Begin forwarded message:
From: Ivo Conde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 15 February 2005 01:43:39 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug and Possible Fix in JK 1.2.8 (I am not sure where/how to
post this)
Hi,
I have found a bug and possible fix in the latest version (1.2.8) of
the JK Connector for
Your important document, correction is finished!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11 Aug 2004, at 17:14, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi all,
We've finished the initial development of extended mod_proxy.
Since the development took place at jakata-tomcat-connectors,
the source code can be found under ajp/proxy.
Here is the list of major features added:
3. Added new module
Begin forwarded message:
From: Andy Mudrak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 10 August 2004 00:57:44 BST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: md5 sums for jakarta downloads
Hi,
I noticed that your MD5 sums on your website are not all formatted
correctly. I specifically downloaded the Tomcat 5.0.27 MD5 file,
Begin forwarded message:
From: v.z. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 5 January 2004 11:19:40 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: an little mistake on site ?
Hi.
On download source-site seems is present en little error.
I've tried to check archive JK 2 Source Release .zip by pgp
signature, your
Not acked.
Pier
Begin forwarded message:
From: Martin Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 18 October 2003 19:07:28 GMT+09:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: typo in tomcat site
Hi Jakarta Webmaster,
There's a typographic error in
FYI
-- Forwarded Message
From: Michael Kidd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:46:52 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tomcat binary page links not up
Webmaster,
I'm trying to download a tomcat file on the following page:
Getting lots of those lately... Might want to check the website.
(It's not mirrored)
Pier
-- Forwarded Message
From: Tye, Rebecca A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:48:16 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Downloading Tomcat 4.06
Where's the link to download Tomcat
Getting a lot of those... You might want to update the links in the
website to point to the mirrors?
Pier
---BeginMessage---
We are using Tomcat 4.0.6 and I need
to download binaries, both the Windows install version and for Linux. Recently
4.0.6 downloads have disappeared from your website.
Grzegorz Paszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:21:29AM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Grzegorz Paszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i.e ecs, tomcat-4.1.24,
Any example?
On ftp.task.gda.pl and on sunsite.icm.edu.pl I'm not able to find rpm files
for
ecs and tomcat-4.1.24
Not acked...
Pier
-- Forwarded Message
From: Vijaya Dasari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:18:26 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: broken
Hi,
The link
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/coyote/jk2/index.html
is broken.
Thanks,
Vijaya.
Not acked.
Pier
-- Forwarded Message
From: Bruce Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 12:13:35 -0600
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED],
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED],
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Files missing from website - webapp
Not acked
-- Forwarded Message
From: mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:25:52 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Poor documentation for jk
Hi Webmaster,
I would like to bring to light the fact that the documentation for the
jk mod to bind apache and tomcat is severly
Not acked...
-- Forwarded Message
From: Tony Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:33:01 -0800 (PST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fwd: jakarta_tomcat_mod_jk connector
As followup to my previous note, I have contacted redhatLinux, and found that
their version of Apache
FYI, not acked
-- Forwarded Message
From: Rob Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 01:08:50 -0600 (CST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Rob Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: openprojects.net name change
Today (Jan 30, 2003) at 01:05 -0600, Rob Levin wrote:
To the Webmaster,
-- Forwarded Message
From: Adam Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:29:06 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dead links ...
Hello ...
I was interested in downloading the newest version of Tomcat and all the links
I tried were dead. Here's where it sent me:
-- Forwarded Message
From: Nicholas Schuetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:57:21 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat IRC link bout to be broken
As you may or may not know openprojects.net was bought by freenode.net.
Therefore the server address you want has changed to:
Not acked... FYI...
Pier
-- Forwarded Message
From: Stoffer, Shawn D [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 11:55:11 -0700
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: documentation error
I wished to point out that in the jakarta/tomcat documentation, there is an
error.
FYI, not acked... Can someone look into it?
Pier
-- Forwarded Message
From: Laurent Blume [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:12:14 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GPG key for mod_jk2 2.0.2 not valid ?
Hello,
I hope you won't mind my email, I'm a bit unsure about whom I
On 13/12/02 21:39 Bradford Holcombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got some issues with 4.1.16 that I want to check against the Tomcat bug
database, but nagoya is refusing connections.
We just moved the machine... And it works fine at its new home... You might
want to try straight from the IP
On 12/12/02 5:28 Sriram N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I've always respected Pier's views on a number of topics, but I do feel
that crap is a very flexible adjective. The users I help out with Tomcat are
very pleased with the admin tool.
