[ANN] Apache Jakarta Tomcat 5.0.29-beta Released

2004-10-06 Thread Shapira, Yoav
The Apache Jakarta Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate availability of Tomcat 5.0.29-beta. The release contains a significant number of bug fixes, and we expect it to be ratified as a Stable release when the vote takes place next week as usual. Release notes:

TCKs for 5.5.3 and 5.0.29

2004-10-06 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Sun folks, or anyone with access to the Servlet and JSP TCKs: can you please run them against the 5.5.3 and 5.0.29 releases when you get a chance, and post your results here? Thanks in advance ;) Both 5.0.29 and 5.5.3 pass all our internal tests without exception. Yoav Shapira Millennium

Tomcat 5.5.3 and 5.0.29 Tagging Today

2004-10-05 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, As previously suggested last week, and since no on objected, I will tag Tomcat 5.5.3 and 5.0.29 in CVS today, at 1700h GMT. Please give me a few minutes' safety margin around the above time, as the network here at work seems troubled today. Thanks, Yoav Shapira Millennium Research

RE: Tomcat 5.5.3 and 5.0.29 Tagging Today

2004-10-05 Thread Shapira, Yoav
of some esoteric bug in 1.4.2_05 that means I shouldn't use it, let me know ;) Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Shapira, Yoav Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 8:54 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Tomcat 5.5.3 and 5.0.29 Tagging Today Hi

NSIS warning while building 5.5.3 release

2004-10-05 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, While generating the .exe distro for the 5.5.3 release, I noticed NSIS spit out the following warning several times: [exec] Generating language tables... warning: LangString DESC_SecWebapps is not set in language table of language 1033 It's probably not a big deal, since it's just a

Proposal: 5.0.29 release next Wednesday, October 6th

2004-10-01 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I propose to cut the 5.0.29 release next Wednesday, October 6th, at 1500h GMT. There is no rush, but there is a significant number of items in the changelog (34 or so: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/c hangelog.xml?only_with_tag=TOMCAT_5_0), and I feel

[VOTE][RESULT] Tomcat 5.5.2 Stability

2004-10-01 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, This past Monday I posted a vote on 5.5.2 stability: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=109628849208040w=2. The results are as follows: Alpha: Remy, Costin, Mladen (I think, taking liberty to interpret his I agree with Costin statement as a vote ;)) Beta: Jean-Francois, myself So

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.31

2004-10-01 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, Just out of curiosity, don't you need 3 binding +1 votes to get this out there? According to http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html, this is a Release Testing vote that requires Majority approval, and the same page defines Majority approval as An action requiring majority approval

RE: Want to contribute some Catalina launching scripts for OpenVMS

2004-09-27 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Yeah, file a Bugzilla enhancement issue: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla. It'd be a good contribution. If you were willing to monitor bugzilla and/or the tomcat-user list for user complaints and/or bugs found with your scripts, that'd be even better. (You wouldn't have to check every day

RE: Interesting usage of Tomcat...

2004-09-24 Thread Shapira, Yoav
-Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Arcand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 5:01 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Interesting usage of Tomcat... Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Shapira, Yoav wrote: http://www.theserverside.com/talks

RE: classloader

2004-09-24 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I think it's a great goal and a great idea -- I look forward to seeing progress on it ;) Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Costin Manolache Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 10:41 AM To: [EMAIL

RE: Bugzilla 30936: secure attribute is persisted twice

2004-09-23 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I might take a stab at this later today, using my first approach: secure will become an attribute of the ProtocolHandler interface. The Connector will retain its getSecure/setSecure methods, but they'll just pass through to the ProtocolHandler. That way the attribute will only be in one

RE: Bugzilla 30936: secure attribute is persisted twice

2004-09-23 Thread Shapira, Yoav
, September 23, 2004 8:58 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Bugzilla 30936: secure attribute is persisted twice Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, I might take a stab at this later today, using my first approach: secure will become an attribute of the ProtocolHandler interface. The Connector

RE: Bugzilla 30936: secure attribute is persisted twice

2004-09-23 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, An option would be to tie the Connector object creation with the creation of the protocol handler instance. That makes sense anyways. Why delay, since the Connect isn't useful without a ProtocolHandler anyways? Yoav This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business

Interesting usage of Tomcat...

