Filip Hanik wrote:
I didn't say anything about just simple round robin
the algorithm for distribution can be entirely separate from
the stickiness as they are two separate things. The
distribution algorithm, (round robin, load, random, etc) is
separate and should not be confused.
Graham Leggett wrote:
sticky sessions are tightly coupled with the load
balancer
itself and the way it decides the client route.
In theory sticky sessions shouldn't be tightly coupled like
this - it should be a case of plan a) stick to the same
server, else revert to plan b).
Graham Leggett wrote:
Yes, but why would you wish to separate those?
Because they are two separate behaviours that could quite
easily be used independantly of each other.
OK, it makes sense.
I'm not that familiar with mod_proxy code, so please no
hooks, not jet
:)
I am
Filip Hanik wrote:
I suppose in this case the load balancer would run HOOK_MIDDLE, and
sticky would run HOOK_LAST.
cool, and then have the server just try them in that order?
ie, if the sticky server went down, it just takes the next
one from the list (and that list should be
Costin Manolache wrote
I can understand the jk2 object oriented C is considered
too complex.
True.
But I certainly can't agree on a design that is not modular
and doesn't support this basic requirement. We already have
mod_jserv and mod_webapp
- and a long history of rewrite
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Ideally since we could have a cluster of Apache WebServer
linked to a cluster of Tomcat ServletEngines, and that member
could enter or exit these 2 clusters we should have something
using Multicast (ideally a native JavaGroups) for both
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
We should first determine if Apache2 will have to monitor a
service/system links to the various tomcats (in cluster
configuration) to learn about real-time topology.
In fact, that is why I've pursued the .xml config over the current one.
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat
For example majors Linux distributions are now using Apache
2 instead
of Apache 1.3. So Apache 2.x will be more and more used.
When not running inside Apache, there are tons of things when
cannot use, including configuration. So
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Well I'd like to see jk 1.2.x continuing its slow maintenance
cycle since it's the most used module for now.
And start from scratch the new mod_coyote.
Ok, but let's try to make the code 'reusable', protocol and basic
config tree
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat
The only 2 JNI models that actually work are jk2 protocol
marshalling, pass only byte[] and eclipse swt small simple calls
with mostly int and byte[] params
All that is cool, but what you propose looks a lot like JK 2
(JMX
Hi,
All (except Costin) developers has to say something, so my conclusion is
that we are not dead after all ;)
Seems that the major obstacle is the configuration, so I propose that we
forget that for a while, and make a
'generalized' environment that will sattisfy all the 'needs'.
That
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Of course all that sounds like JK3, but ...
Did you see my post about a simpler module specific for now
to Apache 2.x (2.0/2.1), may be something which could be
included in standard Apache 2.x distribution which will save
us hours on
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Well I'd like to see the JK3 or whatever will name the new
module to be much more simpler and with less code.
Bingo!
I'm trying over and over again to 'push' something like 'zero-config', not
depandant of any current container.
Just imagine
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat
- it should be simpler than JK 1 or 2
That's the general idea
- it should have a name which doesn't confuse folks :)
APR_JAVA as static core lib + mod_javalink?
For example I wish to make a WIN2003 http.sys kernel module.
- No JNI in
Hi all,
Seems that the JK2 development has been stalled for a while, cause either
developers loose the interest, or it's so damn good :)
I would like to propose few things that IMO could make the JK2 a better.
1. Get rid of JNI from core and make a new 'server/jni/(iis|apace2|xxx)'.
This new
-Original Message-
From: Andy Armstrong
2. workers2.properties - workers2.xml using apr_utils xml support.
Get rid of 'assumed' properties like figuring out the
context from url.
Get rid of copying mappings from 'default' to virtual hosts.
Of course, it would require few
-Original Message-
From: Jess Holle
If you're proposing getting rid of JkUriSet, DON'T!
That's exactly what I whish to do.
It is *very* helpful to be able to mount URI's for a specific
web app in an Apache .conf file that contains all the other
settings for that web app.
-Original Message-
From: Jess Holle
I can see eliminating all web-server-specific configuration
options in the long-term -- though keeping the existing
options around for a while as deprecated alternatives would
be nice, i.e. to give everyone a conversion grace period.
You are abolutely correct (but not from my point of view).
Did you ever think that some core Java config stuff has to be in the event
log?
Did you ever tried to make the Tomcat registry configurable?
Why is then so hard to accept the JK2 as a independent project?
MT.
