on
at least Linux systems ?
If someone forgets to set JAVA_HOME and has multiple JDK's
installed, they could get a suprise. I suspect most non-beginners
would rather see an error
In Tomcat 4.0.2 and later, the above code would, I believe,
fit into the
bin/setclasspath.sh script. This script, which already checks that your
$JAVA_HOME contains a java, javac, and jdb command, would extend that
functionality. BTW, setclasspath.sh is source by all the
executable Unix scripts
Christopher,
Did you take a look at my scripts ?
tomcat3 starter :
#!/bin/sh
#
# Wrapper script for Tomcat, to be sure it will allways
# be run with correct user profile (tomcat by default)
#
# derived from stuff in tomcat.init
#
# Gomez Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Keith Irwin [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
A quick note to say that the Tomcat 3.3.1-b1
and Tomcat 4.0.2 have been upgraded to RPM release 2
TC 3.3.1-B1
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1-b1/rpms/
TC 4.0.2 + CONNECTORS
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.2/rpms/
The
What about renaming native2 (jk2) in JTC to mod_jk2
and jk2_module ?
+1 if you talk about the binary. -0 if you talk about directory/file
names.
No only source/binary, without touching anything in CVS layout.
It will be need to rename all non static references,
variables functions, but I
No change in CVS tree, just in source to avoid conflict
between mod_jk(s) even if one is a jk_module and the
other jk2_module
Rigth now, I'll wait for JTC developpers 'green ligth' to
do the changes in JTC native2 ONLY :)
Green light from me. It's an excelent idea.
Now a small
A quick proposal ( vote ? ): I would like to start using
commons-logging
in jk2. Right now it has println() style, but beeing able to benefit
from the fine control that log4j ( and other loggers ) provides
would help a lot.
If nobody oposes, I will check in a current build of commons-logging
Well, the Java code looks very similar to me. So the native code could
easily be ported to j-t-s.
It's just that this code is 100% Tomcat-dependency free. So
since it's some
generic capability other projects could want, I proposed to
move it to the
commons, instead of leaving it as a hidden
Any objection to see JkMount renamed to Jk2Mount in mod_jk2
and in general all Directive subject to collisions with the
original mod_jk...
The both could be installed at the same time ...
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:36 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Any objection to see JkMount renamed to Jk2Mount in mod_jk2
and in general all Directive subject to collisions
I saw there is provisions in commons-sandbox daemon for
Interception of Signals.
Did there is plan to add this feature to Tomcat 3.3.1/4.0.2
as it will be a real bonus for site admins ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY
Work is still in progress for the renaming of
jk2 (native2) calls and vars to jk2_.
Should be achieved tomorrow or on Thursday :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint :
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 5:01 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
So JkMount in Jk2 will point to NOP ?
No, it'll be commented out ( as long as we use jk in parallel
with jk2 ).
( to avoid name
Well, of course the process would have to be started as root
and the setuid to a
non-root user happens at the start of the process. Then, the
JNI calls allow you
to invoke setuid to switch back to the saved uid which is
root (since that is
the uid of the parent process). The only issue that
Ouf, finished the renaming of jk2 (native2)
Some remarks :
1) I choose to rename ALL JK directive since there are
just too many which are common in JK (SSL, LOG, DATE...)
...
AP_INIT_TAKE1(
Jk2WorkersFile, jk2_set1, workerFile, RSRC_CONF,
the name of a worker file for
It's very easy at least in Unix world to have tomcat
run as a basic user :
Attached is the wrapper code (tomcat4) I use in TC 4.0.2 RPMS
which replace catalina.sh
dtomcat4 is a modified version of catalina.sh
Ditto for jasper4 and djasper4
I'm unsure it's very usefull to have Tomcat 4.0
[Wed Feb 20 00:19:28 2002] [notice] Apache/2.0.28 (Unix)
mod_ssl/3.0a0 OpenSSL/0.9.6b DAV/2 mod_jk/1.2.0 mod_jk/1.2.0
configured -- resuming normal operations
mod_jk/2.0.0 sounds better.
ok, so let's call it mod_jk/2.0.0
3) To have both installed you should rename mod_jk.so from
native2
Oups miss to include diff ;)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
jk2_renaming2.zip
Description: jk2_renaming2.zip
--
To
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments
Oups miss to include diff ;)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED
Seems a good idea ;)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Philippe Van Der Gucht
There is still a problem with Jk2Worker directive (arg)
I'm working on it
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original
Get jakarta-servletapi-4-src.tar.gz in
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0/src/
yes, it should be also copied in 4.0.2 release (ASAP)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD
BTW: Did there is plan to port mod_jk/2.0.0 to Apache 1.3
and IIS/iPlanet/Domino ?
Of course, but my primary goal is to clean the code and
refactor it - and making it work well with Apache2.0.
It should be reasonably easy to write the adapters
for the other ( few days for each to get it
Ok, I'd like to have mod_jk 2.x with Apache 1.3 and
may be with/without APR...
I start to have doubts about supporting mod_jk2 without
APR - we should keep doing that at least until APR is
officially released and until we have a working
mod_jk2 for IIS/etc using APR. After that we can
I suggest a fifth log level be added called request.
(debug, info, request, error, emerg)
This log level would log each request with the following
possible info,
what info is logged could be controlled by an new config option
JkLogRequestFormat.
+1, I don't know if I'll have time to help
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
These features could be added to mod_jk 1.2.0 (native)
and 2.0.0 (native2) in jakarta-tomcat-connectors.
What is the status of mod_jk (2) 1.2 and Ajp 14?
mod_jk 1.2 is the original mod_jk from TC 3.3, with little
cleanup.
mod_jk 2.0 is a serious rewrite of mod_jk
That requires making both versions 'coexist', and
that requires renaming the module and the conflicting
directives.
Done, I'll modify mod_jk.c to mod_jk2.c ASAP
Well I'll rename and update build files this nigth
(CET) and will commit tomorrow morning (CET)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
OK, I think that explains it.
So mod_jk 2.0 and Ajp14 are still in development, and it
may be a while before they are finished.
Depends on how many people will help, a known story ;)
What about mod_jk 1.2, when will that be ready for production use?
Ready to use, I'm using it since TC 4.0.2
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
If you talk about the module name - I think that's
absolutely required.
mv mod_jk.c mod_jk2.c, ok ?
Change build.xml to generate mod_jk2.so, and
the internal name ( so LoadModule will work ).
Renaming mod_jk.c to mod_jk2.c doesn't help too
much
Renaming mod_jk.c to mod_jk2.c doesn't help too
much, but it's ok ( and will be more consistent).
mod_jk2.c is mandatory for :
IfModule mod_jk2.c
... handle jk2 directives ...
/IfModule
That's why renaming is mandatory
Urg, sorry for all these mandatory words ;?
--
To unsubscribe,
OK, I think that explains it.
So mod_jk 2.0 and Ajp14 are still in development, and it
may be a while before they are finished.
What is the status of mod_jk (2) 1.2 and Ajp 14?
My opinion:
Jk2 supports all the features from jk1 ( and some more ).
There are probably some new bugs and
701 - 800 of 1169 matches
Mail list logo