2004-09-23 Thread Shapira, Yoav
http://www.theserverside.com/talks/VendorPerspectives/Mainsoft/interview .tss Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.

Bugzilla 30936: secure attribute is persisted twice

2004-09-20 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I'm looking at http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30936. The secure attribute is persisted twice, causing a Digester error, because it's an attribute of both the Connector itself and its ProtocolHandler. The simplest fix seems to be to remove one these attributes. It seems

RE: Bugzilla 30936: secure attribute is persisted twice

2004-09-20 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I'm going to wait for Peter for save-to-XML rewriting, before bothering with fixing the various issues. (right now, saving data sources needs to be redone as well) I contemplated that, but it seems that here the core problem is not the persisting itself: it's the duplication of attributes.

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 build.properties.default build.xml

2004-09-16 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Good solution -- thanks. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 9:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 build.properties.default build.xml

[ANN] Apache Jakarta Tomcat 5.5.2-alpha Released

2004-09-15 Thread Shapira, Yoav
The Apache Jakarta Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate availability of Tomcat 5.5.2-alpha. This build of the new 5.5 branch addresses several minor issues raised by early testers on the mailing list, and contains other fixes to ensure all the Tomcat unit tests pass as they did in the

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 build.xml

2004-09-15 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I think the new version numbering in build.xml is too complicated and too high maintenance to be worth the small (and at this point purely theoretical) gains. I'd be happy going back to simple version is a string property, without any math or conditionals around it. Yoav Shapira Millennium

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 build.xml

2004-09-15 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, OK, but still you will need to update that, and be limited to numbers only, cause the installer will break in case of strings. I agree that the build.xml is vrong place to maintain versions. Perhaps to add some property file that will be accessible from catalina too and give the 'true'

RE: 5.5.2-alpha tomorrow

2004-09-14 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Great ;) Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 2:45 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: 5.5.2-alpha tomorrow Remy Maucherat wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Some results for

Reminder: 5.5.2-alpha CVS tag today at 1600h GMT

2004-09-14 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed,

RE: Tomcat 4.1.30 (although its still there in tomcat 5.0.28) temp file issue.

2004-09-14 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Ant 1.6 adds a tempdir attribute to the Javac task. You can use that to se the tempdir via Ant or in the DefaultCompilerAdapter. You will need to run with Ant 1.6 or later obviously, and also have a custom version of DefaultCompilerAdapter. If you'd like your enhancement to be ported into

RE: Version announcements

2004-09-13 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Since I've been involved with Tomcat: - Release announcements have included the Release Manager's opinion of stability (alpha/beta/stable), - Release announcements were made to tomcat-dev, tomcat-user, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - No release candidate terminology was used or implied - About a week

5.5.2-alpha tomorrow

2004-09-13 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, As a reminder, we agreed last week to cut the next Tomcat 5.5 release, 5.5.2, tomorrow (Tuesday, September 14th). If everyone could finish committing their changes by noon EDT, they'd be great. If someone is still working and wants to change the release date or time, let's hear it ;) Is it

RE: 5.5.2-alpha tomorrow

2004-09-13 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Shapira, Yoav wrote: If everyone could finish committing their changes by noon EDT, they'd be great. Hi, I saw couple of your posts mentioning EDT. I presume it's some strange time zone :). Can you use a simple thing like GMT? Sure, no problem ;) EDT = my timzone = GMT - 4 (Full

RE: 5.5.2-alpha tomorrow

2004-09-13 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, So: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=281 meaning: Tuesday, September 14th, (EDT noon - CEST 2200h) Correct? :). Wouldn't it be EDT + 4 = GMT, CEST = GMT + 2, so EDT + 6 = CEST, so EDT noon = CEST 1800h ? Yoav This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential

RE: 5.5.2-alpha tomorrow

2004-09-13 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Developers List Subject: Re: 5.5.2-alpha tomorrow Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, Is it OK with everyone to explicitly call this 5.5.2-alpha in the release announcements and Jakarta news/download pages? The stability vote will be as usual, one week after the release, and the stability vote results