-Original
Can someone kill this guy?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-Original Message-
From: Bill Barker
Having the option to do per-host and even per-context configs
makes life much easier for admins of servers that support it.
Otherwise, you end up with a file that looks like:
jk-config
host1;
host2;
host3;
-Original Message-
From: Jess Holle
Who ever asked the poor apache admin about the TC's config ater all?
It really does not matter who the admin is. Even a
sophisticated admin is going to want to have file
modification dates they can trust on various aspects of the
The problem could be in the shm. On some platforms the shm remains hunging
until reboot.
The apr-1.0 has introduced a new function apr_shm_remove(), for removing a
named shared memory segment.
MT.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June
Check the Jakarta-commons/daemon package or...
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-commons/daemon/src/native/nt/procr
un/
MT.
-Original Message-
From: George Sexton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27. svibanj 2004 16:51
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: Source for
Hi,
How about releasing JK2 2.0.5?
There was some fixes from Norm and the IIS bug resolved dealing with upload.
Henri, are you willing to roll that again?
MT.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-Original Message-
From: Andy Armstrong
How about releasing JK2 2.0.5?
There was some fixes from Norm and the IIS bug resolved dealing with
upload.
And there are recent changes to the Domino redirector in there too which
will be of great interest to the ten or so people on
-Original Message-
From: Andy Armstrong
Is it only or 5.x or it can be used for Domino 6 too?
It should be fine with all Domino versions but I haven't tested against
6. I can find out from the 'extensive' user community whether any of
them have.
It seems to me that the 6.0
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat
I'm going to unsubscribe Gal from tomcat-dev for now, since a
lot of spam is coming through this old email.
Subscribe again if you'd like to be on the list (but with a
slightly different email so we don't get the spam ;) ).
(Apache
From: Cox, Charlie
This may be helpful in allowing more people to build jk/jk2
for windows.
Even more if you create a buildable makefiles :-)
The Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit 2003 includes
the core tools developers need to compile and link
C++-based applications for Windows and
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat
This may be helpful in allowing more people to build jk/jk2 for
windows.
Even more if you create a buildable makefiles :-)
They don't include their make in the package ? (it's cmake, right ?)
Yes, that's the cache, you don't have
-Original Message-
From: Angus Mezick
I grabbed the .so and it worked just fine. I am guessing it
is a dll with a different name.
Correctly.
You may name your .dll file to .angus.mezick if you prefer :).
The reason for renaming to .so was to make a consistent documentation
-Original Message-
From: Cox, Charlie
I didn't have time to look at it yet, but I was hopeful after
seeing it on the apache users list. Sorry for misleading...
No, it's quite a good choice actually.
To build the IIS connector you will the SDK anyhow if using VC6.
The main
-Original Message-
From: NormW
Hmmm
It seems your proposal has left everyone speechless which could
mean either +1 or +0 perhaps...
Norm
It's probably +0 thought :)
Really, I think it's a good solution, that doesn't change the overall
appearance of the current
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: NormW
Good day All.
Below is a link to a 'discussion paper' on the future use of
xml for /jkstatus pages, and comes at the request of Henri.
Any feedback should be to the general forum and not
specifically to me.
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 2:00 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: [5.0.22] Release vote
ballot
Release 5.0.22 as Stable:
[x] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
I've tested the new Windows wrapper, and it did work for me
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat
There was a bug in the service.bat (now fixed in the CVS) caused by
missing quotations.
Can you repack only those tree?
No.
Ok then, It will manifest only when Tomcat installed in path having spaces,
but only for manual install, so
-Original Message-
From: Angus Mezick
So, the only relationship between JK lbfactor and JK2
lb_factor is in their names and the fact they have SOMETHING
to do with load balancing.
They definetly don't seem to do the same thing.
I gave you detailed explanation how the lb
-Original Message-
From: Angus Mezick
Yup, I think I misinterpreted what you said in the email back
then. I wasn't able to rid myself of the assumption that jk
lbfactor and jk2 lb_factor behave the same. That assumption
is now dead. If you reply to my email with the series
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:48 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: 5.0.22 tag ?
I plan to tag 5.0.22 tomorrow. Any objections ?
What about new procrun?
I'm having all the patches ready and tested, and tomcat.nsi changed
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat
The new procrun looks professional.
It's been cooking for over a year and I've tried to do my best :)
It seems really good
quality overall (I do have a bad feeling about Win9x). The log viewer
is gone though.
Win9x is not supported
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Mladen discussed about using PHP from Tomcat.