Bunch of loosers who're not able to see a server.xml
On 12/12/02 1:06 Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at the original vote I realize that what you ask can't be done.
Tomcat 4 is the RI of Servlet 2.3, JSR 154 is for Servlet 2.4. So it
isn't possible to create a JSR 154 only dist of Tomcat 4.
It is _NOT_... Tomcat is the servlet
On 10/12/02 8:40 am, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Remy
Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember perfectly, and this Tomcat-HA was a complete joke. You
proposed a new implementation of the Catalina classes, which doesn't
make sense given the current Tomcat state
That's what I was
On 10/12/02 8:57 am, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Henri Gomez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Pier (a _user_ now)
And that's sad.
Not apparently, as I am the reason why noone picked up Tomcat 4 :-)
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
enough).
New signature! :-)
Pier
--
[...] mod_webapp, which was *the* main reason for many people not to adopt
Tomcat 4.x - Remy MaucheratWorks for me - Pier Fumagalli
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
On 9/12/02 3:59 Jeanfrancois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(2) The Admin Tool should go with the minimal distribution of Tomcat. We
decided to include JMX in Tomcat distribution...what's the point having
JMX and not the Admin Tool? Maybe JSP is not required by all Tomcat
users, but I'm sure
On 9/12/02 9:16 Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I would love to see is a tree of downloads where each one gains more
and more features (it is additive). Such as:
JSR-154 Implementation
/ \
Jasper
On 9/12/02 17:14 Jeanfrancois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Youy don't need to learn JSP/Admin Tool if you don't use it. The actual
Tomcat installation doesn't require you to learn the Admin Tool or JSP
As I said 6 or so months ago... That thing is a security hole as big as
the Empire
On 9/12/02 15:16 Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to
have an official vote on my prior proposal.
This is the list of included features:
Libs:
- JMX
- JAAS
- JNDI
- digester ( and beanutils, collections it needs ).
-
On 9/12/02 23:06 Jeanfrancois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 9/12/02 17:14 Jeanfrancois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Youy don't need to learn JSP/Admin Tool if you don't use it. The actual
Tomcat installation doesn't require you to learn the Admin Tool or JSP
On 9/12/02 23:38 Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 9/12/02 15:16 Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to
have an official vote on my prior proposal.
This is the list of included features
On 9/12/02 23:51 Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ehemm... With 24 pages of vulnerability notes? Ha.. Hahaha Hahahaha! :-)
Correction to self... Not 24 pages... 24 notes... (Ok, I have an eyesight
test tomorrow morning at 10:20 in SOHO... I know, I know...)
Pier
On 10/12/02 0:10 Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But in this case you keep making false statements, and not only here. It
should be quite easy to look for a [VOTE] or [PROPOSAL] that you made
and was voted on tomcat-dev.
Then find it.
I believe it never even went to [VOTE]...
On 10/12/02 0:30 Jeanfrancois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, don't tell me that ALL that collection of cruft doesn't have a bug...
It's just that we are lucky and noone found them yet (given enough eyes...
Linus says)...
I never say that and I will never says that. But I least I have
for this one (next time I'm in the US!)
Pier
Original Message
Subject: Re: 5.0 proposal
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 21:49:51 +0100
From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
On 10/12/02 1:06 Justyna Horwat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess the high art of potty humor is not lost on idiots. My buttocks
are clenched in anticipation for the Pier (C) and TM fart jokes. :)
Damn you know me far too well, Justy! :-)
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
On 6/12/02 16:09 Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Create a separate minimal JSR 154 only distribution of Tomcat 4.x:
+1 [X]
0 [ ]
-1 [ ]
Or simply use Jetty :-)
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 7/12/02 16:32 Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The majority decision works only if enough people vote.
So far we have:
+1: Jon, Pier, Bill
-0: Costin
-1: Remy
Anyone else ?
For the records, please check in $CVSROOT/avail... I'm not a committer... I
only support _strongly_
On 8/12/02 0:43 Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 2002/12/7 4:25 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jon, I'm very sorry mate, you're 4 months too late :-( I lost my fight about
this very same topic back then...
Maybe to late for your opinion, but honestly, I haven't
On 28/11/02 17:25 Pedro Igor Craveiro e Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Do you know what for is this libc.so.6 ?
Main C library for Linux, the one that contains also printf...
When i run the httpd, he return that this shared lib could not be found.
Then you're in troubles. Update your Linux
On 28/11/02 7:37 pm, in article 000701c2970d$2d408f90$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Pedro Igor Craveiro e Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok.
