Cluster fixes
I am going through the cluster code right now and will be adding fixes along the way. I think the development of this code has focused more on features than stability, so I would like to ask that for the next period, lets focus on the stability and get this beast back in shape again. Filip - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability
ok, I'll look into this this week. Filip Peter Rossbach wrote: Hey, the problem is arround the keep a live handling code and the auto reconnect at SimpleTcpCluster. One thread can say: I drop the connection and open new one, then start transfer message and wait for ack. Other thread comes and see ups. the connection is not there. ( Arrg missing sychronized). I open a new socket and close the old current use socket. Under Suse Linux 9.1, the first thread wait for keepAlive timeout (60 sec). BAD!!! => Asnyc mode the queue grow very fast. Sometimes all other nodes have the same problem and the complete cluster standing still. Nothing todo wait for ACK I am made very limited testing the effects at sync,pooled mode. I preferred the async modes. I have merge my fix at the 5.5.10 CVS Head Basis. Currently my customer start a weekend load test. I also merge the changes at 5.5.9 Basis. Both version needs testing and documentation, but my time and ressource are limited. Need help, setup clusters and start loading tests. I start to open a bug report for better community discussion and add my fix pack for testing. build-src bin pack I must review my changes and document my szenario. Than Filip can start to review the changes and testing the clustering. Thanks for you help. :-) My customers needs the new 5.5.9 Release. The best thing is, we package a separate patch-cluster-fix and mark 5.5.9 as beta. Peter Filip Hanik - Dev Lists schrieb: Hi Peter, what's up with the cluster code? I will have some time to load test and debug any problems you might have, also, do you have problems on the synced-pooled setting, or on all connectors? Filip - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability
Hi Peter, what's up with the cluster code? I will have some time to load test and debug any problems you might have, also, do you have problems on the synced-pooled setting, or on all connectors? Filip Peter Rossbach wrote: Hey, [X] Stable -- good build (Normal Tomcat) [X] unstable and buggy cluster code, Argg! The normal Tomcat features are very stable on my tests. But my cluster code refactorings has drop the clustering. I have test the cluster under load this week and find some very bad bugs :-( - Complete cluster hang sometimes - In some situation the async mode can't dequeue I have build some quick fixes and can build a patch for some 5.5.9 cluster classes (Monday evening). Vote for a server classes fix pack or package the catalina-cluster.jar again. Sorry, Peter Yoav Shapira schrieb: Hi, Tomcat v5.5.9 has been out for more than a week now, so hopefully we have had time to test/use it. We're still waiting for the TCK results, but let's hear your opinion: [ ] Stable -- good build [ ] Beta -- minor bad stuff: what is it? [ ] Alpha -- something serious is wrong: what is it? The vote will run for about 72 hours as usual. Yoav Shapira System Design and Management Fellow MIT Sloan School of Management / School of Engineering Cambridge, MA USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