The point is better native integration, php support will be just an example
of such integration.
Jean-Frederic Clere make some tests during his vacation and
send me the following mail to be
From Costin Manolache
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 7:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TC evolment
That's probably why I tought let's integrate PHP was an
April 1 joke :-).
You were wrong.
I thought that MS-Sun agreement was a April fools joke too :).
If Mladen is serious
Hi,
After a long time here is the preview:
http://jakarta.apache.org/~mturk/procrun2M3.zip
This is a totally rewritten version of a procrun with couple of significant
changes.
It finally doesn't need the java.exe to redirect TC's stdout/stderr.
Those can be redirected to the same or separate
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat
Since it has lot's of extra features, it cannot be used in place of
existing procrun.
The TC service has to be reinstalled.
And the parameters and everything else is the same ?
(if yes, then you can add the binaries in the CVS
From Costin Manolache
We also know that IIS or iPlanet may sometimes be faster than
apache or tomcat.
So what ? As we used to say on tomcat-dev when we were slower
than apache - performance is not the only thing that matters.
I would bet resin is still a bit faster ( probably not
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat
For tomcat - you can attempt to rewrite/replace every
feature in Java
( we are doing this for LDAP auth for example - not sure if JNDI is
better or faster than the native ldap auth in apache ). Or
you can try
to use JNI or
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes i will be willing to help with
the test. I can install the version on the dev server which
is IIS 5.0 with TC 5.0 and W2K and use these same machines to
do the test.
As of the email issue, I am subscribed but i get way too many
emails i can't read them
From Costin Manolache
mod_php inside TC.
I found out that TC is only 8% slower the Apache2.x.
So if I need PHP and JSP, the Apache2 is total overhead.
MT.
I hope this is an April 1 joke :-)
Maybe you can also integrate mod_perl and mod_dotnet ( or
whatever is called
From Costin Manolache
Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 9:14 AM
If a majority of my web content is a dynamic one, delivered through
JSP, PHP, or what ever, why would I need a dummy web server
as an intermediate?
The webserver is not only for static content. If you use
Apache
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
I think that we need to change the thinking perspective
from TC being
a 'helper' to TC being a 'workhorse'.
Interesting idea Mladen.
Next idea.
If we drop Apache 2.0 support we need to have jk/jk2 jobs
done somewhere :
What about
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use tomcat exclusively behind apache. This is for
performance reasons both as a proxy for slow clients
(releasing relatively expensive tomcat
resources) and as a static content server.
As said, it all depends on a particular use
Hi,
Heretic perhaps, but I'd like to integrate PHP (perhaps even Perl) directly
with TC.
Are there any thoughts on the subject, or perhaps someone is already working
on it?
Anyhow I'd like to hear are there any pros or cons, and finally are there
any interest of doing that at all.
MT.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Armstrong
Heretic perhaps, but I'd like to integrate PHP (perhaps even Perl)
directly with TC.
What do you mean by 'integrate'? Have tomcat handle PHP
requests by some means?
mod_php inside TC.
I found out that TC is only 8% slower the
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere
What do you want to do?
- Call native methods in TC to get PHP running.
- Write a servlet engine that understands PHP. (Well the
problem would be the libraries).
If a majority of my web content is a dynamic one, delivered through
From: Remy Maucherat
I got approval from Geir (the PMC chair) to ship with MX4J
and the installer.
So there will be a new 5.0.21 tag today, with new binaries :)
That's really good news.
Hope it'll last for a while :)
MT.
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat
So there will be a new 5.0.21 tag today, with new binaries :)
That's really good news.
Hope it'll last for a while :)
BTW, are there any new procrun binaries for this build ?
Bill did some bug fixes and updates, but I'm afraid he
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
You may change the README.html too.
Which README.html (the one on jakarta ?)
Yep. That one.
You could rush.
Cannot before tomorow (or later this evening).
What stops you from putting source and alread built binaries in the right
]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 4:53 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: jk2 2.0.4 tagged
Henri Gomez wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
First set of Linux binaries available :
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk2/binar
ies/linux
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/
Sources shoud be put and signed in the:
/x1/www/www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk2/source
You may change the README.html too.
Also in the root of jk2 there are some current sources that
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 2:41 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: jk2 2.0.4 tagged
jk2 2.0.4 has been tagged.
jk2_2_0_4
We're now in HEAD at 2.0.5-dev
Cool :)
Will you build the sources?
MT.
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Will you build the sources?