RE: 5.5.2-alpha tomorrow

2004-09-13 Thread Shapira, Yoav
List Subject: Re: 5.5.2-alpha tomorrow Mladen Turk wrote: Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, Is it OK with everyone to explicitly call this 5.5.2-alpha in the release announcements and Jakarta news/download pages? The stability vote will be as usual, one week after the release, and the stability

RE: [ANN] Apache Jakarta Tomcat 5.5.1 Released

2004-09-10 Thread Shapira, Yoav
. Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, -1. The ASSUME_KERNEL is a suggestion meant at more advanced users and should not be imposed on everyone using RH9 by default. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Joseph Shraibman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday

RE: Dates for 5.0.29 and 5.5.2

2004-09-09 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Take a look at the changelog in CVS. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: David Rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 10:45 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: Dates for 5.0.29 and 5.5.2 Shapira, Yoav wrote: We

RE: [ANN] Apache Jakarta Tomcat 5.5.1 Released

2004-09-09 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, -1. The ASSUME_KERNEL is a suggestion meant at more advanced users and should not be imposed on everyone using RH9 by default. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Joseph Shraibman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 5:00

RE: 5.5.1 on Tuesday

2004-09-08 Thread Shapira, Yoav
: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 11:33 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: 5.5.1 on Tuesday Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, OK. Please finish committing by noon EDT today if you're still working on stuff. If that's impossible, please let me know before noon, as I plan to CVS tag around then and start

Dates for 5.0.29 and 5.5.2

2004-09-08 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, How about next Tuesday, September 14th, for cutting release 5.5.2, and next Saturday, the 18th, for cutting 5.0.29? Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is

RE: Dates for 5.0.29 and 5.5.2

2004-09-08 Thread Shapira, Yoav
, September 08, 2004 1:45 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Dates for 5.0.29 and 5.5.2 Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, How about next Tuesday, September 14th, for cutting release 5.5.2, and next Saturday, the 18th, for cutting 5.0.29? Do we need 5.0.29 already ? Rémy

RE: [VOTE] 5.0.28 Stability Rating

2004-09-07 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, OK, let's let this vote run one more day to allow people who were away over the weekend to voice their objections/votes (if any). Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Peter Rossbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004 3:04 AM

RE: 5.5.1 on Tuesday

2004-09-07 Thread Shapira, Yoav
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 6:53 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: 5.5.1 on Tuesday Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, I propose to cut the 5.5.1 release on Tuesday (September 7th), thereby giving us the weekend to do additional work on it. OK? I'm done with my

RE: 5.5.1 on Tuesday

2004-09-07 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, OK. Please finish committing by noon EDT today if you're still working on stuff. If that's impossible, please let me know before noon, as I plan to CVS tag around then and start the release. There is a couple of exception when you turn the security manager on (some

[VOTE][RESULT] Tomcat 5.0.28 Stability Rating

2004-09-07 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, The Tomcat Development Team has voted to rate Apache Jakarta Tomcat 5.0.28 as a Stable release, with 6 +1 votes and no votes for Alpha or Beta ratings. The complete voting thread archive is at http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED] a.apache.orgby=threadfrom=876550. The Tomcat

RE: [5.5] compile error -- build.xml

2004-09-03 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, For once, it wasn't me who broke the build ;) Remy removed that and I think it will be gone again soon, as we've morving away from the jakarta-regexp dependency in favor of JDK 1.4 java.util.regex. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Mladen Turk

RE: [5.5] Using dotted version naming

2004-09-03 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, I'm 0 on it. I think we (and numerous other projects, large and small) have been doing fine with a.b.c, and a.b.c.d is overkill. But if it's automated, and we keep using a.b.c for normal releases and use a.b.c.d only for patches, then it's OK. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research

RE: Kinda Urgent: Huge Temporary Files (2BG) Fill Up Root Partition (mrfxxxxx.tmp files?)

