Fwd: Bug and Possible Fix in JK 1.2.8 (I am not sure where/how to post this)

2005-02-15 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Begin forwarded message: From: Ivo Conde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 15 February 2005 01:43:39 GMT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug and Possible Fix in JK 1.2.8 (I am not sure where/how to post this) Hi, I have found a bug and possible fix in the latest version (1.2.8) of the JK Connector for

Re: Error in document

2004-12-12 Thread pier . fumagalli
Your important document, correction is finished! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [proxy] New implementation ready for testing

2004-08-16 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 11 Aug 2004, at 17:14, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi all, We've finished the initial development of extended mod_proxy. Since the development took place at jakata-tomcat-connectors, the source code can be found under ajp/proxy. Here is the list of major features added: 3. Added new module

Fwd: md5 sums for jakarta downloads

2004-08-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Begin forwarded message: From: Andy Mudrak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 10 August 2004 00:57:44 BST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: md5 sums for jakarta downloads Hi, I noticed that your MD5 sums on your website are not all formatted correctly. I specifically downloaded the Tomcat 5.0.27 MD5 file,

Fwd: an little mistake on site ?

2004-01-05 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Begin forwarded message: From: v.z. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 5 January 2004 11:19:40 GMT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: an little mistake on site ? Hi. On download source-site  seems is present en little error. I've tried to check archive  JK 2 Source Release .zip by pgp signature, your

Fwd: typo in tomcat site

2003-10-18 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked. Pier Begin forwarded message: From: Martin Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 18 October 2003 19:07:28 GMT+09:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: typo in tomcat site Hi Jakarta Webmaster, There's a typographic error in

FW: tomcat binary page links not up

2003-09-23 Thread Pier Fumagalli
FYI -- Forwarded Message From: Michael Kidd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:46:52 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tomcat binary page links not up Webmaster, I'm trying to download a tomcat file on the following page:

FW: Downloading Tomcat 4.06

2003-09-15 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Getting lots of those lately... Might want to check the website. (It's not mirrored) Pier -- Forwarded Message From: Tye, Rebecca A [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:48:16 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Downloading Tomcat 4.06 Where's the link to download Tomcat

[Fwd: Need Tomcat 4.0.6 LE (jdk1.4) Binaries]

2003-09-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Getting a lot of those... You might want to update the links in the website to point to the mirrors? Pier ---BeginMessage--- We are using Tomcat 4.0.6 and I need to download binaries, both the Windows install version and for Linux. Recently 4.0.6 downloads have disappeared from your website.

Re: General question about download

2003-06-19 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Grzegorz Paszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:21:29AM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote: Grzegorz Paszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i.e ecs, tomcat-4.1.24, Any example? On ftp.task.gda.pl and on sunsite.icm.edu.pl I'm not able to find rpm files for ecs and tomcat-4.1.24

FW: broken

2003-04-01 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked... Pier -- Forwarded Message From: Vijaya Dasari [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:18:26 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: broken Hi, The link http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/coyote/jk2/index.html is broken. Thanks, Vijaya.

FW: Files missing from website - webapp module builds

2003-04-01 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked. Pier -- Forwarded Message From: Bruce Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 12:13:35 -0600 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED], '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED], '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Files missing from website - webapp

FW: Poor documentation for jk

2003-03-21 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked -- Forwarded Message From: mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:25:52 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Poor documentation for jk Hi Webmaster, I would like to bring to light the fact that the documentation for the jk mod to bind apache and tomcat is severly

FW: jakarta_tomcat_mod_jk connector

2003-03-21 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked... -- Forwarded Message From: Tony Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:33:01 -0800 (PST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fwd: jakarta_tomcat_mod_jk connector As followup to my previous note, I have contacted redhatLinux, and found that their version of Apache

FW: openprojects.net name change

2003-01-30 Thread Pier Fumagalli
FYI, not acked -- Forwarded Message From: Rob Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 01:08:50 -0600 (CST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Rob Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: openprojects.net name change Today (Jan 30, 2003) at 01:05 -0600, Rob Levin wrote: To the Webmaster,

FW: dead links ...