I'm preparing a source tarball, and will build Linux binaries
for Fedora Core 1, Suse 9.0 and Suse SLES 8.0 (PPC).
Others archs, are welcomed
Did we agreed on binary dist?
What's gonna be the dir
Hi,
I have some problems with the applications that rely on java.io.tmpdir.
The reason is that the startup set the java.io.tmpdir to CATALINA_TMPDIR,
and
that is ..\temp.
So each application looses the system temp dir, and it's quite random.
I propose to use the absolute paths for startup, even
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Hi to all,
Did some of you have Windows binaries for jk 1.2.6-dev and
2.0.4-dev and Apache 2.0.49 ?
Why?
I have.
MT.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:17 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.49, windows jk and jk2
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Hi to all,
Did some of you have Windows binaries for jk 1.2.6-dev and
2.0.4-dev
Hi,
Hope you guys wont mind :-).
I've rerun all sources though gnu indent.
The coding style in the sources was so messy and different, so IMO some
standardization was required.
It is a standard Apache-wide coding style (AFICT it's very close to Sun
coding convention).
I don't say that we need
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Hi to all,
Just see that Struts is becaming a top level project, like
ant last year.
What's your opinions on moving Tomcat as top level project ?
-1
Why would we need that?
If we are not recignised already as a valuable part of ASF,
-Original Message-
If we are not recignised already as a valuable part of ASF, why all
the fuzz?
Because we don't have the said recognition.
???
I'm thinking to leave the ASF at all...
What was the altruistic community become the playground for the major
companies like
From: Shapira, Yoav
Now that some more coherent arguments have been put forth, I
tend to +0.
Visibility-wise, I don't think Apache-Jakarta-Tomcat and
Apache-Tomcat are very different: our reputation is already
established. But if we can do something to give us a louder
voice and
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
I'd like to see Guenter Knauf promoted to commiter since he
provided us may fine patches on jk2 and help make this release happen.
+1
I was going to propose him by myself too :)
We need more and more people involved in the native side
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere
I have the following error:
+++
# sbin/apachectl start
Syntax error on line 250 of /opt/SMAWoIS/apache13/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /opt/SMAWoIS/apache13/libexec/mod_jk2.so into
server: ld.so.1:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Wed Mar 17 10:06:27 2004] (debug ) [jk_shm.c (166)] shm.init():
file=anonymous size=1703936
[Wed Mar 17 10:06:27 2004] ( info ) [jk_shm.c (122)]
shm.create() Created head fed8 size 8192 [Wed Mar 17
10:06:27 2004] (debug )
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Did some of you, JFC, Mladen, Guenter, Kurt, Norm could works
on a little HOWTO (text based will be suffisant) for jk2,
explaining how to set up jk2 in IIS and Apache 2 web-servers ?
It could be added to the release and will help remove
Oops, hit a wrong button so the post ended up the users list :-)
Original Message
Subject:Releasing JK 2.0.4
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:36:11 +0100
From: Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Seems that the shm is working now.
Greg, have you
-Original Message-
From: Guenter Knauf
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/conf
workers2.properties.minimal
great!! That was really missing!
Guenter.
Well, not such a big deal :).
What I'd like to do is to make a JK2 distribution (perhaps even 2.0.4)
to
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Henri, when do you plan to tag the release?
Did everything is correct with SHM ?
Yes, It seems it does.
Not so sure about 1.3 but it should, cause the problem was with double shm
initialization for each child, but that is fixed now.
-Original Message-
From: Guenter Knauf
Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/conf
workers2.properties.minimal
The INSTALL can include some except from xdocs.
I can make that, but would rather see some native speaker involved.
here's what Norm has put
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Turk,
The name is Mladen :-).
Different errors, but still does not work:
That's actualy good, we are getting somewhere :).
2004] (error ) [jk_shm.c (102)] shm.create(): error creating
shm 22 Invalid argument
This is very
-Original Message-
From: NormW
I want to also echo Guenter's thanks to the committers, less
for adopting the suggestions offered but for taking the time
to look at and (hopefully) consider them. I suspect all have
other commitments beyond Mod_Jk2 and suggestions generally
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Did there is still things in the pipes which prevent the jk2
2.0.4 release ?
Mladen, Norm, Jean-Fred, Guenter ?
Have you (or pehaps others too) been able to test the new shm
implementation?
MT.
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: jk2 2.0.4 release
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Did there is still things in the pipes which prevent the jk2
2.0.4 release ?
Mladen, Norm, Jean-Fred, Guenter ?