2004-09-03 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Tomcat doesn't produce these, they must come from one of your apps or you have a funky installation. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Peter Alvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 6:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: [5.5] Using dotted version naming

2004-09-03 Thread Shapira, Yoav
-Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 9:17 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [5.5] Using dotted version naming Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hola, I'm 0 on it. I think we (and numerous other projects, large and small) have been doing

RE: [5.5] Using dotted version naming

2004-09-03 Thread Shapira, Yoav
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 10:46 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [5.5] Using dotted version naming Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hola, I'm 0 on it. I think we (and numerous other projects, large and small) have been doing fine with a.b.c, and a.b.c.d is overkill. But if it's

RE: [5.5] Using dotted version naming

2004-09-03 Thread Shapira, Yoav
10:56 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [5.5] Using dotted version naming Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, The x.x-dev is a placeholder in build.xml. The Release Manager adds version=a.b.c to his/her build.properties when doing a release, thereby overriding the placeholder x.x-dev value

5.5.1 on Tuesday

2004-09-03 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I propose to cut the 5.5.1 release on Tuesday (September 7th), thereby giving us the weekend to do additional work on it. OK? Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that

RE: [ANN] Apache Jakarta Tomcat 5.0.28 Released

2004-09-02 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, Thanks for running the TCKs ;) Let's do a stable vote this Saturday, 9.4, as that's 28.8 + 1 week. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Amy Roh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 7:49 PM To: Tomcat Developers List

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 tomcat.nsi

2004-09-01 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Yeah, search/replace. But I grep'ped the file before and didn't think I saw any 5.0's that were unsafe to change. My mistake, I'll change it back right now -- sorry about that ;) Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: jndi-datasource

2004-09-01 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Dude, stop cross-posting please. Keep it on tomcat-user. Thanks, Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: V. Karthik Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:38 AM To: Tomcat Users; Tomcat Developers Subject: Re:

RE: 5.0.28 some tomcat.nsi faults

2004-09-01 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, Can we re-roll just the exe distribution or the new release is needed for that? Technically, I can re-roll just the exe distro, but that's not that good a practice from a configuration management standpoint. We only want one 5.0.28 out there, not the 5.0.28 that was before 9/2/2004 and

RE: Tomcat Benchmarking / Load Testing

2004-08-31 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, There are some entries on the FAQ (Misc section I think is where I put it), but it's far from complete. No one wants to give out details, it's all confidential/proprietary/security-constrained information. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From:

RE: i18n and packaging

2004-08-31 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I think it'd be nice to split the language resources out, not because of their size but to make it easier for users to modify and enhance the i18n bundles. I think we'll get more i18n-related contributions that way. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message-

RE: i18n and packaging

2004-08-31 Thread Shapira, Yoav
: i18n and packaging Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, I think it'd be nice to split the language resources out, not because of their size but to make it easier for users to modify and enhance the i18n bundles. I think we'll get more i18n-related contributions that way. I suppose it could indeed encourage

[5.5.0] Tagging today at 2pm EDT

2004-08-31 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, I'm going to tag and build 5.5.0 today at 2pm EDT (my time: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=43, you're all welcome to visit any time ;)). I'll upload the build, do the required site updates, etc, and as usual wait about 12 hours for all the mirrors to pick up the release

RE: Tomcat Benchmarking / Load Testing

2004-08-31 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I'm sure he would if he could, but as I said they're mostly confidential. This is getting off-topic for the tomcat-dev list, please continue discussion on tomcat-user if you'd like. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Gaurav Vaish [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Japanese message updates and one bug fix in Tomcat 5

2004-08-31 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I've applied your patches on the TOMCAT_5_0 branch and Amy Roh has done so in CVS HEAD. Thanks for submitting them ;) Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Kazuhiro Kazama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 2:26 AM To: [EMAIL

RE: [Patch] File descriptor leak in ManagerBase - please advise.

