Re: libapr and --disable-shared?

2001-07-05 Thread rbb
I am also worried with mod_webapp for Apache-2.0, what will happend when a internal typedef of APR comming from httpd will be used by mod_webapp and will be handled differently there because of different APR version? Who said that for Apache 2.0 there will be 2 different versions of

Re: mod_webapp status?

2001-03-22 Thread rbb
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are 100% correct. Let me give a bit more detail. Covalent is currently using APR in many of our modules that work with Apache 1.3. This is actually harder than a module that works with a

Re: Apache 2.0

2000-12-19 Thread rbb
H.. I have all the good intentions in doing this, but I'm unable to get Apache2.0 to work... I've got the _a9 sources, and I was able to compile - but apache crashed. There are known issues with _a9. I would suggest ignoring it completely. Now I'm trying to get apache2.0 using

Re: Apache 2.0

2000-12-18 Thread rbb
Wow. That was fast. I am in the middle of compiling Apache 2.0 on locus so that we can run it with locus's config file on port 8080. I expect we will release the alpha on Friday unless something goes wrong, Once I have Apache running on port 8080 on locus, we can work on getting mod_jk