But, with that first module(mod_jk2.(etc)) the i was using i can put the
apache e tomcat together?
FreeBSD contains a Linux emulator, but AFAICR, it ships
FYI
-- Forwarded Message
From: Manjiri Devdhar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:23:52 +0530
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Apache Tomcat
Hello,
This is Manjiri from Wrox Press Ltd taking care of the Open source titles.
I really
Martin Algesten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we going to release 4.1.15 without addressing this? This is a
standard API call that currently DOES NOT WORK (or am I wrong, can
anyone get hold of a foreign context from the ROOT context?)
I've submitted a possible fix in BZ #13040 ...
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd also like to point out that the servlet API changes are very
limited, and it will be possible to use Tomcat 5.0 with the Jasper
from Tomcat 4.1. So I think major new features should go in the 5.0
codebase.
What is a realistic timeline for 5.0
Who unsubbed this guy on Fri Nov 1 03:31:13 PST 2002???
1036089107 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's not a probe, so, someone (one of the moderators, I believe), unsubbed
him manually (see at the bottom). Any reason why?
Pier
-- Forwarded Message
From: Luca Ventura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
On 31/10/02 14:36 Martin Algesten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Tomcat should either not send any headers on a 304, or if it does
then make sure that they do reflect the correct values for the requested
object (e.g. not call a gif a text).
2. Not entirely sure here. Reading the HTTP/1.1
On 30/10/02 9:19 am, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ALL directories need to be 755 (therefore only THOSE and NOT THE FILES need
to have the +x bit set) they need to look like drwxrwxr-x
Why 755 on directory ? Shouldn't they be 775 to allow group member to
update them ?
Oh, mefuck...
On 29/10/02 11:35 pm, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/10/02 23:02, Mike Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DOH!
Sorry. Thats what you get when you get a Non-Unix weanie to play around on a
Unix box. I knew that I've had to do this in the past but completely spaced
On 30/10/02 6:06 pm, Martin Algesten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An incorrect If-Modified-Since response seems to shag mod_proxy. Now I
don't know how widely used mod_proxy is, or if perhaps this should be
fixed there instead. However I am concerned about this and as I pointed
out I am happy to
On 30/10/02 20:02, Martin Algesten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a nutshell mod_proxy updates its cached entries with whatever new
headers are given to it. E.g. first request comes into mod_proxy and it
can't find the requested resource in its cache. It forwards on to my
tomcat who responds
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Linux threads implementation is _bad_ but that does not mean that the
whole thing bad.
That's why I said works for you? Good... For our setup we _need_
threads...
For the Fun. The kernel threads appair also in ps but I have not (yet) tried
to
One might still feel he's on the pteam! :-)
pier
On 29/10/02 22:00, Jean-Francois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oups..wrong list...sorry.
-- Jeanfrancois
Jean-Francois Arcand wrote:
are available under
http://javaweb.sfbay.sun.com/~ja120114/security-audit/SecurityAudit.html
send_files failed to open
/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/netware/mod_jk_1.3.n
lm.asc: Permission denied
send_files failed to open
/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/netware/mod_jk_2.0.4
2.nlm.asc: Permission denied
send_files failed to open
On 29/10/02 23:02, Mike Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DOH!
Sorry. Thats what you get when you get a Non-Unix weanie to play around on a
Unix box. I knew that I've had to do this in the past but completely spaced
it for this. This should be fixed now.
Rsync should run in another 5
On 29/10/02 22:46, Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
A new test milestone of Tomcat 4.1 has just been released. Please help
test this upcoming Tomcat release for compliance issues and other
problems.
Downloads:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So,
My first question is : why tomcat use all the memory while there is no
users connected (or just one) ?
The JVM allocates chunks of memory (see the -Xmx and -Xms flags by invoking
java -X) and manages them... So, one user, 100 users, same
Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Linux threads are +/- process and are really cheap to create, so it's
should be a problem.
Read, it shouldn't be a problem
It is a problem because every time someone does a PS goes _nuts_ about the
number of JVM processes... While at the end they
Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what is the goog hard config for 500 concurrent users on the same tomcat
server ?
It depend on your application, but I'll recommand a least 3 fast Intel
based linux boxes, with about 512Mo of RAM, and in front an Apache
1.3/2.0
micael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What operating system do you prefer, Pier?
We use Solaris both for Intel and Sun platforms... First reason being is
that we _know_ how that OS works, it's much more tuneable on live systems,
and much easier to configure when you know what you're doing...
On 28/10/02 22:40, Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 00:31, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Those are _not_ processes, they are threads... Use a decent operating system
that supports them nicely (not Linux) and you'll see the difference (how
many times do I have to repeat
send_files failed to open
/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/archives/v4.0.5/bin/hotfix/13365.zip.asc:
Permission denied
send_files failed to open
/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.5/bin/hotfix/13365.zip.asc:
Permission denied
send_files failed to open
Anyone noticed that the web.xml doesn't get reloaded when I reload a
deployed context under 4.0?
Or is it me being stupid?
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 14/10/02 19:45, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The proposal needs to identify a moderator. The moderator will be the one
who approves subscription requests (as well as filtering out spam).
And AFAIK, we've roughly always said no to extra mailing list (but -dev
-cvs and -users) to keep
Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- starting a VM using exec / monitor the child process. It is not
implemented yet in jk2 - but pretty important ( it's one of the features
from jserv that wasn't yet ported). It seems daemon has a bit
of code - as I mentioned from reading it I don't
On 10/10/02 20:21, Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 'feature' is that all tomcat processes ( and you may run more than
one in a load balanced mode ) can be started automatically and monitored.
If one dies, it'll be automatically restarted.
tip
http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html
On 10/10/02 22:23, James C. McMaster (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I know this is not the proper place to ask configuration questions, but I do
not believe this is such.
Use mod_jk
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
On 11/10/02 3:14, Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 2002/10/10 6:50 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can tell you that our main Java instance for VNUNET.COM takes
approximately 4 to 5 minutes to start...
OUCH.
Our main web-app has roughly 400 JSP pages
On 5/10/02 12:43 am, Mark Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has been brought to my attention that some members of the Tomcat
community have expressed a desire to see a requirement lower than J2SE
1.4 in JSP 2.0.
Great... One more reason to start thinking about kicking JSP out of the
door! :-)
On 27/9/02 0:22, Jay Ebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I followed the Building the WebApp module exactly and cannot build the
webapp module for Solaris 2.8 using gcc 2.95. After a successful
./configure ... , I get the following errors on the make:
Use mod_jk
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Since I'm tired of you lot, I'm going to say goodbye and retire in lala-land
http://www.psc.edu/science/tang.html... Have fun and try not to hit
bugtrack too often! :-)
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hm The original question was about line numbers on JSPs, when they
are compiled, and when they are executed and throw exceptions, right?
Yes, it was...
I said use some tea because Tea, developed by Disney, goes exactly in
that direction, not having middle layer .java files over which the
On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 10:24 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 04:30, Lenny Karpel wrote:
is it right that when I ask a serious question about jasper2 that I
get
these totally ridiculous answers ?
Well, Jon and Pier are known to throw in a curly one from time to
On Wednesday, September 18, 2002, at 11:35 PM, Ian Darwin wrote:
They admit that they aren't POSIX conformant, and claim that they will
be, and will
do it in a different way than GNUtar does at present. Do you know if
this article
is up to date? Well I guess it must be, it's on gnu.org.
You can use some tea... http://opensource.go.com/ :-)
Pier
On Wednesday, September 18, 2002, at 10:33 PM, Lenny Karpel wrote:
I use IntelliJ's IDEA product for Tomcat relared development .. I
noted the
following statement in thier bugs mailing list with regards to
debugging JSP
Vaughn Bilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I apologize in advance if I'm not following proper protocols for this
submission, but I'm new at this. I have created a patch against Tomcat
4.1.10 which adds a custom tag and associated servlet to the Tomcat
admin context. The tag, designed to replace
Pat Schaider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all --
I'm risking getting scolded for using the wrong list for this, but the
tomcat-user list was totally useless in solving this problem.
The problem is on Tomcat 4.0.3 Standalone on Linux. I am managing this
machine for my university's CS
Ian Darwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 07:22:43PM -0700, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
Pier, you need to use GNU tar. *BSD* tar sucks balls.
Er, you mean perhaps that BSD tar doesn't yet support the
non-standard GNU extensions?
Nope, it doesn't... I'm thinking whether we
Whoever packaged the tar gzip distribution didn't check that it was actually
_packaged_ properly...
I get a few gazillion broken files (noticeably with some beautiful
././@LongLink entries), and with all file names longer than 100 or
something characters foobared up... (like:
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 19:27:31 +0100
From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 4.1.10 tarball
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 19:27:31 +0100
From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List
On 13/9/02 1:14, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This bug is kind of annoying when there are lots of pages
shared across multiple clients. The common practice we
use on Tomcat 4.0.2 is to build symbolic links under each
client that points to a centralized place to avoid file
copying
Therewego... Folks, when you change a release from TEST to FINAL, please,
don't move files around... Use symlinks, but don't use neither mv nor
cp...
Yesterday's promotion of tomcat 4.1.10 from test to release overkilled
the mirrors with a good 43 megabytes of downloads completely useless, and
Not acked
Begin forwarded message:
From: Lukas Hazlehurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Aug 14, 2002 01:05:07 Europe/London
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat 4.03 / 4.04 source download incorrect.
Hello,
Just thought i'd mention that the link
Not acked.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Asuja Andreas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Aug 16, 2002 09:09:44 Europe/London
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Minor bug in Tomcat docs
Hi!
On page
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/appdev/deployment.html
Not acked
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jørgen Nørgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Aug 20, 2002 14:17:23 Europe/London
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Broken link
On http://jakarta.apache.org/site/sourceindex.html there is a link to
Tomcat 4.0.2 srcs
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ballot
+1 [X] Tomcat 5 should use Tomcat 4.1 version numbering scheme and
release management
-1 [ ] Tomcat 5 should use something else (to be decided later)
/ballot
No comment.
ballot
+1 [ ] Start releasing milestones for Tomcat 5.0 on a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
does Tomcat support the Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Method, when it is ssl
enabled ?
If not is it possible to make Tomcat-ssl use Diffie-Helman instead then RSA,
so that Tomcat does not need a certificate when started in ssl mode ?
I believe
Ed Borkmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Please report this error at
# http://java.sun.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
Can't you read what you post?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Punky Tse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil,
I will try tonight if I encounter the same problem. BTW, if you can
choose, why not move to httpd 2.0? At least Pier and me support it! ;-)
That's for sure! :) Apache 2.0 rocks :)
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The latest CVS head works AFAIK... I can't see anywhere in the code where
apr_thread_mutex_lock is actually used anywhere... It might have something
to do with the atomic code, but, hmmm...
Anyhow that should go away with the use of a new APR functionality called
resource list on which we are
Neil Cronin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
using this version of apr, I was able to build and use mod_webapp.so
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/release/v1.2
.0/src/apr_APACHE_2_0_35.tar.gz
I searched nagoya.apache.org for a bug on this, but came up empty
Neil Cronin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are you looking at the apache code, apr, or mod_webapp?
All the three codebases (given my involvement lately - Pier is moving to
HTTPD and APR :)
all versions of mod_webapp compile fine with the trunk of apr, but none will
be loaded with apache 1.3.26.
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Warning: Off topic !
I'd like to post a quick notice about my current job situation.
As of today, I am no longer an employee of Sun Microsystems, and I am
relocating in France.
Welcome to the family of the now-Europeanized ex-Sun
Tobias Wunden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3) Provide Information on dlopen
Build on top of APR and that problem goes away. That's why APR is the way to
go, right?
Pier
--
I love introducing bug: Floating Point Exception this is Access Violation,
Access Violation, this is Floating Point
Not acked...
Pier
--
I love introducing bug: Floating Point Exception this is Access Violation,
Access Violation, this is Floating Point Exception. Eric Prud'Hommeaux
-- Forwarded Message
From: R Andrew Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:24:29 -0400 (EDT)
To:
Patrick Luby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops. The javax.servlet.jsp.* packages have been in jakarta-servlet-4
for a long time.
In any case, I tried seeing if this issue could be solved by merely
moving the javax.servlet.jsp.* packages over to the
jakarta-tomcat-jasper repository.
Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jakarta-apis/jsr154/src/java
jakarta-apis/jsr152/src/java
+1
Pier
--
[Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of different
sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with
the readability of
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An immediate prospect would be the JSTL APIs from jakarta-taglibs/standard
(jsr052).
Makes sense. And jakarta-taglibs will remain for our Apache non-standard
ones, right?
A couple of devils in the details questions:
* Where should CVS commit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe this can't be a 'consensus' vote - at least the proposal
for the code organization was a 'majority' vote with multiple
choices.
This is how the repository was organized before, xml.apache.org
is doing the same for SAX and DOM and JAXP
Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's
[ ] I don't care
[X] I want the API's split into separate repo's.
Pier
--
[Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of different
sublanguages in one monolithic
1 - 100 of 497 matches
Mail list logo