2004-08-31 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, randomIS is set to null in the getBytes method. But that's not as good as an explicit close. So I'll add an explicit close before setting randomIS to null. Your patch I don't like as much because it closes the stream before the readLong method is invoked on it. Yoav Shapira Millennium

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config context.xml

2004-08-31 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I'm actually working in emacs over PuTTY due to some weird network/firewall (mis)configuration issues here at work, so it's a pain for me to fix the tabs at this time ;( Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Tomcat Benchmarking / Load Testing

2004-08-31 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Thanks for sharing. (FAQ'ed) Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Sandy McArthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 11:19 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Tomcat Benchmarking / Load Testing We, University of Florida,

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config context.xml

2004-08-31 Thread Shapira, Yoav
, but it sounds right from what I remember. As I recall, untabify requires selecting the contents of the buffer first. -Paul Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, I'm actually working in emacs over PuTTY due to some weird network/firewall (mis)configuration issues here at work, so it's a pain for me to fix the tabs

RE: Hi!

2004-08-31 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Welcome ;) The web site shows latest stable version, and 5.0.28 has yet to be voted as such. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: V. Karthik Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 2:34 PM To: Tomcat Developers Subject: Hi!

NSI notes for 5.5.0 (or actually 5.5.1 ;))

2004-08-31 Thread Shapira, Yoav
To myself or whoever want to take care of it: - Change all occurrences Tomcat 5.0 to Tomcat 5.5 in tomcat.nsi - Fix [exec] 2 warnings: [exec] unknown variable/constant {SecTomcatDocs} detected, ignoring (ma :MUI_DESCRIPTION_TEXT:5) [exec] LangString DESC_SecTomcatDocs is not set in

RE: [5.5] Release plan

2004-08-27 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Primarily because of the JDK dependency change. We want to indicate that this is more than a point release, e.g. 5.0 to 5.1, and it has more changes including significant API changes. But we don't want to use a major version change e.g. 6.0 because we want to keep those corresponding to

RE: [VOTE] [5.5] Release plan votes

2004-08-27 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, ballot I approve the release plan: [ X ] Yes [ ] No /ballot ballot Tomcat 5.5 should use the following API set for the coding: [ ] J2SE 1.3 [ X ] J2SE 1.4 [ ] J2SE 5.0 /ballot ballot Yoav Shapira will act as the release manager for this branch: [ ] Yes [ ] No /ballot I doubt I can vote

RE: [VOTE] [5.5] Release plan votes

2004-08-27 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, Are you ok with releasing a first 5.5.0 build this WE or monday to properly start this branch offically ? Or do we wait for next week ? Let's do early next week, e.g. Monday or Tuesday. I'm going to do 5.0.28 on Saturday most likely. Yoav This e-mail, including any attachments, is a

RE: [VOTE] [5.5] Release plan votes

2004-08-27 Thread Shapira, Yoav
HEAD? It also appears that jakarta-tomcat-site recieved tags for TOMCAT_5_0_27, TOMCAT_5_0_26 and branch tag of TOMCAT_5_0. -Tim Remy Maucherat wrote: Shapira, Yoav wrote: I doubt I can vote for/against myself, so I'll just say I'll be happy to do the releases for a while ;) Are you ok

Bugzilla http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30762, servlet destroyed after contextDestroyed

2004-08-27 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I've just verified http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30762 is indeed true: the contextDestroyed gets fired before the servlet destroy method. This is a Spec violation. The relevant code hasn't change since Tomcat 5.0.23, when changes were made to StandardContext#stop. I'm a

RE: 5.0.28 next week?

2004-08-25 Thread Shapira, Yoav
PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: 5.0.28 next week? Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hola, I'm ready to cut 5.0.28 once the JSP folks are done with their work. I think you guys are actually all done and waiting for me, right? Shall we say this weekend with Friday as the deadline for committing any

RE: [5.5] Packaging

2004-08-25 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Please make sure target=1.3 is present in all javac tasks :-) Shouldn't we support only JRE 1.4 and 5.0 instead ? I would be able to I'm also not big on JDK 1.3 as the default target. I'm +0 on adding a javaTarget build.properties attribute that users can set to 1.3 but whose default

RE: [5.5] Packaging

2004-08-25 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, I'm personally -1 on droping support for 1.3 ( well, I would be +1 on supporting J2ME or 1.1 as a baseline :-). It depends how you define support, right? Does support mean by default everything is configured for JDK 1.3, and Tomcat is built with target=1.3 ? Or does it means there's an