Have you (or pehaps others too) been
-Original Message-
From: NormW
Greetings All.
Attached is a very small patch to jk_worker_status.c to bring
the resetScoreboard function in to line with recent changes
in jk_shm.c Thanks for the time and attention.
Norm
Commited.
Thanks for spotting that (hope that's the
From: NormW
Perhaps in 2.0.5
* Suggested mainly for consistency with most of the other
objects, but it also now has enough properties that could
appear in a qry= dump.
Well, you may always make a patch :-).
And lastly, the configwebcom.xml indicates the default value
for slots
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Here is a reply I got from the community list :
This is not a complete prohibition on all third-party jars or
libraries, but only on those third-party libraries which are
licensed under terms more restrictive than the ASL.
Ask them is
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere
Mladen Turk wrote:
What about linking to static microsoft libraries?
That is probably not OK.
I know that, but I know too that the law doesn't have a term _probably_ in
it's dictionary.
Do we need to sign that or ASF
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Subject: jk2 2.0.4 release
Hi,
We see many bug fixes in the last 2 weeks in jk2, and I
wonder if some of you still have some corrections to commit.
I'm working on a new shm implementation (as said couple of times during last
week).
Will
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Henri, Remy and Costin proposed to move the binaries to
sourceforge,
until
the things clears up.
I'm in favor of that, and will support such a decision if voted.
Well I didn't agreed on moving TC binaries to sf or others.
Sorry,
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere
Henri fixes the core... But I think we should return 400
otherwise jsp code could be displayed as text.
Someone should take care of jk_dsapi_plugin.c and
jk_isapi_plugin.c and do the same.
jk_isapi_plugin uses
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: NormW
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk2 configwebcom.xml
Good morning.
It depends where :-)
In looking at the new shm, note the following:
1. SHM no longer works on NetWare with either file option.
... will have to look into that.
Good.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
+
#ifdef AS400
#include ap_charset.h
#include util_charset.h /* ap_hdrs_from_ascii */
@@ -50,10 +51,17 @@
#endif
Is it necessary to conditionally
Hi,
I'm working on a new shmem for JK2 implementation using APR (It took me more
then I've expected :-).
After having few different implementations, here is what I propose:
Use the shared memory (anonymous where applicable) through apr_rmm.
The entire shm support will be available _only_ if
Yoav,
Can you kill this account?
Think that anyone posting to this list during last few days receives the
message stating that this account doesn't exists.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The entire shm support will be available _only_ if there is
APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY support.
So if the particular platform doesn't implement that, or the apr's
implementation is bogus, one can disable that when building apr.
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I very seriously doubt this. Apache uses shared memory for the
scoreboard communication between the parent and child
processes. In
Apache 2.0, this is done using APR's
-Original Message-
From: George Sexton
Subject: RE: [OT] unsubscribe stupid users with auto-replies
I think a bigger issue is why is the list software forwarding these?
I have subscribed to many other lists, and this seems to be
the only one that consistently has this
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav
Subject: RE: [OT] unsubscribe stupid users with auto-replies
Hi,
I don't know, I've forwarded your filtering suggestion to the
general Apache mail admin.
One other thing.
Don't know if that would solve the amount of fake list
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav
I know it would require lot of work to implement that, but
IMO it will
stop
the auto subscribe programs.
It will stop the auto-subscribe programs, but at too great an
infrastructure cost I think. Anyways, it's not my call: you
can
-Original Message-
From: Guenter Knauf
If it's a APR bug are there any patches that we can propose?
no.
The problem is the NetWare OS self. We had formerly no SHM
The netware, and windows doesn't need shm at all.
that's not true from APR sight: if I look into apr.h for
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assuming that the next mod_jk2 release wants to go with
the present
APR
(0.94) or even the CVS (pre 1.0?) then we need to kludge
mod_jk on
solaris 8 (at least) to not use APR for this bit.
No it's gonna be 0.95 (the
Henri and others,
What are the remaining issues to be solved?
How about inproc JNI?
I'd like to disable that for all multi process mpm's, meaning almost
everything except winnt.
(It doesnt't work or ever will).
What is the status of shm?
Again, it's useless for all single mpm's.
How about to
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
How about inproc JNI?
I'd like to disable that for all multi process mpm's,
meaning almost
everything except winnt.
(It doesnt't work or ever will).
Multi process MPM ? you means multi-threaded and prefork models ?
Yes, the ones
501 - 600 of 878 matches
Mail list logo