2003-01-17 Thread Pier Fumagalli
-- Forwarded Message From: Adam Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:29:06 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dead links ... Hello ... I was interested in downloading the newest version of Tomcat and all the links I tried were dead. Here's where it sent me:

FW: Tomcat IRC link bout to be broken

2003-01-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
-- Forwarded Message From: Nicholas Schuetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:57:21 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat IRC link bout to be broken As you may or may not know openprojects.net was bought by freenode.net. Therefore the server address you want has changed to:

FW: documentation error

2003-01-07 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked... FYI... Pier -- Forwarded Message From: Stoffer, Shawn D [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 11:55:11 -0700 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: documentation error I wished to point out that in the jakarta/tomcat documentation, there is an error.

FW: GPG key for mod_jk2 2.0.2 not valid ?

2002-12-20 Thread Pier Fumagalli
FYI, not acked... Can someone look into it? Pier -- Forwarded Message From: Laurent Blume [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:12:14 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: GPG key for mod_jk2 2.0.2 not valid ? Hello, I hope you won't mind my email, I'm a bit unsure about whom I

Re: nagoya down

2002-12-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 13/12/02 21:39 Bradford Holcombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got some issues with 4.1.16 that I want to check against the Tomcat bug database, but nagoya is refusing connections. We just moved the machine... And it works fine at its new home... You might want to try straight from the IP

Re: Inputs from a Tomcat user.

2002-12-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 12/12/02 5:28 Sriram N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, I've always respected Pier's views on a number of topics, but I do feel that crap is a very flexible adjective. The users I help out with Tomcat are very pleased with the admin tool. Bunch of loosers who're not able to see a server.xml

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

2002-12-11 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 12/12/02 1:06 Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looking at the original vote I realize that what you ask can't be done. Tomcat 4 is the RI of Servlet 2.3, JSR 154 is for Servlet 2.4. So it isn't possible to create a JSR 154 only dist of Tomcat 4. It is _NOT_... Tomcat is the servlet

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

2002-12-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 10/12/02 8:40 am, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I remember perfectly, and this Tomcat-HA was a complete joke. You proposed a new implementation of the Catalina classes, which doesn't make sense given the current Tomcat state That's what I was

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

2002-12-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 10/12/02 8:57 am, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: Pier (a _user_ now) And that's sad. Not apparently, as I am the reason why noone picked up Tomcat 4 :-) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

2002-12-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
enough). New signature! :-) Pier -- [...] mod_webapp, which was *the* main reason for many people not to adopt Tomcat 4.x - Remy MaucheratWorks for me - Pier Fumagalli -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

2002-12-09 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 9/12/02 3:59 Jeanfrancois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (2) The Admin Tool should go with the minimal distribution of Tomcat. We decided to include JMX in Tomcat distribution...what's the point having JMX and not the Admin Tool? Maybe JSP is not required by all Tomcat users, but I'm sure

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

2002-12-09 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 9/12/02 9:16 Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I would love to see is a tree of downloads where each one gains more and more features (it is additive). Such as: JSR-154 Implementation / \ Jasper

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

2002-12-09 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 9/12/02 17:14 Jeanfrancois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Youy don't need to learn JSP/Admin Tool if you don't use it. The actual Tomcat installation doesn't require you to learn the Admin Tool or JSP As I said 6 or so months ago... That thing is a security hole as big as the Empire

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

2002-12-09 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 9/12/02 15:16 Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to have an official vote on my prior proposal. This is the list of included features: Libs: - JMX - JAAS - JNDI - digester ( and beanutils, collections it needs ). -