RE: [5.5] Packaging

2004-08-25 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, Write once, run anywhere - why would you choose a target that will not run for a (significant) number of people, and try to force them to choose between upgrading tomcat and upgrading other software ? I don't think the number is significant. It's very subjective, and I have no empirical

RE: [5.5] Release plan

2004-08-24 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, I'll gladly do the releases for the branch. The release plan looks reasonable, I'd +1 it. We'll probably add some text on the goals (more on refactored deployer, enhanced i18n support in Admin, easier build because of refactored dependencies, JDK 1.5 vs. JDK 1.4, etc.), but we can do

RE: [VOTE] 4.1.31 maintenance release

2004-08-24 Thread Shapira, Yoav
and TC 4 is soon to be supported only for major bugs and security patches. Furthermore you could expliciteley recommend an update to TC5 for all active TC4 users. Rainer Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hola, I think we long ago agreed not to vote -1 just because you want somebody to work on a different

RE: [5.5] Packaging

2004-08-24 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, I'm planning to do the following changes to packaging: - removing commons-launcher from the final distribution (I see little use of it, since we have good scripts and native wrappers available); it will stay as a dependency to launch stuff during the build process - new release archives

Someone with karma for JSR154...

2004-08-24 Thread Shapira, Yoav
... please commit http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29923. It's just a resources file for the examples, a trivial commit, and I'd like to have it on the TOMCAT_5_0 branch (as well as CVS HEAD) for inclusion in 5.0.28. Thanks, Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics

RE: [VOTE] 4.1.31 maintenance release

2004-08-23 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, I think we long ago agreed not to vote -1 just because you want somebody to work on a different codebase :-) It must have been long enough ago that I wasn't here ;) I don't remember it. Anyways, since is a (non-lazy) majority vote so my -1 is not a veto, just an opinion. We already had

5.0.28 next week?

2004-08-23 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, I'm ready to cut 5.0.28 once the JSP folks are done with their work. I think you guys are actually all done and waiting for me, right? Shall we say this weekend with Friday as the deadline for committing any code on the TOMCAT_5_0 branch? Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics

RE: 5.0.28 next week?

2004-08-23 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I'd like to backport the service.bat to 5_0 branch. Not sure what's the agreement on backporting, but I suppose it's RTC. It has resolved JAVA_HOME and tools.jar issues that many users complain about, as well as using jvm.dll from JAVA_HOME environment variable. You will also need to use the

RE: Where's 4.1.31?

2004-08-20 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, You can't expect a 4.1.31 anytime soon. It's in a maintenance mode where only Spec violations and security flaws are the things that would get a new release out. We suggest the same thing we've been suggesting for a while now, upgrade to 5.x. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics

RE: Where's 4.1.31?

2004-08-20 Thread Shapira, Yoav
jakarta site I'd even be willing to document this process if it is not already. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 9:13 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: Where's 4.1.31? Hi, You can't expect

RE: Where's 4.1.31?

2004-08-20 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I agree with Jess, this is the wrong direction in principle. We're encouraging users to stick with 4.1.x if we do this release. Normally we have just an informal if everyone is OK with this, I'd like to push out release X on this day and then a vote on labeling it as stable. The latter

RE: [VOTE] 4.1.31 maintenance release

2004-08-20 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, ballot The 4.1.31 maintenance release should happen: [ ] Yes [ X ] No /ballot -1 on this release. Reasons have been stated in detail in the other thread, but to summarize this branch is no longer maintained and users should upgrade to 5.x or custom-patch if they have an emergency. Yoav

RE: Karma for jakarta-servlet-*

2004-08-20 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I thought karma for these modules was restricted to members of the servlet expert group. So we can post patches to Bugzilla and they'll apply them. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 20,

RE: Incorrect classloading

2004-08-17 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, A webapp can use its own commons-logging library, but it must then move the one supplied with Tomcat out of the common and into the server lib directory. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Dennis Thrysøe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,

RE: Vacation

2004-08-16 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, Have fun ;) Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 7:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Vacation Hi, I'll be on vacation this week. I'll see if I have time to come up with the

RE: both jdk1.5 and jdk1.4 needed to build tomcat????

2004-08-13 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Note also that CVS HEAD is not guaranteed to be stable until we make a release. If you want a stable reproduction of current code, do your checkouts with the TOMCAT_5_0 branch. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Hiller, Dean D (Dean)

RE: Tomcat 5.0.28 release

2004-08-13 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, OK, feedback well put. Thanks, Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 4:10 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.0.28 release We are using it also and it is very

RE: Tomcat 5.0.28 release

2004-08-13 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, I must say I don't fully understand the above. So what exactly will happen if the common/endorsed directory is removed? What will stop working and on which platform(s)? Are there any specific pointers to bug ids or discussions, that would explain why the endorsed directory was added in the

RE: tomcat build broken with strange javac error(never seen this one before)

2004-08-12 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, The build file works for me. Your servlet-api jar was built with JDK 1.5, so you must build the rest of Tomcat with JDK 1.5. Alternatively, build servlet-api.jar with JDK 1.4 and build the rest of Tomcat with JDK 1.4 as well. You get the general point ;) Yoav Shapira Millennium Research

RE: Why aren't tomcat connectors their own Product under bugzilla?

2004-08-11 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, When a user goes to report a bug he has to first search existing bugs. Right now you would have to search under multiple Project entries, and you would have no way of limiting your search by release number since the release numbers are tomcat release numbers, not jk release numbers. You

RE: JDBC pool configuration bug/ugliness

2004-08-11 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, OK, docs corrected and clarified. Thanks for pointing that out. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Dirk Verbeeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 12:55 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: JDBC pool configuration

RE: How to send a patch

2004-08-11 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, See the Patches section at http://jakarta.apache.org/site/source.html. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Edson Alves Pereira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 3:02 PM To: Tomcat-DeveloperList (E-mail) Subject: How to send

RE: Fwd: md5 sums for jakarta downloads

2004-08-10 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, The format I use for MD5 sums is the standard one. Every other project I know uses this format, so I think if anything this user needs to adjust his preferences ;) However, if there's a standard or spec somewhere that mandates we use md5 -r (reverse output format), then sure, someone point

RE: Tomcat 5.0.28 release

2004-08-10 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I have a couple of only-slightly-related comments, but related nonetheless so I'll put them here. Re: endorsed directories. Do we still want to support JDK 1.3 in Tomcat 5.1? Since we're gearing up for JDK 1.5, we might want to make 1.4 the minimum. I'm +0.5 on this. As for the nature of

RE: Fwd: md5 sums for jakarta downloads

2004-08-10 Thread Shapira, Yoav
of the content is stored in the file. It would be nice if there was a standard in this area, but I have yet to see one in the internet community. We have the same problem with generating md5 checksums for the maven repository at the moment. -Mark Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, The format I

RE: Tomcat 5.0.28 release

2004-08-10 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, I'm using JDK1.3 most of the time, and I think a lot of other people and companies are still using it. I don't mind having the default distribution built for 1.4+ ( no xerces ), with instructions on how to get the additional jars for 1.3. But I think it would be very bad to not be able to

RE: Fwd: md5 sums for jakarta downloads

2004-08-10 Thread Shapira, Yoav
: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 12:54 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Fwd: md5 sums for jakarta downloads Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, Well, as always, when there's an established practice I'd like a stronger reason than it would probably be good to change it ;) I see what you mean, but I don't know

RE: [PATCH] for someone with jakarta-site2 karma

2004-08-09 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, Patch committed, site updated. Any time ;) Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 4:56 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: [PATCH] for someone with jakarta-site2 karma Index:

RE: Tomcat 5.0.28 release

2004-08-09 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, A TOMCAT_5_0 branch was created at the time 5.0.27 was released. I'm not gung-ho about making significant Tomcat 5.0 additions and enhancements, given the advanced state of Tomcat 5.1 development. If there's a showstopper, security, or spec-compliance bug than of course it will be fixed and

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >