RE: jk2 .. uncomfortably silent ?
Tomcat is a child process (ProcessID=0) to HTTP Server
What is your specific concern?
-Martin
My specific concern is mentioned in the message below.. i have pasted
the relevant sections of code there.
--Roshan
-Original Message-
From: NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 3:48 PM
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: mod_jk2 .. is 0 a valid child_id ?
mod_jk2 creates this error long entry each time apache
starts up...
[Mon Dec 15 15:20:17 2003] [error] mod_jk child init 1 0
The relevant code printing the error is in function
jk2_child_init() in
mod_jk2.c
static void jk2_child_init(apr_pool_t *pconf, server_rec *s)
{
//...
if( workerEnv-childId = 0 )
env-l-jkLog(env, env-l, JK_LOG_ERROR, mod_jk
child init %d
%d\n,
workerEnv-was_initialized,
workerEnv-childId );
}
//...
}
Here 0 is assumed to be invalud childID. But other parts of
the code (in the
same function) seem to find the childID=0 to be fine
if (workerEnv-childId = 0) {
workerEnv-childGeneration =
ap_scoreboard_image-parent[workerEnv-childId].generation;
++ap_scoreboard_image-parent[workerEnv-childId].generation;
}
...
/* Restore the process generation */
if (workerEnv-childId = 0) {
ap_scoreboard_image-parent[workerEnv-childId].generation =
workerEnv-childGeneration;
}
I am not too clear about the logic ...however it seems like
something is
not right if thar error is being printed each time apache
comes up.
-- Roshan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jk2 .. uncomfortably silent ?
Wonder why questions on jk2 often never get a response.
Are the relevant developers not active on this list ?
Even cc-ing the developers who are credited in the relevant source code
doesnt help !!
--Roshan
-Original Message-
From: NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 3:48 PM
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: mod_jk2 .. is 0 a valid child_id ?
mod_jk2 creates this error long entry each time apache starts up...
[Mon Dec 15 15:20:17 2003] [error] mod_jk child init 1 0
The relevant code printing the error is in function
jk2_child_init() in
mod_jk2.c
static void jk2_child_init(apr_pool_t *pconf, server_rec *s)
{
//...
if( workerEnv-childId = 0 )
env-l-jkLog(env, env-l, JK_LOG_ERROR, mod_jk
child init %d
%d\n,
workerEnv-was_initialized,
workerEnv-childId );
}
//...
}
Here 0 is assumed to be invalud childID. But other parts of
the code (in the
same function) seem to find the childID=0 to be fine
if (workerEnv-childId = 0) {
workerEnv-childGeneration =
ap_scoreboard_image-parent[workerEnv-childId].generation;
++ap_scoreboard_image-parent[workerEnv-childId].generation;
}
...
/* Restore the process generation */
if (workerEnv-childId = 0) {
ap_scoreboard_image-parent[workerEnv-childId].generation =
workerEnv-childGeneration;
}
I am not too clear about the logic ...however it seems like
something is
not right if thar error is being printed each time apache comes up.
-- Roshan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mod_jk2 .. is 0 a valid child_id ?
mod_jk2 creates this error long entry each time apache starts up...
[Mon Dec 15 15:20:17 2003] [error] mod_jk child init 1 0
The relevant code printing the error is in function jk2_child_init() in
mod_jk2.c
static void jk2_child_init(apr_pool_t *pconf, server_rec *s)
{
//...
if( workerEnv-childId = 0 )
env-l-jkLog(env, env-l, JK_LOG_ERROR, mod_jk child init %d
%d\n,
workerEnv-was_initialized, workerEnv-childId );
}
//...
}
Here 0 is assumed to be invalud childID. But other parts of the code (in the
same function) seem to find the childID=0 to be fine
if (workerEnv-childId = 0) {
workerEnv-childGeneration =
ap_scoreboard_image-parent[workerEnv-childId].generation;
++ap_scoreboard_image-parent[workerEnv-childId].generation;
}
...
/* Restore the process generation */
if (workerEnv-childId = 0) {
ap_scoreboard_image-parent[workerEnv-childId].generation =
workerEnv-childGeneration;
}
I am not too clear about the logic ...however it seems like something is
not right if thar error is being printed each time apache comes up.
-- Roshan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [ANN] Apache Tomcat 4.1.27 Stable released
Hi Remy, Are these security bugs existing in all versions of Tomcat 4 prior to 4.1.27 ? Or was there a version of Tomcat where these were introduced ? I couldnt find the reference to these security issues on the tomcat web site section mentioning the 4.1.27 release. This information will be very much useful since we may need to redeploy our free HPUX Tomcat distribution to customers. Thanks, --Roshan -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tomcat Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ANN] Apache Tomcat 4.1.27 Stable released The Tomcat Team announces the immediate availability of Apache Tomcat 4.1.27 Stable. Among other bugfixes and improvements, Tomcat 4.1.27 includes security fixes for: - Improper recycling of SSL client certificates with Coyote JK 2 - Improper handling of invalid content lengths in requests, causing HTTP processors to be left in an invalid state in Coyote HTTP/1.1, causing a DoS condition - URI normalization bug in Coyote - Improper handling of certain URLs in Coyote JK 2, causing a DoS condition Downloads: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi Remy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat shutdown port and security
Given that _anybody_ on the local machine could simply telnet to the port and issue a SHUTDOWN command. Isnt the current shutdown mechanism in Tomcat 4 a security issue ? -- Roshan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat Listener and file sockets
I have tried asking for this before (in vain)..but anyway ... Can Tomcat listen (for AJP13 requests) on a file socket (AF_UNIX) instead of the regular AF_INET socket ? mod_jk2 allows configuration to specify the socket file. However no documentation (or anything in the Tomcat source code) seems to support such configuration. I hope that atleast somebody (whoever implemented AF_UNIX in mod_jk2) must have tried out atleast once to get mod_jk2 talking to Tomcat via AF_UNIX sockets. Also there is a bug report #19917 on someone complaining about this not working in Tomcat 4.1.24. Woder if he had it working on an earlier version of Tomcat. No docs on mod_jk2 side or Tomcat side talk about the Tomcat side configuration required. Looking some Java/Tomcat source code it didnt seem like there is support for AF_UNIX sockets in Java. I am using tomcat 4. -- Roshan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat4 , mod_jk2 AF_UNIX connections
mod_jk2 allows for AF_UNIX connections to talk to Tomcat4. (http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/doc/jk2/conf igwebex.html) So lets say we specify /tmp/jk2.socket as the AF_UNIX file socket for communication between mod_jk2 and Tomcat4. We can tell mod_jk2 in the workers2.properties about this. I assume that Tomcat4 would also have to be told to listen on this file rather than on Port 8009. But the Tomcat docs dont seem to say a thing about how to go about doing this. So I looked into the CoyoteConnetor.java to see if i could find something. But i dont see any support for that in it either. Where is the support for this functionality implemented in tomcat and how do you configure Tomcat to take requests from this AF_UNIX socket file ? anyone knows about it? --Roshan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