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

2002-12-09 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 9/12/02 23:06 Jeanfrancois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 9/12/02 17:14 Jeanfrancois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Youy don't need to learn JSP/Admin Tool if you don't use it. The actual Tomcat installation doesn't require you to learn the Admin Tool or JSP

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

2002-12-09 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 9/12/02 23:38 Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 9/12/02 15:16 Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to have an official vote on my prior proposal. This is the list of included features

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

2002-12-09 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 9/12/02 23:51 Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ehemm... With 24 pages of vulnerability notes? Ha.. Hahaha Hahahaha! :-) Correction to self... Not 24 pages... 24 notes... (Ok, I have an eyesight test tomorrow morning at 10:20 in SOHO... I know, I know...) Pier

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

2002-12-09 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 10/12/02 0:10 Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But in this case you keep making false statements, and not only here. It should be quite easy to look for a [VOTE] or [PROPOSAL] that you made and was voted on tomcat-dev. Then find it. I believe it never even went to [VOTE]...

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

2002-12-09 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 10/12/02 0:30 Jeanfrancois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now, don't tell me that ALL that collection of cruft doesn't have a bug... It's just that we are lucky and noone found them yet (given enough eyes... Linus says)... I never say that and I will never says that. But I least I have

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

2002-12-09 Thread Pier Fumagalli
for this one (next time I'm in the US!) Pier Original Message Subject: Re: 5.0 proposal Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 21:49:51 +0100 From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

2002-12-09 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 10/12/02 1:06 Justyna Horwat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess the high art of potty humor is not lost on idiots. My buttocks are clenched in anticipation for the Pier (C) and TM fart jokes. :) Damn you know me far too well, Justy! :-) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

2002-12-07 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 6/12/02 16:09 Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Create a separate minimal JSR 154 only distribution of Tomcat 4.x: +1 [X] 0 [ ] -1 [ ] Or simply use Jetty :-) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

2002-12-07 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 7/12/02 16:32 Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The majority decision works only if enough people vote. So far we have: +1: Jon, Pier, Bill -0: Costin -1: Remy Anyone else ? For the records, please check in $CVSROOT/avail... I'm not a committer... I only support _strongly_

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

2002-12-07 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 8/12/02 0:43 Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 2002/12/7 4:25 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jon, I'm very sorry mate, you're 4 months too late :-( I lost my fight about this very same topic back then... Maybe to late for your opinion, but honestly, I haven't

Re: mod_jk-2.0.42.so

2002-11-28 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 28/11/02 17:25 Pedro Igor Craveiro e Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you know what for is this libc.so.6 ? Main C library for Linux, the one that contains also printf... When i run the httpd, he return that this shared lib could not be found. Then you're in troubles. Update your Linux

Re: mod_jk-2.0.42.so

2002-11-28 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 28/11/02 7:37 pm, in article 000701c2970d$2d408f90$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Pedro Igor Craveiro e Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok. But, with that first module(mod_jk2.(etc)) the i was using i can put the apache e tomcat together? FreeBSD contains a Linux emulator, but AFAICR, it ships

FW: Apache Tomcat

2002-11-15 Thread Pier Fumagalli
FYI -- Forwarded Message From: Manjiri Devdhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:23:52 +0530 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Apache Tomcat Hello, This is Manjiri from Wrox Press Ltd taking care of the Open source titles. I really

Re: ServletContext.getContext() still completely broken.

2002-11-15 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Martin Algesten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are we going to release 4.1.15 without addressing this? This is a standard API call that currently DOES NOT WORK (or am I wrong, can anyone get hold of a foreign context from the ROOT context?) I've submitted a possible fix in BZ #13040 ...

Re: JSPC refactoring/documentation

2002-11-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd also like to point out that the servlet API changes are very limited, and it will be possible to use Tomcat 5.0 with the Jasper from Tomcat 4.1. So I think major new features should go in the 5.0 codebase. What is a realistic timeline for 5.0

FW: R: GOODBYE from tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org

2002-11-01 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Who unsubbed this guy on Fri Nov 1 03:31:13 PST 2002??? 1036089107 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's not a probe, so, someone (one of the moderators, I believe), unsubbed him manually (see at the bottom). Any reason why? Pier -- Forwarded Message From: Luca Ventura [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:

Re: production quality?

2002-10-31 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 31/10/02 14:36 Martin Algesten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Tomcat should either not send any headers on a 304, or if it does then make sure that they do reflect the correct values for the requested object (e.g. not call a gif a text). 2. Not entirely sure here. Reading the HTTP/1.1

Re: [4.1.14] New test milestone released

2002-10-30 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 30/10/02 9:19 am, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ALL directories need to be 755 (therefore only THOSE and NOT THE FILES need to have the +x bit set) they need to look like drwxrwxr-x Why 755 on directory ? Shouldn't they be 775 to allow group member to update them ? Oh, mefuck...

Re: Someone fix this...

2002-10-30 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 29/10/02 11:35 pm, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 29/10/02 23:02, Mike Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DOH! Sorry. Thats what you get when you get a Non-Unix weanie to play around on a Unix box. I knew that I've had to do this in the past but completely spaced

Re: production quality?

2002-10-30 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 30/10/02 6:06 pm, Martin Algesten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: An incorrect If-Modified-Since response seems to shag mod_proxy. Now I don't know how widely used mod_proxy is, or if perhaps this should be fixed there instead. However I am concerned about this and as I pointed out I am happy to

Re: production quality?

2002-10-30 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 30/10/02 20:02, Martin Algesten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a nutshell mod_proxy updates its cached entries with whatever new headers are given to it. E.g. first request comes into mod_proxy and it can't find the requested resource in its cache. It forwards on to my tomcat who responds

Re: TOMCAT memory usage : how to manage and benchmark ?

2002-10-29 Thread Pier Fumagalli
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Linux threads implementation is _bad_ but that does not mean that the whole thing bad. That's why I said works for you? Good... For our setup we _need_ threads... For the Fun. The kernel threads appair also in ps but I have not (yet) tried to

Re: 10/29/02 Notes

2002-10-29 Thread Pier Fumagalli
One might still feel he's on the pteam! :-) pier On 29/10/02 22:00, Jean-Francois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oups..wrong list...sorry. -- Jeanfrancois Jean-Francois Arcand wrote: are available under http://javaweb.sfbay.sun.com/~ja120114/security-audit/SecurityAudit.html

Someone fix this...

2002-10-29 Thread Pier Fumagalli
send_files failed to open /builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/netware/mod_jk_1.3.n lm.asc: Permission denied send_files failed to open /builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/netware/mod_jk_2.0.4 2.nlm.asc: Permission denied send_files failed to open

Re: Someone fix this...

2002-10-29 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 29/10/02 23:02, Mike Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DOH! Sorry. Thats what you get when you get a Non-Unix weanie to play around on a Unix box. I knew that I've had to do this in the past but completely spaced it for this. This should be fixed now. Rsync should run in another 5

Re: [4.1.14] New test milestone released

2002-10-29 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 29/10/02 22:46, Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: A new test milestone of Tomcat 4.1 has just been released. Please help test this upcoming Tomcat release for compliance issues and other problems. Downloads:

Re: TOMCAT memory usage : how to manage and benchmark ?

2002-10-28 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, My first question is : why tomcat use all the memory while there is no users connected (or just one) ? The JVM allocates chunks of memory (see the -Xmx and -Xms flags by invoking java -X) and manages them... So, one user, 100 users, same

Re: TOMCAT memory usage : how to manage and benchmark ?

2002-10-28 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Linux threads are +/- process and are really cheap to create, so it's should be a problem. Read, it shouldn't be a problem It is a problem because every time someone does a PS goes _nuts_ about the number of JVM processes... While at the end they

Re: Réf. : Re: TOMCAT memory usage : how tomanage and benchmark ?

2002-10-28 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what is the goog hard config for 500 concurrent users on the same tomcat server ? It depend on your application, but I'll recommand a least 3 fast Intel based linux boxes, with about 512Mo of RAM, and in front an Apache 1.3/2.0

Re: [OT]Re: TOMCAT memory usage : how to manage and benchmark ?

2002-10-28 Thread Pier Fumagalli
micael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What operating system do you prefer, Pier? We use Solaris both for Intel and Sun platforms... First reason being is that we _know_ how that OS works, it's much more tuneable on live systems, and much easier to configure when you know what you're doing...

Re: TOMCAT memory usage : how to manage and benchmark ?

2002-10-28 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 28/10/02 22:40, Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 00:31, Pier Fumagalli wrote: Those are _not_ processes, they are threads... Use a decent operating system that supports them nicely (not Linux) and you'll see the difference (how many times do I have to repeat

Problems mirroring the tomcat distribution site...

2002-10-24 Thread Pier Fumagalli
send_files failed to open /builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/archives/v4.0.5/bin/hotfix/13365.zip.asc: Permission denied send_files failed to open /builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.5/bin/hotfix/13365.zip.asc: Permission denied send_files failed to open

WEB.XML not reloaded???

2002-10-16 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Anyone noticed that the web.xml doesn't get reloaded when I reload a deployed context under 4.0? Or is it me being stupid? Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] tomcat-commiters list

2002-10-14 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 14/10/02 19:45, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The proposal needs to identify a moderator. The moderator will be the one who approves subscription requests (as well as filtering out spam). And AFAIK, we've roughly always said no to extra mailing list (but -dev -cvs and -users) to keep

Re: jk2 and daemon ( was Re: commons-daemon release ?)

2002-10-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - starting a VM using exec / monitor the child process. It is not implemented yet in jk2 - but pretty important ( it's one of the features from jserv that wasn't yet ported). It seems daemon has a bit of code - as I mentioned from reading it I don't

Re: jk2 and daemon ( was Re: commons-daemon release ?)

2002-10-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 10/10/02 20:21, Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The 'feature' is that all tomcat processes ( and you may run more than one in a load balanced mode ) can be started automatically and monitored. If one dies, it'll be automatically restarted. tip http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html

Re: Cannot build mod_webapp.so on Solaris 8

2002-10-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 10/10/02 22:23, James C. McMaster (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know this is not the proper place to ask configuration questions, but I do not believe this is such. Use mod_jk -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL

Re: jk2 and daemon ( was Re: commons-daemon release ?)

2002-10-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 11/10/02 3:14, Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 2002/10/10 6:50 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can tell you that our main Java instance for VNUNET.COM takes approximately 4 to 5 minutes to start... OUCH. Our main web-app has roughly 400 JSP pages

Re: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement

2002-10-08 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 5/10/02 12:43 am, Mark Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has been brought to my attention that some members of the Tomcat community have expressed a desire to see a requirement lower than J2SE 1.4 in JSP 2.0. Great... One more reason to start thinking about kicking JSP out of the door! :-)

Re: Cannot Build WebApp on Solaris 2.8

2002-09-27 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 27/9/02 0:22, Jay Ebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I followed the Building the WebApp module exactly and cannot build the webapp module for Solaris 2.8 using gcc 2.95. After a successful ./configure ... , I get the following errors on the make: Use mod_jk -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Tired...

2002-09-27 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Since I'm tired of you lot, I'm going to say goodbye and retire in lala-land http://www.psc.edu/science/tang.html... Have fun and try not to hit bugtrack too often! :-) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jasper 2 Question

2002-09-20 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Hm The original question was about line numbers on JSPs, when they are compiled, and when they are executed and throw exceptions, right? Yes, it was... I said use some tea because Tea, developed by Disney, goes exactly in that direction, not having middle layer .java files over which the

Re: Jasper 2 Question

2002-09-20 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 10:24 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote: On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 04:30, Lenny Karpel wrote: is it right that when I ask a serious question about jasper2 that I get these totally ridiculous answers ? Well, Jon and Pier are known to throw in a curly one from time to

Re: 4.1.10 tarball is borked.

2002-09-19 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On Wednesday, September 18, 2002, at 11:35 PM, Ian Darwin wrote: They admit that they aren't POSIX conformant, and claim that they will be, and will do it in a different way than GNUtar does at present. Do you know if this article is up to date? Well I guess it must be, it's on gnu.org.

Re: Jasper 2 Question

2002-09-19 Thread Pier Fumagalli
You can use some tea... http://opensource.go.com/ :-) Pier On Wednesday, September 18, 2002, at 10:33 PM, Lenny Karpel wrote: I use IntelliJ's IDEA product for Tomcat relared development .. I noted the following statement in thier bugs mailing list with regards to debugging JSP

Re: Small code contribution

2002-09-17 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Vaughn Bilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I apologize in advance if I'm not following proper protocols for this submission, but I'm new at this. I have created a patch against Tomcat 4.1.10 which adds a custom tag and associated servlet to the Tomcat admin context. The tag, designed to replace

Re: Tomcat not scaling very well...

2002-09-17 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Pat Schaider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all -- I'm risking getting scolded for using the wrong list for this, but the tomcat-user list was totally useless in solving this problem. The problem is on Tomcat 4.0.3 Standalone on Linux. I am managing this machine for my university's CS

Re: 4.1.10 tarball is borked.

2002-09-17 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Ian Darwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 07:22:43PM -0700, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: Pier, you need to use GNU tar. *BSD* tar sucks balls. Er, you mean perhaps that BSD tar doesn't yet support the non-standard GNU extensions? Nope, it doesn't... I'm thinking whether we

4.1.10 tarball is borked.

2002-09-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Whoever packaged the tar gzip distribution didn't check that it was actually _packaged_ properly... I get a few gazillion broken files (noticeably with some beautiful ././@LongLink entries), and with all file names longer than 100 or something characters foobared up... (like:

Re: 4.1.10 tarball is borked.

2002-09-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 19:27:31 +0100 From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 4.1.10 tarball

Re: 4.1.10 tarball is borked.

2002-09-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 19:27:31 +0100 From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List

Re: [PATCH] for bug#12049: symlinked directories, jsp pages arenot served

2002-09-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 13/9/02 1:14, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This bug is kind of annoying when there are lots of pages shared across multiple clients. The common practice we use on Tomcat 4.0.2 is to build symbolic links under each client that points to a centralized place to avoid file copying

FW: [NAGOYA.APACHE.ORG] RSYNC Output

2002-09-06 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Therewego... Folks, when you change a release from TEST to FINAL, please, don't move files around... Use symlinks, but don't use neither mv nor cp... Yesterday's promotion of tomcat 4.1.10 from test to release overkilled the mirrors with a good 43 megabytes of downloads completely useless, and

Fwd: Tomcat 4.03 / 4.04 source download incorrect.

2002-08-20 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked Begin forwarded message: From: Lukas Hazlehurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed Aug 14, 2002 01:05:07 Europe/London To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat 4.03 / 4.04 source download incorrect. Hello,   Just thought i'd mention that the link

Fwd: Minor bug in Tomcat docs

2002-08-20 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked. Begin forwarded message: From: Asuja Andreas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri Aug 16, 2002 09:09:44 Europe/London To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Minor bug in Tomcat docs Hi!   On page http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/appdev/deployment.html

Fwd: Broken link

2002-08-20 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked Begin forwarded message: From: Jørgen Nørgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue Aug 20, 2002 14:17:23 Europe/London To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Broken link On http://jakarta.apache.org/site/sourceindex.html there is a link to Tomcat 4.0.2 srcs

Re: [5.0] [VOTE] Release numbering scheme and test releases

2002-08-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ballot +1 [X] Tomcat 5 should use Tomcat 4.1 version numbering scheme and release management -1 [ ] Tomcat 5 should use something else (to be decided later) /ballot No comment. ballot +1 [ ] Start releasing milestones for Tomcat 5.0 on a

Re: Diffie Hellman

2002-08-01 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, does Tomcat support the Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Method, when it is ssl enabled ? If not is it possible to make Tomcat-ssl use Diffie-Helman instead then RSA, so that Tomcat does not need a certificate when started in ssl mode ? I believe

Re: HotSpot Virtual Machine Error : 11

2002-08-01 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Ed Borkmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # Please report this error at # http://java.sun.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi Can't you read what you post? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: webapp/apr cvs tags?

2002-07-31 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Punky Tse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Neil, I will try tonight if I encounter the same problem. BTW, if you can choose, why not move to httpd 2.0? At least Pier and me support it! ;-) That's for sure! :) Apache 2.0 rocks :) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: webapp/apr cvs tags?

2002-07-30 Thread Pier Fumagalli
The latest CVS head works AFAIK... I can't see anywhere in the code where apr_thread_mutex_lock is actually used anywhere... It might have something to do with the atomic code, but, hmmm... Anyhow that should go away with the use of a new APR functionality called resource list on which we are

Re: [Fwd: webapp/apr cvs tags?]

2002-07-30 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Neil Cronin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: using this version of apr, I was able to build and use mod_webapp.so http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/release/v1.2 .0/src/apr_APACHE_2_0_35.tar.gz I searched nagoya.apache.org for a bug on this, but came up empty

Re: webapp/apr cvs tags?

2002-07-30 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Neil Cronin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: are you looking at the apache code, apr, or mod_webapp? All the three codebases (given my involvement lately - Pier is moving to HTTPD and APR :) all versions of mod_webapp compile fine with the trunk of apr, but none will be loaded with apache 1.3.26.

Re: [OT] Leaving Sun

2002-07-29 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Warning: Off topic ! I'd like to post a quick notice about my current job situation. As of today, I am no longer an employee of Sun Microsystems, and I am relocating in France. Welcome to the family of the now-Europeanized ex-Sun

Re: Connectors on MacOS X

2002-07-23 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Tobias Wunden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3) Provide Information on dlopen Build on top of APR and that problem goes away. That's why APR is the way to go, right? Pier -- I love introducing bug: Floating Point Exception this is Access Violation, Access Violation, this is Floating Point

FW: Jakarta-tomcat page requires update

2002-07-22 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Not acked... Pier -- I love introducing bug: Floating Point Exception this is Access Violation, Access Violation, this is Floating Point Exception. Eric Prud'Hommeaux -- Forwarded Message From: R Andrew Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:24:29 -0400 (EDT) To:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

2002-07-18 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Patrick Luby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oops. The javax.servlet.jsp.* packages have been in jakarta-servlet-4 for a long time. In any case, I tried seeing if this issue could be solved by merely moving the javax.servlet.jsp.* packages over to the jakarta-tomcat-jasper repository.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

2002-07-18 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jakarta-apis/jsr154/src/java jakarta-apis/jsr152/src/java +1 Pier -- [Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of different sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with the readability of

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

2002-07-18 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: An immediate prospect would be the JSTL APIs from jakarta-taglibs/standard (jsr052). Makes sense. And jakarta-taglibs will remain for our Apache non-standard ones, right? A couple of devils in the details questions: * Where should CVS commit

Re: Missed vote

2002-07-17 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe this can't be a 'consensus' vote - at least the proposal for the code organization was a 'majority' vote with multiple choices. This is how the repository was organized before, xml.apache.org is doing the same for SAX and DOM and JAXP

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

2002-07-17 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's [ ] I don't care [X] I want the API's split into separate repo's. Pier -- [Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of different sublanguages in one monolithic

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >